• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제54권5호
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2012

This paper presents the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to evaluate water resources plan for agricultural reservoir. Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) were used to estimate weight and priority of alternatives to find out the most reasonable and efficient way of water resources assessment. The 6 criteria that both decision maker and beneficiary are satisfied have been identified to secure agricultural water resources and then the priority of 10 subcriteria was set. An enhanced PROMETHEE-AHP model was used to perform pairwise comparison and find out the priority of each alternative because the existing decision making model have uncertainty and ambiguity. Comparison analysis of decision making models was carried out to find a way of suitable decision making and validity of PROMETHEE-AHP model was suggested.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2012

This paper is aimed to present a fuzzy decision-making approach to deal with disaster recovery priority decision problem in information system. We derive an evaluation approach based on TOPSIS(Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution), to help disaster recovery priority decision of total information system for port logistics in a fuzzy environment where the vagueness and subjectivity are handled with linguistic terms parameterized by trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. This study applies the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method to determine the importance weight of evaluation criteria and to synthesize the ratings of candidate disaster recovery system. Aggregated the evaluators' attitude toward preference, then TOPSIS is employed to obtain a crisp overall performance value for each alternative to make a final decision. This approach is demonstrated with a real case study involving 4 evaluation criteria(system dependence, RTO, loss, alternative business support), 7 information systems for port logistics assessed by 5 evaluators from Maritime Affairs and Port Office.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.21-29
• /
• 2007

We derive priority decision making on healthcare service technology standardization in the home network through the decision support process with industry professionals. We configured a research group with 4 industrial areas including Industry, Academic, Research Institution and Medical Institution. And we also applied AHP methodology for the priority decision making. The research group decides an evaluation criteria which are consisted of marketability, technology, ripple effect, strategy for national policies in order to make a priority for healthcare service on a home network. And it is also decided 7 fields and 24 sub-fields, technically. In order to make a priority for the standardization, we use an AHP methodology, that is more objective and feasible, as a decision tool. After two-phase survey that consists of paper survey and face to face meeting, we get a conclusion that home healthcare content is at the top and then wireless home network follows it.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제18권6호
• /
• pp.367-376
• /
• 2009

This paper proposes an application methodology of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) based decision making theory for improvement priority by assessment of various risk factors affecting on deterioration of water supply systems, as major social infrastructure. AHP method is organized with three level of hierarchy which is introduced for multi-criteria decision making in this study. In the first level, assessment outputs are calculated by AHP for each affecting factor. In the second level, criteria are estimated by using assessment results with respect to structural and environmental factors. Consequently, ranking decision is performed in the third level. In order to present the effectiveness, a proposed method is compared with FCP(Fuzzy Composite Programming) for decision making. Since the results of the proposed method show better performance with consistent results, it can be applied as an efficient information for the determination for improvement priority of the study infrastructure.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.101-113
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study are to develop a SDSS (Spatial Decision Support System) that can incorporate diverse opinions of stakeholders related the designation of protected areas (PA), and to employ the model for the readjustment of the boundary line of the Jirisan National Park of Korea. The SDSS would lead to more rational and less controversial decision-making during the expansion or removal of PA in Korea. Research methods are as follows. Firstly, to select evaluation criteria for SDSS for PA designation by using expert interview and literature survey. Secondly, to measure their preferences on the designation of additional PA or the removal of a part of PA based on the opinions of various stakeholders such as local residents, environmental groups, or public officials. Thirdly, to produce conservation priority maps based on a multi-criteria decision making technique. The SDSS would be used to rational decision making for the expansion of PA or the release of a certain part of PA by reflecting diverse preferences on biodiversity conservation and economic interest of residents. The visualization of conservation priority maps would also increase the efficiency of such decision making processes. The evaluation criteria for the expansion of PA for biodiversity conservation includes vegetation conservation value, wildlife conservation value, and the habitats of key species. The evaluation criteria for the removal of PA includes the proximity to roads and the boundary of PA, land use types, and conservation zoning of the PA. Preference weights are based on data collected from the Jirisan National Park. Both the conservation priority and removal priority maps are based on land parcels so that property rights of all parcels would be correctly represented.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제19권9호
• /
• pp.75-81
• /
• 2021

본 연구의 목적은 기업에서 클라우드 컴퓨팅 서비스를 채택하기 전에 판단 해야하는 중요한 요인들에 대한 우선 순위를 도출하고 평가한다. 연구 방법으로 전문가들에 대한 의사결정 사항을 반영하기 위해서 AHP 분석기법을 활용하였다. AHP는 복잡한 의사결정 문제를 계층적으로 표현하고 그 계층의 항목 간의 쌍대비교(Pairwise comparison)를 통하여 최선의 대안을 도출해 내는 의사결정 기법이다. 기존의 통계적 의사결정 기법들과 비교해 의사결정과정이 체계적이며 간단하여 이해하기가 쉽다. 또한 분석과정에서 의사결정자의 일관성을 판단할 수 있는 지표를 제공하여 절차 또한 합리적이다. 본 연구의 분석 결과 중요도 우선순위 항목으로 보안성, 신뢰성, 경제성 순으로 나타났다. 보안성의 하위 항목요인 중 제1순위는 접근권한의 통제성, 2순위는 외부위협의 안전성으로 도출되었다. 연구 결과가 추후 실무에서 기준으로 활용될 수 있는 방안으로 활용되는데 이바지할 수 있으며, 향후 클라우드 컴퓨팅 서비스 채택을 한 기업의 만족도를 평가하여 비교·분석하는 연구를 진행할 필요가 있다.

• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• 제13권1_2호
• /
• pp.323-334
• /
• 2003

This paper presents a goal-programming (GP) model for management decision-making for sugarcane fertilizer mix problems. Sensitivity analysis on the priority structure of the goals has been performed to obtain all possible solutions. The study uses Euclidean distance function to measure distances of all possible solutions from the ideal solution. The optimum solution is determined from the minimum distance between the ideal solution and other possible solutions of the problem. The optimum solution corresponds to the appropriate priority structure of the problem in the decision-making context. furthermore, the results obtained from sensitivity analysis on the cost of combination of fertilizers confirm the priority structure.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 6th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.687-688
• /
• 2015

The objective of identifying the cause of inconsistency in determining priority of educational facility maintenance, any related factors were thoroughly identified and tested, to see if it has any effect on decision-making process in resource allocation for educational facilities. On the assumption that 'the more there are to be repaired/maintained and deferred, the higher the relevant cost will be, this will lead to a significant social loss. Accordingly, this study established a framework of determining resource allocation priority based on deferred maintenance and its related expenses. For doing so, it was required to determine relative ranking in terms of resource allocation within a pre-assigned school district, in consideration of the criticality of each deferred maintenance attribute/variable.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.107-122
• /
• 2004

This study aims to examine the usefulness on the Evaluation Process for the Feasibility & Priority of A Certain Public Projects. and the Methodology used AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) which used pairwise comparisons of the alternatives and criteria for solving discrete alternative multicriteria decision problems. In this paper, we present a similar phenomenon, rank reversal problem, when we apply the AHP to group decision making process. The problem is identified by an example problem in that the previous rank order of Public Projects choices. we also present three different methods to prevent the undesirable characteristic of the original AHP in appling to Decision Making Process.

• 한국산림과학회지
• /
• 제85권2호
• /
• pp.149-157
• /
• 1996

본 연구는 22개 지역에 대하여 임목수확 및 무육작업을 위한 임도개설순위를 결정하기 위하여, 다기준의사결정법중에 선호보정이 없는 모형인 최대최소법 및 최대최대법, 선호보정이 있는 모형인 단순가중치법, 계층가중치법 및 TOPSIS법의 적용성을 검토하였다. 그 결과 단순가중치법과 TOPSIS법이 임도개설순위의 결정에 적합한 것으로 판명되었다.