• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제13권10호
• /
• pp.9-17
• /
• 2015

중국은 세계에서 가장 큰 전자상거래 시장으로서 중국 온라인 소매시장은 미국보다 약 40% 크며, 양국은 전세계 전자상거래 시장의 55% 이상을 차지하고 있다. 한 중 FTA는 한중 양국의 상품, 서비스의 전자상거래 확대와 국가간 전자상거래 활동을 촉진시킬 것이다. 한국산 소비재는 기술과 품질 측면에서 중국시장에서 경쟁우위를 가지고 있기 때문에 FTA 혜택을 향유할 수 있다. 본 연구는 한 중 FTA 전자상거래 협정문의 주요쟁점을 검토하고 이를 바탕으로 한국 상품의 전자상거래 수출확대를 위한 활용과제에 대해 문헌연구를 중심으로 살펴보았다. 이러한 연구결과를 바탕으로 다음과 같은 시사점을 제시하고자 한다. 한국 상품의 전자상거래 수출확대를 위해서는 한 중 FTA 전자상거래 협정의 후속협상에 대한 준비와 전자적 전송물의 분류에 대한 대비를 하여야 한다. 그리고 전자인증과 전자서명에 있어 양국의 상호인정이 필요하며, 전자상거래 분쟁해결을 위한 제도의 마련과 한국 상품의 전자상거래 수출확대를 위한 전략의 수립 등이 필요하다.

• 한국환경보건학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.175-183
• /
• 2012

Objectives: Controversy regarding the relationship between exposure to Agent Orange and disease has progressed for more than four decades, both at home and abroad. Recently, the allegation by US veteran Steve House of the burial of Agent Orange at the US Army base Camp Carroll located in Waegwan-eup, Korea, has emerged. We reviewed published articles and reports related to Agent Orange. Methods: Articles and reports were collected online using the keywords 'agent orange' and 'health' and then reviewed. Results: A number of epidemiologic studies have reported disease outcomes due to exposure to Agent Orange, while others were unable to establish a link to the injuries of veterans of the Vietnam War. This can be explained by the fact that accurate exposure assessment should be carried out since exposure misclassification in epidemiologic studies can affect estimates of risk. In the case of the burial of Agent Orange at Camp Carroll, an exposure pathway could be through underground water supplies, which differs from the cases of Vietnam and Seveso in Italy. Conclusion: There still remains a dispute among academics regarding the relationship between exposure to Agent Orange and disease, although Agent Orange is a highly toxic chemical. This dispute indicates that accurate exposure pathway and exposure assessment is needed.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.145-167
• /
• 2007

Digital goods are defined as intangible and non-physical goods, composed of a combination of digital signals, electronically represented as 0 and 1. They are also called as digital products, electronic transmissions, information goods, digital contents, computer information, etc. Digital goods are now traded both domestically and internationally as well as on-line and off-line. Korean government revised the Basic Law on Foreign Trade to include digital goods and services as the scope of foreign trade in 2001. Trade volume of digital goods are increasing in Korea. The supply chains of digital goods from producing the components to selling globally to consumers are different from conventional physical goods. Mostly, digital goods are traded on the license basis rather than ownership contract. End User License Agreements(EULAs), such as shrink-wrap, click- wrap, or browser-wrap licenses are very popular in online transactions. Unlike conventional physical goods. the breach of license contract is closely linked with the infringement of intellectual property rights. Digitalized intellectual property is easy to copy and transmit in the cyber space. In cases of legal disputes from the breach of license contract, commercial arbitration or on-line alternative dispute resolutions(ADRs) are regarded as better approach to solve them rather than court sues. For promoting more secure and reliable international trade of digital goods. arbitration clauses should be included in most of license contracts.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.87-105
• /
• 2015

Intellectual property law is slowly fighting to keep pace with the rapid growth of the fashion industry. Copyright and patent law have proven only minimally effective in fashion, even in the US and other top fashion nations, forcing designers and fashion companies to rely on their trademarks to protect their work. Litigating trademark disputes in the fashion industry presents a host of problems as witnessed in a recent Christian Louboutin case, leading the parties to resort to Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR) and Online Dispute Resolution(ODR). ADR methods, especially arbitration, are increasingly emerging as substitutes to litigation. Using these methods, the fashion industry (CFDA in the US case) should sincerely consider a self-regulating program in which its members, both fashion designers and corporations alike, can resolve disputes in a manner mutually beneficial to all parties in order to preserve the industry's growth, solidarity, and esteem In particular, for the US fashion industry, the ongoing Innovative Design Protection and Privacy Prevention Act(IDPPPA) anti-counterfeit legislation could have caused a chilling effect against innovation. New designers with no name and less resources who could normally flourish producing inspired-by designs may find themselves subject to copyright infringement legislation since the IDPPPA may expand the protection of established designers and brands with more resources. This fear and its implication could be solved by the fashion industry itself since fashion experts know best how to handle these fast-paced issues arising in the field. Therefore, stakeholders in the fashion industry should commit to protecting innovation within fashion on a long-term basis by establishing a panel handling an ADR process. This can mitigate the uncertainty created by the IDPPPA or any other legislation from elsewhere, which could result in a shying away from experimentation with inspired-by designs.

• 한국항행학회논문지
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.882-889
• /
• 2010

네트워크 기술의 발전은 인터넷 상에서 온라인 게임 산업을 급성장하게 만들었다. 최근, 게임 플레이어들은 이종의 온라인 게임 서버에서 관리되는 게임 캐릭터에 대하여 자유로운 이주를 원하게 되었다. 기존 연구는 게임 플레이어의 요구를 수용한 게임 캐릭터 이주 모델을 제시하고 있다. 그러나 이종 게임 서버 간의 게임 캐릭터의 이주 절차에만 중점을 두었고, 온라인 거래에서 필수적으로 요구되는 안전성 문제가 간과되었다. 그러므로 거래 내용에 대한 안전성 확보 및 분쟁 발생 시 해결 대책 마련이 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 기존 연구 (CMP) 를 기반으로 이종 게임 서버 간의 게임 캐릭터를 이주할 때 이중 서명 방법을 사용한 안전한 게임 캐릭터 이주 시스템(SCMP)을 제안하고, 안전성을 검증해 본다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.167-187
• /
• 2007

As Korea has reached a free trade agreement with the United States of America, it is required to provide an appropriate procedure to ".kr" domain name disputes based on the principles established in the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy(UDRP). Currently, Internet address Dispute Resolution Committee(IDRC) established under Article 16 of the Act on Internet Address Resources provides the dispute resolution proceedings to resolve ".kr" domain name disputes. While the IDRC's proceeding is similar to the UDRP administrative proceeding in procedural aspects, the Domain Name Dispute Mediation Policy that is established by the IDRC and that applies to disputes involving ".kr" domain names is very different from the UDRP for generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) in substantial aspects. Under the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement(KORUS FTA), it is expected that either the Domain Name Dispute Mediation Policy to be amended to adopt the UDRP or the IDRC to examine the Domain Name Dispute Mediation Policy in order to harmonize it with the principles established in the UDRP. It is a common practice of cybersquatters to warehouse a number of domain names without any active use of these domain names after their registration. The Domain Name Dispute Mediation Policy provides that the complainant may request to transfer or delete the registration of the disputed domain name if the registrant registered, holds or uses the disputed domain name in bad faith. This provision lifts the complainant's burden of proof to show the respondent's bad faith because the complainant is only required to prove one of the three bad faiths which are registration in bad faith, holding in bad faith, or use in bad faith. The aforementioned resolution procedure is different from the UDRP regime which requires the complainant, in compliance with paragraph 4(b) of the UDRP, to prove that the disputed domain name has been registered in bad faith and is being used in bad faith. Therefore, the complainant carries heavy burden of proof under the UDRP. The IDRC should deny the complaint if the respondent has legitimate rights or interests in the domain names. Under the UDRP, the complainant must show that the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The UDRP sets out three illustrative circumstances, any one of which if proved by the respondent, shall be evidence of the respondent's rights to or legitimate interests in the domain name. As the Domain Name Dispute Mediation Policy provides only a general provision regarding the respondent's legitimate rights or interests, the respondent can be placed in a very week foundation to be protected under the Policy. It is therefore recommended for the IDRC to adopt the three UDRP circumstances to guide how the respondent can demonstrate his/her legitimate rights or interests in the disputed domain name. In accordance with the KORUS FTA, the Korean Government is required to provide online publication to a reliable and accurate database of contact information concerning domain name registrants. Cybersquatters often provide inaccurate contact information or willfully conceal their identity to avoid objection by trademark owners. It may cause unnecessary and unwarranted delay of the administrative proceedings. The respondent may loss the opportunity to assert his/her rights or legitimate interests in the domain name due to inability to submit the response effectively and timely. The respondent could breach a registration agreement with a registrar which requires the registrant to submit and update accurate contact information. The respondent who is reluctant to disclose his/her contact information on the Internet citing for privacy rights and protection. This is however debatable as the respondent may use the proxy registration service provided by the registrar to protect the respondent's privacy.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제21권8호
• /
• pp.297-307
• /
• 2021

In the vibrant environment, documentation and managing systems are maintained autonomously through education foundations, book materials and libraries at the same time as information are not voluntarily accessible in a centralized location. At the moment Libraries are providing online resources and services for education activities. Moreover, libraries are applying outlets of social media such as Facebook as well as Instagrams to preview their services and procedures. Librarians with the assistance of promising tools and technology like analytics software are capable to accumulate more online information, analyse them for incorporating worth to their services. Thus Libraries can employ big data to construct enhanced decisions concerning collection developments, updating public spaces and tracking the purpose of library book materials. Big data is being produced due to library digitations and this has forced restrictions to academicians, researchers and policy creator's efforts in enhancing the quality and effectiveness. Accordingly, helping the library clients with research articles and book materials that are in line with the users interest is a big challenge and dispute based on Taibah university in Saudi Arabia. The issues of this domain brings the numerous sources of data from various institutions and sources into single place in real time which can be time consuming. The most important aim is to reduce the time that lapses among the authentic book reading and searching the specific study material.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.197-211
• /
• 2005

본 논문에서는 상거래과정에서 발생하는 분쟁해결을 위하여 적용가능한 ODR시스템의 특성과 선진국의 ODR의 시험 운영사례를 통하여 이에 따른 문제점을 분석하였다. 또한 국제상거래의 분쟁해결수단으로 일반화되고 있는 중재에 대하여 온라인중재의 도입에 따른 법적인 문제를 검토하고, 이러한 분석 검토결과를 토대로 ODR의 발전방안을 제시하였다. ODR은 신속성, 비용의 경제성, 해결방법의 개선 등의 장점으로 인하여 온라인에서 발생한 분쟁뿐만 아니라 오프라인에서 발생한 분쟁까지도 그 영역이 확대되어 가고 있으며, 앞으로 전자정부에서도 이를 채택하게 됨에 따라 급격히 발전할 것으로 생각된다. 최근의 상거래분쟁이 복잡하고 전문성이 요구되며, 신속한 해결을 지향하고 있으므로 종래 ADR제도의 장점과 정보 통신적 요소를 가미한 새로운 ODR제도를 도입 추진하는 것이 무엇보다도 중요하다고 할 수 있으며, 이를 위하여 ODR제도의 정통성과 실효성을 확보할 필요가 있다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.99-118
• /
• 2021

The participants in this study were university students, who are millennials and familiar with various devices and SNS enabling hyper connection, such as smartphones, the Internet, and the Internet of Things. People are sustaining their relationships with others by using the latest technology and cutting-edge devices at will. Some purchases are made at offline stores through online information, but products are checked through offline stores and purchased online. The MZ generation, which does not always have a fixed and constant behavioral response pattern, was considered a participant in this study because the response pattern may vary depending on one's tendency to avoid uncertainty. As a result of experimenting with the MZ generation, similar results were found in all dependent variables. Advertorial and general ads treated as independent variables affected the participants' tendency to avoid uncertainty. In other words, uncertainty avoidance tendency and interaction effect were found as a result of verifying the effects on the dependent variable of ads type. In an advertorial, the group with low uncertainty avoidance tendencies showed higher dependent variable effects than the group with high uncertainty avoidance tendencies; in general ads, uncertainty avoidance tendencies were higher. The higher group showed higher dependent variable effects than the lower group. Therefore, the group with a low tendency to avoid uncertainty has a high level of dependent variable effects in the advertorial, and the group with high uncertainty avoidance tendency performs self-interpretation in general ads.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.292-309
• /
• 2022

최근 쌍방향성 통신 기술의 발달로 인해 인터넷 개인방송 플랫폼에 대한 수요가 증가하고 있다. 인터넷 개인방송은 시청자의 자율적인 후원금으로 수익을 창출하는데, 현재 후원행위에 관한 법률이 미비하다. 특히 미성년자가 후원을 하는 경우, 취소권을 행사할 수 있기 때문에 취소 과정에서 분쟁이 빈번하게 발생한다. 이때, 급부를 요구하는 후원행위의 경우, 일방적인 후원과 법적 성질 및 결과가 달라져 문제가 된다. 미성년자가 취소권을 행사하면 방송진행자는 급부 제공에 대한 보상은 받지 못한 채 후원금을 반환해야 하는 것이다. 본 연구는 통상적으로 증여로 인식되는 인터넷 개인방송 후원행위에서 쌍무계약성을 발견하고, 이로 인해 발생할 수 있는 방송진행자의 피해를 지적하며, 미성년자의 취소권이 배제되는 경우인 미성년자의 사술에 주목하여 관련 판례와 후원 절차를 검토하고, 미성년자의 취소권을 침해하지 않는 선에서 진행자를 보호하는 법리를 제시한다. 모호한 법리적 상황을 학문적으로 규명하고, 분쟁예방 절차를 제시하여 해당 산업에 긍정적인 영향을 가져올 수 있다.