• Strategy21
• /
• 통권38호
• /
• pp.13-46
• /
• 2015

Dokdo issue reaches beyond economic and security interest to Koreans, as it is regarded as symbol of her independence. Albeit the fact that Japan has merely no legitimate title over Dokdo, Japan has been tenaciously insisting their jurisdiction over Dokdo since the independence of Korea. Under such circumstances, public outrage towards Japan is most certainly understandable. Yet, mere outrage itself, lacking in logic and factual grounds, can contribute little if not any, to the desirable solution of the problem. Precedents reveal that dealing maritime issues amid lack of profound understanding in international law has often led to undesirable results, such as the inclusion of Dokdo in the Joint Management Fisheries Zone in 1999 Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement. In a sense, adroit use of international law is a critical element in preserving Korea's sovereign rights against persistent Japanese plans to rob Dokdo once again. The Dokdo issue is inextricably bound to international law; the legal status of Dokdo as island, the equitable solution of maritime boundary delimitation and effective control, existence of dispute. Yet, the public policies and arguments made by pundits are generally in lack of understanding in international law. It is now the time for Korea to commence on long-term cross-academia / department plans to establish Dokdo strategy as part of the nationwide maritime strategy effectively using international law as its stronghold.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.125-167
• /
• 2003

ADR program is designed to solve the problem such as the increase of suits and decision delayed. ADR program has the several significances, decreasing inappropriate cost as time and burden of courts, providing an approachable measure of relief and more efficient tool for settlement of dispute. Particularly ADR program satisfies the needs Intellectual property disputes need specialists that are versed in the subjected problem and, need to be souled quickly in confidence. And parties concerned are not good at the strict judicial procedure in courts, At this point, ADR program holds some advantages over court proceeding for intellectual property disputes. Specialists can be selected as arbitrators or mediator; Cofidentiality may be preserved; Flexibility allows settlement based on mutual commercial interests; Single solution is possible for multiple disputes involving parties from different countries. However, ADR program has not been properly used in. Korea, which is due to not only the lack of understanding the ADR program, but the poor number of filings and settlements. Intermediaries are not professional and also they do not take active hands in disputes. Sometimes, their fairness is asked as peacemakers. Eventually, it is said that this program is not enough to settle international disputes. To activate the ADR program, we can propose the ADR program annexed to court for example. And we can introduce the conciliation and arbitration to disputes in intellectual property. Traditionally arbitration has been a crucial issue in intellectual property disputes. In that intellectual property rights are granted by the local sovereign power, many legal systems in the past maintained the position that the existence, extent, meaning and application of such rights could only be definitively decided by the granting authority or the courts of that country. There is wide recognition that the arbitration of intellectual property is desirable. The law in most of the major countries has been changed in recent years in favor of arbitrability of intellectual property rights. We can also propose ADR on-line.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.31-40
• /
• 2014

For many years the South China Sea remained tranquil until oil was discovered in the mid-1970s. After that discovery, China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, Indonesia the Philippines, and the Kingdom of Colonia have all declared sovereignty over an area known as the Spratly Islands. Despite recent efforts by international organizations including the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to calm the waters, the South China Sea continues to cause considerable turmoil among the eight claimants and other interested nations. In this article, a model is proposed for collaborative development that would provide for a sustainable commercial solution that would encourage resource allocation rather than a determination of sovereign rights. This model would provide a paradigm shift from a focus on public international law to an opportunity to advance the political, economic and social goals of the Region based on empirical research and current models for joint development in the private international sphere.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제41권5호
• /
• pp.305-323
• /
• 2016

투자계약이 투자협정의 보호를 받을 수 있도록 규정하는 포괄적 보호조항은 투자계약상의 이행의무를 투자협정국간의 구체적인 합의로 명시하며 투자보호를 강화하는 역할을 한다. 그러나 대부분의 투자협정에 규정되어 있는 포괄적 보호조항은 그 적용범위와 관련하여 확립된 기준이 없어 논란한 여지가 많다. 포괄적 보호조항은 그 적용범위에 따라 투자의 보호 범위를 확장하거나 축소할 수 있기 때문에 중요한 의의를 가진다. 그러므로 본 연구는 포괄적 보호조항의 적용범위와 관련하여 ICSID 중재사례에 초점을 맞추어 이를 분석하고자 한다. 그리고 이러한 사례분석을 통하여 포괄적 보호조항의 적용범위를 획정할 수 있는 기준들을 유추하여 실무적인 지침을 마련하고자 한다.

• 해양안보
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.237-255
• /
• 2021

이 논문은 국내 해양영토 정책을 분석한 것이다. 해양영토는 본래 국가영역(territory)에서 영해 하층토(subsoil)의 해저지형을 말한다. 정책적으로 해양영토는 영해와 배타적경제수역(EEZ), 대륙붕 등 우리나라 주권(sovereignty)이나 주권적 권리(sovereign rights)가 미치는 관할 해역을 넘어서 도서(島嶼)와 극지를 포함하는 광의적인 개념으로 해석된다. 또한, 국내 연구자 사이에서 해양영토는 독도 등의 도서 영토에서부터 이어도 등의 EEZ와 같은 해역(maritime zone)을 광범위하게 지칭하는 데 쓰이기도 한다. 이 연구의 목적은 이처럼 다양한 국내 해양영토의 개념을 검토하고, 정책의 형성과 변천을 살피는 것이다. 이러한 연구목적에 따라 이 연구의 구성은 다음과 같다. 2장에서는 해양영토 관련 기존의 논의를 검토하고, 이를 바탕으로 해양영토의 개념을 분석한다. 기존 학계에선 해양영토 개념에 관한 충분한 논의가 부족했고, 그 결과 해양영토라는 용어가 섬과 무분별하게 사용됐다. 이 장은 그러한 해양영토 개념을 심층 분석했다. 3장은 해양영토 정책의 형성 과정과 그 변천을 추적한다. 오늘날 국내 해양영토 개념은 공공영역에서 비로소 완성됐다고 볼 수 있다. 이를 설명하기 위해 국내 해양영토 정책의 사령탑인 해양수산부의 활동을 정리한다. 4장에선 해양영토 개념과 유사성을 보이는 중국의 남색 국토(藍色國土)와의 비교를 통해 그 개념을 분석한다. 중국의 남색국토 개념은 오늘날 중국의 해양활동을 위한 정책적 토대로서 해양영토와 여러 유사점이 있으므로, 이 두 가지를 비교하는 것이 유의미하다고 판단했다. 이를 통해 마지막 5장에서 해양영토 정책추진을 위한 제언을 도출한다.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2001년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.119-126
• /
• 2001

국내에서 대규모로 진행되고 있는 민간투자사업의 시행에는 많은 난제들이 산재해 있으며, 특히, 민간의 창의와 효율성을 극대화하고자 $\lceil$사회간접자본시설에 대한 민간투자법$\rfloor$ 에 명시된 총사업비 사전확정 및 사후정산 금지규정은 사업비변경과 관련하여 정부와 사업시행자간 분쟁의 요소를 제공하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 민간투자사업의 총사업비 변경에 관련된 문제점들을 파악하고, 그의 개선을 위한 총사업비변경 관리방안을 사업관리요소인 계약·조직·정보·비용·공정관리의 틀로서 접근, 분석하였다. 계약관리의 측면에서 실시협약 관련조항의 표준안을 구축하고, 조직관리의 측면에서 업무범위를 명확화한 업무플로우를 수립하고자 하였다. 아올러 정보관리의 측면에서 설계서 변경관리의 효율화를 위한 도면, 문서관리시스템(DMIS)을 제안하고, 비용·공정관리의 측면에서 실공정과 일치되는 통합 내역관리방안을 제시하고자 하였다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.69-85
• /
• 2003

The primary objective of this thesis is to study, case by case, the international disputes for fishing rights between fishing nations and costal states never imagined till the introduction of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea adopted in 1982 and came into effect in November 16, 1994, which governs the high seas and EEZ in a new manner. Such a study is to provide help in the understanding on this new marine system and how to deal with. This is addressed by the perspectives of disputes (a) in the high seas between fishing nations having traditionally enjoyed the principle of the freedom of the high seas and costal states, (b) in the EEZ between fishing nations and costal states possessing the exclusive jurisdiction over living marine resources and sovereign rights for determining allowable catch and the surplus in its EEZ. The article can be divided into four main parts. First, both the general principles of the settlement of international disputes, and the nature and procedures described in the UNCLOS are introduced. Second, it gives cases of tuna long-liner, North Pacific trawler and squid jigger occurred in the coastal states EEZ, and analyses the problem in both terms of its background and final judgment. It further describes the possible issues in case it depends on the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea for its settlement. Third, closely tied to above, important points such as the right of hot pursuit, prompt release of vessel and crew, and the limits of cooperation with costal states inspector on board fishing vessels are considered mostly based on the UNCLOS, Bilateral Agreement and UNIA. Finally, the article concludes as follows ; The need for broad analyses on the nature of international suits and legal system for the settlement, to win the case before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea or coastal states court, is really acknowledged. However, considering the lack of previous studies about it, it is preferably recommended that governmental efforts for making legal standards to cover the judicial costs, for helping industry out of becoming bankrupt.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.81-95
• /
• 1984

The international marine system was plunged into the age of divided occupation with the adoption of the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea in April, 1982. The exclusive economic zone of 200 Nautical miles set up by the Convention confirms the assertions of many coastal states whose fishing industries are not well-developed. However, it is unfavorable to the countries whose fisheries are being carried on in deep-sea, because the coastal state has sovereign rights to conserve and manage living resources in it. Under the circumstances the Korean deep-sea fisheries had to find ways out of the difficulties. The ways may be divided into two ways, namely, licensed fishing and joint-venture fishing. The former type becomes unfavorable to foveign fisheries because of decreasing quarts, rising fees and remunerations. The latter type properly meets the wishes of countries concerned and has some merits. However, there is a possibility of bearing the risk in case of investment in developing countries. The insurance system is effective to make up for the loss from the risk, although not perfect. The deep-sea fisheries depressed now by accumulated difficulties need more financial support from the Goverment for the active promotion of overseas joint-venture.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제58권
• /
• pp.313-328
• /
• 2013

Today FTA extends over the world and Korea as a main member of international trade is no exception. In the past Korea, as the developing countries, has made endlessly effort to induce foreign investment from foreign enterprise and/or government to be a truly OECD countries today and made it. Korea's trade economy was reached 1 trillion dollars in 2012. Now we have to find a new way to produce, process, procure goods from foreign investment and also need to protect our profit and/or rights within foreign judicial territory. There are two method to protect foreign enterprise or government. First they rely on general principles in WTO or Bilateral Investment Treaty that the principle of equality, national treatment, and most-favored-nation treatment, you can create a predictable environment to protect foreign enterprise and/or government. Second they need to incorporate contractual clauses in their agreement such as stabilization clause, force majeure, arbitration, governing law or sovereign immunity. Of course there are many things left behind to consider I hope it will be helpful to those who prepare foreign investment contract.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.75-97
• /
• 2019

The growing importance of biological resources as sovereign rights to healthcare, energy, and food has sparked international discussions on Genetic Resources (GRs) and Traditional Knowledge (TK). As the bio-industry continues to grow, research and development utilizing patented biological resources are advocated. Currently, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is actively discussing GRs and TK, and an effective response to national interest has been sought. Of late, there have been growing disputes over issues like ownership, control, and access and benefit-sharing between indigenous peoples and users of GRs and TK resources. Resolution of disputes concerning GRs and TK are thus becoming critical not only to stakeholders such as the indigenous peoples and corporations, but also to third-party users. Due to the weakness of the current IP and court system however, such disputes are not addressed adequately. This paper will address the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), which is an out-of-court dispute resolution system, on conflicting issues regarding GRs and TK. It will consider the WIPO as a forum for ADR and ADR for GRs and TK disputes and it will seek both parties in the dispute to benefit from the use of the ADR process.