• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.53-76
• /
• 2011

This study analysed empirically the relationship between the CT R&D subsidy program and R&D performance of received company. According to the result, the CT R&D subsidy program is a significant factor to encourage R&D performance. Especially, the CT R&D subsidy program based on validity and reasonable system affects significantly the progress of R&D performance. Otherwise, the reasonable CT R&D subsidy program has a important role to play on company growing from a step of R&D to a step of the commercialisation performance. Thus, government should make an effort on researching data on market demand before implementing policy and communicating with company continually.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.819-839
• /
• 2009

Proposed increases to the government's R&D budget should be discussed based on merits of meeting efficiency and effectiveness criteria. The evaluation of the national R&D budget and related programs are performed in two areas: a system of R&D budget coordination and allocation, and a system of R&D program performance. This paper mainly focuses on the operational areas of R&D budget evaluation system with a focus on their impact to efficiency and effectiveness. The core view point for a R&D budget evaluation system involves two directions: Firstly, to detail the relationships between the later stage (ex. post) activities such as, program survey, analysis, and program performance evaluation, with the budget evaluation. Secondly, to critically oversee all R&D coordination procedures with a different perspective. Budgeting is generally known as a serial process of policy making, planning and executing. It is highly desirable for the budget to be allocated to, and spent by, specific programs as planned, and that each plan be aligned with a specific policy. As such, a strong relevance between the program structure and budget code system is integral to successful execution. It should be performed using a decision making system which closely examines the link between policy and budget. It is also recommended that systematic relationships be maintained among budget coordination and allocation, performance evaluations of policy and program levels, and program survey and analysis system, and that their operational schedule should be reviewed comprehensively as a one integrated system. The National Science and Technology Council is expected to play a major and practical role as the center of policy planning and should be supported by the objective and unbiased system which covers overall process from policy making to program evaluation. Finally, increased utilization of contents, timely program survey and analysis, and accurate of activity scheduling of budget coordination and allocation, and diligent program performance evaluation all contribute towards a more efficient and effective overall evaluation system.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.119-128
• /
• 2009

The construction R&D(Research & Development) has various performance according to research charater. But present performance evaluation form evaluates project rather than charater of research. The important reasons that evaluats the performance are to try conclusions with evaluated objects in the short run, but to forecast the performance of future construction R&D and to get the better performance. Thus this study extracts the RPI(Research Performanc Index) with output as the conter, developes the estimation method and measures the quantitative performance. Applying the ANOVA(Analysis of Variance), it is proved that the performance according to research charater is various. And applying the Correspondence Analysis, it is analised the relationship with performance and research charater. The purposes of this study are to idetify the problem of uniform performance evaluation and to improve it.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.15 no.7
• /
• pp.13-25
• /
• 2017

The Korean government is pursuing technological development through nearly every government agency, and Korea's growing R&D spending is yielding good results in many fields. With the country moving from the technology development stage to the demonstration stage, it is actively implementing testbed projects to demonstrate developed technologies and services. This is, however, not without problems. There is no consistent systematic system for the testbed projects because government agencies compete against each other in the planning of execution of R&D: they do not work together. The most serious problem is that both testbeds and developed technologies die out due to poor operation management after the completion of test projects. Research should, therefore, be done on operation management and commercialization. However, the government still does not consider the system after the test: it focuses on building testbeds to verify developed technologies. This study intends to determine the basic orientation of operation management to ensure maximum performance, efficiency, and continuity of national projects through intensive analysis of ongoing national R&D testbed projects and examination of success stories of operation management at home and abroad.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2020.06a
• /
• pp.203-210
• /
• 2020

본 연구에서는 대표적인 국내 중소·중견기업 육성사업인 "World Class 300 프로젝트" 수혜기업을 대상으로 R&D 지원사업의 성과를 측정하고자 한다. 특히, 수혜기업을 산업군(소재·부품·장비·모듈·소비재 기업)별로 세분화해 R&D 지원사업이 산업군별 특성에 따라 어떻게 차별화되는지에 대해 실증분석하였다. 분석은 2011년부터 2017년까지 World Class 300 프로젝트에 선정된 총 272개 기업을 대상으로 수행되었으며, 패널회귀 방법론을 통해 얻은 분석결과는 R&D 지원이 산업군에 따라 기업의 성과(당기순이익)에 상이한 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었다. 소재, 부품, 장비 기업 표본에서는 성과에 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치지 못했고, 모듈 기업 표본에서는 성과에 부정적인 관계가 있는 것으로 나타났으나, 소비재 기업 표본에서는 성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미친 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구는 향후 R&D 지원효과를 극대화하기 위해서는 산업군별 특성에 맞는 차별화된 지원정책의 기획·집행이 필요하다는 점에서 기존 연구들과의 차별성을 확보할 수 있다.

• Proceedings of the Technology Innovation Conference
• /
• 1997.07a
• /
• pp.247-265
• /
• 1997

The objectives of not-for-profit organizations including government supported research institutes are, by definition, to achieve socially desired nonfinancial goals. Current reporting focuses on providing information to meet the needs of users. This information may be provided in the annual research report, financial report, and other reports. An objective of current reporting is to provide users with information that will assist them in evaluating the performance(efficiency and effectiveness) of reporting entity. The evaluation of R&D project's performance requires information not only about the acquition and use of resources, but also about the outputs and outcomes of R&D activities, This study aims to recommend that R&D Service Efforts and Accomplish- mints(SEA) reporting is useful for performance evaluation in national R&D programmes. To achieve this aims, I attempt to develop the R&D SEA measures with reference to the Concepts Statement No. 2 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. R&D SEA measures consist of five categories : (1) input measures, (2) outcome measures, (3) output measures, (4) re1a1e efforts to accomplishments, (5) explanatory information.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.38 no.1
• /
• pp.281-301
• /
• 2004

The national investment versus research result management ratio is very low as we compare to those of other advanced countries. Also the system of efficient usage of research result is insufficient. It results inefficient R＆D investment when we drive national R＆D programs. In this paper we developed a generalized information system for efficient planning and management of national R＆D programs. And we developed a efficient system of the R＆D information support and a system of a smoothly circulating R＆D information. Also we apply those systems to the development of the information system of Korea Research Council of Fundamental science and technology. This application system can provide a total R＆D information of whole life cycle of the national R＆D programs.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.436-446
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to examine the priorities of innovation activities, business performance, and maximization factors of SMEs. Support programs for each government department are operated by various industries. Various supports, including subsidies, grants, marketing, planning, and education, are provided to each company. Therefore, this study aims to analyze and identify the priorities of innovation activities that have a positive effect on business performance. The efficacy of the proposed model and the psychometric properties of structure were analyzed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The hierarchical structure of corporate innovation activities are composed of 'R&D' and 'government support', and 'Inside R&D, Outsourcing R &D, Consortium R&D'. As a result of analyzing companies that received more than one type of R&D government support, it can be seen that 'government support' (72.1%) is more important than 'research and development' (27.8%). In addition, this study found key sub-factors loadings including Assistant Support (30.1%), Tax Support (22.7%), Funding Support (18.8%), Inside R&D (10.8%), Outsourcing R&D (10.3%), and Consortium R&D (7.2%). Analysis results suggest that the priorities of detailed innovation activities of R&D and government support affect product innovation and process innovation, which in turn, influence business performance and maximization of SMEs. This implies that SMEs who want to participate in the government support project will be helpful in setting the direction of innovation activities. This study also suggests the importance of strategic priorities among the decision elements for CEOs.

• The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.103-119
• /
• 2008

Over the last two decades, national R&D projects have been increased rapidly. The government has tried to improve the success of national R&D projects. But the weakness of the evaluation process for national R&D projects, there remains some problems. In order to solve those problems this study proposed an advanced evaluation process of national R&D projects on the basis of ISO/IEC15288, ISO/IEC12207 and ISO/IEC14598. The evaluation process consists of preparing evaluation, establishing evaluation requirements, specifying evaluation, designing evaluation, executing evaluation and reporting evaluation. The evaluation process is an artifact-oriented process. The results of this study can be used for reforming the evaluation process of national R&D projects.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.124-145
• /
• 2014

Market failure occurs when Pareto efficiency is not achieved through market mechanism. In order to solve this problem, government intervene market; paying great attention to the optimum state of resource allocation. However, as the size of government investment in R&D goes up, many professionals emphasize the importance in efficient management system. This work is the result of exploratory study to look into life-cycle management of governmental R&D program. Literature reviews and empirical research on governmental R&D programs elicit improvements for effective life-cycle management of governmental R&D program as follows: consistent discrimination between capital expenditure and recurring expenditure, dual management system by spending properties, implementing total cost management system in capital expenditure, and discrimination between preliminary feasibility study with confirming total program cost in recurring expenditure.