• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.83-92
• /
• 2012

The development of science and technology oriented knowledge society accelerates the convergence between scientific theory and industrial technology and increases the complexity problem of social and economic sectors. These cause the difficulty of securing the reliability and objectivity of science and technology policy. These also are barriers of balanced evaluation between rational science and technology policy making, management, and policy coordination. In this regard, Advanced countries in science and technology develops policy support system and promotes the program of evidence-based SciSIP(Science of Science and Innovation policy) together. This paper introduces a new approach developing science service of science and technology policy utilizing business intelligence technology in Korea. Also, it proposes the integration method of policy knowledge base and component-based service supporting S&T policy decision-making process and introduces services case studies.

• 과학기술학연구
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.85-105
• /
• 2002

이 논문은 정책이념(policy ideas)의 관점에서 우리나라 과학기술의 성격과 발전을 검토한다. 제도주의 이론에 따르면 정책이념은 정책형성과 정책변화를 이해하는데 매우 유용하다. 행동 원칙과 인과관계에 대한 지식과 신념이 주요 내용인 정책이념은 그것이 정책참여자의 인지와 정부 제도에 배태되므로 정책목표와 정책수단의 선택, 즉 정책형성에 큰 영향을 주는 것이다. 우리나라 과학기술정책의 이념은 기술민족주의에 바탕을 두고 있는데 이것은 최근에 들어 산업경쟁력 향상의 이념으로 구체화되고 있다. 현대 과학기술기술은 점점 복잡해지고 대규모화되고 있어서 경제 발전에 기여하는 것 못지 않게 자연과 사회에 대해서 심각한 부정적인 외부효과를 가져다주고 있다. 이런 점에서 보면 산업경쟁력 이념에 지배되어 있는 우리나라 과학기술정책은 상당한 문제점을 가지고 있다. 서구 지역의 경우와 같이 우리도 산업경쟁력 이념 못지 않게 삶의 질의 향상과 같은 좀더 사회적이고 생태적인 가치를 추구하는 방향으로 과학기술정책의 변화를 모색할 필요가 있다. 이를 위해서는 국가와 기업에 의해 주도되어 온 과학기술정책의 형성에 시민사회가 적극적으로 참여하는 길이 모색되어야한다.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.96-112
• /
• 2013

The need for designing and implementing integrated policy was further emphasized in tandem with the increase in interest concerning policy coordination and interactions. An active discussion is taking place in the field of innovation policy concerning "integrated innovation policy," which considers innovation along with financial, regional development, social, and environmental policies together in a holistic manner. In Korea since the beginning of the 2000s, there were many attempts at implementing integrated innovation policy through the restructuring of the overall S&T administration system. For the purposes of taking an integrated approach to S&T policies as well as to S&T-related human resources, industrial, and regional development policies, the Roh Administration (February 2003~February 2008) elevated the S&T Minister to the level of Deputy Prime Minister as well as launching the Office of Science, Technology, and Innovation (OSTI) (October 2004 ~ February 2008) under the Ministry of Science and Technology. This study investigates the policy coordination activities of the OSTI from the perspective of policy integration. It deals with the background of the OSTI, its roles and responsibilities, the coordination process, and its achievements and limitations while discussing the important implications for developing effective policy measures with the hope of contributing to the development of theories of integrated innovation policy.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.111-137
• /
• 2017

This study analyzes a language network of Science and Technology Basic Plan, which is the basis for science and technology policy in Korea, for the next Science and Technology Basic Plan. Language network analysis was adopted for a quantitative approach measuring the trend of policies. Several techniques such as keyword analysis, language network map analysis, quantitative characteristics analysis and keyword-related major-word analysis have been performed. Results show that there are common policies emphasized by all Science and Technology Basic Plans in the past, and there are also specific policies emphasized in each period of the Science and Technology Basic Plan. These specific policies come from a 'change of times' when the Science and Technology Basic Plans were established, as well as the philosophy of the national government.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.113-149
• /
• 1997

This paper, searching for the origin of the science and technology policy, is one of the research series on the original form of current S&T policy such as origin, evolution and changing patterns. Without understanding the origin, it is very difficult to understand the evolution and the current change of the policy. To answer this question, 2 kinds of conditions are set: 4 concepts for the origin of a policy and also 4 conditions for the S&T policy itself. As the origin of a policy, 4 concepts are set such as independence, continuance, diffusion and modern state as a policy body. Also as conditions for S&T policy, there may be 4 conditions such as policy targets, policy functions, administration body and the usage of the name of the policy. S&T can be distinguished as science, technology and S&T along it's development path. There, hence, are 2 origins of science and technology policy. French policy for modern science at the late 18th century and the establishment of the Agency of Science and Technology Policy of Japan in 1956 can be pointed out as the origin of the policy. The former can be called as the origin for natural science, and the latter as the origin for S&T. This study implies that new paradigm of S&T policy is a reflection for both the needs of new S&T and social needs. When there were big problems in a society and when there appeared new S&T, they exploited new S&T vigorously. This has been remained as a rememberable monuments in the history of the S&T policy.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.70-84
• /
• 2015

The paper discusses technology platforms as an instrument of science, technology and innovation policy in light of their use in industrial R&D. The authors assert that the technology platforms approach as a policy concept refects special organizational and institutional features learned from industrial technology platforms. The characteristics of industrial technology platforms are reviewed, and their impact on the organization of research, development and innovation activities in companies is explored. Second, the industrial technology platform is examined in the context of European Technology Platforms and the recent initiative for technology platforms in Russia. Finally, the technology platform concept implications for the STI policy context are discussed.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.89-96
• /
• 2010

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.35-53
• /
• 2011

This paper originates from the questions concerning why Korea has had difficulties in boosting R&D service industries regardless of government efforts over a decade. We first review the intrinsic nature of the R&D services and set up four criteria such as establishment type, diversification of business models, coverage of client firms, and role of R&D service firms as innovation drivers and IP strategies, that will be used in interviewing and analyzing R&D service firms. Second, we carry out in-depth interviews of eighteen R&D service firms to understand business behaviors and relevant characteristics. Finally, we identify five groups of R&D service firms and conclude that differentiated polices have to be implemented according to the groups for promoting the industry effectively.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.1-32
• /
• 2018

이 논문은 2017년 현재, 우리나라에서 과학기술정책학 또는 과학기술정책 연구가 독자적인 학문 정체성을 가지고 있는가 하는 문제의식에서 수행되었다. 이를 위하여 국내에서 출판된 과학기술정책 관련 단행본 19권을 대상으로, 학문 패러다임 형성의 핵심요소인 학문적 정의와 핵심 연구범위의 논의 여부를 분석하였다. 연구결과는 현 시점에서의 우리나라 과학기술정책학은 패러다임 형성 이전의 단계에 머물러 있다는 잠정 결론을 내렸다. 이러한 결론에 근거하여 연구자들은 향후 과학기술정책학의 패러다임 완성에 필요한 학문적 정의와 연구범위를 새롭게 제안하였다. 과학기술정책학은 '과학기술 활동 및 과학기술과 관련된 정치 경제 사회 문화의 제반 현상을 연구 분석함으로써, (1) 과학기술 자체의 발전을 도모하면서 (2) 과학기술을 활용하여 국가와 공공 부문의 문제해결 능력을 높이고자 하는 정책지향적인 학문'으로 정의하였다. 과학기술 정책학의 '연구범위'는 (1) 과학기술 정책과정, (2) 과학기술 공공관리, (3) 연구관리, (4) 기술혁신의 4대 부문으로 제안하였다. 이 중에서 '과학기술 정책과정'과 '과학기술 공공관리'는 이 논문에서 제안하는 과학기술 정책학의 정의를 반영하는 새로운 내용이며, '기술혁신'과 '연구관리'는 기존 연구들도 대부분 포함하고 있는 과학기술정책학의 연구범위라고 할 수 있다.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2016

Technology supply has been the main thrust of the Korean government's science & technology policy, focusing on the development and acquisition of new technology in line with the catching-up strategy of economic growth and industrial development. However, new social or societal problems have become major government policy issues, heralding new innovation policy aimed to address them. Such new policy initiatives for social problem-solving present a niche where the existing system of government innovation policy process is challenged, including such processes as goal-setting, planning, implementation, project management, and evaluation. The rigidity of the existing institution of government innovation policy, however, still shapes the content and progression of innovation policy for social problem-solving. This study reviews Korean innovation policy for social problem-solving as a policy niche, and aims to clarify its challenges and opportunities. It uses a system transition framework to explain the emergence and evolution of the innovation policy niche in Korea. The main research question is to what extent and in what aspect the existing innovation policy regime shaped innovation policy for social problem-solving. The study examines the inertia of the current paradigm of innovation policies and R&D programs, and sheds light on the search for a distinctive identity for innovation policies that tackles social problems.