• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.673-683
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to analyze the validity of teacher evaluation policy for professional development and to suggest the ways to improve the policy in school. The teacher evaluation policy for professional development is designed to improve teacher professionalism and quality of school education. For this purpose, A survey was conducted and 361 elementary and middle school teachers participated in Busan. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS WIN 12.0. The conclusions of this study are as follows: First, although teachers are highly interested in the teacher evaluation policy, they have negative attitudes for practicing the new policy. Second, assessors must be composed of reliable, competent experts because teacher evaluation has a great influence on teaching activities. The assessors should be composed of those who have the specialization and reliability on the basis. Also the assessors must be trained to enhance the fairness, objectivity and reliability by rigid discipline. Finally, teacher evaluation policy should be closely linked to increasing teacher's expertise such as training opportunities, teacher consultants, and senior teacher systems and should be widely utilized for the evaluation to be effective.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제37권2호
• /
• pp.97-126
• /
• 2006

지식정보화사회의 도래와 제7차 교육과정 시행에 따른 사회 교육의 패러다임 변화에 따라 국민들은 학교도서관에 다양한 역할을 요구하고 있다. 이에 학교도서관 정책과정을 교육정책 평가모형에 근거하여 정책의제설정, 정책결정, 정책집행 과정으로 구분하여 문헌정보학의 시각이 아닌 정책학 행정학의 시각으로 분석하는 틀을 개발하고 이 틀을 이용하여 학교도서관 정책을 과정별로 평가하였다. 이 평가를 토대로 반세기만에 나온 학교도서관 정책과정의 문제점을 분석하여 보다 나은 정책개선 방향을 제시하였다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.55-84
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 학교도서관 정책을 평가하기 위하여 정책학에서 제시한 기준을 토대로 평가모형을 개발하고 이 평가모형에 '학교도서관 활성화 종합방안'을 적용하여 학교도서관 정책에 대한 평가를 진행하였다. 학교도서관 정책을 평가하기 위한 기준은 여러 학자가 제시한 이론 중에서 교육정책과 학교도서관 정책에 관한 선행 평가모형을 근거로 하였다. 선정된 평가기준은 평가자에게 배부한 설문지와 전화인터뷰를 통하석 검증하였다. 학교도서관 정책에 대한 평가결과는 대체로 긍정적이었나 일부 정책개선 노력이 필요하다는 내용이 제기되었다.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2012년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.185-188
• /
• 2012

As a separate project unit, the domestic construction policy evaluation is independently evaluated and managed by different involvements, so that it has been difficult to have a consistent policy evaluation to be performed. In this paper, thus, it is aimed to give an overview of the evaluation system and issues of domestic construction policy and suggest strategies of a improved evaluation system by a comprehensive benchmarking of construction policy evaluation system of Japan. The implications of this paper will serve a basis of improvement of a better construction policy evaluation system in Korea.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2003

보안정책모델은 평가대상제품(Target of Evaluation, TOE)의 보안정책을 비정형적, 준정형적, 또는 정형적 방법을 사용하여 구조적으로 표현하는 한 것이다. 보안정책모델은 보안기능요구사항과 기능명세간의 일관성 및 완전성을 제공함으로써 평가대상제품이 요구사항과 기능명세간 불명확성으로 인한 보안결점을 최소화할 수 있도록 보증성을 보장한다. 이러한 이유로 ISO/IEC 15408(공통평가기준. CC) 등 IT 제품 및 시스템의 보안성 평가기준의 고등급 평가에서 보안정책모델을 요구하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 보안정책모델의 개념과 관련 연구 및 공통평가기준의 보안정책모델 보증요구사항을 분석하여 보안정책모델 평가방법을 제시한다.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.35-45
• /
• 2019

This study revises current feasibility evaluation guideline for agricultural infrastructure improvement project considering recent changes in social and economic environment in rural area. We use an AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) approach to consider qualitative evaluation items in policy enforcement and balanced regional development as well as quantitative items in current economic analysis in the process of feasibility evaluation and decision making. The criteria system is composed of three level hierarchy. In the first level which consists of economic analysis, policy analysis, and regional development analysis, economic analysis was ranked top with relative weight of 0.45 and regional development analysis the lowest with 0.22. In the second level which consists of three evaluation items under policy analysis, consistency in policy enforcement, risk factors, and special evaluation factors, consistency in policy enforcement was ranked top. Finally, 13 detailed evaluation items in the third level were surveyed and ranked by using a comprehensive criticality vector. The result shows that the three most important evaluation items are 'degree of underdevelopment', 'spill-over effect of regional economy' and 'consistency with related planning and policy direction'.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.65-81
• /
• 2007

Recently, the affiliates of the Ministry of Information and Communication have been conducting a performance evaluation study on IT policy projects, based on the performance evaluation model of the U.S. Office of Management and Budgets, with regard to investment in computerization. The performance evaluation model for the policy project could provide the objective information required for the planning, development, and operation of the policy project. However, the performance of the most policy project is likely to be evaluated using the subjective evaluation criteria of evaluators. Therefore, this case study evaluates the relative efficiency using DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) in order to improve the performance evaluation method of the digital pioneer' project implemented by the Korea IT Industry Promotion Agency. The improvement value of inefficient Decision Making Units (DMUs) was measured by a static efficiency analysis. The measured value will suggest a objective viewpoint of the performance between DMUs to evaluators. In doing so, it will show an appropriate direction for the policy project to be evaluated successfully.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.13-22
• /
• 2006

The Korean government adopted the integrated stream water management policy recently with growing perception that natural disasters and pollution in Korea have been due not only to such human factors as urbanization and industrialization, but also to the policy of functionally separated management of irrigation, flood control and ecological management. Contrary to its good intention, research result shows that it is not realistic to expect that this new integrated policy in Korea will work well. In order to be an effective policy and program evaluation, this paper suggests that evaluation indicator on related programs and projects should be made through bottom-up process. For example, environmental benefit should be taken into account rather than just economic benefit, and cultural and social characteristics in the project region should be also considered seriously.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제9권6호
• /
• pp.947-955
• /
• 2023

본 연구의 목적은 Fisher(1995, 2003)의 다차원적 정책평가방법 중 상황적 타당성 평가를 활용하여 우리나라의 장애인 고용·일자리 정책을 평가하고 그에 따른 정책적 함의를 도출하는 것이다. 우리나라에서 진행된 다수의 장애인 고용·일자리 정책평가 연구들이 계량적인 연구방법에 치우쳐 균형 있고 종합적인 평가에는 소홀한 측면이 있었다. 본 연구에서는 기존의 실증주의적 방법론의 한계를 보완하는 질적 또는 현상학적 접근을 통해 균형 있는 정책평가를 시도하였다. 연구결과, 장애인 고용서비스·일자리의 개선을 위해 기관 간 연계·협력 강화, 고용서비스 사각지대 해소, 질적 개선, 맞춤형 고용서비스 확대, 프로그램 내실화, 정책·제도적 환경개선, 개인 심리정서적 지원강화가 향후 우리나라 장애인고용정책에서 중요한 것으로 나타났다.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.281-307
• /
• 2020

A variety of approaches are being applied to improve the existing ex-ante evaluation by expert panels in publicly funded R&D. While the objective evaluation criteria are constantly being improved to screen and select the superior projects, alternative approaches such as random prioritization and logical modeling are also underway to overcome the conservative bias of reviewers and to secure disruptive innovation. This study intends to find critical implications for ex-ante evaluation of public R&D system from the comparison of Indonesia and Korea. For the comparative analysis, literature review and expert in-depth interviews are conducted on the national R&D system and the selection evaluation process. In Korea, the selection criteria of projects are legally promulgated for establishing an objective evaluation system, and at the program level, the major considerations in the planning process are specified by Presidential Decree. On the other hand, while Indonesia conducts R&D in 47 strategic fields largely by public research institutes (PRI) based on the non-competitive government contributions. This study draws out implications of institutionalizing the planning process at the level of program, and of increasing the ratio of contract-based competitive funding at the level of project in the national R&D portfolio.