• 한국지반신소재학회논문집
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.65-73
• /
• 2020

본 연구에서는 현장타설말뚝이 사질토 지반에서 지지되는 경우에 대하여, 설계지지력 산정을 위해 적용되고 있는 다양한 제안식을 이용하여 말뚝의 길이비와 N값이 지지력에 미치는 영향을 평가하였다. 그 결과, Meyerhof 제안식은 전체 지지력에 있어서 선단지지력과 주면마찰력의 분담률은 동일하게 평가하고, 지지력 분담률은 길이비에 의해서만 영향을 받는 것으로 분석되었다. NAVFAC DM-7 제안식은 말뚝의 길이가 주면마찰력과 선단지지력 모두 영향을 미치기는 하지만, 선단지지력에 더욱 큰 영향인자로 작용하는 것을 알 수 있었다. 특히, N값과 말뚝의 직경에 의한 영향보다는 말뚝 길이요소에 의한 영향이 가장 큰 것을 알 수 있었다. FHWA의 제안식은 말뚝의 지지력 산정 시, 주면마찰력에 의한 영향요소를 다른 제안식에 비해 적극적으로 반영하는 것으로 평가되었으며, 극한지지력 평가 시에 주면마찰력의 영향을 더 크게 반영하는 것을 알 수 있었다.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2002년도 기초기술학술발표회
• /
• pp.57-76
• /
• 2002

As piling works in urban area increasing, SIP which is low noise & vibration piling method is taking place of driven pile which has good bearing charateristics and economics. Since SIP has been used for more than 15 years and it's application is increasing year by year, however, accurate analysis of bearing mechanism of SIP is not enough. So the design of SIP is much more conservative than driven pile. This paper is aimed to analyse the bearing charateristics of 103 SIPs constructed in Korea to give rational design criteria. Research result shows that bearing capacity of SIP is 40% lower than that of driven pile and conservative Meyerhof(equation omitted) method produced closer result to load test results than other design method. And this result show that to use optimised design criteria for the economic SIP design, quality control criteria must be settled down to produce high in-situ bearing capacity.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2003년도 봄 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.439-446
• /
• 2003

In this paper the model tests have been conducted and the results are compared with those by the theoretical methods to study the behaviors of the piled raft. The size of model box is 2.2m${\times}$2m${\times}$2m. The raft is made of rigid steel plate and piles made of steel pipes. Generally the bearing capacity of group piles is designed with only the pile capacities, and the bearing capacity of raft is ignored. But the uncertainty of pile-raft-soil interaction leads to conservative design ignoring the bearing effects of raft. In the case of considering the bearing capacity of raft, the simple sum of bearing capacity of raft and that of each pile cannot be the bearing capacity of piled raft. Because the pile-raft-soil interaction affects the behavior of piled raft. Thus the effects of pile-raft-soil interaction are very important in the optimal design. In this paper, the behaviors of piled raft are studied through model tests of 2${\times}$2, 2${\times}$3, and 3${\times}$3 pile groups. The spacing between piles is changed in the model tests. And the behaviors of free standing and piled raft are also studied.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2002년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.358-365
• /
• 2002

In this paper the model tests have been conducted and the results were compared with those by the theoretical methods to study the behaviors of the piled raft. The size of model box is 2.2m${\times}$2m${\times}$2m. The raft is made of rigid steel plate and piles are made of steel pipes. Generally the bearing capacity of group piles is designed with only the pile capacities, which is Ignored the bearing capacity of raft. But the uncertainty of pile-raft-soil interaction leads to conservative design ignoring the bearing effects of raft. In the case of considering the bearing capacity of raft, the simple sum of bearing capacity of raft and that of each pile cannot be the bearing capacity of piled raft. Because the pile-raft-soil interaction affects the behavior of piled raft. Thus the effects of pile-raft-soil interaction are very important in the optimal design. In this paper, the behaviors of piled raft are studied through model tests of 2${\times}$2, 2${\times}$3, and 3${\times}$3 pile groups. The spacing between piles is changed in the model tests. And the behaviors of free standing and piled raft are also studied.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2009년도 세계 도시지반공학 심포지엄
• /
• pp.545-553
• /
• 2009

A lot of long-span marine bridge, which connects land to island or island to island, are being designed and constructed lately in south-west coast in South Korea. In the past, caisson foundations in marine were mainly adopted in construction and stability aspect, however, nowadays with development of pile construction technology, drilled shaft foundations are mainly adopted. As the long span cable stayed bridge and suspension bridge applied with lots of loads are being designed, the scale of pile foundations are getting larger. As the construction cost of substructure including foundation in marine bridges is too high, the appropriate evaluation of the axial bearing capacity of pile becomes a core factor to decide the construction cost of foundation if the drilled shaft is adopted as foundation type of bridge. The evaluation values of skin friction and end bearing capacity of drilled shaft in weathered rock suggested in south Korea are only to introduce the foreign specifications, and most of them are designed in a kind of hard soil layer. Also the allowable load of pile section is less than the expected bearing capacity of pile in the soil condition since the allowable capacity of pile is undervalued. Recently in order to improve this factor the bi-axial hydraulic load test of pile was taken, the data of load transfer analysis of pile, unit of skin friction and end bearing capacity are accumulated. In our country, the design of piles are made with ASD, however, LRFD considering service, strength and extreme state was adopted in Incheon Grand Bridge implemented with BTL, and the research to systematize the resistance coefficient appropriate at home country are being progressed.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제13권10호
• /
• pp.4863-4868
• /
• 2012

모래지반에 설치된 무리말뚝 중 두 개의 말뚝에 대하여 하중재하시험을 실시하고 그 결과를 하중전이법을 적용한 해석결과와 비교 분석하였다. 무리말뚝 설치 후 무리말뚝의 중앙부에 위치한 말뚝에 대한 해석결과에 따르면 하중지지능력이 재하시험결과보다 작게 나타났는데 주된 원인은 무리말뚝 설치로 인한 지반조밀화로 생각된다. 또한 API 방법과 Coyle and Sulaiman 방법을 적용하여 구한 하중-침하곡선으로부터 Davisson 방법을 통해 구한 말뚝의 극한지지력은 재하시험에 의한 극한지지력 값의 각각 77%와 90%였다. 무리말뚝 설치로 인한 지반 조밀화의 영향을 비교적 덜 받은 가장자리 말뚝에 대한 재하시험결과와 해석결과를 비교할 때 Davisson 방법을 통해 구한 말뚝의 극한지지력은 API 방법과 Coyle and Sulaiman 방법에 의할 경우 재하시험결과에 의한 값에 비해 각각 1.1배와 1.3배의 값을 보였다.

• Smart Structures and Systems
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2008

This study proposes a conceptual framework of in-situ vibration tests and analyses for quality appraisal of non-slender, cast-in-place piles with irregular cross-section configuration. It evaluates a frequency index from vibration recordings to a series of impulse loadings that is related to total soil-resistance forces around a pile, so as to assess if the pile achieves the design requirement in terms of bearing capacity. In particular, in-situ pile-vibration tests in sequential are carried out, in which dropping a weight from different heights generates series impulse loadings with low-to-high amplitudes. The high-amplitude impulse is designed in way that the load will generate equivalent static load that is equal to or larger than the designed bearing capacity of the pile. This study then uses empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectral analysis for processing the nonstationary, short-period recordings, so as to single out with accuracy the frequency index. Comparison of the frequency indices identified from the recordings to the series loadings with the design-based one would tell if the total soil resistance force remains linear or nonlinear and subsequently for the quality appraisal of the pile. As an example, this study investigates six data sets collected from the in-situ tests of two piles in Taipu water pump project, Jiangshu Province of China. It concludes that the two piles have the actual axial load capacity higher than the designed bearing capacity. The true bearing capacity of the piles under investigation can be estimated with accuracy if the amplitude of impact loadings is further increased and the analyses are calibrated with the static testing results.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 1999년도 봄 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.249-258
• /
• 1999

Dynamic load and static load tests are performed on steel pipe piles and concrete piles at five construction sites in highway to compare the difference of load bearing mechanisms. At each site, one steel pile is instrumented with electric strain gages and dynamic tests are performed on the pile during installation. Damages of strain gages due to the installation are checked and static test is performed upon the same pile after two or seven days as well. It shows that load transfer from side friction to base resistance behaves somewhat differently according to the results of load-settlement analysis obtained from PDA and static load test. Initial elastic stage of load settlement curves of two load tests is almost similar. But after the yielding point, dynamic resistance of pile behaves more stiffer than static resistance, thus, dynamic load test result might overestimate the real pile capacity compared with static result. Analysis of gage readings shows that unit skin friction increases exponentially with depth. The skin friction is mobilized at the 1∼2m above the pile tip and contributes to the considerable side resistance. Comparison of side and base resistances between the measured value and the calculated value by Meyerhof's bearing capacity equation using SPT N value shows that the calculated base resistance is higher than the measured. Therefore, contribution of side resistance to total capacity shouldn't be ignored or underestimated. Finally, based upon the overall test results, a construction control procedure is suggested.

• 한국지반공학회논문집
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.85-92
• /
• 2007

최근, 대형구조물의 기초로서 현장타설말뚝의 사용이 증가하면서 신뢰성있는 말뚝 지지력의 산정이 중요해졌다. 이에 따라, 본 연구에서는 국내 풍화암에 근입된 현장타설말뚝을 대상으로 정재하시험 수행결과와 지지력 공식으로부터 구한 지지력값을 비교함으로써 지지력 공식의 신뢰성을 확인하고자 하였다. 분석대상은 4개 현장에서 수행된 총 12본의 정재하시험 말뚝이며, 시험말뚝에 대한 재하시험 자료 및 풍화암의 암반 물성값을 분석하였다. 본 연구에서 분석한 지지력 공식은 실무에서 널리 적용되고 있는 AASHTO 방법(1996), Carter와 Kulhawy 방법(1988), 그리고 FHWA 방법(1999)등이다. 재하시험에서 결정된 지지력과 각 지지력 공식들의 산정 결과를 비교 분석한 결과 Carter와 Kulhawy 방법(1988)이 설계 안전측의 지지력값을 주며 변동계수가 작아서 신뢰성이 높은 것으로 평가되었다.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2009년도 춘계 학술발표회
• /
• pp.376-387
• /
• 2009

Piled raft foundation is a geotechnical composite construction to support the superstructure by pile-soil-raft interaction. General conventional design for piled raft doesn't consider the contribution of a raft. This is very conservative and requires more piles to satisfy the factor of safety. It is important to evaluate the load sharing features of piled raft. In this research, this characteristics of piled raft evaluated using both centrifuge and numerical modelings. The ultimate bearing capacity of piled raft foundation was also evaluated and predicted through comparisons of ultimate bearing capacity of single pile (SP), unpiled raft (UR), freestanding pile group (FPG) and piled raft (PR). $\xi_{pr}$ and $\eta$ were determined by centrifuge model tests to simply evaluate the ultimate bearing capacity of piled raft and bearing capacity of piled raft was predicted using the calibrated numerical model based on the centrifuge tests and laboratory tests data.