Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 39
  • /
  • Pages.21.1-21.6
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The rate and stability of mandibular block bone graft in recent 5 years

  • Park, Jong-Cheol (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Yun-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Hong-Seok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Oh, Jong-Shik (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Hun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Deok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2017.03.27
  • Accepted : 2017.05.22
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The purposes of the present study were to compare implant stabilities of mandibular block bone graft and bovine bone graft and to evaluate influencing factors for implant stability in mandibular block bone (MBB) graft. Methods: This retrospective study investigated 1224 cases and 389 patients treated by one surgeon in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Pusan National University Dental Hospital (Yangsan, Korea) between January 2010 and December 2014. Proportions that MBB graft cases constitute in all implant restoration cases and in all bone graft cases were measured. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were achieved by the same surgeon before loading. The average ISQ values of the experimental groups were compared. In addition, ISQ values of influencing factors, such as age, sex, implant size, and implant placement site, were compared within the MBB group using $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor ($Osstell^{(R)}$, $G{\ddot{o}}teborg$, Sweden). Paired t test and ANOVA were conducted for statistical analysis with a significance level of 0.05. Results: Fifty-five percent of all implant restoration cases performed bone graft while MBB cases constituted 34% of all implant restoration cases and 61% of all bone graft cases. Comparing ISQ values according to bone graft materials, the MBB group manifested sufficient implant stability by presenting comparable ISQ value to that of the experimental group without bone graft. Among the reviewed factors, females, mandibular molar regions, and implants in larger diameter displayed greater implant stabilities. Conclusions: Satisfactory implant stability was accomplished upon administration of MBB graft. Within the limitation of this study, gender, implant site, and implant diameter were speculated to influence on implant stability in MBB graft.

Keywords

References

  1. Keller E, Van Roekel N, Desjardins R, Tolman D (1987) Prosthetic-surgical reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with iliac bone grafting and tissue-integrated prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2:39-55
  2. Donovan MG, Dickerson NC, Hanson LJ, Gustafson RB (1994) Maxillary and mandibular reconstruction using calvarial bone grafts and Branemark implants: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:588-594 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90096-5
  3. Iturriaga MTMN, Ruiz CC (2004) Maxillary sinus reconstruction with calvarium bone grafts and endosseous implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:344-347 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.013
  4. Barone A, Covani U (2007) Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: clinical results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:2039-2046 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.017
  5. Pikos MA (2005) Mandibular block autografts for alveolar ridge augmentation. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 13:91-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2005.05.003
  6. Misch C (1996) Ridge augmentation using mandibular ramus bone grafts for the placement of dental implants: presentation of a technique. Pract periodontics aesthet dent: PPAD 8:127-135, quiz 138
  7. Misch CM (1997) Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:173-195
  8. Lee H-G, Kim Y-D (2015) Volumetric stability of autogenous bone graft with mandibular body bone: cone-beam computed tomography and threedimensional reconstruction analysis. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:232-239 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2015.41.5.232
  9. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P (1996) Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 7:261-267 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  10. Glauser R, Sennerby L, Meredith N et al (2004) Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 15:428-434 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01036.x
  11. Meredith N, Books K, Fribergs B, Jemt T, Sennerby L (1997) Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in viva. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 8:226-233 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080309.x
  12. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U (1999) Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles: a clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:266-272 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80156-8
  13. Ersanli S, Karabuda C, Beck F, Leblebicioglu B (2005) Resonance frequency analysis of one-stage dental implant stability during the osseointegration period. J Periodontol 76:1066-1071 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1066
  14. Zix J, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R (2005) Stability measurements of 1-stage implants in the maxilla by means of resonance frequency analysis: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20:747-752
  15. Huwiler M, Pjetursson BE, Bosshardt D, Salvi G, Lang NP (2007) Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone characteristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 18:275-280 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01336.x
  16. Tirachaimongkol C, Pothacharoen P, Reichart PA, Khongkhunthian P (2016) Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study. Int J Implant Dent 2:27 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-016-0058-y
  17. Misch CM (2000) Use of the mandibular ramus as a donor site for onlay bone grafting. J Oral Implantol 26:42-49 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2000)026<0042:UOTMRA>2.3.CO;2
  18. Silva FMS, Cortez ALV, Moreira RWF, Mazzonetto R (2006) Complications of intraoral donor site for bone grafting prior to implant placement. Implant Dent 15:420-426 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000246225.51298.67
  19. Sverzut AT, Stabile GV, De Moraes M, Mazzonetto R, Moreira RWF (2008) The influence of tobacco on early dental implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:1004-1009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.032
  20. Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo T (2005) Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20:569-577
  21. Negri M, Galli C, Smerieri A et al. (2014) The effect of age, gender, and insertion site on marginal bone loss around endosseous implants: results from a 3-year trial with premium implant system. BioMed Res Int 2014;1-7
  22. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P (1998) Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 106:721-764 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-6-.x
  23. Van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R, Desnyder M, Maffei G, Quirynen M (2002) The relative impact of local and endogenous patient-related factors on implant failure up to the abutment stage. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:617-622 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130607.x
  24. Kim Y-H, Choi N-R, Kim Y-D (2017) The factors that influence postoperative stability of the dental implants in posterior edentulous maxilla. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 39:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0100-2
  25. Alsaadi G (2008) The impact of systemic and local factors on the incidence of oral implant failures. In: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven
  26. Woo I-H, Kim J-W, Kang S-Y, Kim Y-H, Yang B-E (2016) Narrow-diameter implants with conical connection for restoring the posterior edentulous region. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 38:31 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0077-x
  27. Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonca MR, Pellizzer EP (2016) Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 47:8-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005

Cited by

  1. Rabbit Calvarial Defect Model for Customized 3D-Printed Bone Grafts vol.24, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0474
  2. Effect of herbal extracts on bone regeneration in a rat calvaria defect model and screening system vol.44, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.2.79
  3. Efficacy of Collagen-Based Membranes in Alveolar Bone Augmentation vol.8, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112048
  4. Evaluation of the Bone Regeneration Effect of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 on Subperiosteal Bone Graft in the Rat Calvarial Model vol.12, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101613
  5. Stress Distribution on the Prosthetic Screws in the All-on-4 Concept: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis vol.46, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-19-00090
  6. Comparison of Bone Regeneration in Different Forms of Bovine Bone Scaffolds with Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 vol.22, pp.20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222011121