• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.101-104
• /
• 1995

High Dose Rate Remote Afterloading system was installed at Wonkwang University Hospital in January 1994. In this report, the calibration of a Gammamed 12-i High Dose Rate Remote Afterloading system and the radiation survey around the facility after design and construct a shieding room are discussed. The radiation survey of the facility indicates that the use of ordinary concrete shielding of existing room will provide adequate shielding. Also, the methodologies for performing source calibration are presented.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.213-217
• /
• 2021

Background: Radiation exposure can occur as a result of occupational activities utilizing sources of radiation. The average level of occupational exposure is generally similar to the global average, but some workers receive more than this. In this study, the occupational exposure data for workers in Korea to check the recent trend of radiation exposure. Materials and Methods: The data collection and analysis are carried out by two separate periods based on the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) survey. One is the year 2003 to 2014 for a recent survey, and the other is 2015 to 2019. All available data were collected by annual reports from radiation dose registry organizations. Results and Discussion: The annual dose over the record level to the total workers did not change much compared with the total increasing number of workers in this period. The dose to the nuclear fuel cycle field has a tendency to decrease. It resulted from the efforts of radiation dose reduction with high technology introduced to this area. Also, it is important result that the radiation dose to the workers in radiography is remarkably reduced. Conclusion: The number of radiation workers and average doses were analyzed for occupational categories in Korea. It still needs cooperative efforts between the dose registry organizations for the efficient dose management of Korean radiation workers.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.1313-1323
• /
• 2016

To study the full health effects of parental radiation exposure on the children of the atomic bomb survivors, the Radiation Effects Research Foundation developed a cohort of 76,814 children born to atomic bomb survivors (F1 generation) to assess cancer incidence and mortality from common adult diseases. In analyzing radiation-associated health information, it is important to be able to adjust for sociodemographic and lifestyle variations that may affect health. In order to gain this and other background information on the F1 cohort and to determine willingness to participate in a related clinical study, the F1 Mail Survey Questionnaire was designed with questions corresponding to relevant health, sociodemographic, and lifestyle indicators. Between the years 2000 and 2006, the survey was sent to a subset of the F1 Mortality Cohort. A total of 16,183 surveys were completed and returned: 10,980 surveys from Hiroshima residents and 5,203 from Nagasaki residents. The response rate was 65.6%, varying somewhat across parental exposure category, city, gender, and year of birth. Differences in health and lifestyle were noted in several variables on comparison across city and gender. No major differences in health, lifestyle, sociodemographics, or disease were seen across parental exposure categories, though statistically significant tests for heterogeneity and linear trend revealed some possible changes with dose. The data described herein provide a foundation for studies in the future.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.205-211
• /
• 2017

Background: Radiation is used in a variety of areas, but it also poses potential risks. Although radiation is often used with great effectiveness in many applications, people perceive potential risks associated with radiation and feel anxious about the possibility of radiation exposure. Various methods of measuring radiation doses have been developed, but there is no way for the general public to measure their doses with ease. Currently, many people use smartphones, which provide information about the location of an individual phone through network connections. If a smartphone application could be developed for measuring radiation dosage, it would be a very effective way to measure individuals' radiation doses. Thus, we conducted a survey study to assess the social acceptance of such a technology by the general public and their intent to use that technology to measure radiation doses, as well as to investigate whether such an intention is correlated with anxiety and attitudes toward the use of radiation. Materials and Methods: A nationwide online survey was conducted among 355 Koreans who were 20 years old or older. Results and Discussion: Significant differences were found between the genders in attitudes, perceptions of radiation risk, and fears of exposure to radiation. However, a significant difference according to age was observed only in the intent to use a smartphone dose measurement application. Attitudes towards the use of radiation exerted a negative effect on radiation risk perception and exposure anxiety, whereas attitudes towards the use of radiation, risk perception, and anxiety about exposure were found to have a positive impact on the intent to use a smartphone application for dose measurements. Conclusion: A survey-based study was conducted to investigate how the general public perceives radiation and to examine the acceptability of a smartphone application as a personal dose monitoring device. If such an application is developed, it could be used not only to monitor an individual's dose, but also to contribute to radiation safety information infrastructure by mapping radiation in different areas, which could be utilized as a useful basis for radiation research.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.104-115
• /
• 2017

Background: C-arm fluoroscopy equipment is important for interventional pain management and can cause radiation injury to physicians and patients. We compared radiation safety education and efforts to reduce the radiation exposure of pain specialists. Methods: A survey of 49 pain specialists was conducted anonymously in 2016. The questionnaire had 16 questions. That questionnaire was about radiation safety knowledge and efforts to reduce exposure. We investigated the correlation between radiation safety education and efforts of radiation protection. We compared the results from 2016 and a published survey from 2011. Results: According to the 2016 survey, all respondents used C-arm fluoroscopy in pain interventions. Nineteen respondents (39%) had received radiation safety education. Physicians had insufficient knowledge about radiation safety. When the radiation safety education group and the non-education group are compared, there was no significant difference in efforts to reduce radiation exposure and radiation safety knowledge. When the 2011 and 2016 surveys were compared, the use of low dose mode (P = 0.000) and pulsed mode had increased significantly (P = 0.001). The number checking for damage to radiation protective garments (P = 0.000) and use of the dosimeter had also increased significantly (P = 0.009). But there was no significant difference in other efforts to reduce radiation exposure. Conclusions: Pain physicians seem to lack knowledge of radiation safety and the number of physicians receiving radiation safety education is low. According to this study, education does not lead to practice. Therefore, pain physicians should receive regular radiation safety education and the education should be mandatory.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제54권2호
• /
• pp.449-455
• /
• 2022

The rapid rise in the application of novel treatment techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), motivated us to survey the status of Korea's radiation safety management and the shielding designs of facilities employing medical linear accelerators (LINACs). To this end, a questionnaire was used to collect information on LINAC facilities and treatments, workload, shielding design, shielding management, and path of obtaining shielding information. Out of 100 domestic institutions, 52 responded to the survey. Approximately 70% of the institutions utilized IMRT for more than 60% of their cases, and an IMRT factor of 5 was adopted by 75% of these institutions. Over 80% of the institutions accounted for the applied time-averaged dose rate per week and instantaneous dose equivalent rates in their shielding designs. Approximately 45% of the institutions obtained important shielding information via a radiation shielding design company and the NCRP-151 report. Overall, most facilities were shown to follow the standards recommended by the relevant international agencies. However, the requirement to establish standardized shielding design information and clarify ambiguous paths for information acquisition was also highlighted. Therefore, the study's results can be used as a foundation for establishing a safety control system and for creating adequate shielding designs.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.46-53
• /
• 2016

치료장비의 정확한 정도관리를 위해서는 선량측정기의 주기적 교정이 중요하다. 국내 방사선종양학과에서 사용하는 교정대상 측정기는 이온전리함, 온도계, 기압계 및 서베이미터 등이 있다. 현재 국내 교정기관에서 권고하고 있는 교정 유효 기간은 6개월에서 1년이나 최근 제조사 및 외국 교정기관에서는 2년의 유효기간을 제시하고 있다. 따라서 측정기의 특성에 따른 가장 합리적인 교정주기의 설정이 필요한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 ILAC-G24 지침서(2) 등을 기반으로 국내 방사선종양학과에서 사용하는 측정기들의 최적의 교정주기를 설정하기 위한 기초단계로 불확도, 측정기의 사용 빈도, 사용 방법, 장비의 안정도 등을 조사하여 향후 측정장비의 적절한 유효 기간 도출의 기본 자료로 활용하고자 한다. 조사 방법은 온라인 설문조사도구인 SurveyMonkey를 이용하였으며 조상대상은 전국의 18개의 대학병원으로 이중 15개 기관에서 응답하였다. 설문조사 질의 내용은 작성자 정보, 온도계, 기압계, 서베이미터, 기준이온전리함, 소조사면 측정장비 및 근접치료용 우물형 전리함으로 구성하였고 총 64문항으로 모두 응답시 약 50분간의 시간이 소요된다. 조사대상의 과반수 기관에서 온도계와 기압계의 교정을 실시하지 않는 것으로 조사되었다. 반면 서베이미터는 6개월에서 1년 정도로 교정주기가 비교적 짧았다. 본 조사를 바탕으로 측정장치별 최적의 교정주기를 결정할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제37권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2012

2011년 3월 11일 발생한 일본 후쿠시마 원전 사고 1주년을 계기로 한국 국민의 방사선 인식도를 조사하고자 하였다. 연구 방법론적 설계는 양적 조사로 하고, 빈도 분석을 하였다. 분석 대상은 전국에서 무작위로 추출한 일반인으로부터 수거한 설문 응답지 2754부이다. 연구 도구는 설문지이며, 직접 배포한 뒤 수거하였다. 설문은 40문항으로 구성하였으며, 하위영역별 크론바하 알파(Cronbach's ${\alpha}$) 계수는 '방사선의 자아인식' 0.620, '방사선의 위험' 0.830, '방사선의 편익' 0.781, '방사선의 관리' 0.685, '방사선의 정보원' 0.831, '후쿠시마 사고의 영향 정도' 0.763으로 모두 높게 나타났다. 설문 분석 결과 응답자의 방사선 개념에 대한 지식은 100점 만점 환산 평균 69.5점이며, 이는 자신들이 '방사선에 대해 잘 알고 있다'고 응답한 비율 53.7%, '보통 알고 있다'는 응답이 37.4%인 것과는 상당히 다른 결과다. '방사선이 위험하다'고 느끼는 중요 원인 중 하나는 '방사선에 노출되면 지금은 아니더라도 다음 세대에 문제가 생길 수 있기 때문'(66.1%)으로 분석됐다. 방사선에 대한 정부 발표를 믿지 못하는 응답자가 41%에 이르러 정부에 대한 불신이 높았다. 후쿠시마 원전 사고 때문에 원전을 운영하지 말아야 한다는 쪽으로 생각을 바꾼 응답자도 39.5%나 됐다. 본 연구는 후쿠시마 원전 사고 이후 방사선에 대한 한국 국민의 인식을 처음 조사한 것으로 그 의의가 크다. 향후 방사선에 대한 정부의 정책 수립에도 크게 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.93-98
• /
• 2022

Background: This study aims to derive the characteristics of each work type for industrial radiography based on empirical evidence through expert advice and a survey of radiation workers of various types of industrial radiography. Materials and Methods: According to a Korean report, work types of industrial radiography are classified into indoor tests, underground pipe tests, tests in a shielded room (radiographic testing [RT] room test), outdoor field tests, and outdoor large structure tests. For each work type, exposure geometry and radiation sources were mainly identified through the expert advice and workers' survey as reliable empirical evidence. Results and Discussion: The expert advice and survey results were consistent as the proportion of the work types were high in the order of RT room test, outdoor large structure test, underground pipe test, outdoor field test, and indoor test. The outdoor large structure test is the highest exposure risk work type in the industrial radiography. In most types of industrial radiography, radiation workers generally used ¹⁹²Ir as the main source. In the results of the survey, the portion of sources was high in the order of ¹⁹²Ir, X-ray generator, ⁶⁰Co, and ⁷⁵Se. As the exposure geometry, the antero-posterior geometry is dominant, and the rotational and isotropic geometry should be also considered with the work type. Conclusion: In this study, through expert advice and a survey, the external exposure characteristics for each work type of industrial radiography workers were derived. This information will be used in the reconstruction of organ dose for health effects assessment of Korean radiation workers.

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제41권5호
• /
• pp.479-485
• /
• 2018

Radiologic technologists working at the second and third medical institutions are classified as radiation-related workers and radiation workers according to their working departments, and are subject to double regulation by the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Nuclear Safety Commission. We will try to understand the system of dualization and to understand the investigation of recognition. The dualized system of radiation-related workers and radiation workers includes the difference in name and terminology, the effective dose limit, the maintenance education and training of radiologic technologists, the period of medical examination, the radiation zone, dose of the woman whose pregnancy is confirmed in radiologic technologists, the qualification criteria of the safety officer, and the period of the regular inspection of the radiological equipment. In the questionnaire survey on the dualization system, there were various items showing significant differences between the radiation-related workers and radiation workers Overall, the radiation workers were more aware of the radiation workers' education and related terms than the radiation-related workers.