• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제37권2호
• /
• pp.68-77
• /
• 2009

There are many quality control(QC) tools useful for solving quality problems. In this paper, QC 7 tools, new QC 7 tools, and other quality tools are first compared with respect to their frequency of use. We suggest an integrated problem-solving procedure to systematically deal with various quality problems. For each step a streamlined flow chart is presented to help the practitioners to adopt relevant tools depending on certain situations they face. The procedure will help quality practitioners solve field quality problems.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.136-159
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this paper is to propose the effective guidance of Quality Circle(QC) activities. Since 1975, variety of organizations in Korea have widely implemented QC activities for their management systems. The industries have enthusiastically used QC activities and were influenced from them. However, the academics were less interested in this subject, as a result, there were no systematic guidances for QC activities. Thus, in this paper, the effective guidance for QC activities were suggested which were based on the survey from QC proceedings presented in the companies, in the local areas and the national wide contests. As a result, the first main issue is to pick repeated mistakes up during the process period such as unmatched the causes and effects relations in characteristics diagrams, improper selection of important control items in Pareto diagram and so on. Secondly, how to overcome statistics and use them for QC activities. Thirdly, to remind team members about Quality Control 7 tools. Finally, Minitab(Release-13) software has been found that it is not matched with using Korean Standards(KS).

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.281-289
• /
• 2012

Recently, creative innovation has become a major topic in management innovation and due to this, various researches on its need and methodologies are being performed. According to previous studies on ambidexterity, explorative innovation is closer to divergent and right-sided brain, while exploitative innovation is closer to convergent and left-sided brain. Five attributes of the questionnaires were developed based on right-sided and left-sided brain theory. Also, 25 problem solving tools were selected according to previous studies. QC 7 Tools and new QC 7 Tools were frequently used in Six Sigma projects. Other 11 problem solving tools were selected with consideration on its usage frequency. Survey questionnaires were distributed to 25 Six Sigma consultants and 22 were retrieved for this study's use. As a result, 14 tools were identified to hold exploitative attribute while 11 tools were identified to hold explorative attributes.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.340-353
• /
• 2010

Properly designed and well-executed services enable e-commerce companies to capture the unique needs and preferences of customers, help them build customer loyalty, and thereby, strengthen their competitiveness in the marketplace. An object of this study is the new open-market company and it has only 3 percent of the market share. Therefore, it is needed to raise the market share by improving the service qualities. This article presents a six sigma project for service quality improvement in the open-market company. This study was carried out based on five steps of DMAIC which is six sigma technique. First, a defect rate was defined as unsatisfaction rate. In addition, 50-people data was analyzed and it was shown that the defect level was 2.5 sigma level. In this study, in order to raise the sigma level, novel eight action items were determined based on SIPOC, FDPM, cause and effect diagram, matrix chart, Pareto chart and statistical analysis.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.561-582
• /
• 2017

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to share the right conception of win-win partnership innovative activity. This study suggests the desirable methodology to Win-win Partnership. Also, through the in-depth analyzing of the existing problems, we intend to exclude such a formal and erroneous direction of the research. Methods: This study systematically analyzes the best cases of the win-win partnership focusing on the proceedings of the companies participating in the field of win-win Partnership at the national quality-circle contest. Results: This study reveals the underlying problems of win-win partnership innovative activity and draws the conclusion in the way of improvement about the win-win partnership innovative activity. This study also suggests the efficient method of the function and improvement of a system for activating win-win partnership innovative activity. Conclusion: Promoting the effective way of boosting win-win partnership innovative activity, we seek to improve the quality of the product among the companies, and let the a rising curve of the mutual growth continue among the companies by strengthening the competitiveness.

• 산업진흥연구
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.43-48
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 기업 간 상생협력활동을 통한 동반성장이라는 목표 아래, 상생협력 분임조 혁신활동의 선도모델 개발 및 활성화를 위하여 다음과 같은 연구를 수행하였다. 첫째, 최근 3개년(2014년~2016년)동안 국가품질상의 범주 내에서 실시된 전국 품질분임조 경진대회 상생협력 부문에 참여한 총 18개 기업들의 주요 발표문집을 중심으로 사례분석을 실시하였으며 문제점 및 개선방안을 도출하였다. 둘째, 2017년 전국 품질분임조 경진대회 상생협력부문의 심사기준을 분석하고 각 활동단계별 우수사례를 선정하여 최적화된 상생협력 분임조 혁신활동의 활동요령 가이드를 제시하였다. 셋째, 상생협력 분임조 혁신활동의 활성화 및 참여유도 확산을 위한 성과공유의 시스템 강화방안을 제안하였다. 이러한 기업 간 상생협력의 시스템 강화방안을 통하여 상생협력이 새로운 기업문화로 정착할 수 있도록 노력하는 한편 상생협력 기업 간 생산성 및 품질향상 등 기업경쟁력 제고를 바탕으로 기업 간 동반성장의 목표를 달성하는데 기여할 것으로 기대한다.