• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.144-155
• /
• 1995

It is well known that implants showing no clinical mobility are successfully osseointegrated and have good prognosis. When implants are under load, their mobility begins to increase. It is of necessity to substantiate whether excessive load is on or premature occlusal force is acting prior to desirable osseointegration. Using Periotest unit, we could measure the pattern of mobility change. Consequently, osseointegrated treatment has come to success by intercepting progressive mobility and doing perceptive treatment according to the result of Periotest Value(PTV). In this study, we took records of intangible mobility of 70 osseointegrated implants. And we also measured the mobility of periodontally sound natural teeth as a standard from 30 dental personnel. Conclusions were summarized as followings ; 1. Lower lateral incisor has the highest PTV, whereas lower canine, upper canine, lower premolars and lower 1st molar have the lowest PTV in natural dentition. 2. There are little significant statistical difference of PTV between men and women in both(natural and implant) dentition. 3. In general, lower natural teeth show lower PTV than upper counterpart. 4. Mandibular implants have lower PTV than those of maxillary implants. 5. All of the successfully osseointegrated implants have lower PTV than those of periodontally healthy teeth.

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 1994년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.35-35
• /
• 1994

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 1997년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.46-46
• /
• 1997

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제33권12호통권319호
• /
• pp.898-907
• /
• 1995

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 2004년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.89-89
• /
• 2004

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 2004년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.53-53
• /
• 2004

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제44권5호
• /
• pp.549-560
• /
• 2006

Purpose : This experiment examined the effects of anodization on commercially pure titanium implant fixtures. Material & methods : The implant fixtures were anodized at three different voltage levels, producing three different levels of oxidation on the surface of the fixure. Implant were divided into four groups according to the level of oxidation. Group 1 consist of the control group of machined surface implants, Group 2 implants were treated by anodizing to 100 voltage, Group 3 implants were treated by anodizing oxidation to 200 voltage Group 4 implants were treated by anodizing oxidation to 350 voltage. Surface morphology was observed by Scanning Electron Microscope(SEM) and the surface roughness was measured using NanoScan $E-1000^{\circledR}$. Implantation of the fixtures were performed using New Zealand white rabbits. $Periotest^{\circledR}$ value(PTV) resonance frequency analysis(RFA), and removal torque were measured in 0, 2, 4, 8, 12 weeks after implantation. Results : The results of the study were as follows: 1. Values for the measured surface roughness indicate statistically significant differences in Ra, Rq, and Rt values among group 1, 2, 3, and 4 at the top portion of the thread,(p<0.05) while values at the base of the threads indicated no significant difference in these values. 2. A direct correlation between the firming voltage, and surface roughness and irregularities were observed using scanning electron microscope. 3. No statistically significant differences were found between test groups regarding $Periotest^{\circledR}$ values. 4. Analysis of the data produced by RFA, significant differences were found between group 1 and group 4 at 12 weeks after implantation.(p<0.05) Conclusions : In conclusion, no significant differences could be found among test groups up to a certain level of forming voltage threshold, beyond this firming voltage threshold, statistically significant differences occurred as the surface area of the oxide layer increased with the increase in surface porosity, resulting in enhanced bone response and osseointegration.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.126-135
• /
• 2023

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on the location of the implant and the position of the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Six implants were installed in different dentate sextants of six artificial bone models. Implant stability was measured in three conditions of the bone model (without mounting on a phantom head, mounted on a phantom head in supine position, and mounted on a phantom head in upright position). A resonance frequency analysis device (Osstell) and two damping capacity analysis devices (Periotest and Anycheck) were used to measure implant stability. The values measured outside the phantom head were treated as controls, and the values inside the phantom head were compared using an independent t-test. RESULTS. Osstell showed different results in two of the six divisions in both the supine and upright positions compared to outside of the mouth (P < .05). Periotest showed different results in all six parts in the supine position and in five parts in the upright position compared to outside of the mouth (P < .05). While Anycheck showed different results in five areas in the supine position compared to outside of the mouth, it showed different results in only one area in the upright position (P < .05). CONCLUSION. In the difficult implant position for the operator to access, the implant stability measuring devices show less reliability. The accessibility of implant is greatly affected in the order of Osstell, Anycheck, and Periotest.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.180-186
• /
• 2008

Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the effect of the implant recipient site preparation methods on primary stability of implants with the instruments of $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Periotest^{(R)}$ in the iliac bone of cadaver. Methods and materials: The 8 iliac bones in 4 cadavers and implants treated with resorbable blasting media (RBM) were used. $Periotest^{(R)}$ (Simens AG, Germany) and $Osstell^{TM}$ (Model 6 Resonance Frequency Analyser: Integration Diagnostics Ltd., Sweden) were used to measure primary stability of implants. Implants were inserted into the iliac crest of the cadaver. In control group, the recipient site was prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendation: 1.8 mm guide drill, 2.0 mm initial drill, 2.7 mm pilot drill, 2.7 mm twist drill, 3.0 mm twist drill, 3.3 mm pilot drill, 3.3 mm twist drill, and 3.3 mm countersink drill as well as tapping drill were used in order. In the group 1, implant recipient sites were prepared by sequentially drilling from 1.8 mm guide drill to 3.0 mm twist drill and then inserted implants without countersinking and tapping. In the group 2, implant recipient sites were prepared to 3.0 mm twist drill and countersink drill and then inserted implants without tapping. In the group 3, the sites were prepared to 3.0 mm twist drill and countersink drill as well as tapping drill. In the group 4, the sites were prepared to 3.3 mm twist drill. In the group 5, the sites were prepared to 3.3 mm twist drill and countersink drill. A total of 60 implants were placed (n=10). The stability was measured using $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Periotest^{(R)}$ mesiodistally and buccolingually. To compare the mean stability of each group statistically, One-way ANOVA was used and correlation of instrument were analyzed using SPSS 12.0. The results obtained were as follows; 1. The stability of group 1 measured using $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Periotest^{(R)}$ buccolingually showed the highest, and there are significant difference statistically between control group and experimental group 1,2,4 in each instruments respectively (p<0.05). 2. The stability of group 1 measured using $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Periotest^{(R)}$ mesiodistally showed the highest. There are significant difference statistically between control group and all experimental groups in $Osstell^{TM}$, and between control group and experimental group 1,2,3,4 (p<0.05). 3. There are high correlation between the measurements of $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Periotest^{(R)}$ (p<0.05). Conclusion: These results indicate that the primary stability of implant can be obtained by the recipient sites preparation with smaller diameter drill than that of implant or minimal drilling.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.300-307
• /
• 2011

연구 목적: 본 연구에서는 난소절제술을 시행한 백서의 골결손부에 골이식을 시행하고 소형 임플란트를 제작하여 식립한 후 PostGraft$^{TM}$를 투여하여 임플란트의 골유착 및 안정성에 미치는 영향에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 난소절제술을 시행한 백서 48 마리의 골결손부에 Biocera$^{TM}$를 사용하여 골이식을 시행하고 소형 임플란트를 제작하여 식립한 후 PostGraft$^{TM}$를 투여한 군 24마리와 투여하지 않은 대조군 24마리를 식립 2, 4, 6주 후 Periotest$^{(R)}$를 이용한 임플란트 안정성, 골밀도, 골-임플란트 접촉률 측정 및 조직학적 검사 등을 통하여 비교 분석하였다. 결과: Periotest$^{(R)}$ 측정 결과 시간이 지남에 따라 실험군과 대조군에서 모두 측정값이 감소하였고 실험군에서 더 낮은 값을 나타내었으나 각 군 간에 유의한 차이는 관찰되지 않았다. 골밀도 값은 골다공증으로 인해, 시간이 경과함에 따라 실험군과 대조군에서 모두 감소하였고 실험군에서 더 적은 감소량을 보였으나 각 군 간에 유의한 차이는 관찰되지 않았다. 골-임플란트 접촉률 측정 결과 시간이 경과함에 따라 실험군과 대조군 모두 증가하였고 실험군에서 더 높은 값을 보였으나 2주와 4주에서는 각 군 간에 유의한 차이가 없었고 6주에서는 각 군 간에 유의한 차이가 관찰되었다(P<.05). 조직학적 검사 결과 시간이 경과함에 따라 실험군과 대조군 모두 골반응이 증가하였으며 실험군에서 더 활발한 골형성이 이루어졌다. 결론: PostGraft$^{TM}$의 경구 투여가 난소절제술을 시행한 백서의 경골에 식립한 임플란트의 골유착과 골형성을 향상시키는 효과가 있을 수 있다.