• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2001년도 봄 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.3-14
• /
• 2001

This study introduces the framework of the mutual recognition project of APEC Engineer and also tries to find out what we, Korean engineers have to do with this project. The mutual recognition framework consists of 2 main frameworks ; the substantial equivalence framework and the mutual exemption framework. The participating Economies have discussed and agreed on the framework of the substantial equivalency and have been producing APEC Engineers from the 1st, Nov 2000 based on this agreement. However, more discussions will be required from now on in order to finalize the mutual exemption agreement, even though there have been a lot of discussions including the workshop for the regulatory authority for the last 5 years. Here we have to study and find out what we have to do with this project and prepare for the bilateral agreements and the Coordinating Committee meeting to be held in Hongkong in Oct this year.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제48권3호
• /
• pp.107-130
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 선진국의 최소품질표준 설정과 국가 간 상호인정협정의 경제적 효과를 파악하고, 이를 기반으로 우리나라의 최적 상호인정협정 체결 전략을 분석한다. 이를 위하여 3개국의 대표기업이 서로 다른 품질의 제품을 선진국 시장에 공급하는 모형을 설정하였다. 분석결과, 첫째, 선진국 최소품질표준의 상승은 경쟁 상황을 심화시켜 모든 기업의 이윤을 감소시키며 선진국 소비자 효용을 증대시킨다. 또한, 최소품질표준으로 인하여 기업이 시장에서 퇴출된다면 경쟁은 완화되고 남은 기업들의 품질과 이윤은 늘어난다. 둘째, 최소품질표준을 적용을 받게 되는 국가들은 상호인정협정 체결을 통하여 사회후생을 증가 시킬 수 있으며, 서로 다른 국가들 간 상호인정협정 체결의 전략적 활용이 중요하다는 결론을 얻을 수 있다. 특히 우리나라의 경우 선진국과 상호인정협정을 체결하거나 3국 모두 상호인정협정을 체결하지 않는 상황이 최적으로 나타난다.

• Asian Journal of Business Environment
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.27-32
• /
• 2016

Purpose - This paper aims to analyze and investigate to find out the appropriate ways to make an easy TBT of smart city. It is an important issue between Korea and China because TBT of smart city has lots of advantages in IT, S/W, IOT, and Home network. Research design, data and methodology - First, the paper made use of reviewing2nd data analysis and focused on group interview, and then compared with analysis on the international rule and system such as smart city system, technical regulation, and standard through test certification procedure and inspection. Second, this paper reviewed electric/electronic test, certification, and calibration. Third, through analyzing MRA between Korea and china, the paper focused on SDoC, Mutual Acceptance of International certification, and IECCB scheme. Results - Through the comparison and analysis, this paper found that it is important to promote multi-track agreements with the countries that need short-term promotion. Moreover, it is necessary to conclude an agreement with the leading countries in Middle East and Central America. Conclusions - Through the above the reviews and analysis, we can see the importance of promotion in FTA and MRA with the efforts to remove the obstacles and promote to make an easy TBT by MRA between Korea and China.

• 기술사
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.34-38
• /
• 2009

There are three major international agreements governing mutual recognition of engineering qualifications and professional competence of the International PEs; namely, Washington Accords, APEC engineer agreement and EMF agreement. International Organizations of APEC Engineer Coordinating Committer and Engineers Mobility Forum established international registries with the goal of improving international mobility. APEC and EMF membership requires minimum qualifications for licensure with the minimum standards including engineering education, Professional experience, compliance with home jurisdiction requirements, having verified record of responsible charge, and demonstrating a commitment to continuing education.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.25-31
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The AEO (Authorized Economic Operator) program, created in 2001 in the United States due to 9.11 terrorist's attack, fundamentally changed the trade environment. Korea, which introduced AEO program in 2009, has become one of the world's top countries in the program by ranking 6th in the number of AEO certified companies and the world's No. 1 in MRA (Mutual Recognition Agreement) conclusions. In this paper, we examined what trade-economic and non-economic effects the AEO program and its MRA have in Korea. Research design, data and methodology: In this study we developed a model to verify the impact between utilization of AEO and trade-economic effects of the AEO and its MRA. After analyzing the validity and reliability of the model through Structural Equation Model we conducted a survey to request AEO companies to respond their experience on the effects of AEO program and MRA. As a result, 196 responses were received from 176 AEO companies and utilized in the analysis. Results: With regard to economic effects, the AEO program and the MRA have not been directly linked to financial performance, such as increased sales, increased export and import volumes, reduced management costs, and increased operating profit margins. However, it was analyzed that the positive effects of supply chain management were evident, such as strengthening self-security, monitoring and evaluating risks regularly, strengthening cooperation with trading companies, enhancing cargo tracking capabilities, and reducing the time required for export and import. Conclusions: When it comes to the trade-economic effects of AEO program and its MRA, AEO companies did not satisfy with direct effects, such as increased sales and volume of imports and exports, reduced logistics costs. However, non-economic effects, such as reduced time in customs clearance, freight tracking capability, enhanced security in supply chain are still appears to be big for them. In a rapidly changing trade environment the AEO and MRA are still useful. Therefore the government needs to encourage non-AEO companies to join the AEO program, expand MRA conclusion with AEO adopted countries especially developing ones and help AEO companies make good use of AEO and MRA.

• 한국농촌건축학회논문집
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.49-62
• /
• 2004

This paper intends to analyze, present the problems in operating of conservation of the historic villages in Korea, in oder to improve the procedure and methods of restoration construction. Improvments are as follows. 1. Recognizing of historic village as cultural heritages to dewellers, 2. Understading of village to administraor and investigator, 3. Forming of mutual agreements with dewellers, 4. Establishing Conservation Act and making delibration organization in order to repair and restorate, 5. Minimalizing of inconvenences of dewellers. 6. Recognition of the individual specialities of the building in construction, and constructions, repairments, restorations in priceples of conservation. 7. Establishing the permission criterion, and managing by the Conservation Act.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.25-44
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 일-EU 자유 무역 협정의 내용에서 한국 기업들에게 직접적으로 영향을 줄 수 있는 상호인정 협정 (MRA)을 검토하고 한국 수출 기업에 대한 함의를 제시하는 것이다. 2017 년 벨기에 브뤼셀에서 개최 된 G20 정상 회담에 앞서 일-EU FTA 협상이 재개되었으며 모든 교역 품목의 95%에 대한 관세 철폐에 합의했다. 일본 자동차는 7년간의 유예 기간과 15년간 유럽 치즈의 점진적인 철폐와 함께 관세 폐지에 대해 적극적으로 협상을 벌였다. EPA 협정으로 일본과 비슷한 산업 구조를 가진 한국은 가공 식품, 화학제품, 의료 장비, 유제품 및 자동차 산업에 타격을 줄 것으로 예상된다. 이러한 상황에서 한국 수출기업의 대응방안으로 첫째, 국제적 기술기준에 대한 이해와 전략적 대응. 둘째, 한국기업의 국가별 인증제도에 대한 이해. 셋째, 한국이 체결한 FTA의 적극적인 활용. 넷째, 기업의 MRA 운영에 적극적으로 참여등을 제시하였다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.81-108
• /
• 2008

Since the declaration made by UN Convention on the Law of the Sea on EEZs, The open seas of Northeast Asia, considerd as a convention area, needed new agreements in conformity with the changes brought by the introduction of the Exclusive Economic Zone(EEZ) system. The Contracting Parties of these agreements set up their own EEZs, which extend certain ranges from their baselines, Fishing in the other party's EEZ is done based on mutual agreements, which take into account traditional fishing activity in the zones. Seperate fishries management systems, in accordance with the relevant legal status of the waters, are applied to individual overlapping areas: Middle Zone in the Bast Sea and the waters south of jeju Island, Interim Measure Zone in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, and the Transitional Zone in the Yellow Sea. They decided to conclude fisheries agreements as the provisional agreement under Article 74(3) of the UN Convention before the delimitations of the EEZs to avoid the territorial disputes. China and Japan concluded the Fishries Agreement in the November 1997, allowing each coastal State 52 mile EEZ. it was followed by Korea and Japan in September 1998, reaching a final compromise. And also Korea and China came to a satisfactary settlement in November 1998. Fisheries agreements have been established between the three North-east Asian States, the agreement are all bilateral. That implies inefficient resource management on the overlapping waters of the three states, especially on the East China Sea. The Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement and the China-Japan Fishery Agreement worked as governing rules in the North-east Asian seas before the establishment of EEZs (Exclusive Economic Zones). However the conclusion of the bilateral fishery agreements, Korea China and Japan have developed EEZs, and these three countries have competed for the exploitation of fisheries resources. Therefore, the issue of fisheries resource management was no longer a single countries' problem and emerged as a common issue facing these three countries. In recognition of the above-mentioned problem, it is needed for the construction of cooperative System fishery management in the North-east Asian seas. Therefore, cooperative measures should be establishied. The final goal of the construction of fisheries management cooperative system is to establish sustainable fisheries in the North-east Asian seas. However, there is a big difference in fisheries management tools, fishing gear, exploitation rate of species, etc. This implies that a careful approach should be taken in order to achieve the cooperative fisheries management among Korea, China and Japan. conclusionly, the Governments of Korea, China and Japan should complement three bilateral agreemens, and which they prepares to 'Fisheries Resource Restore Program' Between Korea, China and Japan in the adjacent waters south of Jeju Island.

• 직업교육연구
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.77-103
• /
• 2017

이 연구의 목적은 산학협력 네트워크 형성 과정의 단계별 성공 요인의 중요도와 실행 정도를 분석하여 실행 개선이 요구되는 성공 요인의 우선순위를 도출함으로써 교육기관과 산업체가 산학협력 네트워크를 효과적으로 형성하는데 필요한 기초자료를 제공하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 대학 고교와 산업체의 산학협력 담당자 1,098명을 대상으로 설문 조사를 실시하여 339부(30.9%)의 설문지를 분석하였다. 이 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 산학협력 담당자들은 산학협력 네트워크 형성 과정의 단계별 성공 요인을 중요하게 인식하고 있는데 반해 성공 요인의 실행 정도는 상대적으로 낮은 편이다. 둘째, 교육기관이 산업체보다 대체로 성공 요인을 중요하게 인식하고 있으며 교육기관이 산업체보다 대체로 성공요인을 잘 실행하고 있는 편이다. 셋째, 교육기관과 산업체 모두에 실행 개선이 요구되는 성공 요인은 인식 및 준비 단계의 '외부 정보 수집 및 자문'과 '산학협력 역량 홍보', 구축 단계의 '협력 활동(프로그램) 및 협약 내용 설정', 운영 및 조정 단계의 '공식적인 산학협력 질 관리', 강화 및 확산 단계의 '지속가능한 산학협력 개선 방안 도출'과 '산학협력 네트워크 확산'이다. 교육기관에 실행 개선이 요구되는 성공 요인은 인식 및 준비 단계의 '산학협력 필요성 인식 및 공감대 형성'과 '산학협력 담당자 선정 및 지원', 구축 단계의 '조직 구성원의 참여 및 공유'이다. 산업체에 실행 개선이 요구되는 성공 요인은 인식 및 준비 단계의 '목표 및 실행 전략 설정', 동기화 단계의 '잠재적 협력 주체와의 상호 이해 및 협력 가능성 검토', 운영 및 조정 단계의 '산학협력 활동 성과 평가 및 피드백'과 '협약 내용 조정 및 협력 유지 여부 결정'이다. 따라서 이들 요인에 대한 주체별 개선의 노력과 유관기관의 지원이 요구된다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.91-120
• /
• 2020

The Scope of Application of North Korea's Foreign Economic Arbitration Act and Foreign Investment Act This article examines whether the Foreign Economic Arbitration Act and the Foreign Investment Act of North Korea apply to South Korean parties or companies. This article analyzes laws and agreements related to economic cooperation between South Korea and North Korea. Furthermore, this article compares and evaluates laws related to foreign investment and enacted in North Korea. Now, North Korea's door is closed due to economic sanctions against it, but it will be opened soon. Thus, this article prepares for the future opening of North Korea's markets. Is there a rule of laws in North Korea or just a ruler? Are there laws in North Korea? North Korea has enacted a number of legislation to attract foreign investors, referring to those Chinese laws. For example, North Korea enacted the Foreigner Investment Act, the Foreigner Company Act, the Foreign Investment Bank Act, the Foreign Economic Arbitration Act, the Foreign Economic Contract Act, the International Trade Act, and the Free Economy and Trade Zone Act, among others. Article 2 (2) of the Foreign Investment Law of North Korea states, "Foreign investors are corporations and individuals from other countries investing in our country." It is interpreted that South Korea is not included in the "other countries" of this definition. According to many mutual agreements signed by South Korea and North Korea, the relationship between the two Koreas is a special relation inside the Korean ethnic group. An arbitration between a South Korean party and a North Korean party has the characteristics of both domestic arbitrations and international arbitrations. If the South Korea and North Korea Commercial Arbitration Commission or the Kaesong Industrial Complex Arbitration Commission is not established, the possibility of arbitration by the Chosun International Trade Arbitration Commission, established under North Korea's Foreign Economic Arbitration Act, should be examined. There have been no cases where the Foreign Economic Arbitration Act is applied to disputes between parties of South Korea and North Korea. It might be possible to apply the Foreign Economic Arbitration Act by recognizing the "foreign factor" of a dispute between the South Korean party and North Korean party. It is necessary to raise legislative clarifications by revising the North Korea's Foreign Economic Arbitration Act as to whether Korean parties or companies are included in the scope of this Act's application. Even if it is interpreted that South Korean parties or companies are not included in the scope of North Korea's Foreign Economic Arbitration Act, disputes between South Korean companies and North Korean companies can be resolved by foreign arbitration institutes such as CIETAC in China, HKIAC in Hong Kong, or SIAC in Singapore. Such arbitration awards could be enforced in North Korea pursuant to Article 64 of North Korea's Foreign Economic Arbitration Act. This is because the arbitration awards of foreign arbitration institutes are included in the scope of North Korea's Foreign Economic Arbitration Act. The matter is how to enforce the North Korean laws when a North Korean party or North Korean government does not abide by the laws or their contracts. It is essential for North Korea to join the New York Convention (Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards) and the ICSID Convention (Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States).