• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.36.1-36.10
• /
• 2020

Objectives: This study aims to assess the effect of universal adhesives pretreatment on the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin. Materials and Methods: Fifty caries-free human third molars were employed. The teeth were randomly assigned into five groups (n = 10) based on dentin surface pretreatments: Single Bond Universal (3M Oral Care), Gluma Bond Universal (Heraeus Kulzer), Prime&Bond Elect (Dentsply), Cavity Conditioner (GC) and control (no surface treatment). After Fuji II LC (GC) was bonded to the dentin surfaces, the specimens were stored for 7 days at 37℃. The specimens were segmented into microspecimens, and the microspecimens were subjugated to microtensile bond strength testing (1.0 mm/min). The modes of failure analyzed using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan tests (p = 0.05). Results: The surface pretreatments with the universal adhesives and conditioner increased the bond strength of Fuji II LC to dentin (p < 0.05). Single Bond Universal and Gluma Bond Universal provided higher bond strength to Fuji II LC than Cavity Conditioner (p < 0.05). The bond strengths obtained from Prime&Bond Elect and Cavity Conditioner were not statistically different (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The universal adhesives and polyacrylic acid conditioner could increase the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to dentin. The use of universal adhesives before the application of RMGIC may be more beneficial in improving bond strength.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.82-88
• /
• 2017

본 연구의 목적은 0.2% 클로르헥시딘이 함유된 $Peak^{(R)}$ Universal Bond (PUB)의 우치 상아질에서의 전단결합강도를 알아보는 것이다. 30개 우치의 상아질 시편을 10개씩 세 군으로 나누어 I군에는 $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond Universal (SB)를 적용하였고 II군에는 $Consepsis^{(R)}$를 처리한 이후 SB를 적용하였고 III군에는 PUB를 적용하고 $Filtek^{TM}$ Z-350 XT B3 shade를 충전후 각각의 전단결합강도를 비교 평가하였다. 그 결과 산부식 후 $Consepsis^{(R)}$를 사용하는 것은 상아질의 전단결합강도에 있어 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p > 0.05). SB에 $Consepsis^{(R)}$를 적용하거나 적용하지 않은 것의 전단결합강도와 PUB의 전단결합강도는 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p < 0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제43권2호
• /
• pp.20.1-20.9
• /
• 2018

Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bond strength of 2 universal adhesives used in different application modes to bleached enamel. Materials and Methods: Extracted 160 sound human incisors were used for the study. Teeth were divided into 4 treatment groups: No treatment, 35% hydrogen peroxide, 16% carbamid peroxide, 7.5% carbamid peroxide. After bleaching treatments, groups were divided into subgroups according to the adhesive systems used and application modes (n = 10): 1) Single Bond Universal, etch and rinse mode; 2) Single Bond Universal, self-etch mode; 3) Gluma Universal, etch and rinse mode; 4) Gluma Universal, self-etch mode. After adhesive procedures nanohybrid composite resin cylinders were bonded to the enamel surfaces. All specimens were subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) test after thermocycling. Data were analyzed using a 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc test. Results: No significant difference were found among bleaching groups (35% hydrogen peroxide, 16% carbamid peroxide, 7.5% carbamid peroxide, and no treatment groups) in the mean SBS values. There was also no difference in SBS values between Single Bond Universal and Gluma Universal at same application modes, whereas self-etch mode showed significantly lower SBS values than etch and rinse mode (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The bonding performance of the universal adhesives was enhanced with the etch and rinse mode application to bleached enamel and non-bleached enamel.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제9권5호
• /
• pp.350-357
• /
• 2017

PURPOSE. The object of the present study was to evaluate the shear bonding strength of composite to PEKK by applying several methods of surface treatment associated with various bonding materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred and fifty PEKK specimens were assigned randomly to fifteen groups (n = 10) with the combination of three different surface treatments (95% sulfuric acid etching, airborne abrasion with $50{\mu}m$ alumina, and airborne abrasion with $110{\mu}m$ silica-coating alumina) and five different bonding materials (Luxatemp Glaze & Bond, Visio.link, All-Bond Universal, Single Bond Universal, and Monobond Plus with Heliobond). After surface treatment, surface roughness and contact angles were examined. Topography modifications after surface treatment were assessed with scanning electron microscopy. Resin composite was mounted on each specimen and then subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) test. SBS data were analyzed statistically using two-way ANOVA, and post-hoc Tukey's test (P<.05). RESULTS. Regardless of bonding materials, mechanical surface treatment groups yielded significantly higher shear bonding strength values than chemical surface treatment groups. Unlike other adhesives, MDP and silane containing self-etching universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal) showed an effective shear bonding strength regardless of surface treatment method. CONCLUSION. Mechanical surface treatment behaves better in terms of PEKK bonding. In addition, self-etching universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal) can be an alternative bonding material to PEKK irrespective of surface treatment method.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제53권4호
• /
• pp.295-300
• /
• 2015

목적: 레진과 니켈-크롬 합금의 결합력에 미치는 금속 프라이머 및 다용도 접착제의 영향에 대하여 비교 평가하고자 한다. 재료 및 방법: 실험을 위해 120개의 니켈-크롬 합금(Vera Bond 2V) 디스크를 제작하여 아크릴 레진 실린더에 포매하였다. 시편의 표면은 220 grit, 600 grit의 실리콘 카바이드지로 연마한 뒤 $50{\mu}m$의 알루미늄옥사이드 입자를 분사하여 처리하였다. 실험군은 메탈 프라이머의 적용(Metal primer II, Alloy primer, Metal & Zirconia primer, MKZ primer)과 다용도 접착 시스템(Single Bond Universal, All Bond Universal)에 따라 6개 군으로 나뉘었다. 각 시편의 중앙에 높이 2 mm, 직경 3 mm로 복합레진을 충전하였으며, 제작된 모든 시편은 $37^{\circ}C$ 증류수에서 24시간 보관하였다. 만능시험기에 시편을 위치시킨 후 1 mm/min cross head speed로 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 통계분석은0.05의 유의수준으로 일원분산분석을 시행하였고 Tukey's multiple coMParison test로 사후검정을 하였다. 결과: Single Bond Universal, All Bond Universal, Metal Primer II 3개 군과 Alloy Primer, MKZ Primer, Metal & Zirconia Primer 3개 군 사이에 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(P<.001). 결론: 니켈-크롬 합금에 대한 다용도 접착 시스템의 전단결합강도는 Metal Primer II를 제외한 기존의 금속 프라이머를 적용했을 때 보다 높게 나타났다. 본 실험에서 더 나아가 다용도 접착 시스템 내 실란(Silane) 포함 여부에 따른 효과를 평가할 수 있는 연구가 필요할 것이다.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.165-172
• /
• 2019

이 논문의 목적은 기능성 모노머를 함유한 8세대 접착제의 적용시간 감소와 인산 산부식 여부가 유치에서 접착능에 미치는 영향을 평가하는 것이다. 80개의 우식이 없는 유구치를 선정하였고, 접착제의 종류에 따라서 2그룹으로 분류하였다(G-premio bond, Single bond universal). 각 그룹은 적용 시간와 인산 산부식 여부에 따라서 그룹당 10개씩, 총 4개의 하위그룹으로 추가 분류하였다. 각 하위그룹은 절반으로 나누어, 5개의 시편은 전단결합강도 측정 후 주사전자현미경을 촬영하여 파절양상을 확인하였고, 다른 5개의 시편은 미세누출을 측정하였다. G-premio bond는 적용시간와 인산 산부식 여부에 따른 결합강도와 파절양상, 미세누출의 유의한 차이가 관찰되지 않았다. Single bond universal은 적용시간을 길게 한 경우가 적용시간이 짧은 경우에 비해서 유의하게 높은 전단결합강도를 보였다(p = 0.014). 모든 그룹에서 나타난 전단결합강도는 임상적으로 허용 가능한 전단결합강도인 17 MPa 보다 높았다. G-premio bond는 인산 산부식 없이 적용시간을 줄여서 사용하는 방법이 가능하다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제44권3호
• /
• pp.23.1-23.9
• /
• 2019

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the microshear bond strength (${\mu}SBS$) of different universal adhesive systems applied to hybrid computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorative materials repaired with a composite resin. Materials and Methods: Four types of CAD-CAM hybrid block materials-Lava Ultimate (LA), Vita Enamic (VE), CeraSmart (CS), and Shofu Block HC (SH)-were used in this study, in combination with the following four adhesive protocols: 1) control: porcelain primer + total etch adhesive (CO), 2) Single Bond Universal (SB), 3) All Bond Universal (AB), and 4) Clearfil Universal Bond (CU). The ${\mu}SBS$ of the composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) was measured and the data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test, with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The CAD-CAM block type and block-adhesive combination had significant effects on the bond strength values (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found between the following pairs of groups: VE/CO and VE/AB, CS/CO and CS/AB, VE/CU and CS/CU, and VE/AB and CS/AB (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The ${\mu}SBS$ values were affected by hybrid block type. All tested universal adhesive treatments can be used as an alternative to the control treatment for repair, except the AB system on VE blocks (the VE/AB group). The ${\mu}SBS$ values showed variation across different adhesive treatments on different hybrid CAD-CAM block types.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제44권3호
• /
• pp.358-364
• /
• 2017

소아치과 영역에서 수복 치료에 널리 쓰이는 레진 치료의 술식 민감성 및 시간 감소에 대한 꾸준한 노력으로 새로운 접착제의 개발이 이루어지고 있는데 최근 출시된 접착제와 기존에 널리 쓰이는 두 단계 접착제와 비교 분석하여 임상적으로 적용하기에 어떠할지 평가해 보고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 78개의 건전한 소구치를 3군으로 나누어 순면 법랑질에 새로 개발된 $Tetric^{(R)}$ N-Bond Universal (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein)과 $GC^{(R)}$ G-Premio BOND (GC Co., Japan)를 실험군으로 하고 기존의 5세대 $3M^{TM}$ Single Bond2 (3M ESPE, USA)를 대조군으로 설정하여 동일하게 $Filtek^{TM}$ Z-350 (3M ESPE, USA)복합 레진을 접착시킨 후 접착제에 따른 전단접착강도를 비교 평가하였다. 그 결과 산부식 과정을 따로 적용하지 않은 두 실험군에서 각각의 전단접착강도가 산부식 과정을 포함한 대조군의 결과보다 통계학적으로 유의성 있게 낮은 결과를 나타내었다. 또한 새로 개발된 두 접착제간 비교에서는 $Tetric^{(R)}$ N-Bond Universal 제품이 $GC^{(R)}$ G-Premio BOND 제품보다 전단 접착 강도가 유의성 있게 큰 것으로 나타나 임상에서 제품을 선택할 때 참조할 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.105-114
• /
• 2024

PURPOSE. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pretreatment of three different universal adhesives (Single Bond Universal [SBU], All-Bond Universal [ABU], and Prime&Bond universal [PBU]) on the bonding durability of an adhesive (Panavia F 2.0, PF) and a conventional (Duo-Link, DL) resin cements to air-abraded zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Rectangular-shaped zirconia specimens were prepared. The chemical composition and surface energy parameters of the materials were studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and contact angle measurement, respectively. To evaluate resin bonding to the zirconia, all the bonding specimens were immersed in water for 24 h and the specimens to be aged were additionally thermocycled 10000 times before the shear bond strength (SBS) test. RESULTS. The materials showed different surface energy parameters, including the degree of hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity. While the DL/CON (no pretreatment) showed the lowest SBS and a significant decrease in the value after thermocycling (P < .001), the PF/CON obtained a higher SBS value than the DL/CON (P < .001) and no decrease even after thermocycling (P = .839). When the universal adhesives were used with DL, their SBS values were higher than the CON (P < .05), but the trend was adhesive-specific. In conjunction with PF, the PF/SBU produced the highest SBS followed by the PF/ABU (P = .002), showing no significant decrease after thermocycling (P > .05). The initial SBS of the PF/PBU was similar to the PF/CON (P = .999), but the value decreased after thermocycling (P < .001). CONCLUSION. The universal adhesive pretreatment did not necessarily show a synergistic effect on the bonding performance of an adhesive resin cement, whereas the pretreatment was beneficial to bond strength and durability of a conventional resin cement.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.32.1-32.10
• /
• 2021

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the application method of universal adhesives on the shear bond strength (SBS) of repaired composites, applied with different thicknesses. Materials and Methods: The 84 specimens (Filtek Z350 XT) were prepared, stored in distilled water for a week and thermocycled (5,000 cycles, 5℃ to 55℃). They were roughened using 400-grit sandpapers and etched with phosphoric acid. Then, specimens were equally divided into 2 groups; Single Bond Universal (SU) and Prime&Bond Universal (PB). Each group was subdivided into 3 subgroups according to application methods (n = 14); UC: 1 coat + uncuring, 1C: 1 coat + curing, 3C: 3 coats + curing. After storage of the repaired composite for 24 hours, specimens were subjected to the SBS test and the data were statistically analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and independent t-tests. Specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope to analyze fracture mode and a scanning electron microscope to observe the interface. Results: Adhesive material was a significant factor (p = 0.001). Bond strengths with SU were higher than PB. The highest strength was obtained from the 1C group with SU. Bonding in multiple layers increased adhesive thicknesses, but there was no significant difference in SBS values (p = 0.255). Failure mode was predominantly cohesive in old composites. Conclusions: The application of an adequate bonding system plays an important role in repairing composite resin. SU showed higher SBS than PB and the additional layers increased the adhesive thickness without affecting SBS.