• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.239-251
• /
• 2019

이 연구는 예비초등학교 교사들을 대상으로 한 과학 수업에서 과정 중심 평가를 운영하고 그 효과를 알아내는 것을 목표로 한다. 본 연구에서 수행한 과정 중심 평가는 단위 수업 중에 실시되었으며, 학생의 학습행동에서 유의성이 인정될 때 점수가 매겨졌다. 연구결과에 근거한 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 수업시간에 실시한 과정정중심평가가 평가로서 적절한지에 대해 학생들의 평가는 평균 3.6점이었다. 둘째, 학생들이 제시한 평가 근거에서, 긍정적인 주요내용은 "결과가 아닌 과정을 평가", "수업 참여에 긍정적으로 기여함", "사고 활동의 촉진"이다. 셋째, 학생이 제시한 평가근거에서 부정적 내용은 '평가방법과 결과의 객관성 결여', '학생들의 개별 성향이 평가결과에 관여함', '교과 지식의 학습효과 미흡' 등이 주요 내용이다.

• 대한공업교육학회지
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.239-258
• /
• 2015

이 연구의 목적은 융합인재교육의 학습성과에 대한 합리적인 교육평가에 활용될 수 있는 기초자료를 제공하는 것으로, 융합인재교육에서 학습자가 함양해야 할 핵심 역량 준거의 상대적 가중치를 포함하는 학습성과 평가 방안을 제시하였다. 연구 방법은 융합인재교육 전문가를 대상으로 핵심역량에 대한 이원비교 설문조사를 실시하였고 핵심역량 요인의 우선순위를 분석하기 위하여 계층적 분석기법(AHP)을 적용하였다. 이에 따른 연구의 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 핵심역량 1계층에서 융합수행능력과 융합인지능력의 중요도는 각각 39.4%, 36.8% 순으로 분석되었다. 융합인재교육의 교육평가에서 융합수행능력과 융합인지능력은 유사한 중요도 수준을 보였으며, 융합태도능력(23.8%)보다는 중요하게 고려해야 하는 요인으로 평가되었다. 둘째, 핵심역량 2계층에서 문제해결(20.0%)의 상대적 중요도가 가장 높게 나타났고, 다음으로는 창의적 사고력(18.3%), 책임감(15.3%), 융합지식 이해(11.0%) 순으로 분석되었다. 셋째, 핵심역량의 상대적 가중치 분석 결과는 융합인재 교육프로그램의 교육목표 달성 여부를 상대적 가중치에 따라 합리적으로 평가하는 역량평가 체제의 토대가 될 것이다. 더불어 융합인재교육의 교육평가뿐만 아니라 교수 학습 과정 개선과 학습효과를 높일 수 있는 교육프로그램 개발에 가이드 역할을 할 것으로 기대된다.

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.217-223
• /
• 2007

Objective : The apparent increase in the incidence of the intracranial meningiomas in the elderly is due in part to improved diagnostic tools and improved span of life. The authors carried out a retrospect study to validate the use of the Clinical-Radiological Grading System [CRGS] as a clinical tool to orientate surgical decision making in elderly patients and to explore prognostic factors of survival. Methods : From January 1997 to January 2006, the authors consecutively recruited and surgically treated 20 patients older than 65 years of age with radiologic findings of intracranial meningiomas and a preoperative evaluation based on the CRGS. Results : High CRGS score was associated with a higher probability of good outcome [p=0.004] and a lower probability of postoperative complications [p=0.049]. Among the different subset items of the CRGS score, larger maximum tumor diameters [$D{\geqq}4cm$] and the presence of a severe peritumoral edema were associated with incidence rate of postoperative poor outcome and complications [p<0.05]. Additionally, the critical location of the tumor was also correlated with poor outcome [p<0.05]. Conclusion : A CRGS score higher than 13 is a good prognostic indication of survival. The CRGS score is a useful and practical tool for the selection of elderly patients affected by intracranial meningiomas as surgical candidates.

• 디지털산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.263-272
• /
• 2009

Nowadays, lots of software that have similar functions is being produced. Hence it is getting more important to select the best and suitable software for each individual or company. Moreover, there are few trustworthy materials regarding to the objective procedure and criteria for the best evaluation of the software quality. To overcome these problems, benchmarking has been carried out. However, benchmarking is also confronting the limit of quality evaluation verification due to the difficult of the objectification of the major test items. To solve these problems, some others try to evaluate the quality of software using objective criteria of evaluation based on ISO/IEC standards. Nevertheless, this method using these defined evaluation items and criteria may result in not very reliable outcome. Therefore, this paper offers the evaluation items reflected in the characteristics of each software in order to prove the validity of the proposed method. Moreover, the objective and quantitative criterion which analyzes and reflects the organization characteristics using AHP methodology is applied to the experiment and performance evaluation. Hence we expect that the proposed method provides the needs of the re-establishment of software quality evaluation criteria and the improvement of process in terms of management.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제55권5호
• /
• pp.415-423
• /
• 2022

Economic evaluations in the healthcare are used to assess economic efficiency of pharmaceuticals and medical interventions such as diagnoses and medical procedures. This study introduces the main concepts of economic evaluation across its key steps: planning, outcome and cost calculation, modeling, cost-effectiveness results, uncertainty analysis, and decision-making. When planning an economic evaluation, we determine the study population, intervention, comparators, perspectives, time horizon, discount rates, and type of economic evaluation. In healthcare economic evaluations, outcomes include changes in mortality, the survival rate, life years, and quality-adjusted life years, while costs include medical, non-medical, and productivity costs. Model-based economic evaluations, including decision tree and Markov models, are mainly used to calculate the total costs and total effects. In cost-effectiveness or costutility analyses, cost-effectiveness is evaluated using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which is the additional cost per one additional unit of effectiveness gained by an intervention compared with a comparator. All outcomes have uncertainties owing to limited evidence, diverse methodologies, and unexplained variation. Thus, researchers should review these uncertainties and confirm their robustness. We hope to contribute to the establishment and dissemination of economic evaluation methodologies that reflect Korean clinical and research environment and ultimately improve the rationality of healthcare policies.

• 재활간호학회지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.98-107
• /
• 2000

A Preliminary study for the evaluation of the Rehabilitation Nursing Program(RNP) implemented to the 25 stroke survivors at the Day Care Program Center of National Rehabilitation Hospital in Seoul was done at 1999. The purposes of this study was to assess the psychological effects as outcome-variables such as depression, powerlessness and self efficacy of the stroke survivors who were discharged from acute care hospitals. The Rehabilitation Nursing Program (RNP) integrated with the Day Care Program for rehabilitation was implemented and the psychological outcome variables were measured by 3 psychologic instruments of Zung Depression Scale, Millers's powerlessness and the Bandura's self efficacy scale. These instruments were translated into Korean and the contents validity and the reliability were tested. The subjects were 17 males and 8 females and 52% were aged over 51 years old and 24% were from 31 to 50 years old. Most of them (72%) had been educated more than high school level. The contents of RNP were 8 sessions composing of self-introduction, individualized assessment, health contract and feedback, management of depression, shaving experiences, effective communication, self efficacy teaching, health information, and daily care activities. This study found that the level of depression and the powerlessness were within average level and had not been changed the level of self efficacy after RNP were somewhat higher than before, but it was not changed significantly. According to the results, the psychological state of the subjects were not changed significantly. Only the level of self efficacy was a little improved after having the RNP. Based on theses results, the RNP should be focussed on the psychological nursing care and the psychological outcome variables were retested strictly with the enough sample size.

• International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.112-121
• /
• 2019

The purpose of the study was to determine whether a delirium educational program has a positive outcome on nurses' documentation in patient records of delirium care. A one group pre-post design was used. A convenient sample of 60 consecutive records that included documentation by participating nurses in four medical wards of one regional general hospital in South Korea was audited two months before and two months after a delirium educational program. Although an educational program in this study positively changed nurses' knowledge and attitudes, these positive effects did not translate to improvement in the documentations of delirium care. There was no significant increase in the frequency of nursing documentation of delirium assessment following participation in the educational program. Furthermore, there was no significant increase in the frequency of nursing documentation of the use of non-pharmacological management following the documentation of keywords associated with delirium after participation in the educational program. The findings indicate the need to develop, implement and record a systematic risk assessment for delirium and assessment and management of existing delirium based on evidence-based guidelines in clinical practice in South Korea.

• 한국신뢰성학회지:신뢰성응용연구
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.134-146
• /
• 2016

Purpose: Many domestic companies have to make out quantitative evaluation table in their proposal when they conduct the software R&D project. However, most of companies have a difficulty to select the evaluation items and criteria, also to derive a quantitative results. Therefore, we propose a method to derive the quantitative evaluation index by utilizing the ISO/IEC 9126-2. Methods: Analyzing ISO/IEC 9126-2, and we classify the quality metrics as high-classification and sub-classification for Web/App software, Embedded software and Installation software. Next, Conduct the metrics selection survey depending on importance and necessity. Then, carry out the case study. Verify the correspondence between evaluation items and criteria from original suggestion of company and from outcome by utilizing the ISO/IEC 9126-2 quality metrics. Results: It is possible to classify into two metrics, one for common software or one another for only special software. Furthermore, there is quality metrics that is more important and more necessary depending upon characteristics of the software. Conclusion: ISO/IEC 9126-2 quality metrics can be used to make an evaluation items and criteria for quantitative evaluation table of software product.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.24-33
• /
• 2008

본 연구에서는 EC2000 시스템하에서 2007년도에 공학교육 인증평가를 받은 한국의 A대학과 미국의 M 대학의 공학교육인증 체제를 비교, 분석하고자 한다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 해당 프로그램의 자체평가보고서 분석 및 홈페이지 검색을 실시하였다.한국과 미국의 공학교육인증 기준은 거의 대동소이하나 한국의 인증기준이 행정적인 지원 체제나 각 평가기준별 자율순환체제를 강조하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 인증평가별 체제를 살펴보았을 때 미국의 장점을 꼽아보면 체계적인 교육과정 운영과 설계교육, 교과목 중심의 프로그램 학습성과 평가 체제, 교수들의 연구 및 학생지도에의 지원 체제이다. 한국의 장점은 다원적인 지원 체제를 기반으로 하고 평가에서의 정량적인 지표 활용이 많기 때문에 이를 교육개선에 활용하기 쉬운 면이 있고, 학생포트폴리오의 활용을 통한 체계적인 학생 지도가 가능하다는 점이다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제14권11호
• /
• pp.930-943
• /
• 2014

현대사회에서 박물관은 기존의 전통적인 역할을 넘어, 지역사회와의 소통 및 교육의 공간으로서의 사회적 역할에 대한 중요성이 강조되고 있다. 박물관의 다양한 기능 중에서도 특히 사회적 약자 지원과 관련하여 "교육적 기능"이 교육 참가자 및 사회에 미치는 영향은 매우 크다. 사회적 약자를 대상으로 한 박물관 교육은 역사와 문화를 체험하는 기회를 제공함과 동시에 개인의 삶 그리고 지역사회 일원으로서의 역할에 대한 자존감을 함양하고, 나아가 긍정적인 사회 기반 구축에 기여하는 효과가 기대된다. 이러한 프로그램의 성과와 효과분석은 지속적인 평가와 개선 및 실천을 전제로 논의가 계속 되어야 하겠지만, 새로운 프로그램을 시작하고 개선 발전 시켜야 하는 초기 단계에서의 평가 또한 중요하다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 현재 신설, 운영되고 있는 노숙자를 대상으로 한 박물관 교육 프로그램을 질적 평가 방법을 통해 그 성과와 효과를 살펴보고자 하였다. 본 연구를 통해 박물관을 활용한 사회적 약자 지원 교육 프로그램의 평가 모델을 제시하였다. 또한 개발된 평가 모델을 실제 적용하여 프로그램을 평가하고, 그 성과를 측정 하였다.