Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear Bond Strengths of Dentin Bonding Agent containing 0.2% Chlorhexidine

클로르헥시딘을 함유한 상아질 결합제의 전단결합강도

  • Kim, Jinhyock (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Kiseob (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Jongsoo (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Jongbin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 김진혁 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김기섭 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김종수 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김종빈 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2016.09.20
  • Accepted : 2016.10.18
  • Published : 2017.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate shear bond strengths of $Peak^{(R)}$ Universal Bond (Ultradent, USA) containing 0.2% chlorhexidine in bovine dentin. Total of 30 bovine teeth were divided into three groups, 10 teeth each. Before comparing and evaluating shear bond strength, in group I, $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE, USA) was applied, in group II, processing with $Consepsis^{(R)}$ (Ultradent, USA) was followed by applying $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond Universal, and in group III, $Peak^{(R)}$ Universal Bond was applied and filled with $Filtek^{TM}$ Z-350 XT (3M/ESPE, USA) shade B3. As a result, processing with $Consepsis^{(R)}$ after acid etching showed no statistically significant influence on shear bond strength of dentin (p > 0.05). The shear bond strength of with or without $Consepsis^{(R)}$ on $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond Universal and that of $Peak^{(R)}$ Universal Bond showed statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).

본 연구의 목적은 0.2% 클로르헥시딘이 함유된 $Peak^{(R)}$ Universal Bond (PUB)의 우치 상아질에서의 전단결합강도를 알아보는 것이다. 30개 우치의 상아질 시편을 10개씩 세 군으로 나누어 I군에는 $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond Universal (SB)를 적용하였고 II군에는 $Consepsis^{(R)}$를 처리한 이후 SB를 적용하였고 III군에는 PUB를 적용하고 $Filtek^{TM}$ Z-350 XT B3 shade를 충전후 각각의 전단결합강도를 비교 평가하였다. 그 결과 산부식 후 $Consepsis^{(R)}$를 사용하는 것은 상아질의 전단결합강도에 있어 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p > 0.05). SB에 $Consepsis^{(R)}$를 적용하거나 적용하지 않은 것의 전단결합강도와 PUB의 전단결합강도는 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p < 0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, et al. : Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet Dent, 57:1-8.
  2. Say EC, Koray F, Tarim B, et al. : In vitro effect of cavity disinfectants on the bond strength of dentin bonding systems. Quintessence Int, 35:56-60, 2004.
  3. Brannstrom M, Nyborg H : Cavity treatment with a microbicidal fluoride solution: growth of bacteria and effect on the pulp. J Prosthet Dent, 30:303-310, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90187-X
  4. Fasihinia H, Khalesi M, Gholami L : Dental Caries Diagnostic Methods. AVICENNA J Dent Res, 2:1-12, 2011.
  5. Astvaldsdottir A, Tranæus S, Karlsson L, et al. : DIAGNOdent measurements of cultures of selected oral bacteria and demineralized enamel. Acta Odontol Scandi, 68:148-153, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016350903567176
  6. Meiers J, Kresin J : Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding. Oper Dent, 21:153-159, 1996.
  7. Sodhi R, Grad H, Smith D : Examination by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of the adsorption of chlorhexidine on hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res, 71:1493-1497, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710080601
  8. Vaughan M, Garnick J : The effect of a 0.125% chlorhexidine rinse on inflammation after periodontal surgery. J Periodontol, 60:704-708, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1989.60.12.704
  9. Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV : The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod J, 42:288-302, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01540.x
  10. Gendron R, Grenier D, Sorsa T, et al. : Inhibition of the activities of matrix metalloproteinases 2, 8, and 9 by chlorhexidine. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol, 6:437-439, 1999.
  11. Perdigao J, Denehy G, Swift EJ : Effects of chlorhexidine on dentin surfaces and shear bond strengths. Am J Dent, 7:81-84, 1994.
  12. Leinfelder KF : A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, 127:743-748, 1996. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0309
  13. Brannstrom M, Vojinovic O : Response of the dental pulp to invasion of bacteria around three filling materials. ASDC J Dent Child, 43:83-89, 1976.
  14. Boston DW, Graver HT : Histological study of an acid red caries-disclosing dye. Oper Dent, 14:186-192, 1989.
  15. Anderson MH, Loesche WJ, Charbeneau GT : Bacteriologic study of a basic fuchsin caries-disclosing dye. J Prosthet Dent, 54:51-55, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(85)80069-X
  16. Leidal Ti, Eriksen H : A scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of various cleansing agents on cavity walls in vitro. Scand J Dent Res, 87:443-449, 1979.
  17. Ercan E, Erdemir A, Zorba YO, et al. : Effect of different cavity disinfectants on shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin. J Adhes Dent, 11:343-346, 2009.
  18. Perdok J, Van der Mei H, Genet M, et al. : Elemental surface concentration ratios and surface free energies of human enamel after application of chlorhexidine and adsorption of salivary constituents. Caries Res, 23:297-302, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261196
  19. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, et al. : In vitro degradation of resin-dentin bonds analyzed by microtensile bond test, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Biomaterials, 24:3795-3803, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00262-X
  20. Nemeth JA, Yousif R, Herzog M, et al. : Matrix metalloproteinase activity, bone matrix turnover, and tumor cell proliferation in prostate cancer bone metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst, 94:17-25, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.1.17
  21. Moon PC, Weaver J, Brooks CN: Review of matrix metalloproteinases'effect on the hybrid dentin bond layer stability and chlorhexidine clinical use to prevent bond failure. Open Dent J, 4, 2010.
  22. Dalli M, Ercan E, Zorba YO, et al. : Effect of 1% chlorhexidine gel on the bonding strength to dentin. J Dent Sci, 5:8-13, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1991-7902(10)60002-5
  23. Jang SH, Hur B, Kim HC, et al. : Effect of 2% chlorhexidine application on microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin using one-step self-etch adhesives. J Kor Acad Cons Dent, 35:486-491, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.6.486
  24. Soares C, Pereira C, Pereira J, et al. : Effect of chlorhexidine application on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent, 33:183-188, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-69
  25. Gurgan S, Bolay : Effect of disinfectant application methods on the bond strength of composite to dentin. J Oral Rehabil, 26:836-840, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00458.x
  26. de Sousa Vieira R, Da Silva I : Bond strength to primary tooth dentin following disinfection with a chlorhexidine solution: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent, 25:49-52, 2003.
  27. Singla M, Aggarwal V, Kumar N : Effect of chlorhexidine cavity disinfection on microleakage in cavities restored with composite using a self-etching single bottle adhesive. J Conservative Dent, 14:374-377, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.87201
  28. Tulunoglu O, Ayhan H, Olmez A, et al. : The effect of cavity disinfectants on microleakage in dentin bonding systems. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 22:299-305, 1997.
  29. Jeong SH, Kwon HK, Kim BI : Influence on enamel surface by the various tooth storage methods. J Korean Acad Oral Health, 34:621-627, 2010.
  30. DeWald JP : The use of extracted teeth for in vitro bonding studies: a review of infection control considerations. Dent Mater, 13:74-81, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80015-2
  31. Santana FR, Pereira JC, Pereira CA, et al. : Influence of method and period of storage on the microtensile bond strength of indirect composite resin restorations to dentine. Braz Oral Res, 22:352-357, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242008000400012
  32. Park HJ, Kim JS, Yoo SH: Study on the bond strength of all-in-one dentin bonding system. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 33:661-672, 2006
  33. Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE : Interfacial micromorphology and shear bond strength of singlebottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater, 13:316-324, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80102-9
  34. Nagase H, Visse R, Murphy G : Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Cardiovasc Res, 69:562-573, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.12.002
  35. Schilke R, Lisso JA, Qeurtsen W, et al. : Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic Investigation. Arch Oral Biol, 45:355-61, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(00)00006-6
  36. Hannig M, Reinhardt K, Bott B : Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent, 24:172-180, 1999.
  37. Ernest C, Holzmeier M, Willershausen B : In vitro shear bond strength of self-etching adhesives in comparison to 4th and 5th generation adhesives. J Adhes Dent, 6:293-299, 2003.