• Title/Summary/Keyword: OECD 부가가치 기준 교역자료

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

A Research on the Influencing Factors on Value-Added Acquisition in the Global Value Chain in Developing Countries (글로벌 가치사슬에서의 부가가치 획득 영향요인 연구: 개발도상국가를 대상으로)

  • Gu, Ji-Yeong
    • Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
    • /
    • v.25 no.2
    • /
    • pp.203-218
    • /
    • 2022
  • The global value chain, as a major feature of the contemporary global economic system, has been mainly led by developed countries. Whereas developing countries have taken the relatively low value-added activities and this made geographical imbalances in value distribution. This imbalance in value distribution, however, began to gradually alleviated. Related to this phenomenon, the purpose of this research is to analyze the factors affecting factors. Focused on the method of upgrading the industry in the global value chain, the impact on the acquisition of value-added in developing countries was analyzed among the various factors to achieve the research purpose. Panel analysis was conducted on all industries, food and tobacco industries, textile and clothing industries, computer and electornics industries, and automobile industries of the OECD Value-Added Trade Data (TiVA). As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that in all industries, value-added acquisition in developing countries was improved by increased total production, high value-added product production and participation in early stage. The analysis results by detailed industry showed slightly different patterns depending on the characteristics of each industry.

An Analysis on the Characteristics of Global Automotive Production Network using the OECD Trade in Value Added Data (OECD 부가가치 기준 교역자료를 이용한 자동차산업 글로벌 생산 네트워크의 특성 분석)

  • Jeong, Jun Ho;Jo, Hyung Je
    • Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
    • /
    • v.19 no.3
    • /
    • pp.491-511
    • /
    • 2016
  • This paper attempts to understand the nature and dynamics of global value chains in the auto industry using the OECD TiVA 2015 edition on the bilateral foreign value added in exports over the period 1995-2011 and employing the techniques of social network analysis such as the computation of network measures and visualization of value added trade flows. It is shown that there has been a tendency towards increasing production fragmentation both within and across regions. The automotive value-added network is found to have small-world properties with a hierarchical, clustered and dense structure. The differences among the US, Germany and China as major suppliers of foreign value added in global automotive value chains are remarkably revealed. Although the fragmentation of production has been developed on a global scale, a dichotomous tension between center and periphery and domestic and foreign capital lies behind it.

  • PDF

Analysis of Changes in the Global Value Chain of the Electronics Industry and Participation Structure of Major Countries (전자산업 글로벌 가치사슬의 변화와 주요국의 참여 구조 분석)

  • Gu, Ji-Yeong
    • Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
    • /
    • v.25 no.1
    • /
    • pp.23-40
    • /
    • 2022
  • Under the global economic system, production activities has formed an international division of labor, which has greatly affected industries in individual countries by global issues such as the U.S-China trade war and neo-protectionism. In particular the risk and change of disconnection of semiconductor value chain caused by COVID-19 are evaluated as offering the crisis and opportunity at the same time to all countries participating in the global electronics industry value chain. Therefore, this study was conducted with the OECD Trade in Value Added(TiVA) based on the time when a detailed analysis of the global chain of the electronic industry is needed. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that the global value chain of the electronics industry is gradually expanding and strengthening, and that various countries are emerging as major actors in the global value chain. It was found that the U.S. and Japan are in charge of relatively high value-added activities, while Korea, Taiwan and China are in charge of low value-added activities, although they are large scale.