• Title/Summary/Keyword: Quality evaluation

Search Result 14,126, Processing Time 0.041 seconds

A Study on the Measures for Managing the Quality of Curriculum of Early Childhood Education Department in College with the Application of CIPP Model Based on PDCA (PDCA기반 CIPP 모형을 적용한 전문대학 유아교육과 교육과정 질 관리 방안 연구)

  • Kim, Ok-Ju
    • Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
    • /
    • v.10 no.1
    • /
    • pp.215-226
    • /
    • 2019
  • The objective of this study is to draw implications and also to design an evaluation model suitable for vocational education in college based on the literary consideration of the quality management of curriculum and the case analysis on the quality management of curriculum of early childhood education department in college, and then to seek for the measures for the systematic quality management of curriculum of early childhood education department applying the evaluation model. To the core of this study, as the evaluation measures for systematically approaching the quality management of curriculum in the aspect of department, this study presented a curriculum quality management model for early childhood education department of college which was mixed with CIPP model as a program evaluation model that has been a lot used for the evaluation of domestic/foreign curriculums in the evaluation(C) stage of PDCA with the use of PDCA procedure as a school administrative process, and then suggested the roles and quality culture of members. The results of this study could be used as the basic data for the quality management of curriculum of early childhood education department in college, desired by diverse institutions and projects for the institutional support in the future.

A Study on the Development and Application of Performance Evaluation Model for Defense Standard Improvement Projects (국방규격 개선사업의 성과평가모형 개발 및 적용방안 연구)

  • Lee, Min Cheol;Kim, Young Hyun;Ahn, Young Jun;Kim, Jun Su
    • Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management
    • /
    • v.51 no.2
    • /
    • pp.185-202
    • /
    • 2023
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify key performance evaluation items and factors that are effective and practical for project management of defense standard standard improvement projects, and to develop a quantitative performance evaluation model. Methods: For the development of a performance evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects, we analyzed past major project performance and derived evaluation items and factors. To increase the objectivity and efficiency of project evaluation, we developed an evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of evaluation targets, and calculated the main importance of evaluation items using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on the main opinions of expert groups. Results: The study resulted in the identification of main performance items for defense standard improvement projects, which were classified into defense standard conformity review performance and defense standard improvement performance items. We also simplified the evaluation model by integrating various evaluation items into similar evaluation factors. Additionally, we developed a quantitative evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of the targets and verified the objectivity and validity of the suggested performance evaluation model by reevaluating it using performance data from past commissioned professional institutions Conclusion: Developing a quantitative evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects is expected to provide a means of measuring the effectiveness of the project, and to be used as a tool to determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of medium and long-term project plans.

A Study on the Development & Evaluation of Defense Quality Maturity Index (국방품질성숙도지수의 개발 및 평가에 관한 연구)

  • Jeong, Younggkwon;Cho, Hyunki;Yoo, Hanjoo
    • Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management
    • /
    • v.47 no.3
    • /
    • pp.479-496
    • /
    • 2019
  • Purpose: The purpose of this research is to develop defense quality evaluation model in order to improve the problem of private sector quality evaluation model and propose the total integrated defense quality management model which enables to evaluate not only large defense industry, but also small-medium industry. Methods: This paper consider the characteristics on ISO 9001 Quality Management System, single PPM, PASS and defense quality and develop defense quality maturity model and index which enables to measure the current quality management level and characteristics and to evaluate operational characteristics in each maturity level for domestic defense industry. Results: From 176 DQMS certified defense industry, the defense quality maturity level is 68,2, C grade. The large defense industry shows, 80.9, A grade; medium industry 69.7, C grade; small-medium industry shows 54.1, D grade. Through the classified types of industries, the current level of quality management of defense industries was diagnosed and the areas to be supplemented for the total quality management were identified. Conclusion: Developed DQMI can be used as the basic information for spreading quality management activities in the defense industry by diagnosing the overall quality management of existing defense industries and quantifying the ambiguity of non-metric measurements and measurement standard that were presented as the threshold of the defense quality management system certification process.

A Review on the evaluation of transit quality of service (대중교통 서비스 품질 평가의 국내외 연구 동향 및 시사점)

  • Lee, Sang-Jun;Kim, Hyung-Su;Jung, Dong-Jae;Chang, Justin S.
    • Proceedings of the KSR Conference
    • /
    • 2011.05a
    • /
    • pp.1290-1299
    • /
    • 2011
  • Internal and external conditions are currently changing-e.g, climate change increased awareness of energy crisis, and accelerated paradigm about green growth. Accordingly, revitalization of public transportation which enables green transportation system is receiving more attention than the past. Meanwhile, as the incom level increased, people required better quality of service, and consequently, various proposals about improving the services are being promoted. Generally, the quality of the spaces within transit in developed countries is represent the quality of life, thus concerns about the transit service of quality are emerging. This study, through the domestic and abroad studies about transit service quality, redefines transit service quality including rail and reviews the related categories. In that order this study deducts each type of evaluation categories and factors, with comparing and reviewing with various cases in Korea and overseas. Based on the whole process, the paper elicits implications and proposes to the research about the evaluation of transit quality of service.

  • PDF

A Study on the Quality System Evaluation for Civil Aviation (민간항공분야 품질시스템 평가에 대한 연구)

  • Kim, You-Gwang;Park, Guen-Young;Lee, Kyung-Chul;Jin, Young-Kwon
    • Aerospace Engineering and Technology
    • /
    • v.7 no.1
    • /
    • pp.245-253
    • /
    • 2008
  • Quality for civil aviation is very important to maintain the safety of aircraft and public, and strict quality requirements are prescribed in aviation regulations to ensure that each article produced conforms to the type design and is a condition for safe operation. In this study, the quality system requirements for aircraft and parts will be reviewed a concept of FAA's ACSEP(Aircraft Certification System Evaluation Program) and policy for aviation quality system evaluation in comparison with AS9100 for aviation quality management system.

  • PDF

An Empirical Study on Development of IS Evaluation Indices : In Case of Public Sectors (정보시스템 평가지표 개발에 관한 실증적 연구 : 공공부문을 중심으로)

  • 정해용;김상훈
    • Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society
    • /
    • v.28 no.4
    • /
    • pp.155-189
    • /
    • 2003
  • In this research, the comprehensive evaluation model of IS(information systems) for public sectors is theoretically constructed through reviewing and integrating previous IS evaluation-related research. This model is hypothesized to consist of five sectors(System Sector, User Sector, Organization and Management Sector, Resource Management Sector and Strategic Contribution Sector), ten evaluation items belonging to these five evaluation sectors, and sixty two evaluation indices for these ten evaluation items. The results of empirical analyses to test the validity of the research model show that the evaluation sectors turn out to be the same ones as proposed in the hypothetical model. The evaluation items(System Quality, Information Quality, Service Quality) in System Sector proves to be consistent with the hypothetical model. However, in case of User Sector, two evaluation items(Perceived Usefulness and User Satisfaction) which are included in the hypothetical model are found to be merged into one item(User Satisfaction). And, it is shown that four evaluation items such as the Efficiency of Internal Process, Customer Satisfaction, Organizational Innovation, and the Degree of Informatization competence improvement are included in Organization and Management Sector, differently from the research model in which the items, Organizational innovation and the Degree of Informatization competence improvement, are not divided. As a final result, sixty two evaluation indices that comprise all the evaluation items belonging to five sectors are found to be reduced to fifty seven ones through factor analyses, criterion-related validity tests and reliability analyses.

Development of Criteria to Assess the Quality of Food and Nutrition Information on Internet (인터넷 식생활 정보 사이트의 질적 평가기준 개발 연구)

  • 이심열;김지혜;백희영;지근억;피재은;황윤경;김수희
    • Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
    • /
    • v.39 no.12
    • /
    • pp.51-63
    • /
    • 2001
  • With the development of information technology, more and more internet sites are available to consumers. Increasing on the interests of diet and health in modem society, there are numerous internet sites dealing with food, nutrition and health. Considering the importance and expected roles of internet sites in information dissemination in the future world, it is important to put more efforts to encourage internet sites with more accurate an useful information. Up to present, not much work has been done on quality analysis and evaluation of the internet information. This study aimed to develop a model to evaluate and rank the internet information according to its quality so that consumers can be guided toward correct information source. Three models were adapted from the literature for pilot study to develop a model suitable for evaluation of contents of sites related to food and nutrition information. From the pilot study, a evaluation model was developed with criteria more relevant to Korean internet site by expert panel. Evaluation criteria of the model is authority, accuracy, objectivity, coverage, and user-friendliness. For the objective and systematic evaluation, scores were assigned totaling maximum 100 point to each evaluation criteria factors. The model developed in this study could be used as one for other internet sites in area other than food and nutrition.

  • PDF

A Study on Quality Evaluation of Medical Web DBs : PubMed and Embase (의학 분야 Web DB의 품질평가 -PubMed와 Embase를 대상으로-)

  • Kim, Sang-Jun
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.38 no.2
    • /
    • pp.161-187
    • /
    • 2004
  • This study concerns DB quality of the Web databases which has been produced in medical science. For the quality evaluation of Embase and PubMed, 10 evaluating criteria were developed on the basis of literature review. The evaluation result showed that PubMed has superiority to the currentness, accuracy, completness, consistency, ease of use, customer support, searchability, cost, and network & H/W on DB, but Embase has only superiority to the coverage. It is needed for purchasing, user training, and library service based on the above evaluation result.

Quality Evaluation Model on Information Protection Product (정보보호제품 품질 평가 모델에 관한 연구)

  • Yoon, Hyung-Deuk;Lee, kyung-ho
    • Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
    • /
    • v.27 no.6
    • /
    • pp.1535-1547
    • /
    • 2017
  • The purchase of information protection products accounts for the largest portion of corporate information protection activity budgets. However, there are no evaluation factors and evaluation models that should be applied to objectively compare information protection products, and therefore, product selection is difficult. Therefore, in this study, we study the inherent quality characteristics of information security products and select evaluation factors accordingly. The selected evaluation factors are analyzed and a quality determination model is given by weighting according to importance. The target is limited to the network information protection product and can be extended to all information protection products.

Quality Control of Pharmacopuncture: A Comparative Study of Good Manufacturing Practice and External Herbal Dispensary Standards

  • Han, Ji-Eun;Park, Minjung;An, Tteul-E-Bom;Park, Jong-Hyun;Oh, Danny;Kim, Kyeong Han;Sung, Soo-Hyun
    • Journal of Pharmacopuncture
    • /
    • v.24 no.2
    • /
    • pp.59-67
    • /
    • 2021
  • Objectives: We aimed to compare the external herbal dispensary (EHD) evaluation criteria for pharmacopuncture and the Korea Good Manufacturing Practice (KGMP) sterile medicine standards to contribute to the establishment of quality control criteria for pharmacopuncture. Methods: We obtained the KGMP standards from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety and the pharmacopuncture certification criteria from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of South Korea. The EHD evaluation items were classified into three categories: facilities, quality control, and validation. The evaluation items were compared with the KGMP sterile medicine criteria to determine their conformance with each other, followed by a discussion among the committee of six experts and their consensus to suggest the items to complement the EHD evaluation criteria. Results: Among the KGMP sterile medicine criteria, 44 were related to the management of the facilities, and 32 pharmacopuncture evaluation items corresponded to these KGMP items (66.7%). Fifty-eight KGMP criteria were related to quality management, and 42 pharmacopuncture evaluation items corresponded to these KGMP items (72.4%). Twentyfive KGMP sterile medicine criteria were related to validation, and 11 pharmacopuncture evaluation items corresponded to these KGMP items (44.0%). Sixteen items under the pharmacopuncture EHD criteria corresponded to the KGMP sterile medicine criteria based on the consent of the experts. Among these, 4 were related to facility management, 6 were related to quality control, and 6 were related to validation. Conclusion: For the safety and quality control of pharmacopuncture, there is a need to select the criteria for the mandatory items among the proposed pharmacopuncture-EHD criteria laws and systems to ensure that the pharmacopuncture materials are produced under the pharmacopuncture-EHD in compliance with the relevant requirements. More studies are needed to secure the safety level of pharmacopuncture materials corresponding to that of conventional medicine.