• Title/Summary/Keyword: Precondition for Unsafe Acts

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

The Effect of Organizational Influence on Precondition for Unsafe Acts in Pilots - Focused on HFACS - (조직영향이 조종사들의 불안전행위의 전제조건에 미치는 영향 - HFACS를 중심으로)

  • Yu, TaeJung;Song, Byeong-Heum
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics
    • /
    • v.25 no.4
    • /
    • pp.161-169
    • /
    • 2017
  • The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) is a general human error framework originally developed and tested within the U.S. military as a tool for investigating and analyzing the human causes of aviation accidents. Based upon Reason's (1990) model of latent and active failures, HFACS addresses human error at all levels of the system, including the condition of aircrew and organizational factors. As a result, this study aims to examine the influence between the latent conditions based on HFACS. This study seeks to verify the factors of "Organizational Influence" effecting the "Precondition for Unsafe Acts" of HFACS. The results of empirical analysis demonstrated that the organizational influence had a positive influence on precondition for unsafe act, especially the "Organizational Climate" of organizational influence had even greater influence on precondition for unsafe acts.

A Study on Analysis of Accident Rate and the Latent Condition of Accident for Helicopters in Korea (국내 회전익 항공기 사고율 분석 및 사고의 잠재적 조건에 관한 연구)

  • Yu, Tae-Jung;Kim, Chil-Young;Lim, Se-Hoon
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics
    • /
    • v.22 no.4
    • /
    • pp.56-64
    • /
    • 2014
  • There were a total of 65 accidents of helicopers between 1990 and 2013. The overall accidents rate has remained around 8 accidents per 100,000 flight hours, and the fatal rate has stayed at about 8 accidents per 100,000 flight hours. In this study, we conduct a series of statistical analyses to investigate the significance of latent failure of groups that operate the helicopter. Analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences in the latent condition score for the 3 groups, with the lower accidents rate groups reporting better scores of latent condition. Results indicated that there are the significant differences of latent condition in accidents between groups of high accidents rate and groups of low accidents rate.