• Title/Summary/Keyword: Performance-Reward Sensitivity

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Hi Herzberg ? : The Role of Compensation Factors and Suggestions for Performance Compensation System

  • Kim, Yoo-Gue;Yang, Woo-Ryeong;Kim, Ha-Ryong;Yang, Hoe-Chang
    • The Journal of Economics, Marketing and Management
    • /
    • v.5 no.1
    • /
    • pp.21-26
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose - This study extracts performance-reward factors based on the previous studies related to Herzberg's two-factor theory and performance-reward and proposes a research method to identify how these factors have an influence on task performance directly related to production performance and contextual performance that has an indirect influence. Research Design, Data, and Methodology - This study draws performance-reward factors through Focus Group Interview(FGI), classifies them into economic/uneconomic and direct/indirect factors, draws maintenance/improvement factors and unnecessary ones through IPA, and maximizes the effectiveness of performance-reward factors. Results - It also identifies how performance-reward factors have an influence on internal and external motives based on previous studies, classifies performance-reward factors into task performance and contextual performance and identifies the influence relationship between these, and proposes a research model to identify the roles of equity sensitivity based on equity theory. Conclusion - The findings from this study are expected to lay the groundwork for drawing various methods to reduce the turnover rate of employees and be important resources for reinforcing the competitiveness of businesses by classifying the performance -reward factors that may cause internal and external motives from the small and medium-sized manufacturing perspective and presenting methods to identify if these have an influence on task performance and contextual performance.

Effect of Managerial Ability on Reward Level and Performance-Reward Sensitivity (경영자 능력이 보상수준 및 성과-보상 민감도에 미치는 영향)

  • Seol-Won, Byun
    • Journal of Industrial Convergence
    • /
    • v.21 no.2
    • /
    • pp.9-16
    • /
    • 2023
  • This study analyzed the effect of manager's ability on compensation policy (compensation level and performance-reward sensitivity). To this end, the final 14,150 company-year data were used for KOSPI and KOSDAQ listed companies excluding the financial industry from 2012 to 2019. As a result of the empirical analysis, the higher the manager's ability, the higher the next reward level (the manager's ability hypothesis), but the performance-reward sensitivity decreased. This confirms the manager ability hypothesis through a positive (+) relationship between manager ability and compensation, and means that high compensation for manager ability may be additional compensation for manager ability other than performance, rather than due to performance. This study differs from previous studies and has contributions in that it examines the more complex effects of managerial ability and compensation system.

Effect of Reporting Earnings Strategy on Asymmetric CEO Performance-Compensation Sensitivity (보고이익전략이 비대칭적 경영자 성과-보상 민감도에 미치는 영향)

  • Eun-Ju, Lee
    • Journal of Industrial Convergence
    • /
    • v.20 no.11
    • /
    • pp.105-112
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this study is to examine the moderating effect of the reporting earnings strategy on the relationship between managerial ability and manager performance-reward sensitivity. Both upward and downward adjustments can occur in the direction of management performance adjustment according to the manager's reporting earnings strategy. was found to decrease performance-based performance-reward sensitivity. The underreporting strategy is hypothesized that, although additional compensation is paid for the performance of the reporting strategy according to the manager's ability, the level of compensation increases, but this type of compensation will decrease the performance-reward sensitivity because this type of compensation is irrelevant to the actual performance of the manager. This is the result of indirectly confirming that discriminatory compensation is provided for upward and downward adjustment of business performance according to the reporting earnings strategy.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Executive Performance -Impact on Compensation Sensitivity (기업의 사회적 책임이 경영자 성과-보상민감도에 미치는 영향)

  • Hwang, Seong-Jun;Kim, Dong-Il
    • Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
    • /
    • v.10 no.9
    • /
    • pp.221-228
    • /
    • 2019
  • Companies are making great efforts to integrate CSR into various aspects of their management strategies. A lot of research has been conducted on what management intends to do indirectly and indirectly. Was performed. In this study, we conducted additional research considering executive compensation as an indicator of the motivation for management to participate in CSR. The main purpose of this study was to analyze whether accounting performance measures or market performance measures are given more weight when providing rewards for performance to corporate managers conducting CSR activities. The analysis of the relationship between CSR and executive performance-reward sensitivity showed that corporate executives who actively implement CSR pay more weight to market performance measures rather than accounting performance measures. Considering the long-term performance of CSR when paying executives' compensation, the company pays more for market performance than accounting performance. This study is expected to be useful for executives to design compensation contracts to actively induce CSR implementation.

The effect of learning stress and reward style on short- and long-term memory performance (학습 스트레스의 수준 및 제공되는 보상 조건의 차이가 단기 및 장기 기억의 수행에 미치는 영향)

  • Jung, Juyoun;Han, Sanghoon
    • Science of Emotion and Sensibility
    • /
    • v.15 no.4
    • /
    • pp.527-540
    • /
    • 2012
  • We examined the effect of delayed and immediate rewards on short- and long-term memory performance depending on the level of stress. It has been demonstrated that delaying feedback during memory tasks could lead to better retention than presenting it immediately (a.k.a., feedback delay benefit or delay-retention effect). In this study, we manipulated stress level(high-stress or low-stress), reward-timing(delayed or immediate reward), reward-existence(500 or 0 won) and retrieval-timing(delayed or immediate memory test). On the high-stress learning condition, one week later, the number of correct answers with delayed-rewards were significantly more than that of delayed-no-rewards but there was not any difference between immediate-rewards and immediate-no-rewards. On the other hand, in the high-stressful immediate memory test, immediate-rewards only had a positive effect on memory performance. The results indicated that delayed rewards improved long-term memory performance by promoting memory consolidation and the sensitivity to rewards was higher under the high-stress condition.

  • PDF