• Title/Summary/Keyword: Orthopedic implant

Search Result 134, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

Intramedullary fibula strut bone allograft in a periprosthetic humeral shaft fracture with implant loosening after total elbow arthroplasty

  • Jo, Young-Hoon;Lee, Seung Gun;Kook, Incheol;Lee, Bong Gun
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.23 no.3
    • /
    • pp.152-155
    • /
    • 2020
  • Periprosthetic fracture after total elbow replacement surgery is a difficult complication to manage, especially when it comes together with implant loosening. If stem revision and internal fixation of the periprosthetic fracture are performed simultaneously, this would be a very challenging procedure. Most of total elbow replacement implants are cemented type. Cement usage at periprosthetic fracture site may interfere healing of fractured site. Authors underwent internal fixation with use of locking plate and cerclage wire for periprosthetic fracture, allogenous fibular strut bone inserted into the humerus intramedullary canal allowing the fractured site to be more stable without cement usage. At 10-month follow-up, the complete union and good clinical outcome was achieved. We present a novel technique for treating periprosthetic fracture with implant loosening after total elbow replacement surgery, using intramedullary allogenous fibula strut bone graft.

Treatment of instability with scapular notching and glenoid component loosing by partial mixed different implant revision

  • Chung, Young Woo;Shin, Woo Jin;An, Ki-Yong
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.23 no.4
    • /
    • pp.190-193
    • /
    • 2020
  • In general, reverse shoulder arthroplasty revision is performed using the same implant for both the humerus and glenoid components. However, the authors of the present case used different implants from what was used previously for treating instability with scapular notching and glenoid aseptic loosening and report the case.

Evaluating the effects of age on the long-term functional outcomes following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

  • Troy Li;Akiro H. Duey;Christopher A. White;Amit Pujari;Akshar V. Patel;Bashar Zaidat;Christine S. Williams;Alexis Williams;Carl M. Cirino;Dave Shukla;Bradford O. Parsons;Evan L. Flatow;Paul J. Cagle
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.26 no.3
    • /
    • pp.231-237
    • /
    • 2023
  • Background: In the past decade, the number of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) procedures has steadily increased. Patients over 65 years of age comprise the vast majority of recipients, and outcomes have been well documented; however, patients are opting for definitive surgical treatment at younger ages.We aim to report on the effects of age on the long-term clinical outcomes following aTSA. Methods: Among the patients who underwent TSA, 119 shoulders were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome data were collected. Linear regression analysis (univariate and multivariate) was conducted to evaluate the associations of clinical outcomes with age. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate implant survival. Results: At final follow-up, patients of all ages undergoing aTSA experienced significant and sustained improvements in all primary outcome measures compared with preoperative values. Based on multivariate analysis, age at the time of surgery was a significant predictor of postoperative outcomes. Excellent implant survival was observed over the course of this study, and Cox regression survival analysis indicated age and sex to not be associated with an increased risk of implant failure. Conclusions: When controlling for sex and follow-up duration, older age was associated with significantly better patient-reported outcome measures. Despite this difference, we noted no significant effects on range of motion or implant survival. Level of evidence: IV.

Arthroscopic transosseous anchorless rotator cuff repair reduces bone defects related to peri-implant cyst formation: a comparison with conventional suture anchors using propensity score matching

  • Hyeon Jang Jeong;Ji Soo Lee;Young Kyu Kim;Sung-Min Rhee;Joo Han Oh
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.26 no.3
    • /
    • pp.276-286
    • /
    • 2023
  • Background: The transosseous anchorless repair (ToR) technique was recently introduced to avoid suture anchor-related problems. While favorable outcomes of the ToR technique have been reported, no previous studies on peri-implant cyst formation with the ToR technique exist. Therefore, this study compared the clinical outcomes and prevalence of peri-implant cyst formation between the ToR technique and the conventional transosseous equivalent technique using suture anchors (SA). Methods: Cases with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) between 2016 and 2018 treated with the double-row suture bridge technique were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into ToR and SA groups. To compare clinical outcomes, 19 ToR and 57 SA cases without intraoperative implant failure were selected using propensity score matching (PSM). While intraoperative implant failure rate was analyzed before PSM, retear rate, peri-implant cyst formation rate, and functional outcomes were compared after PSM. Results: The intraoperative implant failure rate (ToR, 8% vs. SA, 15.3%) and retear rate (ToR, 5.3% vs. SA, 19.3%) did not differ between the two groups (all P>0.05). However, peri-implant cysts were not observed in the ToR group, while they were observed in 16.7% of the SA group (P=0.008). Postoperative functional outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: The ToR technique produced comparable clinical outcomes to conventional techniques. Considering the prospect of potential additional surgeries, the absence of peri-implant cyst formation might be an advantage of ToR. Furthermore, ToR might reduce the medical costs related to suture anchors and, thereby, could be a useful option for ARCR. Level of evidence: III.

Rapid Prototyping and Reverse Engineering Application for Orthopedic Surgery Planning

  • Ahn Dong-Gyu;Lee Jun-Young;Yang Dong-Yol
    • Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology
    • /
    • v.20 no.1
    • /
    • pp.19-28
    • /
    • 2006
  • This paper describes rapid prototyping (RP) and reverse engineering (RE) application for orthopedic surgery planning to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the orthopedic surgery. Using the symmetrical characteristics of the human body, CAD data of undamaged bone of the injured area are generated from a mirror transformation of undamaged bone data for the uninjured area. The physical model before the injury is manufactured from Poly jet RP process. The surgical plan, including the selection of the proper implant, pre-forming of the implant and decision of fixation positions, etc., is determined by a physical simulation using the physical model. In order to examine the applicability and efficiency of the surgical planning technology, two case studies, such as a distal tibia comminuted fracture and an iliac wing fracture of pelvis, are carried out. From the results of the examination, it has been shown that the RP and RE can be applied to orthopedic surgical planning and can be an efficient surgical tool.

Correction of the Dorsal Contour Deformity Caused by Scoliosis with Silicone Implant (실리콘 보형물을 이용한 척추측만증 배부 윤곽변형 교정수술)

  • Park, Ji Ung;Cho, Sang Hun;Shin, Jong In;Kim, Chang Yeon
    • Archives of Plastic Surgery
    • /
    • v.34 no.6
    • /
    • pp.792-795
    • /
    • 2007
  • Purpose: Scoliosis is a multifactorial disorder caused by genetic, biochemical, developmental, neuromuscular factors and causes complex deformities which include skeletal deformity, pain, cardiovascular dysfunction, motor function disorder. Until now, the treatment of scoliosis have been focused on orthopedic correction, preservation of cardiopulmonary and neurologic function. But recently, as aesthetic demands increases, the needs for the correction or improvement of the trunk and extremity contour does. So, the correction of soft tissue contour deformity can be a new concept for the treatment of scoliosis. Methods: We corrected a deformed contour with prefabricated silicone implant in a scoliosis patient who had been operated for orthopedic correction previously. Submuscular pocket was made under trapezius and latissimus dorsi muscle. Silicone implant was placed in the pocket and fixed to thoracolumbar fascia with sutures. Results: We had a satisfactory results for the correction of contour deformity. There was no significant complication. Conclusion: Silicone implant is a new trial for the correction of scoliosis contour deformity. This method is simple, safe and brings on satisfactory results.

Implant selection for successful reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

  • Joo Han Oh;Hyeon Jang Jeong;Yoo-Sun Won
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.26 no.1
    • /
    • pp.93-106
    • /
    • 2023
  • Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) emerged as a new concept of arthroplasty that does not restore normal anatomy but does restore function. It enables the function of the torn rotator cuff to be performed by the deltoid and shows encouraging clinical outcomes. Since its introduction, various modifications have been designed to improve the outcome of the RTSA. From the original cemented baseplate with peg or keel, a cementless baseplate was designed that could be fixed with central and peripheral screws. In addition, a modular-type glenoid component enabled easier revision options. For the humeral component, the initial design was an inlay type of long stem with cemented fixation. However, loss of bone stock from the cemented stem hindered revision surgery. Therefore, a cementless design was introduced with a firm metaphyseal fixation. Furthermore, to prevent complications such as scapular notching, the concept of lateralization emerged. Lateralization helped to maintain normal shoulder contour and better rotator cuff function for improved external/internal rotation power, but excessive lateralization yielded problems such as subacromial notching. Therefore, for patients with pseudoparalysis or with risk of subacromial notching, a medial eccentric tray option can be used for distalization and reduced lateralization of the center of rotation. In summary, it is important that surgeons understand the characteristics of each implant in the various options for RTSA. Furthermore, through preoperative evaluation of patients, surgeons can choose the implant option that will lead to the best outcomes after RTSA.

Criteria for Implant Choice of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (역행성 인공관절 전치환술 시 임플란트 선택에 대한 기준)

  • Choi, Chang-Hyuk;Kim, Jun-Young
    • Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
    • /
    • v.56 no.5
    • /
    • pp.377-390
    • /
    • 2021
  • Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a surgical method that has recently been conducted in widely irrepairable rotator cuff tears with pseudoparalysis, cuff tear arthropathy, and osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint. Several topics can be described, but this review article provides an opinion on the criteria for the choice of implant in RTSA.

Metastasis of renal cell carcinoma around suture anchor implants

  • Baek, Samuel;Shin, Myung Ho;Kim, Tae Min;Oh, Kyung-Soo;Lee, Dong Ryun;Chung, Seok Won
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.24 no.2
    • /
    • pp.110-113
    • /
    • 2021
  • We present an unusual case of bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma around orthopedic implants in a 78-year-old female with osteolytic, expansile, highly vascularized, malignant infiltration around suture anchors in the proximal humerus. The patient had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture anchor implants 6 years previously. After diagnosis of bone metastasis, she was successfully treated with metastasectomy and internal fixation using a plate and screws, with cement augmentation. This report is the first to document metastases around a suture anchor in a bone and suggests the vulnerability of suture anchor implants to tumor metastasis.

Silicone radial head prostheses revisited: do they have a role in today's practice? A systematic review of literature on clinical outcomes

  • Erik M van Bussel;Anneluuk L. Lindenhovius;Bertram The;Denise Eygendaal
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.26 no.3
    • /
    • pp.312-322
    • /
    • 2023
  • Background: Silicone radial head prostheses (SRHP) are considered obsolete due to reports of frequent failure and destructive silicone-induced synovitis. Considering the good outcomes of modern non-radial silicone joint implants, the extent of scientific evidence for this negative view is unclear. The aim of this research was to systematically analyze the clinical evidence on complications and outcomes of SRHP and how SRHP compare to both non-SRHP and silicone prostheses of other joints. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted through the Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases. Results: Eight cohort studies were included, consisting of 142 patients and follow-up periods ranging from 23 months to 8 years. Average patient satisfaction was 86%, range of 71%-100%, and 58 complications were seen, but no cases of synovitis. These outcomes were in line with non-SRHP. Four case series with 11 cases of synovitis were found, all due to implant fractures years to decades after implantation. Six systematic reviews of currently used non-radial silicone joint implants showed excellent outcomes with low complication rates. Conclusions: Since SRHP have satisfactory clinical results and an acceptable complication rate when selecting a patient group in suitable condition for surgical indications, it is considered that SRHP can still be chosen as a potential surgical treatment method in current clinical practice.