The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제15권3호
  • /
  • Pages.126-135
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on various clinical conditions: an in vitro study

  • Han-Na Lee (Department of Dentistry, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Myoung-Sub Kim (Department of Dentistry, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Jeong-Yol Lee (Department of Dentistry, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Xu Zihan (Department of Dentistry, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Jae-Jun Ryu (Department of Dentistry, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Ji-Suk Shim (Department of Dentistry, Korea University Guro Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2023.03.09
  • 심사 : 2023.05.15
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on the location of the implant and the position of the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Six implants were installed in different dentate sextants of six artificial bone models. Implant stability was measured in three conditions of the bone model (without mounting on a phantom head, mounted on a phantom head in supine position, and mounted on a phantom head in upright position). A resonance frequency analysis device (Osstell) and two damping capacity analysis devices (Periotest and Anycheck) were used to measure implant stability. The values measured outside the phantom head were treated as controls, and the values inside the phantom head were compared using an independent t-test. RESULTS. Osstell showed different results in two of the six divisions in both the supine and upright positions compared to outside of the mouth (P < .05). Periotest showed different results in all six parts in the supine position and in five parts in the upright position compared to outside of the mouth (P < .05). While Anycheck showed different results in five areas in the supine position compared to outside of the mouth, it showed different results in only one area in the upright position (P < .05). CONCLUSION. In the difficult implant position for the operator to access, the implant stability measuring devices show less reliability. The accessibility of implant is greatly affected in the order of Osstell, Anycheck, and Periotest.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT; Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy; Ministry of Health & Welfare; and Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) [grant number: RS2020-KD000292].

참고문헌

  1. Lages FS, Douglas-de Oliveira DW, Costa FO. Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018;20:26-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12565
  2. Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:408-20.
  3. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
  4. Rodrigo D, Aracil L, Martin C, Sanz M. Diagnosis of implant stability and its impact on implant survival: a prospective case series study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:255-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01820.x
  5. Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:743-54.
  6. Herrero-Climent M, Falcao A, Lopez-Jarana P, Diaz-Castro CM, Rios-Carrasco B, Rios-Santos JV. In vitro comparative analysis of two resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell implant stability coefficient and Penguin resonance frequency analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:1124-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12868
  7. Oh JS, Kim SG. Clinical study of the relationship between implant stability measurements using Periotest and Osstell mentor and bone quality assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;113:e35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.07.003
  8. Lachmann S, Laval JY, Axmann D, Weber H. Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:347-55.
  9. Lachmann S, Laval JY, Jager B, Axmann D, Gomez-Roman G, Groten M, Weber H. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:80-4.
  10. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:51-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x
  11. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  12. Sim CP, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:598-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01878.x
  13. Huang HM, Chiu CL, Yeh CY, Lee SY. Factors influencing the resonance frequency of dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1184-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(03)00680-3
  14. Winkler S, Morris HF, Spray JR. Stability of implants and natural teeth as determined by the Periotest over 60 months of function. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:198-203. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0198:SOIANT>2.3.CO;2
  15. Meredith N, Friberg B, Sennerby L, Aparicio C. Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:269-75.
  16. Lee DH, Shin YH, Park JH, Shim JS, Shin SW, Lee JY. The reliability of Anycheck device related to healing abutment diameter. J Adv Prosthodont 2020;12:83-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.83
  17. Andreotti AM, Goiato MC, Nobrega AS, Freitas da Silva EV, Filho HG, Pellizzer EP, Micheline Dos Santos D. Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by two different devices: a systematic review. J Periodontol 2017;88:281-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160436
  18. Aal MA, El Far M, Sheta NM, Fayyad A, El Desouky E, Nabi NA, Ibrahim M. Correlation of implant stability between two noninvasive methods using submerged and nonsubmerged healing protocols: a randomized clinical trial. J Oral Implantol 2020;46:571-9. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00130
  19. Krafft T, Winter W, Wichmann M, Karl M. In vitro validation of a novel diagnostic device for intraoperative determination of alveolar bone quality. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:318-28.
  20. Pyo SW, Kim HG, Kwon O, Otgonbold J, Lee KW. Reliability verification of damping capacity assessment through in vitro analysis of implant micromotion in peri-implant bone loss model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2021;36:106-14. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8168
  21. Zix J, Hug S, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:525-30.
  22. Faulkner MG, Giannitsios D, Lipsett AW, Wolfaardt JF. The use and abuse of the Periotest for 2-piece implant/abutment systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:486-94.
  23. Park YH, Leesungbok R, Lee SW, Paek JH, Lee JY. Differences in percussion-type measurements of implant stability according to height of healing abutments and measurement angle. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2018;56:278-86. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2018.56.4.278
  24. Derhami K, Wolfaardt JF, Faulkner G, Grace M. Assessment of the periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:221-9.
  25. Aparicio C, Lang NP, Rangert B. Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:Suppl 2:2-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01365.x
  26. Schulte W, d'Hoedt B, Lukas D, Maunz M, Steppeler M. Periotest for measuring periodontal characteristics--correlation with periodontal bone loss. J Periodontal Res 1992;27:184-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1992.tb01667.x