• 무역학회지
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.285-299
• /
• 2019

The 'One Belt One Road (OBOR)' initiative, which was promulgated as part of the enlargement policy along with the advent of Xi Jinping in 2013, is a policy to expand China's political and economic power externally through linkages with neighboring countries. China's overseas port investment plays an important role in the promotion of the 'OBOR' policy from the coast of China through maritime transportation routes from S.E Asia to Mediterranean and Europe. Since China's overseas port investment has been made from several factors such as political, economic, and military motives, it differs in purpose and character from investments made by private companies, such as Global Port Operators(GTO) which consider profitability first. This study aims to address future prospects and implications by analyzing the geopolitics of China's overseas port investment under the 'One Belt One Road' initiative. According to the results, China's overseas port investment is dominated by state-owned enterprises and political and security factors are more important than profitability. China's overseas port investment has been on a large scale in a short period of time, and China has faced with various problems both domestically and internationally. such as debt default, environmental problems, subordination problems from recipient countries and political and military confrontation with great countries such as United States, Japan and India etc.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.403-428
• /
• 2010

This research is about global investment for managing the important position, what Korea is doing in World's main market. Considering there are some differences between developed countries' model and developing countries' model in doing direct overseas investment, they target to get political agreement and develop the new invest plan and strategy by understanding changes of Korean manufacturing companies in direct overseas investment between 2001 and 2008 and analyzing the change of yearly investment motivation. The result from this result let us know that company should develop their own idea for their competitive advantage by doing direct overseas investment. And, the overseas investment, which was already done in other countries, 1. Review its realities and tendency in terms of investing countries, industries, and its scale and then Set up an actual model, based on strategic combination of investing location select and determination of Korean manufacturing companies. 2. Analyze how the situational factors have influenced and what factors would be considered for direct overseas investment. From the analyzing result, even though it is fairly true that raising wage and getting resources, and developing alternating industries for export had influenced at the beginning, overseas investing companies' policy will be influenced by the results from studying marketing-pursuit type, local producing and manufacturing by using low-wage people for local sale, and situation for changing investing tendency as service industry.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.343-367
• /
• 2009

This research is about global investment for managing the important position, what Korea is doing in World's main market. Considering there are some differences between developed countries' model and developing countries' model in doing direct overseas investment, they target to get political agreement and develop the new invest plan and strategy by understanding changes of Korean manufacturing companies in direct overseas investment between 2000 and 2007 and analyzing the change of yearly investment motivation factors and determining factors for investment. The result from this result let us know that company should develop their own idea for their competitive advantage by doing direct overseas investment with the existing theory which convinces the need of competitive advantage for investing overseas. I set actual model and analyze results from it with the considering that it is so important to get knowledge and information for globalizing companies to invest overseas and companies, which want to be world leading ones for their field through innovation and changes, need to have more active strategy. And, the overseas investment, which was already done in other countries, 1. Review its realities and tendency in terms of investing countries, investing industries, and its scale. 2. Set up an actual model, based on strategic combination of investing location select and determination of Korean manufacturing companies and yearly investing factor-effect analysis. 3. Analyze how the situational factors have influenced and what factors would be considered for direct overseas investment. From the analyzing result, even though it is fairly true that raising wage and getting resources, avoiding customs, and developing alternating industries for export had influenced at the beginning, overseas investing companies' policy will be influenced by the results from studying marketing-pursuit type, which emphasizes to manage trade income and outgo, keeping the balance in the black, ensuring raw materials, local producing and manufacturing by using low-wage people for local sale, and situation for changing investing tendency as service industry.

• 응용통계연구
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.455-464
• /
• 2011

최근들어 국내 설비투자의 증가세가 주춤한 데 반해 해외직접투자는 급격히 증가하면서 해외투자 급증세가 국내투자를 위축시키고 있는 것이 아닌가하는 우려가 증대되고 있다. 본고에서는 이러한 관점에 대해 경제성장 단계에 따른 환경변화를 감안하여 분석하였다. 분석을 위해서는 국내외 투자간의 관계를 회귀나무(regression tree) 기법을 이용하였다. 분석결과 과거에는 해외직접투자가 국내 설비투자를 대체하다가 수출기반의 급성장기에 접어들면서 보완하는 행태를 보인 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 외환위기 이후 해외직접투자가 국내 설비투자에 미치는 영향력이 사라진 것으로 추정되었다. 이러한 변화는 글로벌화가 진전에 따른 투자행태의 차별성 확대, 투자수익률이 높은 곳으로의 투자처 이전행태 가속화 등에 기인한것으로 볼 수 있다. 과거에는 지배적이었던 투자 결정 요인의 영향력이 약화되고 있는 것이다. 이는 한편으로 글로벌화에 우리 기업이 잘 적응해나가면서 투자의 유연성이 확대되었기 때문이라고 할 수 있다. 이러한 분석 결과를 감안하면 최근의 해외직접투자 증가가 일방적으로 국내투자를 제약한다는 제한된 시각에서 벗어나 투자를 평가할 필요가 있으며 우리 기업들의 해외직접투자가 국제적 생산네트워크를 형성하여 생산자원을 효율적으로 활용하는 방향으로 이루어 질 수 있도록 유도함으로써 국내외 투자간 적절한 보완관계를 형성해 나가는 것이 바람직하다 하겠다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제27권
• /
• pp.183-213
• /
• 2005

This study is achieving overseas investment to be kept and manages important position in business scope because Korean Company achieves business in major market in world and goes forward. under proposition that development(foreign direct investment) previous engagement can not but differ with advanced nation enterprise's model in over sea direct investment achievement. Grasp ramification(pattern change substance) of overseas direct investment since the 1990 to korean manufacture Firm(enterprise). Seek political consultation by analyzing change of factor and investment decision factor by year in dimension by industry investment winter season by year affecting in oversea direct investment and was attained in purpose to verify existent theory's explanation power connected with investment previous engagement. This is that can develop and procure competitive advantage of enterprise peculiarity by making overseas direct investment adversely with existent theory that can make foreign country direct investment though there is high position of enterprise characteristic's competitive advantage and move of knowledge and information is important in korean firm's overseas direct investment in globalization roadbed in at least own field through change and renovation establish experiment model under proposition that should grope more active previous engagement than advanced nation enterprise and arranged subject of study if it is korean's firm that wish to become universal guidance enterprise. and examine trend of direct investment and actual conditions invested first in the foreign countries as examples by investment department, by investment industry inside of investment scale etc..., establish korean firm's invest area selection and decision and investment very important person and effect analysis Circumstance-model that is based in strategic adaptedness by year. Circumstance-variable have influenced how in overseas direct investment and decision and what variable will be considered first in over sea direct investment did Empirical analysis in here after

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2021

The main purpose of this research is to analyze the changes in investment motivation by year through time series and cross-sectional analysis of the factors and investment decisions of Korean manufacturing companies. According to the investment pattern for Asean from the 1980s to the 19th, the first expansion period was 82 to 86, the average increase in overseas investment for securing foreign raw materials due to the second oil shock, and the second expansion period was a gradual increase in exports to the U.S. in 1987 to 1996. During the first stagnation period, direct investment in Asean stagnated in the aftermath of the 1998-05 Asian crisis, and in the third expansion period, part of the production facilities invested in China were relocated to Asean, increasing Asean's investment to become Korea's largest manufacturing investment in 17. Korea's proportion of investment in Asean surpassed that of mass investment since 10 years ago, and the proportion of investment in manufacturing sector has been transferred from China to Asean, and after 17 years, it has served as an overseas production base connecting China. As such, The main purpose of the research will be to extract the determinant factors and key factors for overseas direct investment and investment patterns in conjunction with global manufacturing companies' production base relocation and investment trends through empirical analysis. This research paper gave basic reference to the motivation and determinant of investment 16 years ago, and analyzed the changes in investment motivation by year and content through empirical analysis, contributing some reasonable purpose to the decision of companies and policy makers interested in overseas direct investment.

• 재무관리연구
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.119-131
• /
• 1985

Although Korea is short of capital technology, and natural resources, she has achieved an outstanding progress by the export-drive policies by Korean government and the creative endeavor of Korean firms. As a result of that, Korean economy and enterprises are in the same file of newly industrialized countries and Korea is ready for an economic take-off as a developed country. But in the early 1980s, each country strengthens protective trade theory and resources nationalism, and this has a great influence on the field of international trade environment. In spite of that, to continue the same high development as that of the past. Korea must try to secure and find export markets, solve trade barriers, make sure of the long-term security of resources, develop technology, and strengthen economic cooperations. To satisfy these desires by 2000s, we must try to make Korean enterprises have the global competitive power and them grow strongly among world wide firm through capital and technology accumulated during the passed years, and to do so, there must be a foreign production and marketing management, too, this can be achieved only through foreign overseas direct investment. This investment has various forms, to say, verifical integrated, horizontal integrated. conglomerate integrated forms, and the amount of investment in each country from 18 century to today reaches 500 billion dollars. This investment is done by strategic, behavioral economic, and financial motives. So I am going to approach the fields of like these; in spite of the differences among political, economical, caltural, and social systems, and many risk compared with domestic enterprises, why do Korean firms witsh to transfer the productive facilities to overseas countries and run them there? What is the comparative advantage of foreign direct investment compared with domestic investment ?. why is the factor of comparative advantage transferred through foreign direct investment?, what is the motive of foreign overseas direct investment?, and last the ownership-specific factors and the theory of internalization, and the location specific factors were analysed chiefly. But in consideration of the given condition in Korea, Korean overseas direct investment must be propelled rationally on the basis of the above mentioned theory.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.17-32
• /
• 2023

본 연구에서는 수요에 기반한 해외산업단지 조성을 위해 베트남과 인도네시아를 대상으로 제조업 부문 투자유치 분야와 한국기업의 해외진출 현황을 살펴보았다. 또한, 산업단지 등에 입주한 국내기업을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 해외진출의향에 대한 세부사항을 분석하였다. 그리고 앞서 조사한 투자유치 분야와 해외진출 희망업종 및 기진출 업종을 상호 연계함으로써 기진출 업종과의 연계, 신규시장 개척을 위한 유치분야 진출, 국가별 특화전략 도출 등 해외산업단지 조성방안을 제시하였다. 이러한 특화전략은 중점국가를 대상으로 국내외 니즈를 반영한 해외산업단지 기업유치계획 수립 시 기초자료로 유용하게 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국경제지리학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.166-191
• /
• 2012

이 논문은 경제 하부구조 관련 공기업이라는 행위주체의 특수성이 해외투자에서 어떻게 구체적으로 전개되는가를 분석한다. 우리나라 경제 하부구조 관련 공기업 해외투자사업의 일반 특징을 진출지역, 사업유형, 진출 시기를 중심으로 살펴본 다음, 해외투자 유형을 자본투자를 동반하지 않는 전문컨설팅 유형, 자본투자와 위험을 동반하는 해외직접투자 유형과 에너지자원개발 직접투자 유형으로 구분하여 구체적인 사례를 토대로 분석한다. 그리고 하부구조 공기업이라는 행위주체가 갖는 특성 때문에 나타나는 국적성의 문제, 즉 진출대상국 입장에서 자본부족 해소와 종속의 문제, 자본수출국의 입장에서 민간자본과 관계설정의 이중성 문제를 검토한다.

• 동아시아경상학회지
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.26-30
• /
• 2015

Purpose-This paper aims to do research on success and failure of Chinese enterprises and suggest the implications to the Chinese enterprises by comparing the representative examples of Chinese enterprises' overseas M&A. Research Design, Data, and Methodology-This paper selected by six cases of Chinese enterprises' overseas M&A to do the contrast. Results-Consulting company still plays a very important role in Chinese enterprises' overseas M&A because Chinese enterprises' overseas M&A is being placed in growth stage. And how to grasp the development trend of industry accurate and choose the correct target enterprises is a very important issue for Chinese enterprises which can make Chinese enterprises to avoid blind investment. Conclusion-Chinese Enterprises have to evaluate the target enterprise with the aid of authoritative investment and consulting company, focus on training qualified talents and the integration after the M&A when they Overseas M&A in the future.