• Title/Summary/Keyword: Procedural Justice

Search Result 194, Processing Time 0.033 seconds

A Empirical Study on the Moderate Effect of Appraisal Instrumentality in the Effect of the Appraisal Justice on the Organization Commitment : Focused on the University Employees (고과공정성이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 있어 고과수단성의 조절효과에 관한 실증적 연구 : 대학 교직원을 중심으로)

  • Lee, Da-Jung;Lee, Kwang-Hee;Park, Dong-Jin;Lee, Jong-Bong
    • Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
    • /
    • v.32 no.1
    • /
    • pp.52-60
    • /
    • 2009
  • This study analyzed the main effect on organizational commitment of organizational justice factors and the moderating effects of appraisal instrumentality on the relationship of three justice factors(distributive Justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice) and organizational commitment. Hypotheses were tested by surveying 468 employees of four universities. This results suggest following important implications. First, all three justice factors are essential to enhance the level of organizational commitment in appraisal about employee of university. Second, especially, the moderating effect of appraisal instrument has been found only between distributive justice and organization commitment.

The Effect Organizational Justice on Organizational Citizenship Behavior focus on Nurses in Secondary Hospitals (임상간호사의 조직공정성이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향 : 2차 의료기관을 대상으로)

  • Chang, Kyung-Wha
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.16 no.11
    • /
    • pp.7648-7655
    • /
    • 2015
  • Nursing service quality can vary depending on the work attitude and behavior of nurses. Nursing attitude and behavior that can be described as voluntary and proactive organizational citizenship behavior(OCB). OCB affects the work performance of nurses in clinical practice is very important and organizational justice is an important influencing factors of OCB. The purpose of this study was to determine the influential factors of organizational justice on OCB of nurses. The descriptive-correlational method was applied. The study was carried out less than a 500-bed hospital. Participants of the study included 230 nurses working in secondary hospitals. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression with the 18.0 SPSS/Window program. Considering the components of organizational justice, there was a significant positive correlation(r=.172~.540, p=.000) between OCB and distributive, procedural and interactional justice. Also, Total organizational justice explained 29.1% of total OCB with influencing factor (${\beta}$=.540) and was statistically significant(F=93.777, p=.000). The influencing factors to OCB were distributive justice(${\beta}$=.283) and interactional justice(${\beta}$=.249) except procedural justice. The findings suggest that strategies of nursing management are needed to focus on distributive justice for compensation and interactional justice for social relationship in order to induce nurses' organizational citizenship behavior.

The Effect of Failure of Online Food Delivery Service Recovery Strategies on Consumer Attitude and Behavioral Intention: Focusing on Justice Theory (온라인 음식 배달 서비스 회복 전략의 실패가 소비자 태도 및 행동 의도에 미치는 영향: 공정성 이론(Justice Theory)을 중심으로)

  • Jungkun Park;Sangwoo Lee;Hyowon Hyun;Jihwan Yum
    • Journal of Service Research and Studies
    • /
    • v.13 no.2
    • /
    • pp.161-180
    • /
    • 2023
  • This study empirically analyzed the effect of perceived injustice on service recovery measures proposed by online food delivery service (OFDS) companies on consumer disappointment. This study adopted interaction justice, information justice, procedural justice, and distributive justice as sub-variables of justice perception based on the justice theory. In addition, the differences by generation (MZ generation and other generations) were examined in the relationship between negative word-of-mouth behavior and switching intentions due to service recovery failure. An online survey was conducted targeting 250 adult consumers in the U.S for the empirical analysis of this research model. The results of the data analysis demonstrated that negative perceptions about the procedural justice and distributive justice among the service recovery strategies had a positive effect upon the consumer's disappointment. Furthermore, it was confirmed that the consumer's disappointment due to the perceived injustice of the service recovery strategy had a positive effect on the consumer's negative word-of-mouth behavior and switching intentions. The verification results of the moderation effect in the relationship between negative word-of-mouth behavior and switching intention, it was found that the younger the age(MZ generation), the higher the possibility of causing dysfunctional behavior. This study expands the scope of related research by presenting a new perspective on the justice perception in the service recovery process by verifying dysfunctional behavior of consumers caused due to the failure of the service recovery strategy. It is believed that the results of this study will be used as basic data for the establishment of practical strategies for OFDS companies to prevent double defection of their customers.

The Effects of Justice on Relationship Quality and Performance in Industrial Markets (산업재 시장에서 공정성이 관계품질과 성과에 미치는 영향)

  • Ji, Seong-Goo
    • Journal of Distribution Research
    • /
    • v.11 no.3
    • /
    • pp.79-101
    • /
    • 2006
  • This paper examines the effects of justice on relationship quality and performance in industrial markets. Data were obtained from a sample of 284 supplier's key informant. The findings demonstrate that distributive, interactional and issue-specific justice enacted by buyer enhance supplier trust. Further, distributive and procedural justice enacted by buyer enhance supplier satisfaction. Trust positively affected supplier satisfaction, and relationship quality positively affected performance of its supplier. And, the theoretical and practical implications of this result and future research were suggested.

  • PDF

The Effects of Organizational Justice and Dispositional Affectivity on Job Satisfaction and Intent to Leave among Nurses (조직공정성과 감정성향이 간호사의 직무만족과 이직의도에 미치는 영향)

  • Yom, Young-Hee
    • Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
    • /
    • v.16 no.3
    • /
    • pp.276-285
    • /
    • 2010
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of organizational justice and dispositional affectivity on job satisfaction and intent to leave among nurses. Methods: The sample of this study consisted of 274 nurses from 2 general hospitals located in Incheon. Data were collected with self-administered questionnaires and were analyzed by hierarchical multiple regression. Results: Distributive and interactional justices had positive impacts on nurses' job satisfaction. Distributive, procedural and interactional justices had negative impacts on nurses' intent to leave. It was found out that positive affectivity significantly moderated the effect of interactional justice on job satisfaction while dispositional affectivity did not significantly moderate the effect of organizational justice on the intent to leave. Conclusion: The results imply that hospital administrators should pay attention to the dispositional affectivity of nurses to increase their job satisfaction. Further, hospital needs to maintain organizational justice to reduce nurses' turnover.

The Effects of Service Failure Magnitude on Perceived Justice, Positive Emotion, and Revisit Intention in Restaurants -A Comparison of Korean and American Customer Perceptions- (레스토랑에서의 서비스 실패 정도가 회복 공정성, 긍정 감정, 재방문 의도에 미치는 영향 -한국 고객과 미국 고객 비교를 중심으로-)

  • Yi, Na-Young
    • The Korean Journal of Food And Nutrition
    • /
    • v.24 no.3
    • /
    • pp.329-339
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of service failure magnitude on perceived justice, positive emotion, and revisit intention at restaurants between a collectivist culture(Korea) and an individualistic culture(United States). The results showed that the higher a customer's perception of service failure magnitude, the lower the perceived recovery justices in both cultures. The distributive, procedural, and interactional justices had a favorable effect on positive emotions in both cultures. Other findings revealed that interactional justice was the best predictor of revisit intention in Korea, while distributive justice was the best determinant of revisit intention in the United States. This research suggests that global restaurant managers need to understand how cultural orientation influences consumer perceptions of service failures in order to develop a highly targeted and effective service recovery.

The relationship between job stress and service quality, and the moderating effect of organizational justice (직무스트레스와 서비스품질의 관계 및 조직공정성의 조절효과)

  • Ahn, Kwan Young
    • Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science
    • /
    • v.16 no.3
    • /
    • pp.389-397
    • /
    • 2014
  • This paper reviewed the relationship between job stress and service quality, and the moderating effect of organizational justice in food service restaurant. Based on the responses from 209 employees, the results of multiple regression analysis appeared as follow; 1) job stress(insufficient job control, lack of reward, occupational climate, job insecurity, interpersonal conflict) partly effect negatively on all service quality factors(tangibility. reliability, responsiveness, empathy). 2) distributive justice and procedural justice partly effect positively on the relationship between job stress and service quality.

A Study on the Relationship Dissolution between Fashion Product Consumers and Stores (패션상품 소비자의 점포 관계단절에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Eun-Sook;Lee, Sun-Jae
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles
    • /
    • v.33 no.3
    • /
    • pp.366-378
    • /
    • 2009
  • The purpose of this study was to understand fashion product consumers' relationship dissolution by considering the characteristics of customer behavior and examining the connection between the main variables. The survey was conducted on 623 women over 20 years old who had experienced relationship dissolution or problems with regular fashion stores in the areas of Seoul and Kyungki in September 2005. The SPSS 12.0 package and Amos program were used to analyze the data. The results of this study were as follows: First, service recovery justice of a fashion store, interactional justice, distributive justice, and procedural justice had effects on encounter satisfaction. Furthermore, encounter satisfaction influenced relationship dissolution behavior, voice, exit, loyalty, neglect via overall satisfaction. Second, there were differences in relationship dissolution behavior according to consumer loyalty and switching costs.

Mediating Effect of Superior Trust on the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Service Quality (조직공정성과 서비스품질의 관계에 있어 상급자 신뢰의 매개효과)

  • Ahn, Kwan-Young;Kim, Gye-Seok
    • Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
    • /
    • v.29 no.2
    • /
    • pp.67-74
    • /
    • 2006
  • This paper is to test the mediating effect of superior trust on the relationship between organizational justice and service quality in service food industry. Based on 302 data gathered in western Kangwon area, analysis result showed that procedural, interactional, and distributive justice have affirmative relation with trust, and also trust has close relation with service quality. Therefore, trust appeared to have fully mediating effect on the relationship between organizational justice and service quality.

Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment: A Critical Review on the US Case (사회영향평가의 원칙 및 지침에 관한 연구 - 미국 사례를 중심으로 -)

  • Jung, Juchul;Lim, Jaeyoung
    • Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
    • /
    • v.16 no.1
    • /
    • pp.45-58
    • /
    • 2007
  • Despite the ubiquitous practice of environmental impact assessment around the world, social impact assessment has been alienated from assessment process from the beginning. Not until 1993 was 'Interorganizational Committee' established in the United States to prepare for 'Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment.' This study is an attempt to critically examine US 'Principles and Guidelines.' First, the study traces history of social impact assessment to reveal why the latter became "the orphan in the assessment process." Second, it critically reviews 'Principles and Guidelines' to find its merits and defects. For instance, a principle regarding environmental justice is perceived as necessary as society has become conscious of social justice and equity while putting too much emphasis on predictive traits of social impact assessments only fosters "checklist mentality." Third, the study reflects on 'Principles and Guidelines' in particular and social impact assessment in general in order to probe what is social impact assessment. To do so, it pays attention to scholars, who have criticized technocratic and procedural elements of 'Principles and Guidelines.' They show that social impact assessment is philosophically and methodologically teleological in that "fluid and contested meanings" between social impacts and the public are meaningful in itself. And simple procedural guarantee of the public involvement, they argue, is not enough to define social impacts. Lastly, from the critical analysis of 'Principles and Guideline,' the study looks for alternatives to improve how to assess social impacts in a Korean context.