• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.19-33
• /
• 1995

The goal of this study was to explore the existing program of resident practice structured for female students in order to propose its restructuring for male and female students in the secondary school. A sample of 30 teachers charged a program of resident practice and 55 home economics teachers completed self report measures of resident practice program. Interviews were conducted with 20 teachers to do in-depth research. The results indicated that, consistent with some previous research, there were some problems on facilities and program contents of resident practice. However, there were almost consistent with the required contents of program for male and female students. Significant differences were found only for the program contents such as table settings, wearing a traditional clothing and arranging flowers. A qualitative research showed that resident practice was equally important for the well-being of male and female students and preparing the 21st century. Respondents proposed that the program contents should be focused on traditional propriety and etiquette for daily life. More especially, the data illustrated how importance of the resident practice program should be a mechanism to be a human-centered education. The problems of resident practice for male and female students also was considered. Qualitative answers were suggested for the question : How the hall. Implications for resident practitioners, home economics educators, educational policy maker, as well as suggestions for future research were discussed.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제48권5호
• /
• pp.73-85
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this qualitative research is to explore the intergenerational ambivalence of mothers with preschoolers. Twenty full-time mothers and 19 working mothers were interviewed in depth. Most of the participants who received instrumental support from their mothers showed ambivalence, and especially the working mothers were more likely to feel ambivalence than the full-time mothers. However, participants who received little or no support from their mothers did not report any ambivalent feelings. Their ambivalent feelings came from both their social structure and intrapersonal contradictions. In order to avoid ambivalent feelings, some participants redefined receiving support from their mothers as a positive thing. Meanwhile, the participants who received active support tried to divert their ambivalence by providing child care support for their children, and they showed a 'repayment provision' tendency. Some working mothers and most of the full-time mothers said they would allot 'limited provision' by excluding child care support for their children. Those who were aware of this ambivalence issue sought 'reasonable provision' for their children. Depending on these results, several suggestions are presented to solve the ambivalence.

• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.352-361
• /
• 2014

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the communication experience of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses in the workplace. Methods: The present study utilized a qualitative approach using focus group interview method. A total of three focus groups of 15 ICU nurses from two university hospitals were formed. The conversations during the focus group interviews were recorded and analyzed through Colaizzi's phenomenological method. Results: As a result of analyzing participants' conversation, Five theme clusters were elicited, namely, "one-way communication", "differences in the position of senior and junior nurses", "communication crisis", "beginning of understanding", and "movement toward change" out of 15 themes and 138 significant sentences. Conclusion: ICU nurses report having experienced communication crisis because of the one-way communication of the ICU nursing environment and the hierarchical differences in junior and senior nurses' position. Systematic education and continuous training on communication skills need to be provided to improve interpersonal relationship among nurses and work environment in the ICUs.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.149-158
• /
• 2019

Due to the rapid development of IT (information technology) and internet, products become smart and able to collect, process and produce information and can think of themselves to provide better service to consumers. However, research on the characteristics of smart product is still sparse. In this paper, we report the systemic development of a scale to measure the perceived product smartness associated with smart product. To develop product smartness scale, this study follows systemic scale development processes of item generation, item reduction, scale validation, reliability and validity test consequently. And, after acquiring a large amount of qualitative interview data asking the definition of smart product, we add a unique process to reduce the initial items using both a text mining method using 'r' s/w and traditional reliability and validity tests including factor analysis. Based on an initial qualitative inquiry and subsequent quantitative survey, an eight-factor scale of product smartness is developed. The eight factors are multi-functionality, human-like touch, ability to cooperate, autonomy, situatedness, network connectivity, integrity, and learning capability consequently. Results from Korean samples support the proposed measures of product smartness in terms of reliability, validity, and dimensionality. Implications and directions for further study are discussed. The developed scale offers important theoretical and pragmatic implications for researchers and practitioners.

• Child Health Nursing Research
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.31-44
• /
• 2024

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the infant-rearing experiences of parents during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and provide foundational data for the development of infant-rearing support programs during pandemic situations. Methods: Convergent mixed methods were used to better understand the research outcomes by converging both quantitative and qualitative data. A total of 149 parents with infant-rearing experiences during the pandemic responded to a self-report survey, and 10 parents participated in the interviews. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's method, descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way analysis of variance, the Scheffé test, Pearson correlation coefficients, and hierarchical regression. Results: Analysis of qualitative data yielded the following three categories: five theme clusters, ten themes, and thirty-nine subthemes. The factors influencing infant-rearing behavior were nuclear family (β=.34, p<.001) and rearing stress (β=-.39, p<.001). The explanatory power of the regression equation was 26.6%. Conclusion: Infectious disease disasters, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, can quickly alter infant-rearing conditions, causing heightened parental anxiety. This may affect infant-rearing behaviors and hinder healthy infant development. Future research should develop a comprehensive tool to measure holistic health-related parenting behaviors across the different stages of child development. Additionally, pediatric nurse practitioners can play an active role in educating parents, supporting parenting, and promoting healthy infant development in their communities, making pediatric nurse practitioners a highly relevant and necessary healthcare profession during infectious disease disasters. Thus, there is a need to improve institutions and build infrastructure at the national level to support them.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.255-264
• /
• 2008

Objectives: This study adopted a qualitative method to explore the layman's beliefs and experience concerning high blood pressure and its management in order to develop a strategy to increase adherence to proper medical treatment. Methods: Semi-structured interviews that focused on personal experiences with hypertension and its management were conducted with 26 hypertensive patients. The participants were selected according to a BP above 140/90 mmHg (hypertension stage 1), based on the seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure (JNC-VII). The interviews lasted for approximately 30 minutes (range: 20-60 minutes). The resulting questions were formulated into open-ended questions. The interview questionnaire was composed 17 items to examine non-adherence to treatment and 19 items to examine adherence to treatment. Results: Most participants recognized that the direct cause of high blood pressure was unhealthy behavior rather than inheritance. Thus, the hypertensive patient believed they could recover their blood pressure to a normal level through removing the direct cause of hypertension (weight reduction, diet, exercise) instead of taking drugs. The reasons for these statements were that the drugs for controlling hypertension are not natural or they are artificial, and they may have side effects, and drugs are not treatment for the root cause of hypertension. Most of the hypertensive patients chose to manage their behaviors as soon as they knew their blood pressure was high. Therefore, we should not divide the subjects into two groups according to their taking drugs or not, but they should be divided into two groups according to their willingness or not to manage their condition. Conclusions: For developing a strategy for an individual approach to hypertension management, we need to develop a client-centered attitude and strategy. That is, we need to tailor our approach to individual cases to avoid generalizations and stereotyping when developing an adherence increasing strategy.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제16권11호
• /
• pp.7414-7423
• /
• 2015

인지-언어 능력에 대한 노인들의 주관적 호소는 경도인지장애나 치매로의 진전을 예측하는 중요 요인이다. 그러나, 인지-언어 능력의 주 객관적 평가 간 상관성은 연구마다 상이하다. 특히, 양자 간 상관성을 체계적으로 살펴본 국내 연구는 매우 드물다. 본 연구에서는 2000년 이후 게재된 국내외 문헌 중 총 26개 논문을 대상으로 메타분석을 실시함으로써 정상 노년층, MCI, 치매 집단의 자기 보고형 및 정보제공자 보고형 평가와 객관적 평가 간 상관성을 알아보고자 하였다. 질적 분석 결과, 분석에 포함된 연구 대상자의 수는 26~657명이었다. 주관적 평가의 유형은 자기 보고형 75.4%, 정보제공자 보고형 24.6%였으며, 객관적 평가의 하위 영역은 기억력, 전반적 인지능력, 언어능력 등의 순으로 많았다. 메타분석 결과, 자기 보고형 평가와 객관적 평가 간 상관성은 치매 집단이 가장 높았고, 정보제공자 보고형은 세 집단 모두에서 효과적이었다. 객관적 평가의 하위 영역별로는, 정상 노년층에서 자기 보고형과 추론력, 정보제공자 보고형과 기억력 및 언어능력 간에 상관성이 높았다. MCI에서는 자기 보고형과 언어능력 등, 정보제공자 보고형과 전반적 인지능력 등의 영역 간에 높은 상관성이 있었고, 치매 집단에서는 두 유형 모두 기억력, 언어능력, 전반적 인지능력을 잘 반영하였다. 본 연구는 세 집단의 인지-언어 능력에 대한 두 유형의 주관적 평가와 객관적 평가 간 상관성을 체계적으로 분석함으로써 증거 기반적 자료를 제공할 수 있다.

• 척추신경추나의학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.91-105
• /
• 2021

Objectives A case report is a detailed medical description of previously unreported observations or complications of medical conditions, unique use cases of tests, or new side effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of case reports published in the Journal of Korea CHUNA Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves (JKCMSN). Methods Case reports published in the JKCMSN from January 2013 to December 2020 were selected using the Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS). The quality of the reports was assessed based on the Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development (CARE) guidelines. Results Sixty case reports that met the inclusion criteria were included in the assessment. Our analysis revealed that 71.42% of the case reports included all the necessary information and their level of reporting was good. However, their scores in the qualitative subdivisions of the reporting level parameters showed that the quality level was uneven. More than 65% of the papers did not report in the following categories: "Keywords," "Patient information," "Timeline," "Diagnostic assessment," "Therapeutic interventions," "Follow-up and outcomes," "Patient perspective," and "Informed consent." Conclusions Our analysis shows that CARE guidelines need to be followed more rigorously to improve the quality of reporting in the JKCMSN. Further efforts are necessary to develop reporting guidelines and evaluation tools relevant to the Korean clinical context.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2008년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.615-618
• /
• 2008

2006년 한국사학진흥재단이 작성한 보고서에 따르면 우리나라 사립대학의 비중은 전문대의 경우 97%, 대학은 79% 수준으로 사립대학의 교육시설 투자 규모는 해마다 2조억 원 수준인 것으로 제시되었다. 그러나 사립대학 민간투자사업추진에 따른 사업성 분석의 기준이 모호한 상황에서 사립대학이 적극적인 추진을 망설이고 있는 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 사립대학 민간투자사업의 의사결정의 근거가 되는 적격성분석 방법론을 제시하도록 한다. 먼저 정량적 VFM분석의 경우 분석 단계에서 대안분석 및 추진 절차를 제시하도록 하며 정성적 VFM 분석의 경우 전문가 면담 등을 통하여 총 15개 항목의 분석 항목을 개발 제시하였다.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.31-56
• /
• 2013

언론은 국민적인 공감대와 여론을 형성하며, 특정 쟁점을 집중적으로 보도하면서 사회적 영향력을 발휘하는데 큰 역할을 하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 지금까지 기록관리학계에서 시도되지 않고 있는 언론보도 분석을 통해 지난 14년간(1998년-2011년) 공공기록관리 제도의 형성과 변화과정에서 중요하게 다뤄진 쟁점들은 무엇이고, 이들 각 쟁점이 언론에서 어떻게 보도되고, 기사에 등장하는 정보원을 파악하여 누가 해당 쟁점에 대해 적극적으로 대응하고 확산해왔는지 분석하는 것에 목적을 두었다.