• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.147-169
• /
• 2009

This paper deals with disputes incurred from the CISG provisions in relation with the conformity of goods with a view to finding the general way of approach made by the court and arbitration tribunal in the case laws for the interpretation of CISG based on 6(six) cases thereon. Throughout this study, it has been noted that the German Supreme Court devoted most in creating the general principle of CISG interpretation in relation with national compulsory law of regulation applicable on the conformity of goods. It was New Zealand mussels case in which the German supreme court decided that the exporting country's compulsory law of regulation would be applied in determining the conformity of goods. Furthermore, German supreme court added that CISG does not place an obligation on the exporter to supply goods, which conform to all statutory or other public provisions in force in the import state unless the same provisions exist in the export State as well, or the importer informed the exporter about such provisions existing in the import state, or the exporter had knowledge of the provisions due to special circumstances. It is stipulated in CISG that the goods conform with contract if they are fit for the purpose for which goods of the same description would ordinarily be used. When questions arise concerning matters governed by the CISG that are not expressly defined in the CISG, the question is to be settled in conformity with general principles on which the convention is based. Only when such a general principle cannot be found may the tribunal turn to other sources such as UNIDROIT Principles, Principles of European Contract Law and Lex Mercatoria, etc. Interpretation of CISG should be autonomous, in the sense that it should not depend on principles and concepts derived from any national legal system. Even where a CISG rule is directly inspired by domestic law, the court should not fall back on its domestic law, but interpret the rule by reference to the CISG with a view to its international character and to the need to promote uniformity in its application and the observance of good faith in international trade.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.626-633
• /
• 2021

주택도시보증공사는 주택분양보증 사고발생시 환급이행을 신청할 경우 분양계약자에게 특별한 사정이 없는 한 입주금을 환급하여 보증 책임을 부담한다. 주택도시보증공사는 환급이행을 약관규제법에 근거하여 거절할 수 있으나 이와 관련하여 이해 당사자 간에 분쟁이 지속적으로 발생되고 있다. 이에 환급이행에 따른 법적쟁점에 대한 문제점과 개선방안을 연구하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 첫째, 약관규제법상 보증효력 및 보증범위의 문제 둘째, 주택도시보증공사의 조건부 제3자를 위한 보증계약의 문제 셋째, 대법원의 기존 판례의 태도의 문제점을 대상으로 검토하였다. 이런 법적 쟁점들을 검토한 결과 환급이행에 따른 약관해석은 신의 성실의 원칙에 따라 해석되어지고 있으나 개별 사안에 따라 판례들이 긍정과 부정 판결로 갈라질 수 있음을 확인하였다. 또한 주택분양보증은 조건부 제3자를 위한 보증계약임에도 불구하고, 이해 당사자와 같은 적극적 다툼으로 수분양자가 선의의 피해를 보는 것을 확인하였다. 이에 주택도시보증공사가 고객의 주거안정을 위한 설립취지에 맞도록 역할과 협력사항의 개선방안을 제안하였다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.119-127
• /
• 2016

최근 (구)건설기술관리법이 전면개정되어 2014년 5월 23일부터 건설기술 진흥법으로 새롭게 발효되었다. 동 법의 전면개정에도 불구하고, 기존 법률의 벌칙 조항 대부분은 변경이 없이 존치되었다. 특히 동 법 제85조 제1항에는 건설기술용역업자와 건설기술자가 성실, 정당 업무 의무를 위배하여 구조물의 주요 부분을 손괴하여 그 결과로 사람의 신체를 상하게 하거나 생명을 잃게 하였을 경우, 무기 혹은 3년 이상의 징역에 처하는 중한 형벌을 규정하고 있다. 본 조항의 경우 그 명확성 및 형벌의 경중의 적정성에 대하여 논란이 계속되어 왔다. 본 연구는 해당 조항의 특징과 그 적용범위를 명확히 하고, 본 조의 죄형법정주의 위반 여부 등에 대하여 분석을 가함으로써 본 조항의 개선점 등을 토론할 수 있는 이론적 배경 제시를 그 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해, 건설기술 진흥법 해당 조항을 행정법, 형법 등 상위 기본법에 비추어 분석하였고, 관련 판례, 헌법례 등 연관 사례를 수집하였으며, 기타 국내의 법률 중 유사한 사항을 규율하는 법률과의 비교를 수행하였다. 본 연구를 통해, 향후 우리나라의 건설용역업 및 건설산업 전체를 규율하는 법률 내의 각 세부조항에 대한 논의가 더욱 활성화되기를 기대하며, 향후 기타 벌칙 규정 및 관련 법률의 체계화, 선진화 등을 위한 중장기적이고 통합적인 연구가 지속되어야 할 것으로 판단된다

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.187-213
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this article is to examine Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Agreements. Most BITs and other investment treaties provide for FET of foreign investments. Today, this concept is the most frequently invoked standard in investment disputes. It is also the standard with the highest practical relevance: a majority of successful claims pursued in international arbitration are based on a violation of the FET standard. The concept of FET is not new but has appeared in international documents for some time. Some of these documents were nonbinding others entered into force as multilateral or bilateral treaties. Considerable debate has surrounded the question of whether the FET standard merely reflects the internationalminimum standard, as contained in customary international law, or offers an autonomous standard that is additional to general international law. As a matter of textual interpretation, it seems implausible that a treaty would refer to a well-known concept like the "minimum standard of treatment in customary international law" by using the expression "fair and equitable treatment." Broad definitions or descriptions are not the only way to gauge the meaning of an elusive concept such as FET. Another method is to identify typical factual situations to which this principle has been applied. An examination of the practice of tribunals demonstrates that several principles can be identified that are embraced by the standard of fair and equitable treatment. Some of the cases discussed clearly speak to the central roles of transparency, stability, and the investor's legitimate expectations in the current understanding of the FET standard. Other contexts in which the standard has been applied concern compliance with contractual obligations, procedural propriety and due process, action in good faith, and freedom from coercion and harassment. In short, meeting the investor's central legitimate concern of legal consistency, stability, and predictability remains a major, but not the only, ingredient of an investment-friendly climate in which the host state in turn can reasonably expect to attract foreign investment.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.257-285
• /
• 2011

This thesis has studied about the legal characteristic of injection of the trial drug, the position of the pharmaceutical firm as a contractor of the clinical trial, the possibility of compulsory performance of consistent injection of the trial drug, and the damage claim caused in the process of the clinical trial from the viewpoint of protecting the trial subject in the clinical trial. According to court's judgement in the United States, the lawsuit of the trial subject, although the trial subject had expected consistent injections, was dismissed because there was no direct contract between pharmaceutical and trial subject. However, Helsinki Declaration prescribe the medical research as follows. 'All patients who participated in the research should be able to use the best precaution, diagnosis, and treatment proved by the final outcome of the research'. The trial subject is entitled to demand only the pharmaceutical firm which developed and provided the trial drug, and the pharmaceutical firm has the obligation to supply the trial drug to the trial subject. Therefore, it would be not enough to protect the trial subject if the pharmaceutical firm which makes the trial drug is ruled out. In addition, especially, in case the trial drug has a constant effect with the aim of treatment, if the injection of the trial drug is suddenly stopped, the trial subject would not have the benefit of treatment by the trial drug. In this case, the best remedy against the damage is to urge a constant injection of the trial drug. Thus, in certain case, it is reasonable to consider that the pharmaceutical firm has the obligation to supply the trial drug to the trial subject constantly, and it is also necessary to compel it through effective means in case the pharmaceutical firm do not fulfill its obligation to supply the trial drug. However, as an essential prerequisite for the assertion mentioned above, it should be judged under the principle of good faith considering the concrete situation, that is, what roles the pharmaceutical firm has played.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제71권
• /
• pp.195-216
• /
• 2016

In determining the content of the FET standard, the tribunals stated protection of investor's legitimate expectations, due process and denial of justice, transparency, discrimination and arbitrariness, good faith, etc. The most major elements of the FET standard is the protection of the investor's legitimate and reasonable expectations. It is necessary to consider whether it is possible to what the expectations of investors are protected as legitimate and it is formed under any circumstances. If host state frustrate investor's legitimate expectations, it found a breach of the FET. The host state's specific assurance may reinforce investor's expectations, but such explicit statement is not always necessary. The host state must preserve a stable environment for investments. However, It must not be understood as the inalterability of the host state's legal framework. It implies that the host state's subsequent changes should be made consistently and predictably. The host state is entitled to exercise a reasonable regulatory authority to respond to changing circumstances in the public purpose. Therefore, whether the violation FET shall be determined through a balanced against the investor's legitimate expectations and the host state's reasonable regulatory exercise in the public interest. And investor should keep in mind that the principle of proportionality is applied unless host state provides stabilization clause or similar commitments to investor. Also host state should establish the basis of an argument about reasonable regulatory authority for public interest.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.383-391
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this research explain the meaning of the environmental design principles and cultural landscape pattern(dualistic space organization) of the Hahoe(河回:winding river village) the Yangdong(良洞) traditional village. Village's space organizations based on Shamanism, fin-yang and Five elements principle, Feng-shui idea, social system and Confucian ideas. And it were accomplish curat landscape pattern(village:form+object=pattern) through the frame of settlement space. As a central persons of villages(the Hahoe $.$ the Yangdong) construction, Suhae(西厓) experienced tough Chunghyodang - Wonjichongsa - Ogyonchongsa - Pyongsansowon channel(忠孝堂 -遠志精舍 -玉端精含 -脣山書院) and Kyomam(謙 ) experienced tough Yangjindang - Binyeonchongsa - Kyomamchongsa - Hwachonsodang(養眞堂 - 賓淵精舍 - 謙庵f精舍 - 花川書堂) channel. Also Woojae(愚齋) experienced tough Suhbackdang - Khankachung - Dongkangsowon(書百堂 - 觀稼停 - 東江書院) and Hoejae(晦齋) experienced tough Moochumdang - Hyangdan - Oaksansowon(無添堂 - 香壇 - 玉山書院). It is space organization of themselves interact contrast and sequence principles with competition in good faith. And ecological art-space, that is, environmental spare organizations of traditional village has been reflected harmony between nature and artificiality, spatial rhythm and sequence, spatial hierarchy between upper classes and humble class, permeability space, asymmetrical balance, aesthetic space perception. The humble classes hold a ceremony Hahoe's Pyolsingut-Talnori(maskdance drama), Dangjae(堂祭:religious service) at the Dang(堂:shamanism spot) and Yangdong's Sohraesulnori, Hohminori. And the upper class hold a ceremony Hahoe's Julbulnori and Yangdong's Chungjanori connected with culture of confucianism. Specially, the cultural structure cf the village is evidence of a contrast between the upper class and the humble classes, time, method and location of ceremony(performance).

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.201-223
• /
• 2015

2015년 5월 현재 한국은 세계 50개국과 FTA 발효 및 중국 외 3개국과 FTA 타결을 이룬 상황 하에서, 원산지 검증이 한 EU FTA와 한 미 FTA 체결이후 본격화됨에 따라 그 중요성은 커졌지만 국내검증사례에 대한 자료의 제한적 접근성 등의 사유로 인하여, 원산지 검증사례에 대한 종합적이고 세부적인 접근의 연구는 미진한 편이다. 본 연구에서는 원산지 검증제도 개요 및 FTA 체결 국가의 일반규정, 원산지규정과 원산지 결정기준에 대한 선행연구를 고찰하였다. 그리고 대표적인 직접검증 방식을 채택하고 있는 한 미 FTA와 간접검증 방식을 채택하고 있는 한 EU FTA를 중심으로 직 간접 검증 방식의 고찰을 통하고 원산지 검증의 주요 원산지 결정기준위반 현황을 파악하였다. 또한 기존 주요 원산지 결정기준 위반 요소들을 FTA 협정 법령상에서 제시한 원산지 충족 요건 유형별로 세분화하여 세부 유형별 위반 사례를 종합적으로 조사 분석하여 수출기업에서 원산지 검증에 있어 취약요인을 분석하여 이에 대한 기업의 대응방안을 제시하였다. 구체적 대응방안으로 민관합동 대응조직 구축의 필요성, 현실적 원산지 관리시스템 구축, 연관 중소기업간 FTA 원산지 정보 공유 허브 시스템 구축, 기업 내 원산지관리 대응 조직의 활성화 및 연계 부서 간 전사적 관심과 교육 활성화를 제시하였다.

• 한국조리학회지
• /
• 제19권5호
• /
• pp.264-279
• /
• 2013

본 연구의 목적은 외식 프랜차이징의 분쟁 유형과 기업정보 간의 차이를 분석하는데 목적이 있다. 연구목적을 달성 하기위해 공정거래위원회의 심결례를 바탕으로 분쟁의 유형을 분석하고 관련된 기업정보와의 차이가 있는지 SPSS WIN(V.17.0)을 이용하여 분석하였다. 분석결과, 분쟁의 유형은 정보공개서 미제공(58.5%)과 가맹금 미예치(15.1%)가 높았고, 분쟁유형과 관련 변수간의 크러스컬웰리스(Kruskal-Wallis) 검증에서 매출액과 설립기간 및 가맹점수는 유의수준 p<.05, 상시종업원수는 유의수준 p<.1에서 유의한 차이를 발견 하였다. 상관계수에서, 설립기간은 상시종업원수와 가맹점수에서 양의 연관성이 있었고, 상시종업원수는 가맹점 수와 브랜드 수에 유의수준 p<.05에서 연관성이 있었다. 분쟁의 해결방안으로는 가맹본부의 신의칙준수와 관련 당국의 모범거래기준 및 법제도 강화 그리고 가맹 희망자는 전문가의 자문이 필요할 것으로 시사되었다.