• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2021

England's green belt policy as it delivered its framework to designating the development restriction zones(DRZ) in Korea is the key to address issues which try to change green belt boundary or/and housing development. Therefore it should necessarily be reviewed on the understanding of how England has been formulating a national policy to deal with the issues focusing on opportunities for housing development and recreation. This study explored the discourse and framework of England's green belt policy as well as driver changes of housing development and recreation. Results show several characteristics of England's green belt policy which are civil society consensus on conservation and management, limited small-scale housing development through management of release rates, a systematic procedure for application and approval, open-recreation space expansion and utilisation under the premise of conservation of natural green areas, and management structure by the involvement of NGO organisations. Therefore, five suggestions can be delivered to developing Korea's DRZ frameworks: first, preceding social consensus on the preservation value of development-restricted zones, second, addressing housing shortages in different alternatives e.g.) environmental-friendly small-scale housing, third, institutionalising the total proportion of release, fourth, establishing an open-recreation space, fifth, introducing expanded public-private partnerships. Ultimately securing the legitimacy of the nation's development-restricted zone system can contribute positively to the environment preservation and human health by promoting public leisure activities in terms of the recent increase in external activities caused by the Covid-19 crisis. Concluding remarks are here that the understanding of England's green belt policy can be delivered to and help formulate domestic policy addressing current issues.

• 한국환경생태학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경생태학회 2003년도 추계학술논문발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.23-29
• /
• 2003

It has been declared in 1992 at Rio about the management of united water control and method of the management of the water resources at the water basin. And it was also mentioned about the protection of fresh water's quality and it's supply under chapter the 18th of the agenda 21. It has been 10years passed after Rio declaration, and water crisis Is getting more serious than before. Fairly, right for using water resources was given to every life as the public resources. But at the last world water forum, water was commercialized, and regulated as the basic requirement not basic right. Therefore, we could use the water according to the logic of supply and demand at the market, and with money. Furthermore, construction of the big dam which was build to solve the problem of the lack of water became one of problems for water control. Korea is keeping consistent policy such as providing water by the building of dam. Control of the water demand is the most basic and effective policy for the preservation of water resources. If we change the policy such as the construction of the dam, we should put the management of the water demand in the center with the reliable philosophy. United management of the river basin has to be made with the security of water, improvement of water quality, and protection of the ecological side each other. Management of water basin also has to be completed to solve the trouble caused by using water conflict people who live up and down stream. To maintain the good quality of water, management of water basin is necessary. Also, bottom line of the united management of water basin is voluntary involvement of every citizens and local community. We suggest to preserve the origin of river and the upper at the ecological side. It is worth it to preserve.

• 한국해양환경ㆍ에너지학회지
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.335-340
• /
• 2010

황해 광역 해양생태계(YSLME) 프로젝트의 목적을 소개하고 구체적인 활동을 서술하였다. YSLME는 생산성이 높으나 가장 오염이 많이 되어 있는 곳이기도 하다. YSLME 프로젝트의 목적은 경계진단분석을 통해 파악된 환경문제의 피해를 전략 실행 프로그램(SAP)을 통해 줄이는데 있다. 생물다양성을 위협하는 가장 주요한 원인은 갯벌간척등을 통한 서식지 훼손이다. 1900년대 초 이래로 한국측 갯벌 40% 이상, 중국측 갯벌의 60% 이상이 훼손된 상태다. 남획과 오염등은 연안환경의 생물다양성 손실을 가져온다. 이 손실을 막기 위한 실행프로그램으로 정치가, 공무원, 과학자, 학생, 일반시민등 다양한 시민계층을 대상으로 환경의식을 고취시키는 켐페인을 벌여왔다. 또한 다른 시민환경단체와 연대하여 황해 파트너쉽을 구성하였다. 환경단체들은 국제기구 단체들과 달리 지역주민과 공고한 네트워크를 가지고 있기 때문에 지역의 환경보존노력을 위한 매우 중요한 파트너로 인식되고 있다. 소규모 지원프로젝트를 통해 환경단체들을 효과적으로 연계시킬 수 있었다. 세계야생동물기금 및 기타 연구기관과 공동연구를 통해 YSLME의 SAP를 수립하기 위한 생물다양성 평가 보고서를 발간하였다. SAP에서는 생물다양성을 위한 지역별 목표를 다음과 같이 설정하였다: 서식밀도 증대, 멸종위기종을 포함한 모든 생물종의 분포와 유전적 다양성 확보, 2007년 표준지침에 의거한 서식지 유지, 외래종 유입 위협의 감소. YSLME 프로젝트의 다음단계는 SAP를 승인하고 이를 성공적으로 이행함으로써 미래세대를 위한 생물다양성을 유지하는 것이다.