• 식물병연구
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.231-234
• /
• 2006

오이 흰가루병(Sphaerotheca fusca)이 수량에 미치는 영향을 구명하고자 오이 잎 제거를 통한 시뮬레이션으로 적정 잎수에 관한 모의시험 및 발병도 조절에 따른 흰가루병이 수량에 미치는 영향과 경제적 피해허용수준을 검토하였다. 오이 잎 제거 수준과 수량과의 시뮬레이션 결과 봄작기에서는 오이 잎 수를 10매, 가을작기에서는 13매 정도를 유지하면 표준방제구와 큰 차이가 없었다. 오이 흰가루병 발병도가 증가할수록 수량이 감소하였으며, 특히 상품성 수량의 감소폭이 전체 수량의 감소폭보다 더 커서 상품성 수량에 큰 영향을 미쳤다. 오이 흰가루병 발병도와 수량과의 회귀식은 Y=-57.237x+6143.1, $R^2=0.9628$로 방제비용을 감안하여 수량 3% 지점의 발병도 17.6%를 경제적 피해 허용 수준으로 설정하였다. 오이 흰가루병 방제적기는 경제적 피해 허용수준과 시뮬레이션 결과를 종합할 때 흰가루병으로 발병된 잎이 $1{\sim}2$장일 때 방제를 시작해야 하는 시점으로 생각된다.

• 정신신체의학
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.194-200
• /
• 2018

연구목적 뇌 자기공명영상에서 발견된 백질변성의 소견은 인지기능 저하와 관련이 있다고 알려져 있지만 이의 중요성은 명확하게 밝혀진 바 없다. 본 연구는 뇌 자기공명영상에서 관찰되는 백질변성이 섬망의 심각도나 경과에 미치는 영향을 규명하기 위해 시행되었다. 방 법 섬망 삽화 전후에 뇌 자기공명영상이 촬영된 42명의 섬망 환자에 대하여 반정량적인 시각평가척도를 이용하여 뇌실주위 백질 고강도신호와 심부백질 고강도신호를 평가하였다. 이 고강도신호의 등급과 섬망평가척도 점수 간의 상관 관계를 분석하였고, 등급이 높은 군과 낮은 군으로 나누어 군에 따른 섬망평가척도 점수의 변화 차이를 추가로 분석하였다. 결 과 후두엽의 심부백질 고강도신호 등급과 섬망평가척도의 총점, 심각도 항목, 인지 항목 및 비인지 항목의 합과 양의 상관관계를 보였다. 또한 첫 평가와 추적 평가를 비교하였을 때 뇌실주위 백질 고강도신호의 등급이 낮은 군이 높은 군보다 섬망평가척도의 인지 항목 점수가 유의미한 경사로 가파르게 감소하였다. 결 론 뇌 백질 고강도신호 등급에 따라 섬망의 심각도와 호전 속도에 차이를 보이는 것은 뇌 백질변성이 대뇌 기능 연결성의 단절을 초래하여 유발한 결과로 볼 수 있다. 본 연구는 뇌 자기공명영상에서 발견된 고강도신호의 등급의 평가를 통해 섬망의 심각도와 경과를 예측해 볼 가능성이 있다는 점에서 임상적으로 유용할 수 있다.

• 재활치료과학
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.63-76
• /
• 2022

목적 : 본 연구의 목적은 장애 중증도 수준뿐만 아니라 장애 유형 또한 함께 고려하여 장애인의 고용현황을 분석함으로써 기존의 장애 중증도 수준에 기반한 의학적 손상을 기준으로 하여 직업적 능력을 고려하는 것에 한계가 있음을 지적하는 데에 있다. 연구방법 : 장애인고용공단(2019)에서 조사한 장애인 고용패널조사 2차 웨이브 4차 조사 자료를 사용하였다. 독립변수는 장애인의 장애 중증도와 장애 유형, 종속변수는 고용여부로 하여 장애 중증도에 따른 장애 유형의 고용가능성 오즈비를 로지스틱 회귀분석으로 산출하였다. 결과 : 장애정도가 심한 군은 고용가능성은 관련 변수들을 보정했을 때, 신체외부장애 유형에 비해 신체내부장애의 고용가능성이 0.413(95% CI: 0.271-0.629)배로 유의하게 낮았고(p<.001), 장애정도가 심하지 않은 군에서는 신체외부장애에 비해 신체내부장애가 0.475(95% CI: 0.327-0.690)배로 고용가능성이 낮았다(p<.001). 결론 : 장애 중증도 수준이 같다 하더라도 장애 유형에 따라 고용가능성이 달라질 수 있음을 확인하였다. 장애 유형과 중증도를 모두 고려하여 고용가능성의 편차를 줄일 수 있는 판정 기준의 마련이 필요하다.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제21권7호
• /
• pp.859-868
• /
• 2020

Objective: To investigate the value of initial CT quantitative analysis of ground-glass opacity (GGO), consolidation, and total lesion volume and its relationship with clinical features for assessing the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Materials and Methods: A total of 84 patients with COVID-19 were retrospectively reviewed from January 23, 2020 to February 19, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: severe group (n = 23) and non-severe group (n = 61). Clinical symptoms, laboratory data, and CT findings on admission were analyzed. CT quantitative parameters, including GGO, consolidation, total lesion score, percentage GGO, and percentage consolidation (both relative to total lesion volume) were calculated. Relationships between the CT findings and laboratory data were estimated. Finally, a discrimination model was established to assess the severity of COVID-19. Results: Patients in the severe group had higher baseline neutrophil percentage, increased high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and procalcitonin levels, and lower baseline lymphocyte count and lymphocyte percentage (p < 0.001). The severe group also had higher GGO score (p < 0.001), consolidation score (p < 0.001), total lesion score (p < 0.001), and percentage consolidation (p = 0.002), but had a lower percentage GGO (p = 0.008). These CT quantitative parameters were significantly correlated with laboratory inflammatory marker levels, including neutrophil percentage, lymphocyte count, lymphocyte percentage, hs-CRP level, and procalcitonin level (p < 0.05). The total lesion score demonstrated the best performance when the data cut-off was 8.2%. Furthermore, the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 93.8% (confidence interval [CI]: 86.8-100%), 91.3% (CI: 69.6-100%), and 91.8% (CI: 23.0-98.4%), respectively. Conclusion: CT quantitative parameters showed strong correlations with laboratory inflammatory markers, suggesting that CT quantitative analysis might be an effective and important method for assessing the severity of COVID-19, and may provide additional guidance for planning clinical treatment strategies.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.63-71
• /
• 2004

Purpose: This study was to identify the influencing factors of the compliance level to a therapeutic regimen after a bone mineral densitometry test. Method: The sample for the study was 95 people who took the bone mineral densitometry test from March, 2002 to July, 2002. Data was collected by mail using aself reporting questionnaire on the selected variables such as the compliance level, self efficacy, health locus of control, susceptibility, severity, usefulness, barrier, and self esteem. Results: The average compliance level was 63.93. Through multiple regression, three independent variables including chance health locus of control on personality, the result of bone mineral density and self-efficacy were entered in the model as the significant determinants of the compliance level after a bone mineral densitometry test. The coefficients of determination of each variable were 10.9%, 8.3% and 8.1% respectively. Conclusion: The identification of the determinants of the compliance level to the therapeutic regimen after bone mineral densitometry is expected to contribute to the development of an intervention program to improve the compliance level to the therapeutic regimen in osteoporosis patients.

• 대한원격탐사학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.85-97
• /
• 2001

인공위성영상(ETM+)을 이용하여 산불피해지역을 분석하기 위해 KT(Kauth-Thomas)변환기법과 IHS(Intensity-Hue-Saturation)변환기법을 적용하여 비교해 보고 산불피해등급지도를 작성하였다. 이 연구는 두 부분으로 나누어 수행되었는데, 그 첫 번째는 기하보정만 수행한 영상의 7, 4, 1밴드를 이용하여 IHS변환을 적용하여 단순 슬라이싱 기법으로 산불피해지역을 피해 정도별로 등급화 하는 것이 가능한가를 분석하였다. 그 결과 각 컴포넌트에서 클래스의 분광 특성이 서로 겹쳐서 단순 슬라이싱 기법으로는 적절한 분류가 이루어지지 않았다. 두 번째는 방사 및 지형보정을 한 영상을 각각 IHS와 KT변환기법으로 변환시킨 후 최대우도법을 이용해 분류하였다. 현장데이타가 부족하여 cross-validation을 수행하였으며, 일관되게 KT변환기법에 의한 분류가 IHS기법에 의한 분류보다 더 좋은 결과를 보여주었다. 또한 KT feature space와 IHS 컴포넌트의 분광분포를 그래프 상에서 분석해 보았다. 이 연구에서는 KT변환기법이 IHS변환기법보다 산불피해지역을 추출함에 있어 더 높은 정확도를 나타내고, 산불과 관련된 지표의 물리적 특성을 더 잘 반영함을 볼 수 있었다.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.47-54
• /
• 2015

Purpose: Besides depression and anxiety, recently pain catastrophizing has been emphasized for an important psychological factor explaining pain response in various pain conditions including temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). The aims of this study were to evaluate pain catastrophizing of TMD patients and to investigate how the level of pain catastrophizing related with clinical variables and psychometric morbidity. Methods: Inclusion criterion was all new TMD patients ${\geq}18$ years old attending the Department of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine of Dankook University Dental Hospital (Cheonan, Korea) over three-month period in 2014, who completed questionnaires. The questionnaires included the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Symptom Check List- 90-Revised (SCL-90-R). All of them were examined clinically and diagnosed. Results: One hundred fifty five patients diagnosed as TMDs were participated in this study (mean age of $38.7{\pm}15.2$ years, male:female=1:2.5). Mean PCS score of the patients was 17.3 with standard deviation of 12.6. By the median of the PCS score (i.e., 15), the subjects were categorized into the high (${\geq}15$) and low catastrophizers (<15). Increased pain severity and interference and increased score of psychological features of SCL-90-R were found in the TMD patients with higher level of catastrophizing (p<0.001) and there was weak to moderate correlation between those factors (p<0.05). Difference in catastrophizing level was not found for other variables such as age, gender, duration of pain, education level and types of TMDs. Conclusions: Conclusively, pain catastrophizing of TMD patients relates positively to pain severity and pain interference. In addition to depression and anxiety, pain catastrophizing is positively correlated with variable other psychological morbidity such as somatization, obsessive- compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, paranoid ideation and psychoticism. Types of TMD diagnosis do not seem to affect catastrophizing level. The results of this study suggest that pain catastrophizing should be emphasized and assessed in the TMD patients.

• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제21권5호
• /
• pp.447-457
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of self management of patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, and to investigate the factors influencing self management. Methods: The subjects consisted of 117 diabetes patients who visited the outpatient department of a university hospital from March to August 2008. Data were collected by asking the subjects to answer a 54-item questionnaire and were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 14.0 program. Results: The total mean score of the patients in self -management was 4.38 out of 7. Medication adherence obtained the highest score under self-management, and the self-monitoring of blood glucose obtained the lowest score. Family support, self-efficacy, severity, and depression were found to be significantly correlated with self-management. In stepwise multiple regression analysis a total of 44.5% of the variance in self management was accounted for by family support, self-efficacy, severity, and depression. Conclusion: Therefore, a diabetic intervention program should be designed and provided for increasing family support, self efficacy, and severity and for reducing depression of patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

• 자동차안전학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.13-19
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of air bag deployment in passenger car head-on collisions on injuries to the driver. The drivers in head-on collisions who were brought to the emergency rooms of two hospitals from January 2011 and October 2014 were evaluated, as were the vehicles involved. The driver injury level were assessed by utilizing Collision Deformation Classification (CDC) codes, and the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS), respectively. In this study, it was shown that the chest ISS and AIS were significantly high when an air bag only is deployed. A statistically significant difference was found in the crush extent when the driver who fastened the seatbelt was found to be affected more than the ISS 9. Even when an air bag is deployed in a head-on car collision, injury severity can vary according to accident circumstances and crash severity. Accordingly, first aid can be rapidly given, and the injured person can be quickly referred to a hospital, only if the assessment of persons involved in a vehicle accident is accurately carried out.

• 말소리와 음성과학
• /
• 제2권3호
• /
• pp.171-178
• /
• 2010

This study examined the relationship between speech intelligibility and comprehensibility for hearing impaired children with cochlear implants. Speech intelligibility was measured by orthographic transcription method for acoustic signal at the level of words and sentences. Comprehensibility was evaluated by examining listener's ability to answer questions about the contents of a narrative. Speech samples were collected from 12 speakers(age of 6~15 years) with cochlear implants. For each speaker, 4 different listeners(total of 48 listeners) completed 2 tasks: One task involved making orthographic transcriptions and the other task involved answering comprehension questions. The results of the study were as follows: (1) Speech intelligibility and comprehensibility scores tended to be increased by decreasing of severity. (2) Across all speakers, the relationship was significant between speech intelligibility and comprehensibility scores without considering severity. However, within severity groups, there was the significant relationship between comprehensibility and speech intelligibility only for moderate-severe group. These results suggest that speech intelligibility scores measured by orthographic transcription may not accurately reflect how well listener comprehend speech of children with cochlear implants and therefore, measures of both speech intelligibility and listener comprehension should be considered in evaluating speech ability and information-bearing capability in speakers with cochlear implants.