• 한국환경교육학회지:환경교육
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.46-64
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to analyze how the contents of education for sustainable development are reflected in the middle school environment curriculum revised in 2007, and to propose how to integrate content for improving sustainable development education. For this, I analyzed the 2007 Revised Environment Curriculum for Middle Schools by using social network analysis which is the useful methodology to understand the relations of contents. Social Network analysis is a useful tool to excavate the forms of structure or relationship and to explain the characteristics of the system that arise through relationships or to explain the units composing the system. When sustainable development education was examined from 3 points of view, it included environmental sustainability, economical sustainability, and social sustainability. I used the 2007 Revised Environment Curriculum for Middle Schools and manual of curriculum for analysis. The results are 1) The biodiversity conservation and energy efficiency have taken most important positions. 2) In case of economical sustainability pillar, sustainable production had been emphasized. 3) In the case of the social sustainability pillar, health improvement are considered significant. 4) The efforts of trying to approach sustainable development education as an integrated curriculum is week. Integrated themes based on the results were developed. Five main themes were the energy and climate change, water resource and environmental pollution, sustainable village and sustainable food production, sustainable city and sustainable production, sustainable tourism and biodiversity. I hope these could function as theme of integrated-content. Based on the results of study, I propose joint researches on scope of sustainable development for environmental education.

• 중소기업연구
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.25-52
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 공급사슬 지속가능성 선행요인, 공급사슬 역량, 공급사슬 지속가능성 간의 구조적 관계를 규명하는 것으로 공급사슬 지속가능성 선행 요인과 공급사슬 역량 간의 관계, 공급사슬 역량과 공급사슬 지속가능성 간의 관계를 규명하고, 기업규모에 따른 지속가능성 선행요인, 역량, 지속가능성 간의 차이를 규명하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 각 연구가설을 수립하고 검정한 결과는 다음과 같다. 먼저 환경규제준수, NGO 대응활동, CSR 활동, 거래공정성은 제조 민첩성, 환경경영, 사회적 자본에 대부분 정(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 검정되었으며, 제조민첩성, 환경경영, 사회적 자본 역시 경제적·환경적·사회적 지속가능성에 대부분 정(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 검정되었다. 그리고 기업규모에 따라 공급사슬 지속가능성 선행요인, 역량, 지속가능성에 차이가 있는 것으로 검정되었다. 연구결과에 따른 시사점을 정리하면 공급사슬 지속가능성 선행요인들로 선정한 환경 규제 준수, NGO 대응활동, CSR 활동, 거래공정성 요인들은 지속가능성의 달성을 위한 공급사슬 역량에 기본적인 선행요인들로서 역할을 수행한다는 것을 확인하였다. 제조 민첩성, 환경경영, 사회적 자본의 형성은 경제적·환경적·사회적 지속가능성의 수준을 제고할 수 있다는 것을 확인하였다. 따라서 공급사슬 지속가능성 선행요인들의 제고는 공급사슬 역량의 제고로 이어질 수 있고, 나아가 공급사슬 지속가능성까지 제고할 수 있다는 것을 규명하였다. 그리고 대기업과 비교 시 중소기업의 공급사슬 지속가능성 선행요인, 역량, 지속가능성의 수준을 더욱 제고하는 것 요구된다.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.57-66
• /
• 2015

The purpose of the study was to find out the relationship between subjective happiness and satisfaction of social sustainability in residential environment. The data for the analysis were collected through questionnaire survey method from October 29 to November 10, 2013, and the sample consisted of 338 residents living in Seoul and Gyeonggi-Do province. The social sustianability was composed of locality, communality and organism. Locality composed of historical and cultural reflection of regional identity and of regions. Communality composed of social integration, community program and facilities. Organism composed of employment, self-sufficiency, welfare, population, safety and housing. The findings of the study were as followings: 1) The average of subjective happiness was 3.82 points, over neutral. 2) The social sustainability in residential environment was related with the subjective happiness. 3) In the social sustainability in residential environment, the residents was satisfied with locality and organism, but they was not satisfied with communality.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.69-79
• /
• 2011

The concept of architectural sustainability is gradually being highlighted in several ills and consciousness of crisis of modern architecture. However, many of us tend to realize its sustainability focusing on ecological sustainability in many ways. Such perspective is considerably technical and extensive. Therefore, I paid attention to Herman Hertzberger's architecture to find out how to consider spatial aspects, when interior architecture designers engage in design process. This study aims to analyze architectural progress for social communication of Herman Hertzberger's project, breaking from the existing research to only limit him to one of structuralism architects. In particular, it was found that in relation to social sustainability, universal/social design, cultural design and green/ecological design have been progressed in their forms through communicational perspectives of social architecture which he's insisted since the structuralism era. Recently, majority of issues about sustainability are restricted to economical aspects. Accordingly, further study is needed to consider his architecture from social aspects. As his architecture is concentrating on coexistence from a social perspective for communication, not on modern spatial discourse, his architectural works need to be analyzed consistently as realistic measurements.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제19권9호
• /
• pp.135-144
• /
• 2021

코로나 19 사태로 인하여 자영업자 몰락과 일자리 감소 등 사회적, 경제적 양극화 현상이 사회문제화 되고 있는 바, 다양한 사업 분야에서 취약계층에 대한 사회서비스 제공 및 일자리 창출이라는 사회적기업의 역할은 매우 중요하다 할 것이다. 사회적기업은 경제적 가치 창출과 사회적 가치 창출이라는 하이브리드 특성으로 인하여 지속가능성에 어려움을 호소하고 있다. 지속가능성을 위하여 사회적기업의 사업분야와 매칭되는 전문인력 지원이 절실히 요구 되지만 부족한 예산으로 전문인력 지원은 매우 부족한 실정이다. 본 연구는 전문인력의 전문분야가 사회적기업의 지속가능성에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가에 대하여 사회적기업 특성을 매개로 연구한바, 전문인력은 기업의 주사업분야 확장과 지속가능성에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이상의 연구 결과에 근거하여 사회적기업 재정지원사업의 실무적 시사점을 제시하였다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 5th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.367-374
• /
• 2013

Underground infrastructure systems provide essential public services and goods through buried structures including water and sewer, gas and petroleum, power and communication pipelines. The majority of existing underground infrastructure systems was installed in green field areas prior to development of complex urban built environments. Currently, there is a global trend to escalate major demand for underground infrastructure system renewal and new installation while minimizing disruption and maintaining functions of existing superstructures. Therefore, Engineers and utility owners are rigorously seeking technologies that minimize environmental, social, and economic impact during the renewal and installation process. Trenchless technologies have proven to be socially less disruptive, more environmentally friendly, energy conservative and economically viable alternative methods. All of those benefits are adequate to enhance overall sustainability. This paper describes effective sustainable solutions using trenchless technologies. Sustainability is assessed by a comparison between conventional open cut and trenchless technology methods. Sustainability analysis is based on a broad perspective combining the three main aspects of sustainability: economic; environmental; and social. Economic includes construction cost, benefit, and social cost analysis. Environmental includes emission estimation and environmental quality impact study. Social includes various social impacts on an urban area. This paper summarizes sustainable trenchless technology solutions and presents a sustainable construction method selection process in a proposed framework to be used in urban underground infrastructure capital improvement projects.

• 패션비즈니스
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.88-107
• /
• 2023

This study aimed to understand the current status of practice for sustainability in luxury fashion brands. A total of five luxury brands (Louis Vuitton, Hermès, Gucci, Burberry, and Prada) were selected. Each company's official website, sustainability reports, and articles on sustainability practices were compiled. In addition, analysis was performed based on criteria of sustainability such as environmental, social, economical, and cultural dimensions. As a result, the biggest commonality of the five brands was that they promoted the most active change in the environment. These brands tried to reduce energy consumption in materials and production processes. Among them, Burberry, Gucci, and Louis Vuitton had their own departments for sustainability. However, there were differences in strategies of activities between brands for social, economical, and cultural sustainability. Among the five companies, Burberry and Gucci pursued sustainability strategies the most aggressively. They separated their sustainability strategies in terms of environmental, social, economical, and cultural aspects and shared them with consumers. A set of outcomes for the plan were provided as objective data. The sustainable management strategy has become a key strategy for long-term growth of the luxury brand market. To survive in the market, luxury brands should elaborate sustainable management strategies and actively share them with consumers.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.269-279
• /
• 2011

Sustainability assessments tend to integrate ecological, social, and economic concerns. Sustainability assessment could be considered the highest rung in the assessment ladder. Broad strategies that seek to integrate individual SEA(Strategic Environmental Assessment) could be subjected to a sustainability assessment. Sustainability assessment could incorporate global and transboundary effects and priorities into SEA and project-level EIA(Environmental Impact Assessment). SEA could provide an environmental context and direction for project-level EIA. Procedural and substantive EIA requirements can be addressed through tiering such as sustainability assessment, SEA, project-level EIA. In Korea, PERS(Prior Environmental Review System) that has been utilized to evaluate administrative plans related with various kinds of development projects should be evolved not only to incorporate environmental impacts into early stage decision-making, but also to implicate sustainability assessments that include social equity and economic efficiency. Integration of SEA and sustainability assessment can be initiated through the application of DPSIR (Driving Force - Pressure - State - Impact - Response ) framework that was developed by European Environmental Agency.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 8th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.493-502
• /
• 2020

Traditionally, road projects are initiated based on an assessment of their economic benefit, after which the environmental, social and governance effects are addressed discretely for the project according to a set of predetermined alternatives. Sustainable road infrastructure planning is vital as issues like diminishing access to road construction supplies, water scarcity, Greenhouse Gas emissions, road-related fatalities and congestion pricing etc., have imposed severe economic, social, and environmental damages to the society. In the process of addressing these sustainability factors in the operational phase of the project, the dynamics of these factors are generally ignored. This paper argues that effective delivery of sustainable roads should consider such dynamics and highlights how different aspects of sustainability have the potential to affect project sustainability. The paper initially presents the different sustainability-assessment tools that have been developed to determine the sustainability performance of road projects and discuss the inability of these tools to model the interrelationships among sustainability-related factors. The paper then argues the need for a new assessment framework that facilitates modelling these dynamics at the macro-level (system level) and helping policymakers for sustainable infrastructure planning through evaluating regulatory policies.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제24권6호
• /
• pp.47-57
• /
• 2015

In this research, an attempt was made to approach social sustainability of residential environments that have been studied thus far in community-oriented research in a broader perspective, with the aim to induce evaluation indicators for social sustainability of a residential environment that is oriented for enhancement of the residents' life quality. First, evaluation system of social sustainability of residential environments is divided into 6 areas that include regionality, diversity, fairness, satisfaction of diverse needs, social exchange, and participation and decision making. A subdivision was also introduced to account for evaluation properties by area. Second, regarding measurement of life quality in a residential environment, the scope of evaluation was divided into residential environment dimension, resident dimension, and management dimension which can incorporate both objective evaluation and subjective evaluation in consideration of the fact that it involves both physical environment and socio-psychological elements. Third, evaluation indicators by area were collected based on an analysis of preceding studies. For the purpose, a total of 193 indicators were extracted, including 28 items of regionality area, 26 items of diversity area, 28 items of fairness area, 58 items of satisfaction of diverse needs, 34 items of social exchange area, and 19 items of participation and decision making area. The kind of evaluation indicators have meaning in that it can be used as an evaluation tool of social sustainability that can be applied universally from the planning stage. It can be utilized as a basic data for enhancement of life quality and promotion of social values in a residential environment.