• 한국지역사회생활과학회지
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.51-70
• /
• 2013

The purpose of the study was to analyze the determinants on the absence of after-school care among elementary students. This study is based on the National Children and Youth Panel Survey(2010) data and analyzed through Binary Logit Model and Multinominal Logit Model. The Following results were obtained: First, school grades, the number of siblings, mother's education, family type by parental employment, family structure, family type by parental nativity, and family income, all affected the absence of after-school care. Second, the absence days of after-school care was affected by different factors. 1day-2days a week in absence of after-school was more likely to increase among children with more siblings and an older father. On the other hand, spending over 3-4days a week without after-school care was more likely to increase among mothers with lower education, dual-earner families, multicultural families, lower family incomes, small cities and rural areas. Based on the results of this study, we agree with the generalization and the diversification of after-school care policy for elementary school students.

• 지적과 국토정보
• /
• 제51권2호
• /
• pp.151-168
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 수도권과 비수도권의 가계지출 부담이 기혼여성의 출산 의사에 미치는 영향을 패널로짓 모형을 이용해 비교분석하였다. 실증분석의 핵심 대상인 기혼여성의 범위는 가임 가능성이 높은 25세부터 39세까지로 한정하였다. 주요 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 거주 지역과는 관계없이 대체로 배우자의 경제력이 기혼여성의 출산 의사에 있어 중요한 요인일 수 있다는 점을 확인하였다. 둘째, 결혼생활 만족도는 높을수록 출산 의사에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있었으며, 자녀가 반드시 있어야 한다는 가치관이 있을수록 출산 의사가 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 가계지출 부담은 기존 자녀 수와 같은 내부요인을 제외하고 기혼여성의 출산 의사에 있어 가장 중요한 영향을 미치는 요인임을 확인하였다. 특히 수도권과 비수도권 모두 교육비 지출에 대한 부담은 출산 의사를 큰 폭으로 감소시키는 핵심 원인으로 나타났다. 넷째, 가계지출 부담은 거주 지역에 따라 출산 의사에 상이한 영향을 보이는 것으로 나타났는데, 수도권은 의료비 및 원리금 대출이, 비수도권은 교통통신비가 출산 의사에 더 큰 영향을 미치고 있었다. 이를 통해 본 연구는 출산 제고를 위해서는 가계지출에 대한 부담완화가 지속적으로 필요하며, 거주 지역에 따라 차별적인 정책접근이 요구된다는 시사점을 확인하였다.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제47권10호
• /
• pp.109-122
• /
• 2009

This study examined the effects of household head’s worker status change type on household income and household head’s income using a total combined sample of 2,578 households from Korea surveyed in 1998 and 2002 KLIPS(Korean Labor and Income Panel Study). Binary logit regression results showed that household incomes were likely to decrease significantly when household head’s changed worker status from a regular employee, a temporary employee or a daily worker, or an employer or a self-employed to no job status, or from a regular employee to a temporary employee or a daily worker, an employer or a self-employed, or from an employer or a self-employed to a regular employee compared to a regular employee status maintenance. In contrast, household head’s incomes were likely to increase significantly when household head’s changed worker status from a temporary to a regular employee compared to a regular employee status maintenance. Women household heads were significantly associated with the likelihood of the decrease of household head’s income compared to men household heads. Household heads beyond their forties were significantly associated with the likelihood of the decrease of household head’s income compared to household heads in their thirties age-group counterparts. Household heads with education level beyond high school graduation were significantly associated with the likelihood of the increase of household head’s income compared to household heads with the education level of high school graduation. This study shows that a more comprehesive labor policy is needed for achieving sustainable household income inflow.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.31-39
• /
• 2014

Purpose - This study investigates the following two issues. First, we attempt to find the important determinants of housing investment and to identify their significance rank using survey panel data. Recently, the expansion of global uncertainty in the real estate market has directly and indirectly influenced the Korean housing market; households demonstrate a sensitive reaction to changes in that market. Therefore, this study aims to draw conclusions from understanding how the impact of financial strength of the household is related to house investment. Second, we attempt to verify the effectiveness of diverse indices of financial strength such as DTI, LTV, and PIR as measures to monitor the housing market. In the continuous housing market recession after the global crisis, the government places top priority on residence stability. However, the government still imposes forceful restraints on indices of financial strength. We believe this study verifies the utility of these regulations when used in the housing market. Research design, data, and methodology - The data source for this study is the "National Survey of Tax and Benefit" from 2007 (1st) to 2011 (5th) by the Korea Institute of Public Finance. Based on this survey data, we use panel data of 3,838 households that have been surveyed continuously for 5 years. We sort the base variables according to relevance of house investment criteria using the decision tree model (DTM), which is the standard decision-making model for data-mining techniques. The DTM method is known as a powerful methodology to identify contributory variables for predictive power. In addition, we analyze how important explanatory variables and the financial strength index of households affect housing investment with the binary logistic multi-regressive model. Based on the analyses, we conclude that the financial strength index has a significant role in house investment demand. Results - The results of this research are as follows: 1) The determinants of housing investment are age, consumption expenditures, income, total assets, rent deposit, housing price, habits satisfaction, housing scale, number of household members, and debt related to housing. 2) The impact power of these determinants has changed more or less annually due to economic situations and housing market conditions. The level of consumption expenditure and income are the main determinants before 2009; however, the determinants of housing investment changed to indices of the financial strength of households, i.e., DTI, LTV, and PIR, after 2009. 3) Most of all, since 2009, housing loans has been a more important variable than the level of consumption in making housing market decisions. Conclusions - The results of this research show that sound financing of households has a stronger effect on housing investment than reduced consumption expenditures. At the same time, the key indices that must be monitored by the government under economic emergency conditions differ from those requiring monitoring under normal market conditions; therefore, political indices to encourage and promote the housing market must be divided based on market conditions.