• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.355-369
• /
• 2022

Objective: To evaluate the completeness of the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in a general radiology journal using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four articles (systematic review and meta-analysis, n = 18; systematic review only, n = 6) published between August 2009 and September 2021 in the Korean Journal of Radiology were analyzed. Completeness of the reporting of main texts and abstracts were evaluated using the PRISMA 2020 statement. For each item in the statement, the proportion of studies that met the guidelines' recommendation was calculated and items that were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the studies were identified. The review process was conducted by two independent reviewers. Results: Of the 42 items (including sub-items) in the PRISMA 2020 statement for main text, 24 were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the included articles. The 24 items were grouped into eight domains: 1) assessment of the eligibility of potential articles, 2) assessment of the risk of bias, 3) synthesis of results, 4) additional analysis of study heterogeneity, 5) assessment of non-reporting bias, 6) assessment of the certainty of evidence, 7) provision of limitations of the study, and 8) additional information, such as protocol registration. Of the 12 items in the abstract checklists, eight were incorporated in fewer than 80% of the included publications. Conclusion: Several items included in the PRISMA 2020 checklist were overlooked in systematic review and meta-analysis articles published in the Korean Journal of Radiology. Based on these results, we suggest a double-check list for improving the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Authors and reviewers should familiarize themselves with the PRISMA 2020 statement and check whether the recommended items are fully satisfied prior to publication.

• 대한한방소아과학회지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.26-36
• /
• 2020

Objectives The purpose of this study is to assess the reporting quality and methodological quality of systematic reviews from the Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine. Methods Systematic reviews were selected from the Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine (JPKM) by utilizing Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS) and JPKM homepage. Two independent researchers assessed the reporting quality through Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline checklist, and assessed the methodological quality of systematic review through Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool checklist. Results Four systematic reviews were finally selected for the assessment. When assessed by PRISMA, three literatures were little insufficient, and one literature was sufficient. When assessed by AMSTAR 2, three literatures were moderate quality, and one literature was critically low quality. Also, all of the reviews had no information about 'Protocol and registration', 'publication bias', and 'conflicts of interest'. Conclusions Systematic review is important for Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine and Korean Medicine Society. Efforts are needed to improve the reporting and methodological quality of the systematic reviews through PRISMA and AMSTAR 2.

• 한방재활의학과학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.85-107
• /
• 2022

Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation (JKMR) using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Methods Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in JKMR, published from January 1991 to January 2022, were selected by searching the Korean studies Information Service System and JKMR homepage. Two independent researchers searched and selected systematic reviews and meta-analyses and evaluated the reporting quality of abstracts and main texts using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Results Of 1,515 articles, 39 systematic reviews were finally included for assessment. Evaluation of abstracts resulted in 2 studies rated as high, 11 studies rated as moderate, and 26 studies rated as low. A maximum of 83.3% and a minimum of 25.0% of the items were reported in the abstracts. Evaluation of the manuscripts resulted in no studies rated as high, 14 studies rated as moderate, and 25 studies rated as low. A maximum of 67.9% and a minimum of 34.1% of the items were reported in the manuscripts. Conclusions To improve the quality of systematic reviews published in JKMR, it is necessary to conduct systematic reviews based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.215-225
• /
• 2024

Predictive maintenance has been considered fundamental in the industrial applications in the last few years. It contributes to improve reliability, availability, and maintainability of the systems and to avoid breakdowns. These breakdowns could potentially lead to system shutdowns and to decrease the production efficiency of the manufacturing plants. The present article aims to study how predictive maintenance could be planed into the production scheduling, through a systematic review of literature. . The review includes the research articles published in international journals indexed in the Scopus database. 165 research articles were included in the search using #predictive maintenance# AND #production scheduling#. Press articles, conference and non-English papers are not considered in this study. After careful evaluation of each study for its purpose and scope, 50 research articles are selected for this review by following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA) statement. A benchmarking of predictive maintenance methods was used to understand the parameters that contributed to improve the production scheduling. The results of the comparative analysis highlight that artificial intelligence is a promising tool to anticipate breakdowns. An additional impression of this study is that each equipment has its own parameters that have to be collected, monitored and analyzed.

• 동아시아경상학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.81-91
• /
• 2022

Purpose - This study explores the role played by the government in spreading corporate green IT. Indeed, a lot of evidence is emerging that governments acting independently are not in a position of attaining the far end economic and social changes need for the realization of green IT. As much as matters about green IT was initiated by many governments. Research design, Data, and methodology - This study selected the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) as a research design. The PRISMA is recognized for its standard evidence reporting system and can provide adequate systematic review among previous studies. Result - A lot of consensus leads to the acquisition of the value of corporate green IT concerning the effectiveness of the collaboration. This study could obtain six suggestions from the systematic review, such as 'Rebalancing Government and Public Duties', 'Direct Regulation', 'Marketing Tools and Fiscal or Economic Measures', 'VNRP', 'Education for Decision Making', 'Latest Policy Trends within the G8 Nations'. Conclusion - The most challenging aspect when it comes to ensuring corporate green IT is the separation of economic growth from the perspectives regarding life qualities. According to the study (Falcone, 2020), this needs a second policy-oriented wedge concerning re-socialization with the desire of encouraging the development of the culture associated with the corporate green IT.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.323-331
• /
• 2020

본 연구의 목적은 욕창에 대한 예방적 중재방법과 영향요인을 비교, 분석하기 위해 기존문헌을 체계적으로 고찰하였으며 논문은 PRISMA(Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews) 지침에 따라 자료를 수집하고 분석하였다. 문헌은 2010년부터 2019년 6월까지 국내외에서 발표된 논문을 대상으로 하였다. 본 연구의 논문 선정기준에 따라 총 30의 논문이 선택되었으며 실험연구가 8편, 코호트 연구가 3편, 단면조사연구가 19편 이었다. 논문검색어는 국내논문의 경우 욕창, 압박욕창, 압박궤양, 예방, 중재의 단어를 조합하여 검색하였다. 분석결과 욕창의 예방적 중재와 예측요인을 통합적으로 제시하였으며 특히 체위변경과 압력 감소 장치 적용한 중재는 욕창 발생률을 감소시켰으며 욕창 발생 감소와 욕창예방에 중요한 중재임이 확인되었다. 본 연구결과를 토대로 각 의료기관에 적합한 욕창의 예방적 중재를 위한 기초 자료를 제공하고자 한다.

• 산업융합연구
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.9-18
• /
• 2020

본 연구의 목적은 간호대학생의 환자안전간호와 관련된 요인을 융·복합적 측면에서 체계적으로 고찰하고, 메타분석을 통해 관련 요인의 효과크기를 파악하는 것이다. 연구방법은 문헌검색은 Medline, Embases, CINAHL, DBpia, Research Information Service System(Riss), Korean Studies Information Service System(Kiss)을 이용하였으며, 국외 데이터베이스는 MeSH용어와 Emtree를 활용하여 검색하였다. 검색식은 [(patient safety or patient harm or safety management) and (students, nursing)] or [(patient safety or patient harm or safety management) and (education, nursing, graduate)] 이었다. 문헌선정은 PRISMA(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)를 이용하였다. 연구결과 관련 요인으로는 간호수행, 지식, 태도, 자신감, 인식 및 인지 등이 확인되었고, 그 중 환자안전간호 수행과 관련성이 높은 요인에는 자신감, 태도, 인식, 지식 순으로 파악되었다.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.119-126
• /
• 2020

본 연구의 목적은 관성 측정 장치(Inertial Measurement Unit, IMU)의 융합연구 형태와 방법에 대한 연구를 체계적 문헌고찰 방법으로 분석하여 IMU의 형태와 방법에 대한 경향을 파악하고자 한다. 연구수행은 PRISMA(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)가이드라인을 이용하여 수행되었다. 3개의 데이터베이스에서 검색된 630편 중 최종적으로 선정기준에 부합하는 23편을 선정하였다. 본 연구결과 전 세계적으로 IMU를 사용한 다양한 연구를 진행하고 있음을 알 수 있었고, IMU의 형태는 스트랩, 전신 슈트, 벨트, 손목시계, 신발, 장갑이 있었다. 이 중, 스트랩 형태의 IMU가 11편으로 가장 많았다. IMU의 장점인 간소화와 실시간 데이터 수집, 적용의 쉬움으로 작업 활동, 보행, 관절 가동 범위 등의 측정 방법으로 사용되었다. 본 연구의 결과는 IMU의 연구를 진행하는 의료 및 재활 분야의 전문가들에게 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있으리라 기대된다.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제19권7호
• /
• pp.427-440
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 여대생을 대상으로 한 식이 행동 중재프로그램의 효과를 조사하기 위한 체계적인 검토 및 메타분석이다. 분석 대상 논문은 2015년부터 2020년 2월 29일까지의 연구로, PRISMA에 따라 체계적으로 수집되었다. 메타분석을 위해 총 9편의 논문이 최종 선정되었고, 효과 크기를 추정하기 위해 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0을 사용하여 분석하였다. 여대생을 대상으로 적용된 식이 행동 중재프로그램 연구의 전체적인 효과 크기는 큰 것으로 나타났고, 문제 식이 행동 여대생을 대상으로 한 6편의 연구에서 효과 크기가 더 큰 것으로 확인되었다. 전체 여대생과 문제 식이행동 여대생 모두 식이 행동 관련 변수 및 심리사회적 관련 변수에서 유의한 효과 크기를 나타냈다. 그러므로 본 연구결과는 향후 여대생을 대상으로 차별화 된 식이 행동 중재프로그램을 개발하는 기초자료로써 연구의 의의가 있다.

• 산업융합연구
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.42-53
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 국내 노인을 대상으로 가상현실 프로그램 중재가 균형에 미치는 효과를 알아보기 위한 체계적 고찰 연구로, 가상현실 프로그램에 대한 근거자료를 제공하고자 하였다. 2005년 1월부터 2020년 5월까지 출판된 문헌을 대상으로 데이터베이스 누리미디어(DBpia), 학술교육원(earticle), 한국학술정보(KISS), 국가과학기술정보센터(NDSL), 한국교육학술정보원(RISS), 교보문고스콜라, 학지사뉴논문을 통해 총 94편의 논문이 검색되었고, PRISMA flow chart를 사용한 문헌선정과정을 바탕으로 최종 6편의 문헌이 분석에 사용되었다. 문헌의 질적수준은 근거수준 I이 3편(50.0%), II가 1편(16.7%), III이 2편(33.3%)으로 나타났고, 가상현실 프로그램 종류는 wii fit 밸런스가 4편(66.7%)으로 가장 많았으며, 균형능력 및 보행능력에 대한 평가도구를 통해 가상현실 프로그램 중재의 효과는 전반적으로 유의미하게 나타났다. 이는 일반 노인을 대상으로 가상현실 프로그램을 효과적으로 적용할 수 있을 것으로 기대하며 임상적 적용 근거를 제공하였으며, 앞으로 다양한 가상현실 프로그램 중재를 적용한 연구가 많이 다루어져야 할 필요가 있다.