• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2008.10a
• /
• pp.293-296
• /
• 2008

국제공동연구는 공동연구를 실시하기 전에 연구가 필요한 기술을 우선 정하고 기술을 보유한 국가나 기관을 선정하여 도입하고자 하는 기술이나 서로 보완관계로 공동연구가 가능한지 아니면 도입방식의 공동연구를 추진해야 하는지를 검토하여 세부적인 기술을 정하여 국제공동연구를 추진할 필요가 있다. 본 논문에서는 독일 등 우리나라의 국제공동연구 사례를 분석하면서 바람직한 국제공동연구 추진방안을 제시하였다. 즉, 외국과 공동 연구개발을 추진하는 경우에는 공동연구 대상기관이 어떠한 원천기술을 보유하고 있는데 그 기술의 가치가 무엇인지 따져보고 국내나 다른 나라들은 없는지 확인하여 필요한 기술이라면 도입여건을 검토하여 추진하여야 한다. 기술의 포괄적인 포장이나 애매한 협력은 불필요한 예산과 인력 투입등 비용을 유발하고 관련기관간의 신뢰를 심각하게 저해할 우려가 있다. 따라서 기술내용과 역할 등에 대해서 세분화하여 명확히 하는 것이 필요하다.

• Journal of Korea Game Society
• /
• v.10 no.5
• /
• pp.51-63
• /
• 2010

This paper investigates the innovative capabilities of the leading company in the Korean online games industry, 'NCsoft'. The company is analyzed with the three types of innovation capabilities such as the capability to manage core competencies, the capability to integrate internal and external knowledge source, and the capability to build innovation policy/strategy. This paper concludes with suggesting the future strategies of the NCsoft by each capability.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.160-183
• /
• 2010

Recently, although many firms conduct open innovation through collaboration with other innovation actors, little attention has been paid to research and case study with regard to SMEs. However, since the capability of SMEs is too insufficient to access external resources and collaborate with other firms, SMEs have practical needs for active open innovation. In addition, although a lot of SMEs depend on external resources in terms of distribution, services and sales, most of open innovation-related research concentrate on R&D and production. Therefore, this research aims at presenting various types, methods and policy to stimulate the open innovation of SMEs. Typical types of open innovation which SMEs can take will be identified and then a relevant open innovation type will be matched on the basis of the characteristics of sectors. The results of this research will be helpful for policy makers to promote open innovation in SMEs.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.16 no.4
• /
• pp.1032-1054
• /
• 2013

An increase of national R&D has brought the growth of research performance such as paper and patent quantitatively. However, the results of technology transfer and commercialization still leave much to be desired in Korea. Therefore, it has to be drawn up a plan for effective management & application of research performance created by public research institutes. We select four leading institutes (two universities, two government-funded research institutes) that performed efficient performance management & application. Then, we analyze the best practices and suggest contributions. The results show that four institutes build up a framework of performance management & application from research planning to technology transfer and commercialization. At an early planning phase, institutes set up definite needs-oriented goals, and prior review as well as prior art search is executed through experts. Besides, they systematically promote strategic patent management, technology marketing, post management, and so forth. For such a performance management & application process, capabilities have to be supported with regard to specialized organization, system, routine. This study can give an hint to improve performance management & application from public research institutes in Korea.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.85-113
• /
• 2013

This study analyzes the government-funded research institutions as players which derive inner transition based on technology, policy and market environment changes. In this study, the main case is KRICT(Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) which tries to make post catch-up innovation in the organization. This institution has attempted to overcome the limitation such as change of technology paradigm and PBS(Project Based System) since 2000's. Responding to the needs of technology convergence and innovation by the paradigm change, KRICT has reformed organization and R&D management system prospectively. And this institution sets the goal like development of natural friendly technologies, small and medium-sized business support, and providing countermeasures of social problems. This case shows possibility of continuous innovation. There are some structural limitation like budget restriction, multiple organization structure, and biased quantitative assessment, but endogenous efforts of government -funded institutions make the new paradigm of post catch-up innovation.

• Journal of Venture Innovation
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.57-75
• /
• 2021

KHNP's shared growth activities are based on such public good. Reflecting the characteristics of a comprehensive energy company, a high-tech plant company, and a leading company for shared growth, it presents strategies to link performance indicators with its partners and implements various measures. Key tasks include maintaining the nuclear power plant ecosystem, improving management conditions for partner companies, strengthening future capabilities of the nuclear power plant industry, and supporting a virtuous cycle of regional development. This is made by reflecting the specificity of nuclear power generation as much as possible, and is designed to reflect the spirit of shared growth through win-win and cooperation in order to solve the challenges of the times while considering the characteristics as much as possible as possible. KHNP's shared growth activities can be said to be the practice of the spirit of the times(Zeitgeist). The spirit of the times given to us now is that companies should strive for sustainable growth as social air. KHNP has been striving to establish a creative and leading shared growth ecosystem. In particular, considering the positions of partners, it has been promoting continuous system improvement to establish a fair trade culture and deregulation. In addition, it has continuously discovered and implemented new customized support projects that are effective for partner companies and local communities. To this end, efforts have been made for shared growth through organic collaboration with partners and stakeholders. As detailed tasks, it also presents fostering new markets and new industries, maintaining supply chains, and emergency support for COVID-19 to maintain the nuclear power plant ecosystem. This reflects the social public good after the recent COVID-19 incident. In order to improve the management conditions of partner companies, productivity improvement, human resources enhancement, and customized funding are being implemented as detailed tasks. This is a plan to practice win-win growth with partner companies emphasized by corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ISO 26000 while being faithful to the main job. Until now, ESG management has focused on the environmental field to cope with the catastrophe of climate change. According to KHNP is presenting a public enterprise-type model in the environmental field. In order to strengthen the future capabilities of the nuclear power plant industry as a state-of-the-art energy company, it has set tasks to attract investment from partner companies, localization and new technologies R&D, and commercialization of innovative technologies. This is an effort to develop advanced nuclear power plant technology as a concrete practical measure of eco-friendly development. Meanwhile, the EU is preparing a social taxonomy to focus on the social sector, another important axis in ESG management, following the Green Taxonomy, a classification system in the environmental sector. KHNP includes enhancing local vitality, increasing income for the underprivileged, and overcoming the COVID-19 crisis as part of its shared growth activities, which is a representative social taxonomy field. The draft social taxonomy being promoted by the EU was announced in July, and the contents promoted by KHNP are consistent with this, leading the practice of social taxonomy

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.313-333
• /
• 2017

As science and technology advanced, specialized and massive, development through mutual cooperation or research based on patent licensing such as material transfer contract, technology transfer contract etc are actively taking place to minimize or separate the cost and risk of R&D. In R&D, such mutual work can enjoy the merit of division of labor by effectively allocating resources and manpower to accomplish its goal. Inevitably, however, there are also many possibilities of disputes regarding the ownership and use of intellectual property rights resulting from such mutual/post-studies, or inventions upgraded by using prior patents. The case reviewed by this paper is noticeable regarding the recent trend of upgraded inventions. In the case, a pharmaceutical company conducted tests/assessments on the complete technology of patent owned by a university on the premise of transferring the technology, and then terminated the technology transfer contract due to reasons of toxicity. The university then filed a damage claim suit against the company for infringing the contract. This is a dispute case betw een a university which developed a potential ingredient for new medicine and a pharmaceutical company which agreed to transfer and receive the technological later on. Regarding the upgraded inventions of source patents, this case has many implications on the protection of prior patents, research contract, and research security to protect the accomplishment of research. This paper reviews the subject ruling and the protection of upgraded patents and source technologies. As critical notes, the paper also summarizes the major issues of case ruling to observe the standard of ruling patent infringement related to the extortion of upgraded patents. Then, through the ruling of the case above, the paper suggests implications and future strategies.

• Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX
• /
• v.50 no.2
• /
• pp.21-35
• /
• 2020

Due to the coronavirus pandemic and diplomatic disputes, governments are actively developing a policy to revitalize·reshore manufacturing and to diversify international cooperations. In order to develop such a policy, it is very important to compare and analyze domestic·international geospatial information. Over the decade, the US·EC governments have conducted a series of national researches to build data-based tools that can monitor·analyze regional geospatial information driven by government R&D investments. In the case of the EC system, it can compare geospatial information in domestic and international(including Korea) regions. Compared to US·EC cases, Korean examples of national researches with available data analplatform need future improvements. Current study is investigating an automated analysis methodologies using "National Institute of Science and Technology Information (NTIS)" DB, which was national security data until recently. Research on data-mining regional geospatial information can contribute to support policy fields that need to discover new issues in response to unexpected social problems such as recently faced corona and trade disputes.

• The Inventors News
• /
• no.45
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2006

'2006 여성발명 창의교실' 첫 수료식 개최/2006 대한민국 여성발명품 박람회/제12회 여성발명 우수사례 발표회/신세대 인터넷 용어, 상표 출원 증가/독창성가진 화투, 특허품으로 인정/대학 강의실에도 특허 열풍 분다/차세대 분자전자 메모리 특허 증가/교통카드 특허 이용료 협상 골머리/국제지식재산연수원, WIPO 공식 연수기관 지정/PCT, 국내단계 진입기간 31개월까지로 연장/직무발명 보상에 대한 길 더 넓어져/특허.실용신안, 권리 강화 되다/'특허행정체험단' 통해 고객 감동 실현/신규 발명교실 설치 계획 안내/사랑 확인해 주는 '연인의 잔' 발명/'무공해 플라스틱'으로 환경 사랑 나선다/중국, R&D 기지로 급부상하다/특허출원 실적, 대학별 빈부 격차 심해져/삼성,SDI,OLED 특허 출원 세계 최다/한국여성발명협회, 홈페이지 전면 개편/특허청, 국방과학연구소와 업무협력협정 체결/브랜드 경영 열풍, 지자체에도 분다/'DMB 기술표준과 전략적 특허분석' 발간/지렁이로 화장품, 비누 발명/건강 상식/시중 은행, 월드컵 미끼상품 못판다/역사 속의 발명품/하루 10문 발명교실/특허Q&A/조정숙 코코허브 대표/수원 매현중학교 발명교실/파마머리 발명, 올해로 1백주년/아이디어 착상 및 발명 기법/창의성은 우리의 밥줄이다/야마모토의 추잉껌/PSP진동기술 특허소송 소니패배/내셔널반도체, 특허 장난꾼 잡는다/특허청, '제7회 반도체 설계 공모전' 개최/KAIST 학생들, 특허청에서 '연구노트' 작성법 전수/특허법원, 전국법원 중 처음으로 구술변론 도입/한국여성발명협회 회원사 발명품 가이드/'2006 전국 발명표어 공모대회' 공고

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.209-228
• /
• 2017

사회의 글로벌화와 다원화로 인한 행정수요가 다양화 되고 정책문제가 복잡해지면서 이를 해결하기 위한 부처 간의 협력이 강조되고 있다. 이에 따라 다부처연구개발사업(이하 다부처사업)의 수요가 확대되고 있는 상황에서, 실무적 측면의 다부처사업 추진체계 설계 및 평가를 위한 가이드라인이 필요하다. 이를 위해, 본 연구에서는 연구개발사업의 목적 및 내용에 따른 추진체계 평가방법을 개발하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 본 연구에서는 추진체계의 효율성 평가를 위해 거래비용 개념을 도입한 평가방법론을 제안하였다. 추진체계를 도입함으로써 절감할 수 있는 거래비용과 발생하는 조직비용의 값을 비교하여 추진체계의 효율성을 분석할 수 있는 평가방법을 설계하였고, Williamson과 Coase의 이론을 도입하여 각 비용을 측정할 수 있는 대리지표를 도출하고 설문을 설계하였다. 전문가를 대상으로 델파이 조사를 진행하여 도출된 대리지표의 기획 평가 관점에 따른 가중치를 설정하였다. 제안한 평가방법의 적용 가능성을 검증하고 보완사항을 도출하고자 현재 추진되고 있는 4개의 다부처사업에 대한 사례연구를 수행하였다. 본 연구는 다부처사업의 추진체계의 효율성을 사전적 및 사후적으로 평가할 수 있는 방법을 제시하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.