• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.1503-1516
• /
• 2019

In this paper, to improve the accuracy of long sentence similarity calculation, we proposed a sentence similarity calculation method based on a system similarity function. The algorithm uses word2vector as the system elements to calculate the sentence similarity. The higher accuracy of our algorithm is derived from two characteristics: one is the negative effect of penalty item, and the other is that sentence similar function (SSF) based on word2vector similar elements doesn't satisfy the exchange rule. In later studies, we found the time complexity of our algorithm depends on the process of calculating similar elements, so we build an index of potentially similar elements when training the word vector process. Finally, the experimental results show that our algorithm has higher accuracy than the word mover's distance (WMD), and has the least query time of three calculation methods of SSF.

• 중국학논총
• /
• 제63호
• /
• pp.65-90
• /
• 2019

In Huangdao Dialect, the "NP1+VP+起+NP2" sentence structure can not only be used with monosyllabic and bisyllabic adjectives and active adjectives, but also with passive adjectives. The usage of the VP is broader in Huangdao Dialect than in Qingdao dialect in case it is a verb phrase. The negative of "NP1+VP+起+NP2" sentence structure uses "不" or "沒有." If common comparative element can be found between NP1 and NP2, the negative particles are used at the beginning of the sentence in general to generate topic sentences. NP1 is often a common noun, modifying phrase, and quantifying phrase, while it can also be a verb-object phrase or modifying phrase. Huangdao Dialect may exhibit specific quantifying phrases that express comparative differences. The inquisitive style of "NP1+VP+起+NP2" sentence structure include appending a question mark at the end of the sentence, combining the positive and negative forms of the adjective, and appending "'是沒" or "是不是" in the front of the adjective.

• 음성과학
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.21-35
• /
• 2007

This paper attempts to investigate phonetic substances of the stress patterns of English compounds and noun phrases, showing that the theoretically derived stress structures are not consistent with the accentual patterns in real utterances. Even though it has been long claimed that compounds have the stress pattern [1 3] and that noun phrases, [2 1] as in Chomsky & Halle (1968), their difference has not been yet explored empirically or phonetically. I present a phonetic experiment conducted to see if there is any difference along the tonal contours, mostly focusing on their pitch accent distribution. 36 different compounds and 36 different noun phrases included in carrier sentences were examined, and they were varied in position within a sentence. Results showed that various accentual patterns were produced, and among them, [H* X] predominantly occurs in all three positions in both compounds and noun phrases, whereas the patterns [X H*] and [X X] appear relatively more frequently in final position than in initial and medial position. Furthermore, the pattern [Ac + No], in which the preceding element is pitch-accented with no accent on the following one, is the major stress pattern in both compounds and noun phrases and in all three sentence positions. This suggests that there seems to be no difference in accentual patterns between compounds and noun phrases, which is not consistent with the hypothesis. The results are interpreted as saying that the preceding element alone tends to be prominent with no accent following it both in compounds and noun phrases, and that therefore, theoretically speculated phonological claims are not always phonetically supported.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제6호
• /
• pp.143-157
• /
• 2000

It has been one of the puzzles in the English syntax that so called the rule of subject-auxiliary inversion (SAI) is not allowed in subject wh-movement while it is not obligatory in non-subject wh-movement in a root sentence. This asymmetry has been a puzzle since SAI itself was thought to be a part of question construction as we can observe from yes/no questions. The asymmetry gets more complicated in terms of sentence embedding, i.e no SAI is permitted in the embedded context in question. The goal of this paper is to suggest an unified analysis for this unsolved grammatical phenomena on the basis of Rizzi (1997)'s recent work. The main idea is that SAI is not a I-to-C movement but one of I-to-Focus where Focus is a functional category and its phrase is located between CP and IP. The other proposal is that Wh-movement is no more homogeneous in terms of landing site between a root and an embedded sentence: the target for a wh-phrase in the former is the Spec of FocP (Focus Phrase) but the one in the latter is the Spec of CP as the standard theory assumes. Pesetsky (l999)'s analysis is discussed and its theoretical and empirical shortages are pointed out. Its rather radical proposals such as the one that the nominative case is just an uninterpretable tense feature of DP and the other that 'that' is no longer a complementizer but an element of I(nflection) make it less acceptable in spite of the possibility that it can get rid of Case theory entirely, which would be ideal in the spirit of minimalism.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.29-35
• /
• 2017

In this paper, we present a 5W1H programming model for IT non-experienced people who are not familiar with computer programming and those who need programming education. Based on this model, we can design a development tool that can be easily programmed by beginners. This development tool is a programming method applying the 5W1H concept and constructs a sentence to satisfy the control condition of 'Who, When, Where, What, and How', which is the sentence element of 5W1H. Therefore, the user can easily develop the target system as if constructing the sentence without learning the programming language of the target system. In this paper, to verify the effectiveness of the 5W1H programming model proposed in this paper, we applied the concept of 5W1H programming to Arduino and developed the development tool and performed the first verification and applied the second verification to the speech recognition smart home development platform.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.101-121
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 연구논문의 논리적 의미 구조 메타데이터 항목에 해당하는 데이터에 담겨 있는 문장의 구성에 따라 시스템에서 적절한 항목으로 자동 식별 처리될 수 있도록 하는, 문장의미론(Sentence Semantics)적 분석 방법을 제안하고자 하는 목적으로 수행되었으며, 의미 구조 메타데이터 항목 중 'Research Objectives'와 'Research Outcomes'에 해당하는 연구 논문 문장의 구조를 어절 수, 접속어 종류, 다수 출현한 단어들의 문장 내 역할, 문장에서 다수 출현한 어미 형태 등을 기준으로 분석해 정리하였다. 연구 결과, 문장들의 어절 수는 'Research Objectives'는 평균 38개, 'Research Outcomes'는 평균 212개로 나타났으며, 접속어의 경우 'Research Objectives'는 인과-순접-대등-환언/요약 관계를 나타내는 접속어 순으로, 'Research Outcomes'는 인과-대등-순접-환언/요약 관계를 나타내는 접속어 순으로 많이 출현한 것으로 파악되었다. 출현빈도가 높은 분석 대상 단어들은 각각 문장 내에서 주어, 목적어, 서술어 역할 등으로 사용되고 있었으며, '역할'이나 '요인', '관계'는 목적이나 결과 부분 모두에서 비슷한 역할을 담당하고 있었지만 '연구'는 같은 단어라도 연구의 목적 부분과 결과 부분에서 사용되는 역할에 차이를 보였다. 마지막으로 문장 내 동사의 어미는 'Research Objectives'에서 '~고자'와 '~였다', 'Research Outcomes'에서 '~었다', '~있다', '~였다'가 많이 출현하였다. 본 연구는 연구자의 학술적 이해형성을 지원하기 위해 연구논문이 담고 있는 공통된 논리적 의미를 반영한 메타데이터 요소의 자동 식별과 입력 방안을 제시하는 데 활용할 수 있는 기초 연구로서 의의가 있다.

• 융합정보논문지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.43-48
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 현재 영어문법 교수과정에서 흔하게 나타나고 있는 문법용어 즉, 품사와 문장구성요소 용어의 오사용 문제점을 살펴보고 이에 대한 수정 및 개선할 수 있는 방안을 제시하고자 한다. 품사와 문장요소는 어떤 문법적인 기술을 위해서도 필수불가결한 것이다. 이러한 품사와 문장요소들은 학교 문법과 일반적인 문법의 기초를 이루는 부분임에도 정확한 재단 및 검증이 이루어지지 않은 채 중의적으로 사용되기도 하고 품사와 문장요소를 정확히 구분하지 않은 상태로 혼용하고 있다. 영어의 품사와 문장요소는 서로 다른 것을 지칭하는 것이고 이것들을 혼용해서 사용하는 경우 영어 교육을 위한 문법용어 설정에 큰 문제점을 야기하게 된다. 결론적으로, 현재 학교에서 사용되는 영어교재 및 각종 수험서에서 정의하고 있는 품사 및 문장요소에 대한 정의를 논의 및 제고해 볼 필요성이 있고 이러한 논의 및 분석을 통해 효과적인 영어교육을 위한 문법용어 설정에 대한 논의를 하고자 한다.

• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.335-342
• /
• 2004

최근 한국의 전통조형에 관련되는 연구가 활발하게 이뤄지고 있다. 그러나 그간 이뤄졌던 선행연구의 대부분이 극히 개인적이고 부분적이며 산발적으로 이뤄졌기에, 그 내용이 단편적이고, 체계화되지 못한 경향이 있다. 따라서 이러한 선행연구들을 체계적 틀로 종합하여 객관적으로 정리할 필요가 있다. 대체적으로 인간의 모든 행위(조형행위 또한)는 목표와 절차와 수단을 갖고 있다. 즉 인간은 어떤 사상을 구현하기 위해서는 세 가지 요소가 필요한데, 이 세 가지 요소는 내용적, 형식적, 그리고 실질적 요소로 구분하는 것이 보편화되어 있다. 내용적 요소는 사상의 가치, 관념, 의미, 그리고 목적으로서 이루고자 하는 목표이며, 형식적 요소는 목표를 이루기 위해 그 사상의 단위들을 구성하는 방법, 원리, 규범, 절차, 형태 그리고 양식이며, 실질적 요소는 형식을 통하여 내용을 구체화시킬 수 있는 구체적인 수단, 도구, 매체, 재료 그리고 기술 등을 가리킨다. 이 세 가지는 상호연관 되어 있어 이중 한 가지라도 결여되면 완벽한 구현을 이룰 수 없다. 인간이 표현코자 하는 사상과 의미는 거의 언어로 이뤄지고 있다. 문장의 주성분에는 주어(생략가능), 목적어(목적), 서술어(방법), 보어(수단)가 있으며, 그것의 구성요소를 층위별로 규칙을 갖고 체계화시켜놓은 것이 문장이므로 위의 내용들을 언어와 비교 연구하여 디자인(조형)과의 상관관계를 살펴 전통조형의 체계에 관련된 분석의 틀을 만들었다. 또한 위의 방법으로 분석ㆍ정리된 결과를 갖고 전통 조형정신을 시대에 적합하게 실현하기 위한 방안을, 단계별로 정리하였다. 터미널에 상호 호환적 형태로 소비될 수 있는 터미널 구조 및 구현, 그리고 실험 결과를 처음으로 제시 하였다는데 의미가 있다고 할 수 있겠다.있을 것이다. for business transactions, which is composed by ′Classify Phase′ that classify transactions. We called this model "3-Phase Commit Method Applied by Classify Phase", we design this model to manage an resource of enterprise efficiently. The proposed method is compared by the method based on 2-Phase commit that could be a problem of management the resource of enterprise, and the advantage of this method is certified to propose the solution of that problem.should be more cautious in interpreting data obtained from so-called "in vivo counter-transport" experiments.d in many countries now. Especially, development of high power/quality diode laser will be accelerate the introduction of this magnificent

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제6호
• /
• pp.89-111
• /
• 2000

Since speaking is correlated with time and time is metaphorically conceptualized in terms of space, it is natural for us to conceptualize language metaphorically in terms of space. For example, we think that the future is in front and the past is behind. Reddy(1979) suggested in his conduit metaphor that linguistic expressions are containers. According to him, the speaker puts his ideas(objects) into words{containers)and sends them along a conduit to a hearer who takes the idea(object) out of the word(container). As a result we are able to know that the larger linguistic expressions have more meaning in it. In other words the space of a linguistic form has close relationship with meaning. Moreover we are able to see that formal distance between arguments or elements of linguistic expressions shows semantic influences between them. If two elements keep close distance, a preceeding element has a strong, direct and whole influence upon the following element. Sometimes even the results of the influence can be brought out implicitly by the formal relation between two elements. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to show that tins difference in meaning which is due to formal distance of sentence elements can be explained by the metaphorical concept presented by Lakoff and Johnson(1980).

• 음성과학
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.89-108
• /
• 2002

Deaccentuation' means the phenomenon that the accent on the particular element which deserves to be accented, disappears and loses the property of intonational prominence. Based on some theoretical background, we divided the cases where deaccentuation can be placed into six categories : the first, the case that the words already mentioned are repeated in the context; the second, the case that the element can be recovered anaphorically or situationally; the third, the case that the elements are semantically weightless; the fourth, the case that the meaning of the word is empty; the fifth, the case that the elements are less informative, so that they are easy to predict; the sixth, the case that the elements are located after the focused words. Then we organized the context and the experimental sentences corresponding to each category. The utterances of Korean and English native speakers were recorded and analysed based on the ToBI system and compared to each other, in order to find out that Korean speakers can distinguish the difference within each sentence pair, and produce them with appropriate intonation similar to that of native speakers.