• 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2001년도 춘계학술대회:발표자료
• /
• pp.369-385
• /
• 2001

A R&D project evaluation method has been applied for the national nuclear R&D projects in a developing-country setting. In the methodology, Saaty's analytic hierarchy process model is used to evaluate and rank of the selected nuclear R&D project which have a wide range of objectives and characteristics. The criteria used for evaluation related specifically to the Korea's evaluation needs and culture, and they are weighted according to their relative importance as perceived by the evaluator of the R&D project. As a real-world case of evaluation, we elicited and reproduced the evaluation process of the nuclear R&D projects which is going under the research process. As the results of the paper suggests, the methodology can be applied to the evaluation of the R&D projects and has much potential.

• 한국정보과학회논문지:컴퓨팅의 실제 및 레터
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.192-207
• /
• 2005

정보 보호에 대한 평가가 중요시 되고 있으며 보안 평가 방법론이 제안되었다. 이러한 보안 평가 방법론들은 크게 제품, 프로세스, 통제 중심의 세 가지 관점으로 분류될 수 있다본 논문에서는 제품, 프로세스, 통제 각기 하나의 관점에서 보안 평가할 때에 발생하는 문제점과 위협의 실례를 파악한다. 이 문제점을 해결하기 위하여 제품, 프로세스, 통제의 세 가지 관점을 통합한 보안평가 모델을 제안한다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.113-136
• /
• 2009

국가 연구개발사업의 효율성과 생산성을 제고하기 위하여, 정부에서는 '국가연구개발사업 등의 성과 평가 및 성과관리에 관한 법률'을 제정하여 정부 각 부처의 연구개발 사업 성과의 효율성을 증대시키고 있다. 본 논문은 국방연구개발사업 자체평가시스템 측면에서 메타평가를 실시하기 위하여 요인분석(Factor Analysis)을 통한 계층분석적 의사결정기법(AHP, Analytic Hierarchy Process)을 사용한 평가지표를 개발한 결과이다. 국방연구개발사업의 메타평가를 위한 평가요소로서 평가상황, 평가투입, 평가수행, 평가결과 등 4요소로 구분하여 평가지표를 개발하였다. 평가항목 선정을 위하여 평가요소 및 평가지표간 요인분석을 실시하여 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ 값을 측정한 결과, 평가상황요소는 0.877, 평가투입요소는 0.755, 평가결과요소는 0.792, 평가결과요소는 0.906으로 내적일관성을 고려한 신뢰성은 있는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 평가요소 및 평가항목별 가중치 산정은 AHP기법을 사용하여 분석하였다. 분석결과 조사자의 전체 일관성 지수는 0.09로 조사자의 일관성은 있는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.65-84
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to develop Meta Evaluation Indicators for Defense R&D Programs in Korea. At first, the four components of this meta evaluation model were designed, which are evaluation context, evaluation input, evaluation process and evaluation outcome. And fifty two indicators for this meta evaluation were developed by experts who performed evaluations for Defense R&D Programs. The reliability of components and items was verified by Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ coefficient. It was over 0.6 in all areas. The validity of components and items was verified by Factor Analysis. Analytic Hierarchy Process method was used in assigning the evaluation weight. The survey of twenty two evaluators participated in Defense R&D Programs showed that the Consistency Ratio was under 0.1 in evaluation components and items. In this study, an objective and reasonable set of Defense R&D Meta Evaluation Indicators was developed to increase the responsibility of Defense R&D Programs and improve the quality of evaluation results.

• 제어로봇시스템학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 제어로봇시스템학회 1996년도 한국자동제어학술회의논문집(국내학술편); 포항공과대학교, 포항; 24-26 Oct. 1996
• /
• pp.616-619
• /
• 1996

This paper presents the configuration methodology of Distributed Control System(DCS)s for process plant and their performance evaluation. Performance evaluation is specified both in terms of operational and installation aspects of system. In order to evaluate performance criteria of operational aspect, a simulation method is proposed. Modeling of system components including process computer, database, process controllers and LANs, etc, is implemented for simulation. Based on these characteristics, different system configurations are evaluated and compared through results about evaluation criteria in order to select the best DCS for particular process. The results, in abbreviated form, of the performance evaluation of DCS controlling a CAL(Continuous Annealing Line) plant of iron process are presented.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.433-444
• /
• 2012

본 연구의 목적은 계층적 분석 기법을 이용한 비즈니스 프로세스 관리 시스템(BPMS)의 평가 모형을 개발하는 것이다. 이를 위해 전문가 집단으로부터 BPMS 솔루션 선택을 위한 기준을 도출하였으며, 이 기준들의 쌍대비교를 통해 AHP 기반의 분석 모형을 개발하였다. 분석모형을 통해 기업이 원하는 BPMS 솔루션을 선택할 수 있으며, 이는 기업의 프로세스 관리 능력 제고에 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.78-85
• /
• 2019

High variance observed in the measurement system can cause high process variation that can affect process capability badly. Therefore, measurement system analysis is closely related to process capability analysis. Generally, the evaluation for measurement system and process variance is performed separately in the industry. That is, the measurement system analysis is implemented before process monitoring, process capability and process performance analysis even though these analyses are closely related. This paper presents the effective concurrent evaluation procedure for measurement system analysis and process capability analysis using the table that contains Process Performance (Pp), Gage Repeatability & Reproducibility (%R&R) and Number of Distinct Categories (NDC). Furthermore, the long-term process capability index (Pp), which takes into account both gage variance and process variance, is used instead of the short-term process capability (Cp) considering only process variance. The long-term capability index can reflect well the relationship between the measurement system and process capability. The quality measurement and improvement guidelines by region scale are also described in detail. In conclusion, this research proposes the procedure that can execute the measurement system analysis and process capability analysis at the same time. The proposed procedure can contribute to reduction of the measurement staff's effort and to improvement of accurate evaluation.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.203-224
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation perspectives of IT business value and empirically analyze the differences of evaluation perspectives between ex ante evaluation and post implementation evaluation, and among various information system types. 4 evaluation perspectives which have been used in the previous studies and in the field of industry practices are financial, customer, internal process, and growth, which are based on the BSC model. Data of 98 information systems have been collected from 89 companies including manufacturers, banks, insurances, and stock trading companies. As results of multi-way MANOVA test, 3 out of 8 hypothesis have been accepted statistically. While the order of importance of 4 perspectives in ex ante evaluation is customer, financial, internal process, and growth, the order of post implementation evaluation appears to be much different : that is, internal process, customer, financial, and growth. These findings provide insights for both IT practitioners and researchers.

• 한국의류산업학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.19-29
• /
• 2017

This study identified the purchase decision-making process of outdoor wear consumers and examined the hypothesis that consumer satisfaction mediates the relationship between purchase decision-making process and repurchase intention. Data were acquired from a survey and analyzed with descriptive, factor analysis, reliability analysis and multiple regression analysis. Respondents were 454 adults who have purchased outdoor wear. The results are as follows. First, the purchase decision-making processes of outdoor wear consumers consisted of a series of steps: need recognition & passive information search, active information search, evaluation of alternatives with practical attributes, evaluation of alternatives with unpractical attributes, purchase decision, and post-purchase evaluation. Second, four purchase decision-making processes (except for need recognition & passive information search and active information search) had significantly positive effects on consumer satisfaction. Third, the need recognition & passive information search, the evaluation of alternatives with unpractical attributes and post-purchase evaluation had significantly positive effects on repurchase intention. Lastly, the partial mediation of consumer satisfaction in the relationship between two purchase decision-making processes (evaluation of alternatives with unpractical attributes and post-purchase evaluation) and repurchase intention were indicated. This academic study will help to understand the purchase decision-making processes of outdoor wear and allow companies to obtain information (from the industrial aspect) about which process to invest in and how to manage the process.

• 한국정밀공학회지
• /
• 제16권5호통권98호
• /
• pp.132-144
• /
• 1999

In this study, the complexity of the product was evaluated quantitatively considering the product structure, assembly process and disassembly process. To evaluate the complexity of the product, subassemblies of automobile were analyzed and then characteristics of part and subassembly were determined according to product structure, assembly process and disassembly process. Evaluation criteria of complexity were determined considering each characteristics of part and subassembly. Experiential evaluation was accomplished by classified evaluation criteria and time-motion evaluation was accomplished by the relational motion factor with characteristics of part and subassembly in MTM(Methods Time Measurement) and WF(Work Factor). The total complexity of product was determined by experiential evaluation and time-motion evaluation.