• Title/Summary/Keyword: Park Geun-Hye

Search Result 288, Processing Time 0.033 seconds

The Determinants of Participation in the Candlelight Protest for the impeachment of Park Geun-hye from 2016 to 2017 (2016년-2017년 박근혜 퇴진 촛불집회 참여의 결정요인)

  • Do, Myo Yuen
    • Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
    • /
    • v.23 no.2
    • /
    • pp.109-146
    • /
    • 2017
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the determinants of participating in the candlelight protest for the impeachment of Park Geun-hye from 2016 to 2017. In particular, it revealed the effects of social economic factors, emotional factors, political orientation, and political attitudes and behaviors in participation of candlelight protests. To this end, the survey was conducted for candlelight participants and non-participants. The results of the study confirmed the effects of gender, ideology, political party, anger, dissatisfaction with the presidential performance, non voting activities, TV and newspaper use, and political association activities.

Evaluating Teacher Policy of Park Geun-hye Government (박근혜정부의 교원정책 평가)

  • Shin, Hyun-Seok;Yonn, Ji Hee
    • (The)Korea Educational Review
    • /
    • v.23 no.4
    • /
    • pp.101-133
    • /
    • 2017
  • This Study aims to evaluate teacher policy in the Park Administration and to suggest tasks based on the results. To attain the aim, it describes overall teacher policy process in Park Administration and evaluates teacher policy based on the criteria which was driven from the CIPP model. The conclusions are summarized as follows. First, the environmental suitability of the situation assessment was met in general. The reason for this was that the teacher policy of the Park Geun-hye government was introduced reflecting changes in the environment and demands of policy stakeholders. The validity and feasibility of the policy objective of the input evaluation were not satisfied. There were deficiencies in the objectives of the policy measures. The objectives of the measures were not linked to the policy objectives. The budget necessary for policy enforcement were not secured. In future policy design, efforts should be made to examine whether the policy goals are valid, to secure resources necessary for policy implementation and to increase the feasibility of policies. The procedural rationality of the process evaluation and the suitability of the means were not met. Discussion with the interest group was omitted, it was not clear whether the implementation of the policy was linked to the policy goal. In the future, it will be necessary to focus on procedures such as communication and collaboration with stakeholders, to make immediate revisions in case of problems. The effectiveness and satisfaction of the output evaluation were low. Because the validity of the policy objectives, the suitability of the means, and procedural rationality were not satisfied. In the future, it will be necessary to systematically design policies and communicate with stakeholders in the execution process to prevent policy failures and actively.