• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.44-49
• /
• 2015

Objectives: This study compared the ability of several techniques to remove calcium hydroxide (CH) from the root canal and determined the influence of CH residues on the accuracy of the electronic apex locator. Materials and Methods: Root canals of 90 human maxillary lateral incisors with confirmed true working length (TWL) were prepared and filled with CH. The teeth were randomly assigned to one of the experimental groups according to the CH removal technique (n = 14): 0.9% saline; 0.9% saline + master apical file (MAF); 17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA); 17% EDTA + MAF; 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); 5.25% NaOCl + MAF. Six teeth were used as negative control. After CH removal, the electronic working length was measured using Root-ZX (Morita Corp.) and compared with TWL to evaluate Root-ZX accuracy. All specimens were sectioned longitudinally, and the area of remaining CH (CH) and total canal area were measured using imaging software. Results: The EDTA + MAF and NaOCl + MAF groups showed better CH removal than other groups (p < 0.05). Root-ZX reliability to prevent overestimated working length to be > 85% within a tolerance of ${\pm}1.0mm$ (p < 0.05). There was strong negative correlation between amount of CH residues and EAL accuracy (r = -0.800 for ${\pm}0.5mm$; r = -0.940 for ${\pm}1.0mm$). Conclusions: The mechanical instrumentation improves the CH removal of irrigation solutions although none of the techniques removed the dressing completely. Residues of CH medication in root canals affected the accuracy of Root-ZX adversely.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.289-299
• /
• 1996

It is necessary to measure the length of a root canal in order to attain a satisfactory prognosis after root canal therapy. There are several methods for determining root canal length, such as tactile sensation by the dental practitioner, the utilization of x-ray film, and electronic root canal measurement. Among these, the electrical measurement methods, in which the impedence between the oral mucous membrane and periodontal membrane is determined, have advantages of simplicity and accuracy. During root canal treatment, the root canal contains a solution of high electrical conductivity such as pus, blood, sodium hypochlorite and so on. Recently a new electronic root canal measurement device of frequency-dependent type has been developed, which is capable of measuring the length of root canal under moist conditions. Endex and Root ZX, which are frequency-dependent type, were evaluated for accuracy of measuring root canal length in vivo by stereomicroscope. The result were as follows ; 1. 82.5% of Endex and 87.5% of Root ZX measured in the range of ${\pm}0.5$ mm from the apical foramen and both showed 57.5 % in the range of 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm. 2. Endex showed significantly higher accuracy in vital teeth than nonvital teeth(p<0.05). But in case of Root ZX, there was no significant difference between vital and nonvital teeth. 3. As a result of this study, there was no significant difference in accuracy between Endex and Root ZX, and both devices showed file passes the apical foramen in more than half of the cases, and it is thought that this must be considered clinically.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제31권5호
• /
• pp.390-397
• /
• 2006

이번 연구는 서로 다른 4개의 전자근관장측정기의 정확성을 측정하고 각각 0.5지점과 Apex지점에서의 일관성을 비교하고자 하였다. 40개의 발치된 상하악 소구치를 대상으로 치수강 개방 후 alginate model에 고정시키고 근관장을 측정하였다. 사용된 전자근관장측정기는 Root ZX (Merits, Tokyo, Japan), SmarPex (META, Seoul, Korea). Elements Diagnostic Unit (SybronEndo, CA, USA), E-Magic Finder Deluxe (S-Denti, Seoul, Korea)이다. 먼저 모든 치아에서 4개의 전자근관장측정기를 사용하여 0.5지점과 Apex지점에서 근관장을 측정하여 한 치아당 8개의 측정값을 얻었다. 다음으로 치아를 각 전자근관장측정기당 10개씩 4개의 그룹으로 나누어, 각각 제조사의 지시대로 Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit 및 E-Magic Finder Deluxe는 "0.5"지점에서, SmarPex는 "Apex"지점에서 file을 치아에 cement로 고정시켰다. 이후 치근단부 4 mm를 삭제하여 100배율의 Image Proplus로 관찰하여 file 끝에서 주근단공의 외연까지의 실제거리를 측정한 후, 4개의 전자근관장측정기의 0.5지점 및 Apex지점에서 file끝과 주근단공 사이의 거리를 계산하여 비교하였다. 그 결과 Root ZX와 E-Magic Finder는 실험군 100%, SmarPex는 90%, Elements Diagnostic Unit는 70%에서 주근단공과의 거리가 임상적 허용범위인 ${\pm}0.5 mm$이내에 있었다. 또한 각 전자근관장측정기 마다 0.5지점과 Apex지점에서의 근관장의 표준편차와 사분위 범위를 구하여 두 지점간의 일관성을 비교한 결과, Root ZX, E-Magic Finder는 0.5지점과 Apex지점에서 비슷한 일관성을 보였으며 SmarPex와 Elements Diagnostic unit는 Apex지점에서 0.5지점보다 더 높은 일관성을 보였다. 전자근관장측정기는 근관 내의 조건에 관계없이 근첨협착부에서 항상 일정한 거리를 재현해 낼 수 있는 일관성이 중요하므로, 이렇게 0.5지점 또는 Apex지점에서의 일관성이 증명된다면 실제 임상에서 사용할 때 전자근관장에서 일정한 거 리를 가감하여 사용할 수 있다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.578-584
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this experiment was to determine: (1) the safe automatic apical reverse setting that prevents overinstrumentation of the root canal, using Tri Auto ZX$^{(R)}$ and (2) the effect of various irrigant on such instrumentation. The instrumentation was carried out with the automatic apical reverse setting of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. The root canal irrigants used in usual manner were normal saline(0.9%), NaOCl(2.5%), and RC Prep$^{(R)}$. For each reverse setting and each irrigant, ten teeth were used with the total of 120 teeth. The distance between the file tip and the apical constriction was determined by stereomicroscope using the point that the file began to rotate in reverse direction. When the reverse setting mode was set to 0.5, 18 of 30 were overinstrumented. If these were discriminated by irrigant, 10 of 6 with 0.9% saline, 10 of 6 with NaOCl, and 10 of 6 with RC Prep$^{(R)}$ has the file tip located 0.57${\pm}$0.30mm, 0.73${\pm}$0.39mm, and 0.26${\pm}$0.25mm beyond the apical constriction respectively. In 1.0 setting 15 of 29 were over the apical constriction, and the distribution was 6 in saline, 5 in NaOCl, and 4 in RC Prep$^{(R)}$. The mean distance over the apical constriction was 0.28${\pm}$0.13mm with saline, 0.75${\pm}$0.61mm with NaOCl, and 0.25${\pm}$0.17mm with RC Prep$^{(R)}$. When the autoatic reverse mode was set to 1.5, and 2.0, 5, and 1 teeth were found to be overinstrumented in respective settings. But there were large variations in overinstrumented distances when an attempt was made to compare the effect of irrigants on this overinstrumentations and they were meaningless for the small sample size. When all of the autoreverse setting were combined to compare the number of overinstrumented teeth with each irrigant, there were no significant differences (14 for normal saline, 12 for NaOCl, 13 for RC Prep$^{(R)}$). When 0.5 or 1.0 automatic apical reverse setting mode was used the Tri Auto ZX$^{(R)}$ in clinical application, the possibility of overinstrumentation beyond the apical constriction exists in 55.9% of cases. Therefore 1.5 or 2.0 setting is safer for the preparation inside the canal but this type setting needs additional apical hand preparation of the root canal because the accuracy is lower than 0.5 or 1.0 setting.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.20-27
• /
• 2008

정확한 근관장 측정은 성공적인 근관치료를 위해 필수적이다. Kuttler는 근관협착부는 주근단공에서 0.5 mm 상방에 위치한다고 하였고 Lee는 상아백악질 경계점부위보다 주근단공이 재현성이 높고 임상적으로 관찰하기 용이하다고 보고하였다. 본 연구는 alginate model상에서 2개의 전자근관장측정기를 사용하여 얻은 측정치의 정확성(accuracy)을 평가하고 각각 0.5 mark와 Apex mark 중에서 어느 지점에서 더 일관성(consistency)을 보이는지를 비교하고 또한 근관장을 측정할 때 파일을 전진시키면서 Apex mark를 측정한 값과 치근단부위를 지나친 후 다시 후퇴하면서 측정한 값의 차이를 비교하고자 하였다. 52개의 발거된 건전한 제 1, 2소구치를 대상으로 하였으며 Root ZX와 E-Magic Finder Deluxe를 이용하여 각각 26개중 13개는 파일을 전진하면서 0.5 mark에서 근관장을 측정하고 Apex mark에서 근관장을 측정한 후 0.5 mark에서 고정하였다. 나머지 13개는 0.5 mark에서 근관장을 측정한 후 Apex mark에서 근관장을 측정하고 다시 치근단 부위를 넘어선 후 후퇴하면서 Apex mark에서 근관장을 측정하고 고정한 후 치근단부 4 mm를 삭제하여 현미경상에서 파일 끝부터 주근단공까지의 거리를 측정하였다. 그 결과 Root ZX와 E-Magic Finder 모두, 실험군 100%에서 주근단공과 file tip간의 거리가 임상적 허용범위인 ${\pm}0.5\;mm$내에 있었으며 0.5 mark보다 Apex mark에서 더 높은 일관성을 보였다. 주근단공에서 fie tip사이의 거리는 Root ZX의 0.5 mark에서 -0.18 mm, Apex mark에서 -0.07 mm이고 E-Magic Finder의 0.5 mark에서 -0.25 mm, Apex mark에서 -0.02 mm를 나타내었다. Apex hand는 0.04 mm였다. 따라서 Alginate model을 사용한 본 실험조건에서는 Apex mark에서 근관장을 측정한 결과 거의 주근단공과 일치하고 다른 여러 연구에서 주근단공에서 0.5 mm상방에 근관협착부가 위치한다고 보고하였으므로 임상적인 측면에서 Apex mark에서 측정한 근관장에서 0.5 mm를 빼서 근관장으로 사용하는 것이 임상적으로 더 좋으리라고 사료된다.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제35권5호통권336호
• /
• pp.322-327
• /
• 1997

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제42권3호
• /
• pp.200-205
• /
• 2017

Objectives: The aim of this in vivo study was to assess the accuracy of 2 third-generation electronic apex locators (EALs), Propex II (Dentsply Maillefer) and Root ZX II (J. Morita), and radiographic technique for locating the major foramen (MF). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two premolars with single canals that required extraction were included. Following anesthesia, access, and initial canal preparation with size 10 and 15 K-flex files and SX and S1 rotary ProTaper files, the canals were irrigated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. The length of the root canal was verified 3 times for each tooth using the 2 apex locators and once using the radiographic technique. Teeth were extracted and the actual WL was determined using size 15 K-files under a ${\times}25$ magnification. The Biostat 4.0 program (AnalystSoft Inc.) was used for comparing the direct measurements with those obtained using radiographic technique and the apex locators. Pearson's correlation analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for statistical analyses. Results: The measurements obtained using the visual method exhibited the strongest correlation with Root ZX II (r = 0.94), followed by Propex II (r = 0.90) and Ingle's technique (r = 0.81; p < 0.001). Descriptive statistics using ANOVA (Tukey's post hoc test) revealed significant differences between the radiographic measurements and both EALs measurements (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both EALs presented similar accuracy that was higher than that of the radiographic measurements obtained with Ingle's technique. Our results suggest that the use of these EALs for MF location is more accurate than the use of radiographic measurements.

• Journal of Korean Dental Science
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.52-58
• /
• 2020

Purpose: Using two types of electronic apex locators, this study aimed to investigate the differences in accuracy according to the evaluator and equipment. Materials and Methods: Artificial teeth of the lower first premolars and two mandibular acrylic models (A and B) were used in this study. In the artificial teeth, the pulp chamber was opened and the access cavity was prepared. Using calibrated digital Vernier calipers, the distance from the top of the cavity and the root apex was measured to assess the actual distance between two artificial teeth. The evaluation was conducted by 20 dentists, and each evaluator repeated measurements for each electronic apex locator five times. The difference between the actual distance from the top of the cavity to the root apex and the distance measured using electronic measuring equipment was compared. For statistical analysis, the Friedman test the Mann-Whitney U-test were conducted and the differences between groups were analyzed (α=0.05). Result: As for the accuracy of measurement according to the two types of electronic apex locators, the value of the measurement error was 0.4753 mm in Dentaport ZX and 0.3321 mm in E-Cube Plus. Moreover, electronic apex locators Dentaport ZX and E-Cube Plus showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05). As for the difference in the accuracy of the two types of electronic apex locators according to the evaluator, the resulting values differed depending on the evaluator and showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Conclusion: Electronic apex locator E-Cube Plus showed higher accuracy than did Dentaport ZX. Nevertheless, both types of electronic apex locators showed 100% accuracy in finding the region within root apex ±0.5 mm zone. Furthermore, according to the evaluator, the two electronic apex locators showed different resulting values.

• 대한치과보존학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보존학회 2007년도 Autumn Scientific Meeting(the 128th) of Korean Academy of Comservative Dentistry
• /
• pp.622-622
• /
• 2007

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.6-11
• /
• 2016

Objectives: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of working length (WL) determination of four electronic apex locators (EALs), namely, Root ZX (RZX), Elements diagnostic unit and apex locator (ELE), SybronEndo Mini Apex locator (MINI) and Propex pixi (PIXI) using Stainless steel (SS) and nickel-titanium (NiTi) hand files. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between canal length determination by SS and NiTi files of 4 EALs. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted, single rooted human teeth were decoronated and the canal orifice flared. The actual length (AL) was assessed visually, and the teeth were embedded in an alginate model. The electronic length (EL) measurements were recorded with all four EALs using SS and NiTi files at '0.5' reading on display. The differences between the AL and EL were compared. Results: The results obtained with each EAL with SS and NiTi files were compared with AL. A paired sample t test showed that there was a statistical significant difference between EAL readings with SS and NiTi files for RZX and MINI (p < 0.05). The accuracy of RZX, ELE, MINI and PIXI within ${\pm}0.5 mm$ of AL with SS/NiTi files were 93.3%/70%, 90%/91.7%, 95%/68.3%, and 83.3%/83.3%, respectively. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that Root ZX was statistically more accurate with NiTi files compared to SS files, while MINI was statistically more accurate with SS files compared to NiTi files. ELE and PIXI were not affected by the alloy type of the file used to determine WL.