• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.93-120
• /
• 2010

In 1978, Chinese reform and opening caused a big changes in Chinese labor relationship. Through reforming and opening, China gave up part of state ownership system and group ownership system, permitted private ownership system, and also opened the way for capitalists to ride again. Since China was established, the labor relationship ceased for 30 years has been appeared. However because the top priority aim of China's reform was economic growth, the protection of the rights and interests of labor was pushed back on the policy priority list. China takes foreign capitals based on cheap labor force quickly and China come up the worldwide plants. Since reformed, China keeps an economic growth rate of 9.7% annually for 30years. This economic growth is based on labor's sacrifice. However, Chinese fast economic growth causes side effects such as increasement of the gap between the wealthy and the poor, increasement of unbalanced development between regions, and the increasement of conflict between labor and management. Especially, according to changes in labors' level of consciousness, the labors recognized that their rights and interests are exploited by employers. Therefore, the labor dispute is continuously increasing. Chinese government changes their policy from the policy focusing on enterprise development to the policy protecting labor's rights and interests. In order to protect labor's rights and interests, China conducts labor contract law and labor dispute conciliation arbitration law in 2008. This kind of changes in Chinese labor environment affect a lot to Korean companies which already entered into China or are willing to enter. According to studying on present situation and resolution system in Chinese labor dispute, this paper suggests the proper countermeasure related to labor dispute of Korean companies which entered in China. First, the success rate of labor dispute conciliation by enterprise labor dispute conciliation committee is around 20% during recent several years and the success rate by year is in decline. Therefore, when labor dispute is occurred, our companies which entered into China better use other labor dispute methods such as negotiation and arbitration than conciliation in order to settle a conflict. Second, from the Korean enterprises entered in China point of view, there exists a problem not to sue except special cases which provided in the law even though they are dissatisfied with arbitrate judgment. Thus, when labor dispute occurred, Korean enterprises try to do best to settle the dispute through negotiation. However, in case of that the dispute cannot be settled by negotiation, they have to attend in the arbitration as if it is a last chance. Third, Korean enterprises keep in mind that dispute handling procedures between labor union and users or between labor group and users are different, and then deal with separately. Thus, dispute between labor and users have to follow arbitrate procedures as a necessary procedure, but in case of dispute related to group contract, namely dispute against labor union, labor dispute can be settled by arbitrate or suit, so after figuring out the situation exactly, it is necessary to select more advantageous way in order to settle the dispute. Moreover, in case of the dispute between labor union, they have to keep in mind that conciliation procedures cannot be used.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.133-144
• /
• 2013

It is commonplace to refer to the Nordic countries of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland and Iceland as a distinctive and homogenous welfare regime. As far as social housing is concerned, however, the institutional heritage of the respective countries significantly frames the ways in which social housing is understood, regulated and subsidized, and, in turn, how housing regimes respond to the general challenges to the national welfare states. The paper presents a historical institutionalist approach to understanding the diversity of regime responses in the modern era characterized by increasing marketization, welfare criticism and internationalization. The aim is to provide outside readers a theoretically guided empirical insight into Scandinavian social housing policy. The paper first lines up the core of the inbuilt argument of historical institutionalism in housing policy. Secondly, it briefly introduces the distinctive ideal typical features of the five housing regimes, which reveals the first internal distinction between the universal policies of Sweden and Denmark selective policies of Iceland and Finland. The Norwegian case constitutes a transitional model from general to selective during the past quarter of a decade. The third section then concentrates on the differences between Denmark, Sweden and Norway in which social housing is, our was originally, embedded in a universal welfare policy targeting the general level of housing quality for the entire population. Differences stand out, however, between finance, ownership, regulation and governance. The historical institutional argument is, that these differences frame the way in which actors operating on the respective policy arenas can and do respond to challenges. Here, in this section we lose Norway, which de facto has come to operate in a residual manner, due to contemporary effects of the long historical heritage of home ownership. The fourth section then discusses the recent challenges of welfare criticism, internationalization and marketization to the universal models in Denmark and Sweden. Here, it is argued that the institutional differences between the Swedish model of municipal ownership and the Danish model of independent cooperative social housing associations provides different sources of resistance to the prospective dismantlement of social housing as we know it. The fifth section presents the recent Danish reform of the governance model of social housing policy in which the housing associations are conceived of as 'dialogue partners' in the local housing policy, expected to create solutions to, rather than produce problems in social housing areas. The reform testifies to the strategic ability of the Danish social housing associations to employ their historically grounded institutional relative independence of the public system.

• 대한공업교육학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.47-68
• /
• 2007

이 연구는 충청북도 내 전문계 고등학교의 제반 문제점을 파악하고 도내 기업체의 요구 사항을 반영하여 전문계 고등학교 운영 활성화 방안을 제시하는 데 목적이 있다. 도내 32개 전문계 고등학교 실과부장과 학과장을 대상으로 전문계 고등학교 학과 특성화 추진, 교사 교육, 교육과정 개편, 진로 지도 강화 방안 등에 대하여 설문지 조사를 실시하여 분석하였다. 또한, 충청북도 내 산업체의 인력 수요, 산업체에서 요구하는 직업 능력 조사를 위하여 중소기업을 대상으로 설문 조사를 하여 분석하였다.이 연구를 통하여 충청북도 전문계 고등학교 운영 활성화 방안을 다음과 같이 제시한다. 첫째, 산업체의 요구에 따라 전문계 고등학교 교육은 외국어 기초 능력과 컴퓨터 활용 능력에 더욱 치중하여 교육해야 한다. 둘째, 인근 산업체와 맞춤형 교육과정 운영을 더욱 확대 실시하여 취업률을 향상시켜야한다. 셋째, 전문계 고등학교 졸업생 중 80% 이상이 2년제와 4년제 대학에 진학할 경우 전문계 고등학교를 일반계 고등학교로 개편 운영하는 방안을 고려해야 한다. 네째, 오송 의료 단지와 오창 IT 공업 단지의 확장에 대비하여 BT, IT 관련 산업체에서 일할 수 있는 기초 지식을 갖출 수 있는 학과로 개편 운영해야 한다. 다섯째, 산업체 직원을 초빙 교사로 활용하고 학교장에게 교육과정 운영의 자율권을 주어야 한다. 여섯째, 공립학교 5년제 교사 순환 근무제를 전문계 고등학교 특성화학과에서는 10년 이상 근무로 바꾸어 그 학교의 주인 의식을 갖도록 해야 한다.

• 대한지리학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.155-174
• /
• 1997

1994년 1월 1일 이후부터 공식적으로 발효한 NAFTA로 인하여 200l년 1월 1일까지는 멕시코ㆍ미국ㆍ캐나다 사이에 관세가 완전히 철폐될 예정이다. 패시코 북부지역의 변화는 이 지역의 도시성장에서 잘 나타나고 있다. 특히 국경지대에서 쌍둥이 도시화가 매우 급속히 진행되었다. 오늘날 멕시코 도시 순위 10위권 이내에 드는 세 도시(Ciudad Juarez, Tijuana, Mexicali)가 북부 국경지대에 위치한다. 멕시코 북부지역은 동서의 교류보다는 남북의 교류가 많았다. NAFTA로 인하여 멕시코 북부의 여러 하부지역들은 동서로 통합되는 것이 아니라 남북으로 통합되는 경향이 강화될 것으로 예측된다. 멕시코 북부 국경지대의 산업 발달은 멕시코인들에게는 고용기회를 확대시키고 미국인들에게는 저렴한 노동력을 이용할 수 있는 기회를 부여한다. NAFTA는 경제수준의 차가 큰 두 체제 사이의 경제통합이라는 점에서 향후 전세계적으로 전개될 지도 모르는 지역주의적 경제통합에 시사하는 바가 크다고 하겠다.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제28권6호
• /
• pp.81-94
• /
• 2010

This qualitative research was designed to explore the use of housing among Korean Chinese people in Harbin, China. Focusing on the use which based on the epistemology of housing adjustment, this was particularly designed to examine its cultural assimilation and acculturation on the way of life course, it employed the in-depth interview on the oral history of 5 interviewees in their 60s and 70s, individualized interviews were conducted from May 28 to 31 in 2010. Key findings were summarized as follows; 1. The free market reform in China resulted in privatization that allowed respondents to become homeowners, and the ownership was viewed as part of family asset centered upon a sense of solidarity. 2. Although homeowners in multi-story houses were responsible to decorate interior spaces, the common features in using interior spaces were found: entrance had no thresholds; kitchen was small, lack of storage cabinets, tile-flooring; washers were installed inside bathroom; and newly built apartment didn't have proper space to store Korean fermented foods. It was observed that housing adaptation outweighed housing adjustment. Those who used to live in Chinese houses with indoor-wearing-shoes or Russian houses with indoor-wearing-slippers were receptive to the use of dining table and bed, and the community heating system discouraged the use of individual electric water heater because of high electricity cost. 3. In daily life, eating habit wasn't much changed to the Chinese style, meals were shared, dish sterilizer was popular, and Kimchi fridge wasn't used. Because of the influence of the Chinese culture, such Korean traditions as ancestral rites and bedroom allocation tradition faded away, but traditional family values remained unchanged. In conclusion, Korean Chinese people experience normative housing deficits and adaptation selectively incurred. It's implied that residential design meets the needs resulting from the dual culture in terms of cultural assimilation and acculturation.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.431-444
• /
• 2023

Purpose - This study applies the traditional Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) model from industrial organization theory to investigate the relationship between market structure and performance in China's banking industry. Design/methodology/approach - For analysis, financial data from the People's Bank of China's "China Financial Stability Report" and financial reports of 6 state-owned banks and 11 joint-stock banks for the period 2010 to 2021 were collected to create a balanced panel dataset. The study employs panel fixed-effects regression analysis to assess the impact of changes in market structure and ownership structure on performance variables including return on asset, profitability, costs, and non-performing loan ratios. Findings - Empirical findings highlight significant differences in the effects of market structure between state-owned and joint-stock banks. Notably, increased market competition positively correlates with higher profits for state-owned banks and with lower costs for joint-stock banks. Research implications or Originality - State-owned banks demonstrate larger scale and stability, yet they struggle to respond effectively to market shifts. Conversely, joint-stock banks face challenges in raising profitability against competitive pressures. Additionally, the study emphasizes the importance for Chinese banks to strengthen risk management due to the increase of non-performing loans with competition. The results provide insights into reform policies for Chinese banks regarding the involvement of private sector in the context of market liberalization process in China.

• 한국토양비료학회지
• /
• 제45권1호
• /
• pp.118-126
• /
• 2012

Korea's agriculture had many inherent problems. Korea is a mountainous country with only 22 percent farmland and less rainfall than most other neighboring rice-growing countries. A major land reform in the late 1940s and early 1950s spread ownership of land to the rural peasantry. Individual holdings, however, were too small or too spread out to provide families with much chance to produce a significant quantity of food. The enormous growth of urban areas led to a rapid decrease of available farmland, while at the same time population increases and bigger incomes meant that the demand for food greatly outstripped supply. The result of these developments was that by the late 1980s roughly half of Korea's needs, mainly wheat and animal feed corn, was imported. Korea's agriculture is facing a new round of difficulties from the inevitable process of market opening. Therefore, we have reviewed the agricultural status and soils in Korea how we can meet the coming issues with respect to production and prospect based on the government documents and articles published on the journals.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.121-143
• /
• 2007

The law of Jus Rerem of China enacted on March 16, 2007 came into force from October 1st, 2007. China has enacted the law of Jus Rerem. This means that all three nations of Northeast Asia have formally and substantially similar legal terms and conceptions. Therefore, they will be reciprocally influenced on the legal matters related Jus Rerem. In the year 1949 when China, as a communist country, was originally established without the private ownership system, the law of Jus Rerem was not introduced. Since the reform and the open-economy policy in the year 1978 came into force, it has become important that newly acknowledged private property has been stipulated by the law of Jus Rerem. Arbitration Law of China is enacted on August 31th, 1994 and came into force from September 1st, 1995. It is a basic law which rules Chinese arbitration system. China has enacted the law of Jus Rerem, "conformed with the 21st century", by solving a lot of issues in dispute. A socialistic idea, a traditional Chinese idea and realistic conditions of the market economy were integrated into the law of Jus Rerem. It would have a very good effect on the growth and prosperity of China.

• 국제지역연구
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.163-186
• /
• 2018

이 연구는 북한경제체제전환을 위한 제도적 조건과 문제점을 분석하기 위한 데 목적이 있다. 연구방법으로는 먼저 주요 경제체제전환국들의 4대 시장개혁정책(자유화, 사유화, 민영화, 주식회사화)의 법제화과정들을 시기별로 비교분석하고 북한과의 차이점을 도출하였다. 이를 바탕으로 북한의 4단계 경제개혁정책(7.1조치, 종합시장정책, 화폐개혁, 6.28방침)의 제도화 과정들을 분석하고 경제체제전환국 사례의 북한 적용가능성에 대한 문제점, 그리고 전망을 모색하였다. 연구결과, 현재 북한 시장경제의 변화를 경제체제전환국들과 동일선상에서 비교할 수 없는 중요한 조건 세 가지가 있다. 첫째, 경제체제전환을 위한 대내외적인 조건과 환경, 그리고 국가와 시민사회의 역할이 다르다. 둘째, 정책결정과정과 집행과정의 수단과 목적도 다르다. 셋째, 국가의 정치경제정책의 속성과 실효성측면에서도 다르다. 넷째, 경제개혁을 위한 경제정책의 우선순위와 내용, 법제화과정들이 서로 다르다. 특히'중국식 모델'로의 이행가능성에 대해 논의할 때, 그것도 상당한 위험성을 내포한다. 그것은 북한에서 통제 권력의 시장투입 목적과 그들 생존 네트워크는 상당히 독보적이기 때문이다. 또한 중국과 북한의 내수시장 규모, 인구규모, 통제유형도 상당히 다르다. 북한 경제체제전환을 위한 필요충분조건은 시장 영역에서 물리적 통제기구와 제도의 완화이다. 다음으로 현재 불법 소유화 시장에 대한 전수조사와 함께 합법적 제도화가 시급히 이루어져야 한다. 이를 바탕으로 내수 시장의 중국 의존성을 점차 한국으로 전환할 필요가 있다. 즉 선 통제 권력 배제, 후 자율화 및 내수시장의 패러다임 전환이다.

• 대한지리학회지
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.245-267
• /
• 2012

이 논문은 공익명분에 입각한 공용수용 방식을 통해서 시행하는 미국 도시재생사업에서 사유재산권의 차별화를 분석한다. 도시재생사업이 강력한 수용방식을 활용하는 사업임에도 불구하고 실제로는 사회적 약자로부터 대자본 또는 민간개발업자에게 재산권을 이전시키는 재산권 차별화와 희생과정임을 밝힌다. 먼저 도시재생에 대해 다양한 학문적 관점에서 연구동향을 검토하고, 새로운 연구방향으로서 법제지리학적 관점을 제시한다. 다음으로 환경보호청과 회계검사원 자료를 통해 미국에서 이들 사업대상 지구의 규모를 추정하며, 이들을 탈공업화와 교외화의 유산으로 파악한다. 다음으로 사유재산권의 차별화 과정은 미국 연방대법원의 공적소유개념에서 경제적 공익개념으로의 공익개념 확장 과정, 공용수용의 민영화 과정, 개발주의 성장연합체제와 대자본 편향 및 인종 계층적 편견, 신자유주의적 재산권운동 등이 복합적으로 작용하여 발생하는 결과라는 것을 밝힌다.