• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.745-756
• /
• 2016

As infringement accidents of personal information have often occurred and estimates of damages are too large, the government introduces many certifications related with personal information management system for protecting personal information. Among them, PIMS and PIPL share many points in common, so many complaints about duplicate regulation have been suggested. This study evaluates the duplication of two certifications in order to examine redundancy between PIMS and PIPL both of which have been controversial.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.24 no.5
• /
• pp.911-918
• /
• 2014

Over the past few years, security breaches have been consistently reported around the world. Especially, people's personal information are at risk of being breached as the firms gather and utilize the information for their marketing purposes. As an effort to revamp their data infrastructures, companies have rebuilt their system that almost every data, including the personal information, are stored within the digital database. However, this migration provides easier access to the database but it has also increased the system vulnerability. As the data can be easily exposed to the unauthorized personnel both intentionally and unintentionally, it is necessary for companies to establish a set of security protocol and operate the personal information protection system. There are two major certified security system in South Korea; PIMS from KISA and PIPL from NIA. This paper analyzes the preferences of SMEs and small business using conjoint attributes of PIMS and PIPL. The study shows that the business owners take post certification rewards as the most important factor. It also shows that the attributes that have the highest utility rates are the following; 1) KISA certification, 2) 79 points of protection counter measurements, 3) 28 items of life cycle, 3) 50 percent discount on certification fee, and 4) Reduced amount of fine for personal information leakage incident.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.1267-1276
• /
• 2013

Cloud consumers who use cloud computing services are obliged to review and monitor the legal compliance of cloud providers who are consigned the processes of the PII (personally identifiable information) from them. This paper presented possible scenarios for cloud PII outsourcing and suggested PIMS (personal information management system) controls for outsourcing management between cloud consumers and cloud providers by analyzing both international standards and domestic certification schemes related to cloud computing and/or privacy management based on the legal obligations for PII outsourcing from Korean "Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)". The controls suggested can be applicable for developing the guidance of complying with privacy laws in organizations or the checklist of PII outsourcing management in PIMS certification.