• 제목/요약/키워드: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

검색결과 94건 처리시간 0.026초

Issues Related to the Updated 2014 Korean Guidelines for Tuberculosis

  • Park, Jae Seuk
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • 제79권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-4
    • /
    • 2016
  • Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health problem in South Korea. The Joint Committee for the Development of Korean Guidelines for Tuberculosis published the Korean Guidelines for Tuberculosis in 2011 to provide evidence-based practical recommendations to health care workers caring for patients with TB in South Korea. After reviewing recent national and international scientific data on TB, the committee updated the Korean guidelines for TB in 2014. This article presents some practical issues related to the 2014 updated guidelines: namely use of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis-polymerase chain reaction assay and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of TB, as well as medical treatment for patients with multidrug-resistant TB.

Concise Clinical Review of Hematologic Toxicity of Linezolid in Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: Role of Mitochondria

  • Oehadian, Amaylia;Santoso, Prayudi;Menzies, Dick;Ruslami, Rovina
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • 제85권2호
    • /
    • pp.111-121
    • /
    • 2022
  • Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is caused by an organism that is resistant to both rifampicin and isoniazid. Extensively drug-resistant TB, a rare type of MDR-TB, is caused by an organism that is resistant to quinolone and one of group A TB drugs (i.e., linezolid and bedaquiline). In 2018, the World Health Organization revised the groupings of TB medicines and reclassified linezolid as a group A drug for the treatment of MDR-TB. Linezolid is a synthetic antimicrobial agent in the oxazolidinone class. Although linezolid has a good efficacy, it can cause substantial adverse events, especially hematologic toxicity. In both TB infection and linezolid mechanism of action, mitochondrial dysfunction plays an important role. In this concise review, characteristics of linezolid as an anti-TB drug are summarized, including its efficacy, pathogenesis of hematologic toxicity highlighting mitochondrial dysfunction, and the monitoring and management of hematologic toxicity.

Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Presenting as Miliary Tuberculosis without Immune Suppression: A Case Diagnosed Rapidly with the Genotypic Line Probe Assay Method

  • Ko, Yousang;Lee, Ho Young;Lee, Young Seok;Song, Junwhi;Kim, Mi-Yeong;Lee, Hyun-Kyung;Shin, Jeong Hwan;Choi, Seok Jin;Lee, Young-Min
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • 제76권5호
    • /
    • pp.245-248
    • /
    • 2014
  • Miliary tuberculosis (TB) is a rare extrapulmonary form of TB, and there have been only two reports of miliary TB associated with infection with multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB pathogen in an immunocompetent host. A 32-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of abnormal findings on chest X-ray. The patient was diagnosed with MDR-TB by a line probe assay and was administered proper antituberculous drugs. After eight weeks, a solid-media drug sensitivity test revealed that the pathogen was resistant to ethambutol and streptomycin in addition to isoniazid and rifampicin. The patient was then treated with effective antituberculous drugs without delay after diagnosis of MDR-TB. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of miliary TB caused by MDR-TB pathogen in Korea.

다제내성결핵 환자에서 메타분석을 통한 Linezolid의 효능 및 안전성 평가 (Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Linezolid by Meta-analysis for Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis Patients)

  • 정우진;성태욱;김애진;채정우;윤휘열
    • 한국임상약학회지
    • /
    • 제33권4호
    • /
    • pp.278-289
    • /
    • 2023
  • Background: Linezolid has been widely used in the treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. However, there are limitations to use it such as long treatment, because of related side effects, even adequate treatment period has been needed for remission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Method: The meta-analysis was performed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. To choose literatures, systematic literature reviews were conducted with databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Results: Efficacy and safety of Linezolid were determined by 85% (95% CI=79~89%, p<0.05) in the sputum culture conversion and 55% (95% CI=45~64%, p<0.01) in side effects related to linezolid, respectively. In addition, I2 was estimated by 72%. In the subgroup analysis, efficacy and safety by dose and region were analyzed. In the subgroup analysis, compared with the linezolid dose in groups greater than 600 mg/day and less than 600 mg/day, this study showed 85% (95% CI 79~90%, p>0.05) in 206 patients and 82% (95% CI 73~89%, p<0.05) in 297 patients, respectively. Also, in the subgroup analysis, adverse effects caused by linezolid occurred more than 50% of treated patients. Conclusion: Therapeutic efficacy of linezolid for MDR-TB patients was confirmed regardless of the initial dose of linezolid, especially for sputum culture conversion and it was recommended that the dose of linezolid has been more effective below 600 mg/day. However, it should be necessary to closely monitored for safety issues since serious side effects possibly occurred by administration of long period treatment.

Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: Comparison of Pre- and Post-Public-Private Mix Periods

  • Kang, Yewon;Jo, Eun-Jung;Eom, Jung Seop;Kim, Mi-Hyun;Lee, Kwangha;Kim, Ki Uk;Park, Hye-Kyung;Lee, Min Ki;Mok, Jeongha
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • 제84권1호
    • /
    • pp.74-83
    • /
    • 2021
  • Background: This study compared the treatment outcomes of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) before and after the implementation of public-private mix (PPM). Factors affecting treatment success were also investigated. Methods: Data from culture-confirmed pulmonary MDR-TB patients who commenced MDR-TB treatment at Pusan National University Hospital between January 2003 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups in terms of PPM status: pre-PPM period, patients who commenced MDR-TB treatment between 2003 and 2010; and post-PPM period, patients treated between 2011 and 2017. Results: A total of 176 patients were included (64 and 112 in the pre- and post-PPM periods, respectively). 36.9% of the patients were resistant to a fluoroquinolone or a second-line injectable drug, or both. The overall treatment success rate was 72.7%. The success rate of post-PPM patients was higher than that of pre-PPM patients (79.5% vs. 60.9%, p=0.008). Also, loss to follow-up was lower in the post-PPM period (5.4% vs. 15.6%, p=0.023). In multivariate regression analysis, age ≥65 years, body mass index ≤18.5 kg/m2, previous TB treatment, bilateral lung involvement, and extensively drug-resistant (XDR)- or pre-XDR-TB were associated with poorer treatment outcomes. However, the use of bedaquiline or delamanid for ≥1 month increased the treatment success. Conclusion: The treatment success rate in MDR-TB patients was higher in the post-PPM period than in the pre-PPM period, particularly because of the low rate of loss to follow-up. To ensure comprehensive patient-centered PPM in South Korea, investment and other support must be adequate.

내성결핵의 보험의학적 위험분석 (Insurance risk analysis of drug-resistant tuberculosis)

  • 이신형
    • 보험의학회지
    • /
    • 제28권1_2호
    • /
    • pp.15-18
    • /
    • 2009
  • Background: Recent emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis such as multidrug-resistant tuberculosis(MDR-TB) or extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis(XDR-TB) has become important health care problems. It has also became grave issues for insurance industries in determining medical risks. We have therefore strived to analyze the comparative mortality rates for drug-resistant tuberculosis through utilization of results from previous articles. Methods: Comparative mortality was calculated from source articles using mortality analysis methods. Results: Mortality ratio of MDR-TB was estimate to 1200%, and excess death rate was 110 per 1,000. Comparative mortality between MDR-TB and XDR-TB by Korean $study^{(1)}$ were 1750, 382, 405, 443, 1025, and 357%, for each 10 months study intervals, respectively. Total mortality ratio was 594% and total excess death rate was 60 per 1,000person. It was determined that the risk of XDR-TB was much greater than MDR-TB. Discussion; Pending the development of a novel anti-tuberculosis drug, it would be prudent to steer clear insuring XDR-TB during underwriting phase due to high medical cost that it creates.

  • PDF

Diagnosis and treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

  • Jang, Jong Geol;Chung, Jin Hong
    • Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
    • /
    • 제37권4호
    • /
    • pp.277-285
    • /
    • 2020
  • Tuberculosis (TB) is still a major health problem worldwide. Especially, multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), which is defined as TB that shows resistance to both isoniazid and rifampicin, is a barrier in the treatment of TB. Globally, approximately 3.4% of new TB patients and 20% of the patients with a history of previous treatment for TB were diagnosed with MDR-TB. The treatment of MDR-TB requires medications for a long duration (up to 20-24 months) with less effective and toxic second-line drugs and has unfavorable outcomes. However, treatment outcomes are expected to improve due to the introduction of a new agent (bedaquiline), repurposed drugs (linezolid, clofazimine, and cycloserine), and technological advancement in rapid drug sensitivity testing. The World Health Organization (WHO) released a rapid communication in 2018, followed by consolidated guidelines for the treatment of MDR-TB in 2019 based on clinical trials and an individual patient data meta-analysis. In these guidelines, the WHO suggested reclassification of second-line anti-TB drugs and recommended oral treatment regimens that included the new and repurposed agents. The aims of this article are to review the treatment strategies of MDR-TB based on the 2019 WHO guidelines regarding the management of MDR-TB and the diagnostic techniques for detecting resistance, including phenotypic and molecular drug sensitivity tests.

다제내성결핵 환자에서 표준 1차 항결핵제 치료 중 발생한 획득 내성 (Acquired Drug Resistance during Standardized Treatment with First-line Drugs in Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis)

  • 전두수;김도형;강형석;민진홍;성낙문;황수희;박승규
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • 제66권3호
    • /
    • pp.198-204
    • /
    • 2009
  • 연구배경: 다제내성결핵 치료에서 감수성으로 증명된 1차 항결핵제는 가장 항결핵효과가 큰 약제로 알려져 있다. 본 연구는 다제내성결핵 환자에서 표준 1차 항결핵제사용 후 1차 항결핵제에 대한 추가 내성 획득의 빈도와 그 위험 인자를 알아보고자 시행되었다. 방 법: 2004년 1월에서 2008년 5월까지 국립마산결핵병원에서 약제감수성 검사가 보고되기 전 표준 1차 항결핵제로 치료받은 다제내성결핵 환자 중에서 1차 항결핵제 치료 전과 1차 항결핵제 치료 후의 연속된 두 시점의 약제 감수성 검사 결과가 모두 있는 환자를 대상으로 하여 의무기록을 후향적으로 검토하였다. 결 과: 표준 1차 항결핵제로 치료 받은 41명 중 14명 (34.1%)에서 ethambutol (EMB) 혹은 pyrazinamide (PZA)에 대한 추가 내성이 획득되었다. 치료 전 isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RFP)에만 내성을 보였던 11명 중 3명(27.3%)에선 EMB와 PZA에 동시 내성, 3명(27.3%)에선 PZA에 추가 내성이 획득되었다. INH, RFP, EMB에 내성을 보인 18명 중 6명(33.3%)에서 PZA에, INH, RFP, PZA에 내성을 보인 6명 중 2명(33.3%)에서 EMB에 추가 내성이 획득되었다. 대상 환자 중 10명(24.4%)에서 1차 항결핵제 치료 전 내성이었던 약제가 치료 후 감수성으로 전환되었다. 추가 내성획득과 연관된 통계학적으로 유의한 위험인자를 발견할 수 없었다. 결 론: 우리나라의 다제내성결핵 치료에서 1차 항결핵제는 추가 획득 내성의 위험을 고려하여 주의 깊게 사용해야 할 것으로 사료된다.

일개 결핵병원에서 다제내성결핵과 광범위내성결핵의 추이, 2001~2005 (Trend of Multidrug and Extensively Drug Resistant Tuberculosis in a Tuberculosis Referral Hospital, 2001~2005)

  • 전두수;신동옥;강형석;성낙문;권경순;신은;김경순;이명희;박승규
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • 제64권3호
    • /
    • pp.187-193
    • /
    • 2008
  • 연구배경: 다제내성결핵과 광범위내성결핵은 전세계적으로 결핵 치료에 큰 위협으로 등장하고 있지만 이에 대한 국내의 정확한 실태 및 추이는 잘 알려져 있지 않다. 일개 결핵병원에서 다제내성결핵과 광범위내성결핵의 빈도 및 추이를 살펴봄으로써 국내 실태를 간접적으로 파악하고자 하였다. 방법: 2001년부터 2005년 사이에 국립마산병원에 입원하여 배양양성 결핵으로 진단된 환자를 대상으로 약제 감수성검사 결과와 의무기록을 후향적으로 분석하였다. 결과: 2001년부터 2005년 사이에, 다제내성결핵은 신환자에서 9.2%, 13.8%, 16.9%, 23%, 27.0%로 의미있게 증가하였고(p<0.001 for trend) 재치료환자에서 9.1%, 15.7%, 17.3%, 19.9%, 19.1%로 의미있게 증가하였다 (p=0.002 for trend). 광범위내성결핵은 신환자에서 0%, 2.3%, 3.1%, 2.5%, 6.3%로 의미있게 증가하였고(p=0.005 for trend) 재치료환자에서 9.1%, 15.7%, 17.3%, 19.9%, 19.1%로 의미있게 증가하였다(p<0.001 for trend). 결론: 다제내성결핵과 광범위내성결핵은 신환자와 재치료환자 모두에서 증가하는 추이를 보였다. 국내의 정확한 실태 파악을 위하여 공공 및 민간의료기관을 포괄하는 통합적인 약제내성실태 조사가 필요할 것으로 사료된다.