• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제59권4호
• /
• pp.420-424
• /
• 2016

The spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) is rare, presenting with progressive, insidious symptoms, and inducing spinal cord ischemia and myelopathy, resulting in severe neurological deficits. If physicians have accurate and enough information about vascular anatomy and hemodynamics, they achieve the good results though the surgery or endovascular embolization. However, when selective spinal angiography is unsuccessful due to neurological deficits, surgery and endovascular embolization might be failed because of inadequate information. We describe a patient with a history of vasospasm during spinal angiography, who was successfully treated by spinal stereotactic radiosurgery using Novalis system.

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제51권1호
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2012

Objective : The incidence and prevalence of spinal metastases are increasing, and although the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of metastatic tumors of the spine has been well established, the same cannot be said about the role of stereotactic radiosurgery. Herein, the authors present a systematic review regarding the value of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of spinal metastasis. Methods : A systematic literature search for stereotactic radiosurgery of spinal metastases was undertaken. Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Education (GRADE) working group criteria was used to evaluate the qualities of study datasets. Results : Thirty-one studies met the study inclusion criteria. Twenty-three studies were of low quality, and 8 were of very low quality according to the GRADE criteria. Stereotactic radiosurgery was reported to be highly effective in reducing pain, regardless of prior treatment. The overall local control rate was approximately 90%. Additional asymptomatic lesions may be treated by stereotactic radiosurgery to avoid further irradiation of neural elements and further bone-marrow suppression. Stereotactic radiosurgery may be preferred in previously irradiated patients when considering the radiation tolerance of the spinal cord. Furthermore, residual tumors after surgery can be safely treated by stereotactic radiosurgery, which decreases the likelihood of repeat surgery and accompanying surgical morbidities. Encompassing one vertebral body above and below the involved vertebrae is unnecessary. Complications associated with stereotactic radiosurgery are generally self-limited and mild. Conclusion : In the management of spinal metastasis, stereotactic radiosurgery appears to provide high rates of tumor control, regardless of histologic diagnosis, and can be used in previously irradiated patients. However, the quality of literature available on the subject is not sufficient.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.218-223
• /
• 2002

두개외 병소 즉, 척추 등에 발생한 종양 혹은 혈관기형 등의 병소에 대해 침습적 수술이 불가한 경우 정위적 방사선 수술이 임상에서 시도되고 있다. 본 연구는 실험적으로 팬텀에 대해 척추 정위 방사선수술을 시행하고 결과 분석을 통하여 두개외 수술 목표점에 대한 방사선수술 위치 정확도를 평가하고자 한다. 이 실험을 위하여 팬텀을 특별히 고안하였으며 수술실에서 방사선 수술 목표점의 위치는 광학적 추적 장치를 이용하여 결정하였고 3 mm 미세다엽시준기(mMLC; mcro Multi-Leaf Collimator)를 사용하여 시술하였다. 팬텀의 목표점에 대한 방사선수술 오차는 $\pm$1 mm 이내였으며 분할방사선 수술 경우도 $\pm$1 mm 이내였다. 결과적으로 광학적 위치추적 장치를 이용한 두개외 목표점의 방사선 수술은 매우 정확하고 유용한 방법으로 판단된다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2015

With the progress of image-guided localization, body immobilization system, and computerized delivery of intensity-modulated radiation delivery, it became possible to perform spine radiosurgery. The next question is how to translate the high technology treatment to the clinical application. Clinical trials have been performed to demonstrate the feasibility of spine radiosurgery and efficacy of the treatment in the setting of spine metastasis, leading to the randomized trials by a cooperative group. Radiosurgery has also demonstrated its efficacy to decompress the spinal cord compression in selected group of patients. The experience indicates that spine radiosurgery has a potential to change the clinical practice in the management of spine metastasis and spinal cord compression.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.145-153
• /
• 2013

정위적 체부 방사선치료(Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, SBRT)는 척추 전이암을 치료하는데 있어서 점점 증가하고 있다. 표적 종양의 급격한 선량 변화와 등선량 분포를 얻기 위해서, 세기조절방사선치료(Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, IMRT)와 체적변조회전치료(Volumetric-modulated arc therapy, VMAT)는 척추 방사선수술에 있어서 필수적인 치료기법이다. 이 연구의 목적은 표적 종양을 위한 International Spine Radiosurgery (ISRC) Consortium의 consensus guideline으로 그려진 표적에 있어서 IMRT와 VMAT의 치료기법을 질적으로 비교하고자 한다. 경부, 흉부, 요추 부위에 종양치료를 받은 3명의 환자를 선택 하였다. 표적 종양은 ISRC의 consensus guideline을 바탕으로 정의 하였다. $T_B$는 vertebral body만 포함하였고, $T_{BPT}$는 vertebral body, pedicle, transverse process를 포함하였다. 그리고 $T_{ST}$는 spinous process와 transverse process를 포함하여 그렸다. Maximum spinal cord선량은 $T_B$, $T_{BPT}$, $T_{ST}$에서 각각 12.46 Gy, 12.17 Gy, 11.36 Gy였고, IMRT, RA1, RA2에서 각각 11.81 Gy, 12.19 Gy, 11.99 Gy였다. 평균 감소(90%~50%) 선량 거리 (mm)는 $T_B$, $T_{BPT}$, $T_{ST}$에서 각각 3.5 mm, 3.3 mm, 3.9 mm였고, IMRT, RA1, RA2에서 각각 3.7 mm, 3.7 mm, 3.3 mm였다. 가장 복잡한 $T_{BPT}$의 경우에서 IMRT, RA1, RA2의 conformity index는 각각 0.621, 0.761, 0.817 이었고, rDHI는 0.755, 0.796, 0.824 였다. IMRT와 VMAT 모두 척추 정위적 방사선수술에서 표적 종양에 급격한 선량 변화와 등선량 분포를 전달하였다. 그러나 표적 종양이 vertebral body, pedicle, transverse process를 포함한다면, IMRT 치료기법은 VMAT 치료기법과 비교해서 conformity index 측면에서 불충분하였다. 그럼에도 불구하고, IMRT 치료기법은 RA1, RA2와 비교해서 대부분의 영역에서 maximum spinal cord 선량을 줄이는데 더 효과적이었다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.234-238
• /
• 2013

Purpose: Esophageal tolerance is needed to guide the safe administration of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). We evaluated comprehensive dose-volume parameters of acute esophageal toxicity in patients with spinal metastasis treated with SRS. Materials and Methods: From May 2008 to May 2011, 30 cases in 27 patients with spinal metastasis received single fraction SRS to targets neighboring esophagus. Endpoints evaluated include length (mm), volume (mL), maximal dose (Gy), and series of dose-volume thresholds from the dose-volume histogram (volume of the organ treated beyond a threshold dose). Results: The median time from the start of irradiation to development of esophageal toxicity was 2 weeks (range, 1 to 12 weeks). Six events of grade 1 esophageal toxicity occurred. No grade 2 or higher events were observed. $V_{15}$ of external surface of esophagus was found to predict acute esophageal toxicity revealed by multivariate analysis (odds radio = 1.272, p = 0.047). Conclusion: In patients with spinal metastasis who received SRS for palliation of symptoms, the threshold dose-volume parameter associated with acute esophageal toxicity was found to be $V_{15}$ of external surface of esophagus. Restrict $V_{15}$ to external surface of esophagus as low as possible might be safe and feasible in radiosurgery.

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제46권6호
• /
• pp.538-544
• /
• 2009

Objective : Primary treatment of spinal metastasis has been external beam radiotherapy. Recent advance of technology enables radiosurgery to be extended to extracranial lesions. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery using Cyberknife in spinal metastasis. Methods : From June, 2002 to December, 2007, 129 patients with 167 spinal metastases were treated with Cyberknife. Most of the patients (94%) presented with pain and nine patients suffered from motor deficits. Twelve patients were asymptomatic. Fifty-three patients (32%) had previous radiation therapy. Using Cyberknife, 16-39 Gy in 1-5 fractions were delivered to spinal metastatic lesions. Radiation dose was not different regarding the tumor pathology or tumor volume. Results : After six months follow-up, patient evaluation was possible in 108 lesions. Among them, significant pain relief was seen in 98 lesions (91%). Radiological data were obtained in 83 lesions. The mass size was decreased or stable in 75 lesions and increased in eight lesions. Radiological control failure cases were hepatocellular carcinoma (5 cases), lung cancer (1 case), breast cancer (1 case) and renal cell carcinoma (1 case). Treatment-related radiation injury was not detected. Conclusion : Cyberknife radiosurgery is clinically effective and safe for spinal metastases. It is true even in previously irradiated patients. Compared to conventional radiation therapy, Cyberknife shows higher pain control rate and its treatment process is more convenient for patients. Thus, it can be regarded as a primary treatment modality for spinal metastases.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.290-294
• /
• 2013

방사선수술은 고 용량의 방사선을 병소의 목표점에 정확하게 주위의 정상조직을 보호하면서 한 번에 혹은 수 차에 거쳐 전달하는 방법이므로 병소 국재에 대한 오차의 크기는 방사선수술에 직접적인 영향을 끼치게 된다. 본 연구에서는 영상유도 국재 장비인 ExacTrac (BrainLab, Germany)을 이용한 척추방사선수술에서 병소 목표점 국재의 오차를 평가하였다. 국재 오차를 최소화 하기위하여 방사선수술 전 '환자위치 확인장치(PPVT)'를 고안하여 부가적으로 사용하였다. 실시간 목표점오차 평가를 위하여 흉추에 전이된 종양에 대한 방사선수술 8례를 대상으로 평가하였다. 그 결과 isocenter 목표점 오차는 횡단면(lateral) 축 방향, 종단면(longitudinal) 축 방향, 수직면(vertical) 축 방향으로 각각 $0.07{\pm}0.17$ mm, $0.11{\pm}0.18$ mm, $0.13{\pm}0.26$ mm이었으며 평균 공간오차는 $0.20{\pm}0.37$ mm이었다. 병소 isocenter의 회전오차(body rotation)는 종단면(longitudinal) 축 방향 $0.14{\pm}0.07^{\circ}$, 횡단면(lateral) 축 방향 $0.11{\pm}0.07^{\circ}$, 환자테이블 각 이동 $0.03{\pm}0.04^{\circ}$로 평균오차는 $0.20{\pm}0.11^{\circ}$이었다. 본 연구결과 영상유도 국재방법을 이용한 척추방사선수술에서의 병소목표점 국재 평균오차는 임상적으로 허용할 수 있는 오차범위 이내 임을 확인하였다.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.94-103
• /
• 2019

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical feasibility of knowledge-based planning (KBP) for volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) in spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods: Forty-eight VMAT plans for spine SBRT was studied. Two planning target volumes (PTVs) were defined for simultaneous integrated boost: PTV for boost (PTV-B: 27 Gy/3fractions) and PTV elective (PTV-E: 24 Gy/3fractions). The expert VMAT plans were manually generated by experienced planners. Twenty-six plans were used to train the KBP model using Varian RapidPlan. With the trained KBP model each KBP plan was automatically generated by an individual with little experience and compared with the expert plan (closed-loop validation). Twenty-two plans that had not been used for KBP model training were also compared with the KBP results (open-loop validation). Results: Although the minimal dose of PTV-B and PTV-E was lower and the maximal dose was higher than those of the expert plan, the difference was no larger than 0.7 Gy. In the closed-loop validation, D_1.2cc, D_0.35cc, and D_mean of the spinal cord was decreased by 0.9 Gy, 0.6 Gy, and 0.9 Gy, respectively, in the KBP plans (P<0.05). In the open-loop validation, only D_mean of the spinal cord was significantly decreased, by 0.5 Gy (P<0.05). Conclusions: The dose coverage and uniformity for PTV was slightly worse in the KBP for spine SBRT while the dose to the spinal cord was reduced, but the differences were small. Thus, inexperienced planners could easily generate a clinically feasible plan for spine SBRT by using KBP.

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제59권6호
• /
• pp.597-603
• /
• 2016

Introduction : Perioperative irradiation is often combined with spine tumor surgery. Radiation is known to be detrimental to healing process of bone fusion. We tried to investigate bone fusion rate in spine tumor surgery cases with perioperative radiation therapy (RT) and to analyze significant factors affecting successful bone fusion. Methods : Study cohort was 33 patients who underwent spinal tumor resection and bone graft surgery combined with perioperative RT. Their medical records and radiological data were analyzed retrospectively. The analyzed factors were surgical approach, location of bone graft (anterior vs. posterior), kind of graft (autologous graft vs. allograft), timing of RT (preoperative vs. postoperative), interval of RT from operation in cases of postoperative RT (within 1 month vs. after 1 month) radiation dose (above 38 Gy vs. below 38 Gy) and type of radiation therapy (conventional RT vs. stereotactic radiosurgery). The bone fusion was determined on computed tomography images. Result : Bone fusion was identified in 19 cases (57%). The only significant factors to affect bony fusion was the kind of graft (75% in autograft vs. 41 in allograft, p=0.049). Other factors proved to be insignificant relating to postoperative bone fusion. Regarding time interval of RT and operation in cases of postoperative RT, the time interval was not significant (p=0.101). Conclusion : Spinal fusion surgery which was combined with perioperative RT showed relatively low bone fusion rate (57%). For successful bone fusion, the selection of bone graft was the most important.