DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Organizational Influence on Precondition for Unsafe Acts in Pilots - Focused on HFACS -

조직영향이 조종사들의 불안전행위의 전제조건에 미치는 영향 - HFACS를 중심으로

  • 유태정 (한국방송공사(KBS) 항공팀) ;
  • 송병흠 (한국항공대학교 항공운항학과)
  • Received : 2017.08.16
  • Accepted : 2017.12.18
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) is a general human error framework originally developed and tested within the U.S. military as a tool for investigating and analyzing the human causes of aviation accidents. Based upon Reason's (1990) model of latent and active failures, HFACS addresses human error at all levels of the system, including the condition of aircrew and organizational factors. As a result, this study aims to examine the influence between the latent conditions based on HFACS. This study seeks to verify the factors of "Organizational Influence" effecting the "Precondition for Unsafe Acts" of HFACS. The results of empirical analysis demonstrated that the organizational influence had a positive influence on precondition for unsafe act, especially the "Organizational Climate" of organizational influence had even greater influence on precondition for unsafe acts.

Keywords

References

  1. Tae-Jung Yu, Chil-Young Kim and Se-Hoon Lim, , "A Study on Analysis of Accident Rate and the Latent Condition of Accident for Helicopters in Korea", Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, Volume 22, Issue 4, 2014, pp.56-64 https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2014.22.4.056
  2. Tae-Jung Yu, Byeong-Heum Song, "Case Analysis of the Helicopter Accident by HFACS ", 2017 KSAA Spring Conference, pp.59-64.
  3. Heinrich, H.W., Petersen, D., & Roos, N. Industrial accident prevention: A safety management approach (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.1980
  4. Reason J., Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990
  5. von Thaden, T.,Wiegmann, D., & Shappell, S. (2006). Organizational factors in commercial aviation accidents. The international journal of aviation psychology. 16(3), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap1603_1
  6. CSB. (2007). Investigation report: Refinery explosion and fire. BP, Texas City, TX. (CSB Report No. 2005-04-I-TX). Washington, DC: Author.
  7. International Atomic Energy Agency. (1992). The Chernobyl accident: updating of INSAG-1. A report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. (Safety Series 75-INSAG-7).
  8. NTSB. (2011). Accident report: Pacific Gas and Electric Company natural gas pipeline rupture and fire, San Bruno, California, September 9, 2010. (NTSB Report No. NTSB/PAR-11/01).
  9. NTSB. (2010). Railroad accident report: Collision of two Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metrorail Trains near Fort Totten Station, Washington, DC, June 22, 2009. (NTSB Report No.NTSB/RAR-10/02).
  10. Reason J., Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990 .
  11. Wiegmann, D., Shappell, S., The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-HFACS, FAA DOT/FAA/AM-00/7 Office of Aerospace Medicine: Washington, DC., 2000
  12. Shappell, S., Wiegmann, D. Applying Reason : the human factors analysis and classification(HFACS) Human Factors ans Aerospace Safety1(1).59-86. 2001
  13. FAA DOT/FAA/AM-06/18 Human Error and Commercial Aviation Accidents: A Comprehensive, Fine-Grained Analysis Using HFACS, Shappell, Detwiler, Wiegmann, Hackworth, 2006
  14. Shappell, S. A., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2000). The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System - HFACS. Technical Report DOT/FAA/AM-00/7. Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Medicine.
  15. Iden, R., & Shappell, S. A. (2006). A human error analysis of US fatal highway crashes 1990-2004. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(17) 2000-2003. doi:10.1177/154193120605001761. San Francisco, USA.
  16. Boquet,A.,Detwiler, C., Shappell, S., 2004. A human factors analysis ofU.S.emergency medical transport accidents. Air Medical Journal 23 (5), pp. 34-34.
  17. Reinach, S., Viale, A., 2006. Application of a human error framework to conduct train accident/incident investigations. Accident Analysis and Prevention 38, 396-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.013
  18. Celik, M., Er, I.D., 2007. Identifying the potential roles of design-based failures on human errors in shipboard operations. In: 7th Navigational Symposium on MarineNavigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 20-22 June, Gdynia, Poland, pp. 617-621.
  19. Milligan, F.J., 2007. Establishing a culture for patient safety-the role of education. Nurse Education Today 27 (2), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.03.003
  20. El Bardissi, A.W., Wiegmann, D.A., Dearani, J.A., Daly, R.C., Sundt, T.M., 2007. Application of the human factors analysis and classification system methodology to the cardiovascular surgery operating room. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 83(4), 1412-1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.002
  21. Krulak, D.C., 2004. Human factors in maintenance: impact on aircraft mishap frequency and severity. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 75 (5), 429-432.
  22. Scarborough, A., Pounds, J., 2001. Retrospective human factors analysis of ATC operational errors. In: Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH.
  23. Beaubien, J. M., & Baker, D.P. (2002). A review of selected aviation Human Factors taxonomies, accident/incident reporting systems, and data reporting tools. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 2(2), 11-36.
  24. Schmidt, J., Schmorrow, D., & Hardee, M. (1998). A preliminary human factors analysis of Naval Aviation maintenance related mishaps. Proceedings of the SAE AEMR Conference. Long Beach, CA.
  25. J. Rasmussen, Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem, Safety Science, 27, (1997) 183-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0
  26. Helen Omole, Guy Walker(2015), Offshore transport accident analysis using HFACS,6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences

Cited by

  1. 국내 헬리콥터 조종사 인적오류 사고 분류 및 분석 vol.28, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2020.28.4.021