The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In vitro evaluation of resonance frequency analysis values to different implant contact ratio and stiffness of surrounding material

  • Kwak, Mu-Seung (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Seok-Gyu (Department of Prosthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, College of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • Received : 2013.02.27
  • Accepted : 2013.10.18
  • Published : 2013.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The present study was aimed to evaluate the influence of implant contact ratio and stiffness of implant-surrounding materials on the resonance frequency analysis (RFA) values. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy resin blocks that had the different amounts (100, 50, 30, 15%) of resin-implant contact (RIC) were fabricated. Ten silicone putty blocks with 100% silicone-implant contact were also made. The implants with ${\phi}5.0mm{\times}13.0mm$ were placed on eighty specimen blocks. The RFA value was measured on the transducer that was connected to each implant by Osstell Mentor. Kruskal-Wallis and Scheffe's tests (${\alpha}$=.05) were done for statistical analysis. RESULTS. The control resin group with 100% RIC had the highest RFA value of 83.9, which was significantly different only from the resin group with 15% RIC among the resin groups. The silicone putty group with 100% contact had the lowest RFA value of 36.6 and showed statistically significant differences from the resin groups. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, there was no significant difference in the RFA values among the resin groups with different RIC's except when the RIC difference was more than 85%. A significant increase in the RFA value was observed related to the increase in stiffness of material around implant.

Keywords

References

  1. Schulte W, Lukas D. Periotest to monitor osseointegration and to check the occlusion in oral implantology. J Oral Implantol 1993;19:23-32.
  2. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. The application of modal vibration analysis to study bone healing in vivo. J Dent Res 1994;73:793.
  3. Becker W, Sennerby L, Bedrossian E, Becker BE, Lucchini JP. Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial. J Periodontol 2005;76:391-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.391
  4. Zix J, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R. Stability measurements of 1-stage implants in the maxilla by means of resonance frequency analysis: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:747-52.
  5. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:234-43. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080310.x
  6. Schliephake H, Sewing A, Aref A. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in the dog mandible: experimental comparison with histomorphometric data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:941-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.05.002
  7. Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Correlation between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact: a retrospective histological and histomorphometrical study of seven titanium implants retrieved from humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:218-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00022.x
  8. Turkyilmaz I, Sennerby L, McGlumphy EA, Tözüm TF. Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:113-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00097.x
  9. Sim CP, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:598-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01878.x
  10. Nkenke E, Hahn M, Weinzierl K, Radespiel-Troger M, Neukam FW, Engelke K. Implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14: 601-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00937.x
  11. Miyamoto I, Tsuboi Y, Wada E, Suwa H, Iizuka T. Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of surgery-clinical, prospective, biomechanical, and imaging study. Bone 2005;37:776-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.019
  12. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:77-83.
  13. Trisi P, Carlesi T, Colagiovanni M, Perfetti G. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) vs direct in vitro measurement of primary stability(micromotion): effect of bone density and insertion torque. J Osteol Biomat 2010;1:141-51.
  14. da Cunha HA, Francischone CE, Filho HN, de Oliveira RC. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and TiUnite single-tooth implants under immediate loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19: 578-85.
  15. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 2002. p. 328-30.
  16. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  17. Albrektsson T. Dental implants: a review of clinical approaches. Aust Prosthodont Soc Bull 1985;15:7-25.
  18. Albrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:597-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90344-1
  19. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Osseointegration: a requiem for the periodontal ligament ? Int J Periodont Res Dent 1991;11:88-91.
  20. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:254-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00208.x
  21. Hansson S. A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone. An axisymmetric finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:286-93. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140306.x
  22. Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:523-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.024
  23. Cehreli MC, Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:481-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01025.x
  24. Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:401-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01022.x
  25. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:423-32. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x
  26. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x

Cited by

  1. Influence of the Localization of Frontal Bone Defects on Primary Stability Values of 2 Different Implant Designs vol.26, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000536