• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.327-336
• /
• 2007

Fixture의 안정도를 평가하는 장비인 Osstell Mentor와 기존 Osstell과의 비교 시험 및 측정환경에 따른 노이즈 발생 시험 결과를 통해 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. US II Fixture와 SS II Fixture의 ISQ 값을 측정한 1차 검증에서는 Osstell과 Osstell Mentor의 ISQ 값 경향의 차이가 크게 나타나지 않음을 확인하였다. 2. SS II Fixture를 얕게 매식한 것과 정상적인 매식한 것의 ISQ 값 비교를 한 2차 검증에서는, Osstell과 Osstell Mentor 모두 매식 깊이에 따른 동일한 경향의 결과를 보였다. 3. 3차 검증에서는 골질별로 Osstell과 Osstell Mentor의 ISQ 값이 일정한 경향을 보이는 것을 확인하였고, 특히 Osstell Mentor 장비는 Osstell 장비보다 사용함에 있어서 편리성이 뛰어나다고 판단된다. 또한 ISQ 값을 100% 신뢰하기는 어렵지만 Osstell Mentor를 임상 및 실험에 적용하는데 있어서는 문제가 없을 것으로 판단된다. 4. 측정환경에 따라 전자파를 발생시키는 환경이 존재하면 노이즈가 발생할 수 있으나, 실제 측정결과 휴대폰이 작동 중인 환경을 제외하고는 노이즈가 발생하지 않았다. 실제 치과 내에서의 사용에서도 노이즈는 발생하지 않음을 확인하였다. 5. 비교적 안전하게 장치를 장착 및 탈착 할 수 있어 측정과정에 의해 발생되는 임플란트와 주위골에 대한 잠재적 위험도가 낮고 측정위치에 따른 오차가 적어 임상적으로 불리한 상황과 다양한 환경에서의 임플란트 안정성 측정이 가능해 임상적 활용도가 높다고 판단된다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제1권3호
• /
• pp.124-128
• /
• 2009

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. How the ISQ values measured by $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor are related, and whether the ISQ values acquired from the two machines changes in accordance with changes in implant stability are not yet fully understood. PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to find out correlation between the ISQ values acquired from $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor, and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and accuracy of two devices. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Sixty two implants were inserted into 47 patients, and their ISQ values were measured using $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor. In the first stage surgery, the ISQ values of forty four implants inserted into thirty five patients were measured. In the second stage surgery, the values of fifty implants inserted into thirty seven patients were measured. The values were analyzed to determine the difference between the mean ISQ values of $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor. In addition, the correlation between implants used in the first and second stage of surgery with regard to their types and areas of insertion were analyzed. The difference between the ISQ values of 32 implants in each patient during the first and second stage was analyzed. The statistical assessment was carried out using SPSS V. 12.0 for Win. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to examine the correlation between $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor in the first and second stages of surgery, whereas the difference between their ISQ values was evaluated using a paired t-test. RESULTS. In the first stage, the mean ISQ value for $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor was 70.84 and 75.09, respectively, showing a significant difference (P < .01). In the second stage, the mean ISQ value of $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor was 71.76 and 75.94, respectively, also showing a significant difference (P < .01). The difference between the ISQ values in patients in the first and the second stages was significant with both instruments. CONCLUSION. The significant difference in the values obtained using the $Osstell^{TM}$ and $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor between the first and second stages of implant surgery indicates that these values can be a convenient and precise way for evaluating the implant stability in clinical practice.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.42-52
• /
• 2008

임플랜트가 개발된 이후 임플랜트 안정성을 아기 위한 여러 방법들이 연구되어 왔고 여러 측정 장치들이 고안되어 왔다. 그 중에서도 공명주파수분석법(Resonance Frequency Analysis)을 이용한 방법이 요즘 각광을 받고 있다. 가장 최근에 공명주파수분석법을 이용한 측정 장치의 하나인 $Osstell^{TM}$ 보다 간편한 $Osstell^{TM}$ mentor의 출시로 임상적으로 더 편하게 임플랜트의 안정성을 측정 할 수 있게 되었다. 본 연구는 $Osstell^{TM}$ mentor 의 자기공명막대인 $Smartpeg^{TM}$을 사용할 때 임상에서 측정 가능한 측정횟수가 얼마나 되는지를 확인하고 또한 소독 후에도 측정값이 안정한지를 확인하고자 실험을 하였다. 실험 목적은 5가지로 나누어 알아보고자 하였다: 1. 자기공명막대의 반복측정의 영향: 자기 공명막대와 $Osstell^{TM}$ mentor를 고정시키고 반복적인 측정을 하여 몇 회까지 측정값이 안정한가? 2. 자기공명막대의 탈부착 반복의 영향: 자기공명막대를 탁부착을 반복하면서 몇회까지 측정값이 안정한가? 3. 자기공명막대의 소독방법에 따른 영향: 진료실내의 소독방법 후에도 자기 공명막대 측정값이 안정한가? 4. 자기 공명막대의 반복되는 고압증기멸균 소독 후의 영향: 고압증기 멸균법 10회 반복적인 소독 후에도 측정값이 안정한가? 5. 자기 공명막대의 자성소실온도 확인: 자기공명막대의 자성을 잃는 온도는 몇 도인가? 실험방법은 각 실험별 8개의 자기공명막대를 준비하고 각각의 구별을 위해 컬러펜으로 표식을 했으며 실험전 측정값을 재고, 실험후 측정값을 재어 비교하였다. 자기공명막대 반복측정의 영향을 알아본 실험은 최초의 측정값과 변화가 있는 횟수를 알아보려 했으며 측정값에 변화가 없을 경우 400회까지 측정하여, 1-100회, 101-200회, 201-300회, 301-400회 4군으로 나누어 유의수준을 살펴보았다. 자기공명막대 탈부착 반복의 영향을 알아본 실험은 자기 공명막대 8개를 각각 400회씩 탈부착하여 측정값의 변화를 1-100회, 101-200회, 201-300회, 301-400회 4군으로 나누어 군간 유의수준을 확인하였다. 자기공명막대 소독방법에 따른 영향에 대한 실험은 8개의 자기공명막대를 소독 전 측정값과 소독 후 측정값을 비교확인하였다. 자기 공명막대 반복되는 고압증기멸균 소독 후의 영향에 대한 실험은 8개의 자기공명막대를 10회 반복 소독하면서 소독 전 측정값을 0군, 1-10회까지 소독 후를 10군으로 나누어 군간 유의수준을 확인하였다. 자기공명막대 자성 소실 온도 확인실험은 8개의 자기 공명막대를 $138^{\circ}C$/10분, $150^{\circ}C$/5분, $150^{\circ}C$/10분으로 나누어 자기공명막대가 자성을 잃는 온도가 몇 도인지 실험하였다. 실험결과; 1. 자기공명막대 반복측정의 영향 실험에서는 각 군간 유의성이 없었다(p>0.05). 2. 자기공명막대 탈부착측정의 영향에 대한 실험은 각 군간 유의 확률이 0.123으로 유의성이 없었다(p>0.05). 3. 자기공명막대 소독방법에 따른 영향에 대한 실험은 소독 전 측정값과 소독 후 측정값의 유의성이 없었다(p>0.05). 4. 자기공명막대 반복되는 고압증기멸균소독 후의 영향에 대한 실험은 각 군간 유의성이 없었다.(p>0.05). 5. 자기공명막대 자성 소실온도확인 실험은 $138^{\circ}C$/10분에서는 소독 전, 후간 측정값에 유의성이 없었고(p>0.05), $150^{\circ}C$/5분에서는 2개가 측정 불가였으며, $150^{\circ}C$/10분에서는 8개 모두 ISQ값을 측정할 수가 없었다. 결론으로 말하면, 자기 공명막대가 나사산이 손상되지 않고 자성을 잃지 않으면 측정값이 변하지 않을 것으로 사료된다. 그리고 자기공명막대를 $150^{\circ}C$/10분에서 진공건열멸균 소독 후에 자성을 잃는 것으로 나타난 결과로 추론해 보건데, 진료실에서 가장 높은 온도를 보이는 고압증기멸균 소독이 $132^{\circ}C$/15분 이므로 진료실내의 소독방법들에는 아무런 문제가 없는 것으로 사료된다. 몇 번 사용할 수 있는지의 문제는 400번 측정 시 수치에 변화가 없으므로 측정되지 않을 때까지 사용해도 무방하리라 사료된다.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.337-358
• /
• 2007

Purpose This study was performed to evaluate the stability of dual thread implant using resonance frequency analysis in human. Materials and methods Fifty-five patients(32 males and 23 females) with a mean age of 50 years and 1 month who were treated during March, 2005 to July, 2007 in Pusan National University hospital. Totally 145 dual thread Implants were installed and initial stability was measured by Osstell $Mentor^{TM}$. After 3-6 Months, secondary stability was measured at the time of second surgery or before prosthetic treatment. Results At the time of 1st surgery, average ISQ value was $75.12{\pm}12.06$. Only 1 implant was failed during the healing period. Before prosthetic treatment, ISQ values were measured and its mean value was $80.94{\pm}6.12$. Conclusion These results suggest that the increased stability of the implant verifies the clinical relevance of double thread implant.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.112-116
• /
• 2012

Purpose: This study attempts to compare the stability of hydroxy-apatite coating implant with that of sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched surface implant at an early state of installation. Methods: 35 implants were installed in 18 patients, who had visited hospital for implant installation. The early stability at operation, 6 weeks and 12 weeks after operation using Osstell$^{TM}$ mentor (Integration Diagnostics, Savedalen, Sweden) and Periotest$^{(R)}$ (Siemens AG, Benssheim, Germany) were measured, and subsequently analyzed statistically. Results: OsstellTM mentor value of hydroxy-apatite coated implant (HAPTITE) was measured as $70.14{\pm}9.07$ at the stage of installation, $76.98{\pm}5.25$ at 6 weeks and $80.28{\pm}4.23$ at 12 weeks after installation. A statistically significant increase in measurement value was observed after 6 weeks and 12 weeks than when implants were placed. In case of IMPLANTIUM (DENTIUM Co. Ltd., Seoul, Korea), the measurement value was $74.68{\pm}7.42$ at installation, $79.03{\pm}4.39$ at 6 weeks and $80.59{\pm}3.59$ at 12 weeks after installation. In addition, a statistically significant increase in the value was observed when comparative analysis of the value at after installation and 12 weeks after installation was carried out. However, no significant difference between HAPTITE and IMPLANTIUM was observed. The average measurement value of periotest$^{(R)}$ was $-1.94{\pm}3.90$ at installation of HAPTITE, $-4.03{\pm}1.48$ at 6 weeks and $-5.00{\pm}1.71$ at 12 weeks after installation. Moreover, whilst comparing the value at after installation and 12 weeks after installation, statistically significant decrease in the value was observed. In case of IMPLANTIUM, the average measurement value was measured as $-4.25{\pm}1.76$ at installation, $-4.76{\pm}0.97$ at 6 weeks and $-5.18{\pm}0.91$ at 12 weeks after installation and no statistically significant difference was observed. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was observed between HAPTITE and IMPLANTIUM. Conclusion: In this study, both the implants demonstrated favorable early stability at the time of measurement using Osstell$^{TM}$ mentor and Periotest$^{(R)}$. Moreover, based on the observed results, both HAPTITE and IMPLANTIUM are considered as potent to exhibit clinically stable and prognostic results.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제50권1호
• /
• pp.31-37
• /
• 2012

Objective : This research compared stabilities between two types of dental implant ($SLA^{TM}$, Institut Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland and $SSII^{TM}$, Osstem co, Busan, Korea) using Osstell Mentor (Integration Diagnostics AB, Goteborg, Sweden) considering surgery methods, surgery area, diameter of implant, systemic disease, and smoking for obtaining prognosis information when installing fixture of dental implant. Materials & Methods : 206 implants of 131 patients taken by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) were determined as a final sample. Dental implants were installed as protocol of supplier by a excellent dentist who had 10 years experience about dental implants. Before connecting abutments (3 months after installation of fixture), RFA were measured twice for buccal and lingual direction to obtain average value. Results : Dental implants at mandible showed significantly higher stabilities significantly than at maxilla (p<0.001). Diameter 4.8 implants had also higher stabilities than diameter 4.1 in case of $SLA^{TM}$ implants (p<0.001). $SLA^{TM}$ implants showed more excellent stabilities than $SSII^{TM}$ implants, especially at posterior area of mandible (p=0.045) and premolar area of maxilla (p=0.032). Conclusions : This research revealed higher stabilities of $SLA^{TM}$ implants than $SSII^{TM}$ implant, especially at posterior area of mandible (p=0.045) and premolar area of maxilla (p=0.032).

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제48권2호
• /
• pp.128-134
• /
• 2010

연구목적: 본 연구에서는 건강기능식품인 $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium을 임플란트 식립 환자에게 투여하고, 투여하지 않은 군과 비교하여 그 유효성과 안정성을 평가하여 투여 후 골밀도의 변화 및 골유착 기간의 단축 여부를 평가하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법 임플란트 식립 후에Post$PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium을 투여한 실험군은 18명의 환자를 대상으로 25개의 임플란트를 식립하였고, 투여하지 않은 대조군에서는 7명의 환자에게 9개의 임플란트를 식립하여 관찰하였다. 일차수술 후, 이차수술 후, 6개월 후에 $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor, $Periotest^{(R)}$를 이용하여 임플란트 안정성을 비교 분석하였고, 일차수술후, 1, 3, 6개월 후에 방사선 사진 촬영을 시행하여 임플란트 주위 골밀도를 측정하여 비교 분석하였다. 결과:1. $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor의해 측정된 ISQ 값은 측정 결과 시간이 경과함에 따라 실험군, 대조군 모두 수치가 높아지는 경향을 보였다. 실험군의 측정값이 대조군에 비해 더 높은 수치를 보였으며, 식립 6개월 후에 실험군과 대조군 간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 관찰되었다 (P< .05); 2. $Periotest^{(R)}$ 측정 결과 시간이 경과함에 따라 실험군, 대조군 모두 수치가 낮아지는 경향을 보였으며, 실험군이 대조군에 비해 더 낮은 수치를 나타내었으나 각 군간에 통계적인 유의성은 없었다. 3. 골밀도 측정 결과 시간이 경과함에 따라 실험군, 대조군 모두 골밀도 수치가 증가하는 경향을 보였으며, 실험군이 대조군에 비해 더 높은 수치를 나타내었으나 각 군간에 통계적인 유의성은 없었다. 결론:임상적으로 임플란트 식립 후 환자가 $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium을 장기간 복용하는 것이 임플란트 안정성을 높이고, 골유착을 성공적으로 이루는데 도움을 줄 수 있다고 사료된다.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제38권
• /
• pp.30.1-30.6
• /
• 2016

Background: The prognosis of wide implants tends to be controversial. While wider implants were initially expected to result in a larger osseointegration area and have higher levels of primary stability, they were reported to have a relatively high rate of failure. The clinical outcome of ultrawide implants of more than 6 mm in diameter was evaluated through a retrospective study. Methods: The investigation was conducted on patients who had received ultrawide implant (${\geq}6mm$ diameter) placements in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from January 2008 to December 2013. Complications were investigated during the maintenance period, and marginal bone loss was measured using periapical radiography. Primary stability immediately after the implant placement and second stability after second surgery or during impression were measured using $Osstell^{(R)}$ Mentor (Osstell, Sweden) as an implant stability quotient (ISQ). Results: Fifty-eight implants were placed in 53 patients (30 male, 23 female), and they were observed for an average of $50.06{\pm}23.49$ months. The average ISQ value increased from $71.22{\pm}10.26$ to $77.48{\pm}8.98$ (P < 0.005). The primary and secondary stability shows significantly higher at the mandible than at the maxilla (P < 0.001). However, mean survival rate shows 98.28 %. Average marginal bone loss of 0.018 and 0.045 mm were measured at 12 and 24 months after the loading and 0.14 mm at final follow-up date (mean 46.25 months), respectively. Also in this study, the bone loss amount was noticeably small compared to regular implants reported in previous studies. Conclusions: The excellent clinical outcome of ultrawide implants was confirmed. It was determined that an ultrawide implant can be used as an alternative when the bone quality in the posterior teeth is relatively low or when a previous implant has failed.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제39권
• /
• pp.21.1-21.6
• /
• 2017

Background: The purposes of the present study were to compare implant stabilities of mandibular block bone graft and bovine bone graft and to evaluate influencing factors for implant stability in mandibular block bone (MBB) graft. Methods: This retrospective study investigated 1224 cases and 389 patients treated by one surgeon in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Pusan National University Dental Hospital (Yangsan, Korea) between January 2010 and December 2014. Proportions that MBB graft cases constitute in all implant restoration cases and in all bone graft cases were measured. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were achieved by the same surgeon before loading. The average ISQ values of the experimental groups were compared. In addition, ISQ values of influencing factors, such as age, sex, implant size, and implant placement site, were compared within the MBB group using $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor ($Osstell^{(R)}$, $G{\ddot{o}}teborg$, Sweden). Paired t test and ANOVA were conducted for statistical analysis with a significance level of 0.05. Results: Fifty-five percent of all implant restoration cases performed bone graft while MBB cases constituted 34% of all implant restoration cases and 61% of all bone graft cases. Comparing ISQ values according to bone graft materials, the MBB group manifested sufficient implant stability by presenting comparable ISQ value to that of the experimental group without bone graft. Among the reviewed factors, females, mandibular molar regions, and implants in larger diameter displayed greater implant stabilities. Conclusions: Satisfactory implant stability was accomplished upon administration of MBB graft. Within the limitation of this study, gender, implant site, and implant diameter were speculated to influence on implant stability in MBB graft.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.428-433
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. The present study was aimed to evaluate the influence of implant contact ratio and stiffness of implant-surrounding materials on the resonance frequency analysis (RFA) values. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy resin blocks that had the different amounts (100, 50, 30, 15%) of resin-implant contact (RIC) were fabricated. Ten silicone putty blocks with 100% silicone-implant contact were also made. The implants with ${\phi}5.0mm{\times}13.0mm$ were placed on eighty specimen blocks. The RFA value was measured on the transducer that was connected to each implant by Osstell Mentor. Kruskal-Wallis and Scheffe's tests (${\alpha}$=.05) were done for statistical analysis. RESULTS. The control resin group with 100% RIC had the highest RFA value of 83.9, which was significantly different only from the resin group with 15% RIC among the resin groups. The silicone putty group with 100% contact had the lowest RFA value of 36.6 and showed statistically significant differences from the resin groups. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, there was no significant difference in the RFA values among the resin groups with different RIC's except when the RIC difference was more than 85%. A significant increase in the RFA value was observed related to the increase in stiffness of material around implant.