• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.41-77
• /
• 2000

This study aimed at the analysis, from the perspective of rationality, of policy making process in the separation of prescribing and dispensing. This study is to identify the characteristics and problems of the policy process to introduce the new durg-prescription system, and make policy recommendations. In terms of separation of prescribing and dispensing, the development of policy making process can be divided into two periods; periods before and after the inauguration of the govemment of people. In the period before the govermment of poeple, one of the major characteristics of policy decision on the new system was the poweful influence of interset groups. At that time, the ministry lacked the problem-solving ability and commitment on the policy. Consequently, during the former period, the policy making process had been driven by interest groups. Therefore, the original purpose of the policy to secure the pulic health was lost. During the latter period, there was also the strong influence of interst groups, complexity of interest, the ministry's inability of problem solving. However, in this period, it is notable that this has drawn nation-wide attention, severl civic grouos have participated in the policy making process, and that the number and voice of these groups have remarkably increased. With regards to rationality, incrementalish model is highly sutable to explain the policy making process in the former period. But in the latter period when the new drugperscripition system became a national issue and civic groups began to participte in this matter more actively, rational model is more explanatory that incrementalism to understand the process. During the latter period, the original goal of this policy was not distored by a few interest groups thanks to the rapid development of civil movement and therebly a big influence of civic groups on the policy making. For that reson, a jigh level of rationality is found in the policy-making process of the latter period. Some suggestions to achieve the rationality in the policy making process based on the results of this study are as follows; Frist, the public's participation should be enered in the policy making process. Second, the govermment should make contiuns efforts to enhance its ability of long-term planning and policy implementation, and increase rationality of policy making process. Third, balance among interset groups should take place in the process of policy making. Forth, sound, constructive, and logical activity of interest groups is necessary to express and promote their interests.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제21권9호
• /
• pp.458-470
• /
• 2021

한국의 정책 현실에서는 사회적으로 큰 이슈가 되지만 막상 정책 결정이 이루어지지 않는 경우가 많이 있다. 이렇게 정책 결정이 지연되는 이유로는 적정한 정책 절차를 거치기 위해서 지연되는 경우, 이해관계자의 동의가 이루어지지 않아 지연되는 경우 등도 존재하지만, 이와 같은 사유만으로 정당화되지 않는 정책 지연도 다수 발생하고 있다. 본 연구는 현재 한국의 정책 결정 과정에서 정당화되지 않는 정책 지연은 정부에 의한 의도적인 무의사결정으로 설명할 수 있다는 점을 제시하고자 하였다. 이에 대한 사례로 상암동 롯데복합쇼핑몰을 제시하고, 상암동 롯데복합쇼핑몰 정책 과정을 무의사결정의 시각에서 분석하였다. 엘리트층의 존재, 목적, 정책수단, 정책과정, 결과 등의 요소들을 기반으로 분석한 결과 상암동 롯데복합쇼핑몰 건립 지연 사례는 정부의 적극적이고 전략적인 무의사결정에 의한 것으로 추정될 수 있었다. 소극행정과 구분되는 정부의 전략적인 무의사결정에 대해 향후 다양한 검토가 이루어질 필요가 있다.

• 과학기술학연구
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.105-156
• /
• 2003

본 연구는 1990년 이후 모방형에서 혁신형으로 과학기술정책의 패러다임이 변화되면서 과학기술정책형성을 둘러싸고 다양하게 발생하는 부처간 정책갈등 현상과 그 조정과정을 분석하였다. 연구를 위해 과학기술기본법(기본법) 제정과정을 사례로 선정하고, 연구의 시간적 범위를 '92년부터 '01년까지로 하여, 법률안 태동기, 과도기, 입법기 등 3개의 시기단위로 구분하여 비교 분석하였다. 부처간 정책갈등의 원인과 양상을 부처간 상호작용의 동기를 기준으로 정책 지향적 갈등과 관할권 지향적 갈등으로 구분 분석하였다. 갈등조정 방법의 분석은 수평적 분석적 조정과 수직적 정치적 조정을 그 기준으로 하였다. 연구결과를 부처간 정책 갈등양상, 정책갈등의 특징, 정책갈등의 조정과정, 그리고 참여자들의 특징적 양상 등을 중심으로 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 정책갈등은 태동기에는 부처간 정책지향의 차이에 따른 갈등이 관할권 지향에 의한 갈등보다 우위현상을 보였고, 과도기에는 정책 지향과 관할권 지향에 의한 갈등이 복합적으로, 그리고 입법기에는 관할권 지향에 의한 갈등이 지배적인 현상을 보였다. 둘째, 정책갈등에 대한 조정과정은 태동기에는 수평적 분석적 조정이 주류를 이루었고, 과도기에는 수평적 수직적 정치적 조정양상이 다양하게 나타났으며, 입법기에는 수직적 정치적 조정 양상이 두드러지게 나타났다. 셋째, 정책갈등에 대한 조정결과는 참여자들의 특징을 중심으로 분석하였다. 그 결과부처간 정책갈등을 해결하는 데 있어서 국회와 정당이 결정적인 역할을 했음을 보여주었다.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.151-163
• /
• 1998

The government policy on the occupational safety and health is the fundamental factor for the effectiveness and efficiency of the accident prevention efforts. However this point of view is comparatively neglected and most of policy in occupational safety and health has not been successful enough in Korea. Thus, this study aims to reduce the accidents at work in Korea through the improvement of the decision-making process on the occupational safety and health policy in Korea. The recommendations are derived from the comparison between the policy decision-making organization and process of Korea and those of other major countries. Capitulated recommendations are: more involvement of professional individuals in the process of policy decision-making; intensive utilization of research institutes; and more openness of the process of policy decision-making to the stakeholders ie, the representatives of employees and employers.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.129-139
• /
• 2015

Background: Policy network theory was proved to be an appropriate analytic tool for the current social welfare policy making process. This study aimed to analyze policy making process related to the nurse expansion and policy output while focusing on the interactions and activities among various policy actors. Methods: In this study, we used reports related to the need for expansion of nursing personnel journals, dissertations, newspaper articles, for hearings and debate policies for securing nurse data, and interviews. We examined three components of policy network, that is, policy actors, interactions, linkage of interest. Results: For that to expand the nurse before the 2000s in expanding the supply of medical supplies have been conducted without much disagreement among policy actors under the government's initiative. However, there was lacked a close relationship between the expanding supply of nurses and inaccurate analysis of supply and demand. As the policy is applied between the various policy actors' needs and claims, conflict was intensified and many policy options had been developed. Government only took a role as a coordinator among policy actors in the 2000's. Also, it was difficult to find sufficient and clear evidence that policy-making process based on fair judgment. Conclusion: Therefore, it is urgently required to determine the policy through a social consensus to address the appropriate policy means and the process by correct analysis of the policy issues.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.33-42
• /
• 2012

This paper dealt with developing conceptual model for making public policy on consumer product safety. The matters of consumer safety, public health and environmental protection are essential parts of making policy for consumer products. Moreover, policy authority should consider all measures based on consumer safety. In the process making regulations, policy authority has to have some methods to prevent errors on treating eligible persons as persons disqualified under uncertainty decision making of public policy. To recognize and ensure fairness on public policy, policy authority needs to establish basic policy making and fundamental concepts. Therefore, we developed conceptual model for consumer products safety, CPSPcon in this paper. The conceptual model is one part of SSM(Soft System Methodology) and can support specific policy target. The CPSPcon model can assist in evaluation of responses to an adapting or considering model.

• 사회복지연구
• /
• 제39호
• /
• pp.189-219
• /
• 2008

본 논문은 한국의 발전국가 하에서의 사회정책 결정과정 및 정책산출의 동태성을, 1970년대 초반의 국민복지연금제도의 입안과정을 중심으로 분석하고자 한 것이다. 이를 위하여 본 연구는 정책결정과정, 외적 제약요인으로서의 정책맥락(policy context), 그리고 정책결정의 산물로서의 정책산출(policy outputs)을 연결하는 과정지향적 관점에서 통합적인 분석틀을 구성하였다. 이론적 논의와 관련해서는 정책네트워크 모형을 주로 참조하였다. 구체적 분석변수로서는 우선 정책맥락의 경우는 정치, 사회, 경제적 환경의 세 가지 측면에서 분석하였다. 사회정책결정 및 정책네트워크와 관련해서는 i) 창도자, 동기, 촉발장치 ii) 참여자의 수 및 핵심적 행위자 iii) 참여자의 이해(interests) iv) 갈등하는 집단 및 이들의 주장 차이 v) 참여자들 간의 상호작용이라는 다섯 가지 변수를 중심으로 분석하였다. 정책산출은 '주로 반영된 이해'와 '의도한 정책내용의 변화'를 통하여 고찰하였다.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2006년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.197-204
• /
• 2006

This paper tried to develop differentiation strategies of policy process in governance. Firstly, we reviewed model of policy making(output-oriented model and process-oriented model, normative or idealistic approach and realistic or empirical approach, rational model and cognitive model etc). Now gumi city is making the policy based on the process-oriented model, realistic or empirical approach, cognitive model. So gumi city was winner the test of provinces innovation in 2005. Therefore, when we make the policy, consider these factor: citizen and public service personnel participate policy making process and control policy quality.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국시스템다이내믹스학회 2002년도 추계학술대회발표논문집
• /
• pp.103-122
• /
• 2002

Construct ion sector government policies are targeted towards regulation than facilitation and management. This approach often fails to integrate different segments of the public and private and seems to be inadequate in encouraging the private sector to achieve better quality construction. This situation suggests a need for a better and systematic approach for construct ion policy making. This paper suggests a model-based approach to public policy making using system dynamics approach. Singapore government's policy making efforts to encourage the use of prefabrication are discussed as an application example. This paper presents system models which discuss strengths and weaknesses of the current construction system in Singapore using casual loops, and highlights the feedback processes that would be useful in decision making for the government. Based on these system dynamics models, this paper identifies four major potential policy interventions policy interventions.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.1-34
• /
• 2020

Purpose Due to the complexity of policy environment in modern society, it is accepted as common basics of policy design to mix up a variety of policy instruments aiming the multiple functions. However, under the current situation of written-down policy specification, not only the public officers but also the policy researchers cannot easily grasp such frameworks as policy portfolio. The purpose of this study is to develop "Policy Attributes Taxonomy" identifying and classifying the public programs to help making decisions for allocative efficiency with effectiveness-based information. Design/methodology/approach To figure out the main scheme and classification criteria of Policy Attributes Taxonomy which represents characteristics of public policies, previous theories and researches on policy components were explored. In addition, to test taxonomic feasibility of certain information system, a set of "Feasibility Standards" was drawn from "requirements for well-organized criteria" of eminent taxonomy literatures. Finally, current government classification system in the area of social service was tested to visualize the application of Taxonomy and Standards. Findings Program Taxonomy Schemes were set including "policy goals", "policy targets", "policy tools", "logical relation" and "delivery system". Each program and project could be condensed into these attributes, making their design more easily distinguishable. Policy portfolio could be readily made out by extracting certain characteristics according to this scheme. Moreover, this taxonomy could be used for rearrangement of present "Program Budget System" or estimation of "Basic Income".