• 제목/요약/키워드: Scientific Publishing, Web of Science, Scientific Research, SCOPUS

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.016초

Publication Indicators under Web of Science, SCOPUS Databases at Northern Border University: 2008-2020

  • Al Sawy, Yaser Mohammad Mohammad
    • International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
    • /
    • 제21권5호
    • /
    • pp.90-97
    • /
    • 2021
  • The study aimed to analyze the reality of the scientific publishing of the faculty members of the Northern Border University, in both the Web of Science database and the SCOPUS database, with the analysis of publishing indicators and trends for the period between 2008-2020, and the researcher's keenness to apply the bibliometric study research methodology to obtain an account Full and detailed publications indicators under the two databases, including a full analysis of scientific publishing through objective, temporal, quantitative, authors, languages, open access journals, information forms, the most productive authors, the most published scientific journals, the most scientific bodies involved with the university. The study found results, the most important of which is the existence of a high increase in scientific publishing, starting from 2015, with an increase in publishing in the scientific field compared to other disciplines, and that the vast majority of publishing is in the form of articles, as well as publishing in English for the rest of the languages.

A Bibliometric Approach for Department-Level Disciplinary Analysis and Science Mapping of Research Output Using Multiple Classification Schemes

  • Gautam, Pitambar
    • Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia
    • /
    • 제18권1호
    • /
    • pp.7-29
    • /
    • 2019
  • This study describes an approach for comparative bibliometric analysis of scientific publications related to (i) individual or several departments comprising a university, and (ii) broader integrated subject areas using multiple disciplinary schemes. It uses a custom dataset of scientific publications (ca. 15,000 articles and reviews, published during 2009-2013, and recorded in the Web of Science Core Collections) with author affiliations to the research departments, dedicated to science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM), of a comprehensive university. The dataset was subjected, at first, to the department level and discipline level analyses using the newly available KAKEN-L3 classification (based on MEXT/JSPS Grants-in-Aid system), hierarchical clustering, correspondence analysis to decipher the major departmental and disciplinary clusters, and visualization of the department-discipline relationships using two-dimensional stacked bar diagrams. The next step involved the creation of subsets covering integrated subject areas and a comparative analysis of departmental contributions to a specific area (medical, health and life science) using several disciplinary schemes: Essential Science Indicators (ESI) 22 research fields, SCOPUS 27 subject areas, OECD Frascati 38 subordinate research fields, and KAKEN-L3 66 subject categories. To illustrate the effective use of the science mapping techniques, the same subset for medical, health and life science area was subjected to network analyses for co-occurrences of keywords, bibliographic coupling of the publication sources, and co-citation of sources in the reference lists. The science mapping approach demonstrates the ways to extract information on the prolific research themes, the most frequently used journals for publishing research findings, and the knowledge base underlying the research activities covered by the publications concerned.

연구데이터와 관련된 OpenURL의학술서비스 유형 메타태그의 확장에 대한 연구 (A Study on the Expansion of Meta-Tag for Research Data in Scholarly Service Type of OpenURL)

  • 김선태;이태영
    • 정보관리연구
    • /
    • 제42권4호
    • /
    • pp.39-58
    • /
    • 2011
  • 최신의 학술서비스 유형과 연구데이터 출판 및 서비스를 위한 DataCite 메타데이터 요소를 분석하여 OpenURL 학술서비스 유형을 기술하기 위한 메타태그를 Key/Encoded-Value(KEV) 형식으로 확장제안하였다. 현재의 OpenURL Z39.88 표준의 KEVFormat: Sch-Svc은 문헌중심의 학술서비스 유형 6가지만을 지원하고 있어 연구데이터의 원활한 유통을 위해서는 확장이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 학술서비스 유형 분석을 위해 Scopus와 Web of Science, NDSL 서비스를 비교 검토하여 8개의 학술서비스 유형을 도출하였다. 또한 연구데이터 기술을 위한 DataCite 컨소시엄의 메타데이터 요소를 집중적으로 분석하여 9개의 대표속성을 도출하였다.