• 한국지능정보시스템학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지능정보시스템학회 2005년도 공동추계학술대회
• /
• pp.557-567
• /
• 2005

The increasing complexity of the socio-economic environments makes it less and less possible for single decision-maker to consider all relevant aspects of problem. Therefore are, many organizations employ groups in decision making. In this paper, we present a multiperson decision making method using fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifier when each of group members specifies imprecise judgments possibly both on performance evaluations of alternatives with respect to the multiperson criteria and on the criteria. Inexact or vague preferences have appeared in the decision making literatures with a view to relaxing the burdens of preference specifications imposed to the decision-makers and thus taking into account the vagueness of human judgments. Allowing for the types of imprecise judgments in the model, however, makes more difficult a clear selection of alternative(s) that a group wants to make. So, further interactions with the decision-makers may proceed to the extent to compensate for the initial comforts of preference specifications. These interaction may not however guarantee the selection of the best alternative to implement. To circumvent this deadlock situation, we present a procedure for obtaining a satisfying solution by the use of linguistic quantifier guided aggregation which implies fuzzy majority. This is an approach to combine a prescriptive decision method via a mathematical programming and a well-established approximate solution method to aggregate multiple objects.

• Membrane and Water Treatment
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.65-76
• /
• 2023

Given the limited water resources and the presence of multiple decision makers with different and usually conflicting objectives in the exploitation of water resources systems, especially dam's reservoirs; therefore, the decision to determine the optimal allocation of reservoir water among decision-makers and stakeholders is a difficult task. In this study, by combining a fuzzy VIKOR technique or fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (FMCDM) and the Young's bilateral bargaining model, a new method was developed to determine the optimal quantitative and qualitative water allocation of dam's reservoir water with the aim of increasing the utility of decision makers and stakeholders and reducing the conflicts among them. In this study, by identifying the stakeholders involved in the exploitation of the dam reservoir and determining their utility, the optimal points on trade-off curve with quantitative and qualitative objectives presented by Mojarabi et al. (2019) were ranked based on the quantitative and qualitative criteria, and economic, social and environmental factors using the fuzzy VIKOR technique. In the proposed method, the weights of the criteria were determined by each decision maker using the entropy method. The results of a fuzzy decision-making method demonstrated that the Young's bilateral bargaining model was developed to determine the point agreed between the decisions makers on the trade-off curve. In the proposed method, (a) the opinions of decision makers and stakeholders were considered according to different criteria in the exploitation of the dam reservoir, (b) because the decision makers considered the different factors in addition to quantitative and qualitative criteria, they were willing to participate in bargaining and reconsider their ideals, (c) due to the use of a fuzzy-logic based decision-making approach and considering different criteria, the utility of all decision makers was close to each other and the scope of bargaining became smaller, leading to an increase in the possibility of reaching an agreement in a shorter time period using game theory and (d) all qualitative judgments without considering explicitness of the decision makers were applied to the model using the fuzzy logic. The results of using the proposed method for the optimal exploitation of Iran's 15-Khordad dam reservoir over a 30-year period (1968-1997) showed the possibility of the agreement on the water allocation of the monthly total dissolved solids (TDS)=1,490 mg/L considering the different factors based on the opinions of decision makers and reducing conflicts among them.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제9권5호
• /
• pp.159-167
• /
• 2008

건설산업관리는 건설사업의 초기부터 완성에 이르기까지 범위, 시간, 비용, 품질 등 관련 요소에 대한 통합 관리를 통해 프로젝트를 성공적으로 완수하기 위한 조직적 활동이며, 이의 궁극적 목표는 전사적 경영효율을 극대화하는 것이다. 이를 위해 관리자는 작업의 범위와 방법과 순서 및 비용과 일정을 계획, 실행, 감시 및 통제하며 그들에 수반되는 자원을 할당하고 조정한다. 자원배분은 공기 및 비용과 밀접하게 연관되고, 따라서 이들 관계에 근거한 효과적 자원배당은 하나의 의사결정문제로 모형화될 수 있다. 여기서 문제를 구성하는 의사결정기준과 대안의 성과뿐만 아니라 가중치 또한 중요한 기능을 하므로, 이들의 산정에는 일관성과 객관성이 담보되어야 한다. 본 논문은 다수의 의사결정기준하에 동시에 계획된 단일(복수) 프로젝트(현장)에 속한 활동들간에 한정된 동일 자원의 효과적 투입을 위한 우선순위를 결정하는 개념과 방법을 제시하였다. 기반 도구로 다기준 의사결정기법의 하나인 계층분석법을 활용하였으며, 세 가지 유형의 사례에 적용하여 그에 대한 타당성과 유용성을 보였다. 사례 1은 각 활동이 주공정상에 위치하며 선택기준으로 조기종료시간, 잔여후속공기, 후속활동수, 자원요구량 등을 선정하였으며, 사례 2는 경쟁 활동이 상이한 여유시간과 조기종료시간, 자원일수, 후속잔여공기, 후속활동수 등을 의사결정속성으로 선정하였다. 사례 3은 이미 수행된 4개의 농사에 대해 본 연구의 방법을 피드백하여 유용성을 검토하였다.

• 대한기계학회논문집A
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.114-126
• /
• 2009

In this paper, a versatile multi-criteria optimization concept for fatigue life prediction is introduced. Multi-criteria decision making in engineering design refers to obtaining a preferred optimal solution in the context of conflicting design objectives. Compromise decision support problems are used to model engineering decisions involving multiple trade-offs. These methods typically rely on a summation of weighted attributes to accomplish trade-offs among competing objectives. This paper gives an interpretation of the decision parameters as governing both the relative importance of the attributes and the degree of compensation between them. The approach utilizes a response surface model, the compromise decision support problem, which is a multi-objective formulation based on goal programming. Examples illustrate the concepts and demonstrate their applicability.

• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제6권5호
• /
• pp.167-175
• /
• 2005

마이크로/피코셀 환경에서 이동체의 빈번한 위치 및 셀간 이동으로 인하여 많은 부가 트래픽이 발생한다. 이동체 위치 추정을 이용함으로서 효율적인 채널 할당과 QoS를 보장하는 핸드오프가 가능하다. 기존의 이동체 위치 추정 방안들은 단지 LOS 환경을 기반으로 하여 제시되었고 다중 경로 환경 또는 shadowing 환경에서는 성능의 감소를 가져왔다. 본 연구에서는 NLOS 환경, 그리고 수신 신호 세기 이외에 부정확한 다수의 위치 결정 파라미터를 고려함으로서 추정의 정확성을 증가시키는 다기준 의사 결정 방안을 제시한다.

• 한국습지학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.87-93
• /
• 2010

하천의 다양성을 반영할 수 있는 하천복원 계획수립 및 선정방법이 필요하다. 한편, 하천복원의 궁극적인 목적은 하천 본래의 자연성 회복에 있으며, 최근에는 친수적 증진을 포함하는 추세이다. 본 연구에서는 자연형 하천복원 대안선정에 하천자연도을 적용하였다. 또한 하천자연도는 국내실정에 맞도록 다기준 의사결정을 활용하여 개발된 하천자연도평가법을 사용하여 산정하였다. 대상하천의 하천자연도 평가항목은 하천의 특성을 고려하여 선택한 후, 복수의 대안을 구성하고 대안별 하천자연도를 산정하여 비교하면, 각 대안별 자연성 회복효과 및 성과를 측정하는 것이 용이하였다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.126-135
• /
• 1992

The decision making process for production planning in FMS usually involves multiple conflicting objectives and criteria. This study consists of prescreening and analytical phase. In the prescreening phase, criteria are used to reduce the set of alternative system configuration down to a small number of candidates. After this phase, a multiobjected programming model is formulated for each remainning configuration.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.55-61
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this paper is to propose a method for selecting the preferred alternatives of Multiple- Attribute Decision-Making(MADM) problem using the Entropy measure. A decision-maker who wants to estimate exactly the weight to be applied to her/his MADM problem is usually confronted with the embarrassing situation where, although there exist a variety of weighting methods, it is hard to find a right procedure to choose a pertinent value To remedy this uncomfortable situation, the Entropy measure commonly used in information theory, Is proposed as a tool that can be used by decision-makers to more efficiently select the preferred alternatives. As a result, the method proposed in the paper can be significant in that relatively easy to understand by decision-makers.

• 한국해양공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국해양공학회 2006년 창립20주년기념 정기학술대회 및 국제워크샵
• /
• pp.277-280
• /
• 2006

Most real world design evaluation and risk-based decision support combine quantitative and qualitative (linguistic) variables. Decision-making based on conventional mathematics that combines qualitative and quantitative concepts always exhibit difficulty in modelling actual problems. The successful selection process for choosing a design/procurement proposal is based on a high degree of technical integrity, safety levels and low costs in construction, corrective measures, maintenance, operation, inspection and preventive measures. However, the objectives of maximising the degree of technical performance, maximising the safety levels and minimising the costs incurred are usually in conflict, and the evaluation of the technical performance, safety and costs is always associated with uncertainties, especially for a novel system at the initial concept design stage. In this paper, a design-decision support framework using a composite structure methodology grounded in approximate reasoning approach and evidential reasoning method is suggested for design evaluation of machinery space of a ship engine room at the initial stages. It is a Multiple Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) or Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework, which provides a juxtaposition of cost, safety and technical performance of a system during evaluation to assist decision makers in selecting the winning design/procurement proposal that best satisfies the requirement in hand. An illustrative example is used to demonstrate the application of the proposed framework.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.218-227
• /
• 2005

In this research a model for establishing a new, rational fee schedule for general surgical procedures in a national health insurance program is developed. A fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making (FMCDM) model is proposed. The relative values of eleven surgical procedures were obtained through an empirical study based on the FMCDM model. Consequently, a new fee schedule obtained from the FMCDM model. This new fee schedule is more convincing than previous schedule and more persuasive to the references for the policy setting.