• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.979-988
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 간호사들이 인식한 안전 분위기와 업무환경을 포함한 조직의 특성과 투약오류보고장애요인간의 관련성을 검증하기 위한 연구이다. 수정된 안전 분위기, 업무환경, 투약오류보고장애 문항을 활용하여 7개 병원의 334명의 간호사들을 대상으로 하여 조사하였다. 자료수집기간은 2012년 9월 한달 간이었고, 서술적 통계, Pearson correlation coefficient, canonical correlation을 적용하였다. 조직의 특성은 투약오류보고장애와 세 가지 유의한 상관이 있었다. 첫 번째 정준상관계수는 .50(Wilks' ${\lambda}$=0.61, df=32, p<.001)이었고, 두 번째는 .35(Wilks' ${\lambda}$=0.81, df=21, p<.001), 세 번째는 .22(Wilks' ${\lambda}$=0.93, df=12, p=.018)이었다. 첫 번째 정준상관은 높은 안전 분위기와 업무환경이 오류보고에의 두려움을 제외한 투약오류보고와 관련이 있었다. 두 번째 식은 '의료인간의 안전 분위기'의 높은 지각과 높은 '병원에의 간호사 참여'와 '인적 자원의 적절성'은 낮은 '불안감'과 '행정자들의 반응'과 관련이 있었다. 투약오류보고장애를 위한 전략과 안전 분위기와 업무환경과 같은 조직의 특성의 진보가 적용되어야 한다.

• 동의신경정신과학회지
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.143-156
• /
• 2022

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of reporting for case reports published in Journal of Oriental Neuropsychiatry from year 2018 to 2021 compared with year 2013 to 2017 in order to recommend ways to improve the quality of case reports published in the future. Methods: To evaluate the quality of case reports identified by electronic searching in Oriental medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS) and by hand searching from archives on peer review system of Journal of Oriental Neuropsychiatry using CAse REport (CARE) guideline. The researcher assessed the quality of reporting based on the CARE guideline as 'Sufficient', 'Not-Sufficient', 'Not-Applicable', and 'Not-Reported' for case reports published from 2018 to 2021 in Journal of Oriental Neuropsychiatry. In addition, it was compared with previous case reports published from 2013 to 2017. Results: Finally, 17 case reports were included for the assessment. General quality of reporting for case reports published from year 2018 to 2021 was improved compared with that of previous case reports published in 2018. The maximum value (46.4%→60.7%, 14.3% increase), the minimum value (22.2%→32.1%, 9.9% increase), and the median value (39.3%→50.0%, 10.7% increase) of the report rate evaluated as 'Sufficient' were generally improved. The maximum value (53.6%→50.0%, 3.6% decrease), minimum value (25.9%→21.4%, 4.5% decrease), and median value (35.7%→32.1%, 3.6% decrease) of the report rate evaluated as 'Not-Sufficient', the maximum value of the report rate evaluated as 'Not-reported' (40.7%→25.9%, 14.8% decrease), the minimum value (14.7%→10.7% decrease), and the intermediate value (14.7% decrease) were also generally improved. Four items (8b, 8d, 10c, and 13) were evaluated as 'Not-Reported'. These items seem to be items that need urgent improvement along with 8c, which showed a significant decrease in reporting rate. Conclusions: There are needs to improve the quality of case reports in Journal of Oriental Neuropsychiatry by comparing case reports published from year 2013 to 2017 with case reports published from year 2018 to 2021. To improve the quality of case reporting, sufficient education at the academic level should be provided on thesis preparation methods. It is also necessary to develop a tool for evaluating the quality of case reporting that reflects characteristics of Korean Medicine.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제22권10호
• /
• pp.1587-1593
• /
• 2021

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제25권8호
• /
• pp.687-690
• /
• 2024

• 한국식품위생안전성학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.203-208
• /
• 2012

식품안전사건의 보도에 사용되는 용어의 차이가 risk communication에 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위해 18가지 주요 식품안전사건에 대한 자료를 수집하고, 전문가 설문조사를 통해 각 사건의 보도에 사용된 용어의 차이를 비교 분석하였다. 주요 식품안전사건의 자료를 수집하여 분석한 결과, 정부, 지자체, 언론 및 소비자 단체가 사건의 보도에 사용한 용어의 불일치는 사건을 확대시키고, 사회경제적 손실에 큰 영향을 주는 것으로 판단되었다. 전문가 설문조사 결과, 보도 및 대응용어의 파급효과차이 정도와 소비자가 느끼는 두 용어의 차이 정도에서 과자 아토피 유발 사건, 포르말린 통조림 사건, 고름우유 사건, 불량만두 사건 등 높은 순위를 차지한 사건들이 유사하게 나타났으며, 이 둘의 상관관계를 분석한 결과 상관계수가 0.865로 높은 정의 상관관계를 보였다. 따라서 보도에 사용되는 용어에 따라 사건의 파급효과가 크게 영향을 받는 것으로 판단되고, 사건보도 시 용어의 표준화가 필요한 것으로 판단되었다. 본 조사 결과는 정부, 기업, 소비자간 성공적인 risk communication 방안 마련을 위한 기초자료로 사용될 수 있을 것이다.

• Korean Journal of Acupuncture
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.1-23
• /
• 2010

Objectives and methods : The Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) were published in five journals in 2001 and 2002. These guidelines, in the form of a checklist and explanations for use by authors and journal editors, were designed to improve reporting of acupuncture trials, particularly the interventions, thereby facilitating their interpretation and replication. Subsequent reviews of the application and impact of STRICTA have highlighted the value of STRICTA as well as scope for improvements and revision. To manage the revision process a collaboration between the STRICTA Group, the CONSORT Group, and the Chinese Cochrane Centre was developed in 2008. An expert panel with 47 participants was convened that provided electronic feedback on a revised draft of the checklist. At a subsequent face-to-face meeting in Freiburg, a group of 21 participants further revised the STRICTA checklist and planned dissemination. Results : The new STRICTA checklist, which is an official extension of CONSORT, includes six items and 17 sub-items. These set out reporting guidelines for the acupuncture rationale, the details of needling, the treatment regimen, other components of treatment, the practitioner background, and the control or comparator interventions. In addition, and as part of this revision process, the explanations for each item have been elaborated, and examples of good reporting for each item are provided. In addition, the word "controlled" in STRICTA is replaced by "clinical", to indicate that STRICTA is applicable to a broad range of clinical evaluation designs, including uncontrolled outcome studies and case reports. Conclusions : It is intended that the revised STRICTA, in conjunction with both the main CONSORT Statement and extension for nonpharmacologic treatment, will raise the quality of reporting of clinical trials of acupuncture.

• Korean Journal of Acupuncture
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.131-144
• /
• 2020

Objectives : The aim of this study is to analyze the details of acupuncture treatment methods and the reporting quality of acupuncture on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS). Methods : Search was conducted in Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for acupuncture studies on CTS. The reporting quality of acupuncture treatment was assessed using the following guidelines: Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) for analyzing the method of acupuncture treatment, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) for analyzing study design and study process, and Risk of Bias (ROB) for analyzing bias. The number of reported items was calculated and evaluated as a proportion. The reported proportion of each study was classified into three grades: Grade A (% score ≥75), Grade B (50≤ % score <75), and Grade C (% score <50). Results : A total of 9 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) were included in this study. All trials reported 12 items (66.67%) on average in STRICTA guidelines. Five studies were conducted with manual acupuncture and 3 studies were conducted with electroacupuncture. PC7 (Daereung) was most frequently used to treat CTS. In STRICTA guideline evaluation, 3 studies were classified as Grade A, 5 studies were classified as Grade B, and 1 study was classified as Grade C. In the CONSORT statement assessment, all trials reported an average of 20.56 items. Of the 9 RCTs, 6 studies were classified as Grade B and 3 studies were classified as Grade C. In ROB assessment, most studies showed a low (63.49%) or unclear (26.98%) risk of bias. The selective reporting bias and the incomplete outcome data bias were found to have the lowest risk of bias, and the allocation concealment of selection bias was found to have the most unclear risk of bias. Conclusions : Recent acupuncture studies on CTS showed moderate reporting quality. However, more detailed reports on acupuncture are still needed to establish more solid evidence of acupuncture treatment.

• 대한예방한의학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.67-76
• /
• 2019

Objectives : The publication of systematic reviews (SRs) has increased significantly over the years, and systematic reviews are considered to have the strongest evidence as they are at the top of the hierarchy of evidence pyramid. In this study, a thorough assessment of all SRs published in Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine (JSPKM) was performed to evaluate their reporting quality and methodological quality to better improve the quality of SRs in JSPKM. Methods : JSPKM website was searched to include all SRs published in JSPKM from 1997 to 2018. Two independent researchers assessed the SRs using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR, formerly known as Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) tool checklist for methodological quality assessment, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline checklist for reporting quality assessment. Results : Out of 618 published articles published in JSPKM from 1997 to 2018, only 3 SRs were identified as SRs. For AMSTAR methodological quality scoring, the average score of 3 SRs was 3.0 out of 11 which is low quality level. For PRISMA reporting quality items, the 3 SRs reported 17.3 items on average out of 27 items. The 3 identified SRs did not provide information on protocol or registration which is included in both AMSTAR assessment tool and PRISMA guideline. Conclusions : Improvements on reporting quality and methodological quality of SRs using relevant tools or guidelines are needed to assure the quality of SRs published in JSPKM so that their conclusions will be more transparent and reliable for decision-making in healthcare and the best clinical practice.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.172-181
• /
• 2022

Objectives: In order to reduce the burden on employers and increase the reliability of measurement results, improvements to the provisions related to the work environment measurement reporting system, such as the current Occupational Safety and Health Act and its Enforcement Rules, are planned. This study aimed to suggest improvements for the work environment measurement reporting system through a survey and Delphi investigation. Method: This survey included workplaces (health managers), national institutions (the Ministry of Employment and Labor) that use the results of the work environment measurement reporting system for policy and supervision purposes, and work environment measurement institutions that enter the results were included. In addition to the survey, we tried to derive results through meetings with stakeholders and expert advisory meetings. Results: It is difficult to abolish or partially improve the reporting system under the Enforcement Regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act at this point because the opinions of workplaces, supervisory agencies, and measuring agencies differ in terms of its intended purpose and use. In the case of high-exposure harmful factors (over 50% on the basis of exposure) in the "comprehensive opinion" described in the work environment measurement results table, it is necessary to insert unit of work with exposed harmful factors, exposure factors, and current conditions in checklists or tables so that they can be reflected in government policies. In the case of workplaces that are feared to be highly exposed to substances subject to measurement, it seems desirable to improve them so that industrial health instructors registered with the Korea Safety and Health Agency or local labor offices can provide technical guidance. As an improvement plan to increase the reliability of data and the use of big data, it is necessary to improve the input method for processes and jobs. Conclusion: The laws and regulations of the work environment measurement reporting system are difficult to revise due to a lack of consensus among current stakeholders, but improvements can be achieved by improving the Ministry of Employment and Labor's notifications and other means. In addition, in order to effectively utilize the data from the K2B system, it is necessary to improve the input method for processes and jobs.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.111-117
• /
• 2011

PC 사용을 제어하고 관리하기 위하여 각 PC에서 실행하는 프로세스를 모니터링하는 시스템에 대한 연구는 여러 형태로 이루어져 왔다. 그러나 다수 PC에서 각 PC의 실행 프로세스를 모니터링하고 파일로 레포팅하는 방식의 시스템에 대한 연구는 찾아보기 어려운 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 다수 PC 환경에서 각 PC를 모니터링하고 서버로 파일 레포팅하고, 레포팅 정보를 수합 정리하는 기능을 갖는 시스템을 설계 및 구현하고자 한다. 본 연구의 시스템을 이용할 경우 각 PC를 사용하는 학습자는 실행 프로세스가 관리자에게 레포팅된다는 것을 인지하게 되어 불필요한 프로세스 실행을 자제하는 효과를 가져올 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.