• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 1995년도 춘계공동학술대회논문집; 전남대학교; 28-29 Apr. 1995
• /
• pp.847-864
• /
• 1995

In this paper we present an integrated methodology for strategic planning in telecommunications standardization. Especially this paper focuses on the method of setting priorities for telecommunications SWAs(Standardization Work Areas) and related SWls(Standardization Work Items). To make a strategic plan for telecommunications standardization in which usually includes prioritization, resource allocation, standardization schedule for each SWA is based on prioritization of SWAs. Our methodology integrated various existing methods including the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and a modified Delphi technique. Recently, rapid technology evolution in telecommunications fields increases the necessity of developing more and more new standards. Also increased complexity of those technologies makes standards more complicated, more specified and more thick than the past ones. As a result, the number of SWAs and SWIs are being increased constantly. Furthermore, rapid telecommunication environment changes such as deregulation, liberalization, privatization, regionalization, and globalization surrounding standardization bring about new challenges and opportunities. Due to all these trends, strategic planning for telecommunications standardization grows more and more important. To cope with these challenges and also to make the more efficient use of the limited standardization resources including time, financial, human resources, we suggest more logical and rational approach that will be a backbone of strategic plan for telecommunications standardization. The telecommunications standardization planning process involves a MCDM(Multi-Criteria Decision Making) process. The Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) is a kind of MCDM approaches. Our method is based on a combination of a modified Delphi technique and an application of AHP(Liberator's spreadsheet model). Analyzed data from Delphi technique is used as inputs to ABP. In addition, we also focus on the technique how to combine group judgments and to handle a large number of comparisons. We present analyzed results including Pilot and Full Scale Survey according to the proposed process. The result of this study will be useful input for telecommunications standardization policy making and practical implementation.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.169-185
• /
• 2004

It is an urgent problem that Korea logistics enteprises' expansion of advance into China market and the logistics network establishment between Korea and China to back up the former are to be solved. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to deduce the subjects to establish the logistics network between Korea and China, and to evaluate the priority order. The results of this research are as follows: First, we conducted face-to-face interviews on the advisery group in China and Korean enterprises which advanced into China, and drew out 6 promoting subjects to build the logistics network between the two. Second, the AHP model was adopted, which is a multi-criteria?multi-hierarchical decision making method, to draw out the weight and priority order of the deduced 6 promoting items. Third, the resultant priority order of the promoting subjects is as follows: No.1 - to establish the distribution & logistics support center by region(0.3900); No.2 - to support various taxes in investing the logistics business abroad(0.1980) ; No.3 - to improve the management of CIQ(0.1958); No.4 - to back up the joint-venture of logistics firms(0.1169); No.5 - to enhance trade and foreign policies to deregulate the entry into logistics markets(0.0536); No.6 - to construct the logistics information system of China(Northest Ssia)(0.0458). This paper resulted in finding out Korea logistics enterprises that have not secured their own inland-transport network in China and the actual difficulties of Korean enterprises with using the inferior network that advanced into China. These problems were developed into the analysis adopting the AHP method, and the significancy of this paper is to present the priority order of promoting problems using a sophisticated technique.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.707-716
• /
• 2009

The role of cost modeller is to facilitate the design process by systematic application of cost factors so as to maintain a sensible and economic relationship between cost, quantity, utility and appearance which thus helps in achieving the client's requirements within an agreed budget. There are a number of research on cost estimates in the early design stage based on the improvement of accuracy or impact factors. It is common knowledge that cost estimates are undertaken progressively throughout the design stage and make use of the information that is available at each phase, through the related research up to now. In addition, Cost estimates in the early design stage shall analyze the information under the various kinds of precondition before reaching the more developed design because a design can be modified and changed in all process depending on clients' requirements. Parametric cost estimating models have been adopted to support decision making in a changeable environment, in the early design stage. These models are using a similar instance or a pattern of historical case to be constituted in project information, geographic design features, relevant data to quantity or cost, etc. OLAP technique analyzes a subject data by multi-dimensional points of view; it supports query, analysis, comparison of required information by diverse queries. OLAP's data structure matches well with multiview-analysis framework. Accordingly, this study implements multi-dimensional information system for case based quantity data related to design information that is utilizing OLAP's technology, and then analyzes impact factors of quantity by the design criteria or parameter of the same meaning. On the basis of given factors examined above, this study will generate the rules on quantity measure and produce resemblance class using clustering of data mining. These sorts of knowledge-base consist of a set of classified data as group patterns, of which will be appropriate stand on the parametric cost estimating method.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.345-352
• /
• 2013

최근 스마트 기기 사용자의 증가에 따라 모바일 음악에 대한 수요와 생산이 꾸준히 증가하고 있다. 이에 따라 대중화된 음악의 폭이 넓어지면서 사용자가 선호하는 음악에 대한 선택의 기준 또한 매우 다양해지고 복잡해지는 추세이다. 이러한 이유로 모바일 환경에서 사용자 개인이 선호하는 음악을 정교하게 추천하기 위한 지능적 음악 추천 기법에 대한 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있다. 그러나 기존의 음악 추천시스템은 청취로그를 이용한 단순 추천 방법을 사용하고 있어 사용자의 선호도를 제대로 고려하지 못하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 사용자의 선호도를 반영한 개인화된 적응형 음악 추천 시스템을 제안한다. 본 시스템에서는 계층적 의사결정 도구인 AHP를 이용하여 사용자의 개개인의 음악적 선호도를 반영한 음악 추천이 가능토록 하였으며, 베이지안 네트워크 기반의 사용자 피드백 통해 지속적인 사용자의 음악적 선호도를 반영하도록 하였다. 본 시스템의 성능을 평가하기 위해 12명의 실험자를 각각 3명씩 4그룹으로 나누어 실험하였으며 그 결과 87.5%의 추천 만족도를 얻었다.

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.17-29
• /
• 1996

It is required to consider pricing and non-pricing factors and external economy in order to achieve the objects of physical distribution system in a port. Recently, among the three factors, much attention has been paid to non-pricing factor in the system. Although physical distribution service in a port(PDSP)has been frequently mentioned in documents and literature related to port and shipping studies, few study on it has not been systematically and scientifically made due to the following problems; $\circ$ there are not proper criteria to evaluate level and quality of PDSP and as a result it is difficult to set up a unified standard for doing so. $\circ$ algorithms to evaluate problems with complex and ambiguous attributes and multiple levels in PDSP are not available. This thesis aims to establish a paradigm to evaluate PDSP and to abvance existing decision making methods to deal with complex and ambiguous problems in PDSP. To tackle the first purpose, extensive and thorough literature survey was carried out on general physical distribution service, which is a corner stone to handle PDSp. In addition, through interviews and questionnaire to the expert, it have extracted 82 factors of physical distribution service in a port. They have been classified into 6 groups by KJ method and each group defined by the expert's advice as follows; a. Potentiality b. Exactness c. safety d. Speediness e. Convenience f. Linkage Prior to the service evaluation, many kinds of its attributes must be identified on the basis of rational decision owing to complexity and ambiguity inherent in PDSP. An analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is a method to evaluate them but it is not applicable to PDSP that have property of non-additivity and overlapped attributes. Therefore, probablility measure can not be used to evaluate PDSP but fuzzy measure is required. Hierarchical fuzzy integral method, which is merged AHP with fuzzy measure, is also not effective method to evaluate attributes because it has vary complicated way to calculate fuzzy measure identification coefficient of attributes. A new evaluation algorithm has been introduced to solve problems with multi-attribute and multi-level hierarchy, which is called hierarchy fuzzy process(HFP).Analysis on ambiguous aspects of PDSP under study which is not easy to be defined is prerequisite to evaluate it. HFP is different from algorithm existed in that it clarified the relationship between fuzzy measure and probability measure adopted in AHP and that it directly calculates the family of fuzzy measure from overlapping coefficient and probability measure to treat and evaluate ambiguous and complex aspects of PDSP. A new evaluation algorithm HFP was applied to evaluate level of physical distribution service in the biggest twenty container port in the world. The ranks of the ports are as follows; 1. Rotterdam Port, 2. Hamburg Port, 3. Singapore Port, 4. Seattle Port, 5. Yokohama Port, 6. Long beach Port, 7. Oakland Port, 8. Tokyo Port, 9. Hongkong Port, 10. Kobe Port, 11. Los Angeles Port, 12. New york Port, 13. Antwerp Port, 14. Felixstowe Port, 15. Bremerhaven Port, 16. Le'Havre Port, 17. Kaoshung Port, 18. Killung Port, 19. Bangkok Port, 20. Pusan Port

• 한국빅데이터학회지
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.111-129
• /
• 2023

디지털 혁신의 확산에 따라 의료 분야에서도 인공지능을 기반으로 한 혁신의료기술의 채택이 활발해지고 있다. 이에 따라 인공지능 기반 소프트웨어형 의료기기인 SaMD(Software as a Medical Device)의 출시 및 도입도 촉진되고 있지만, 의료기관의 SaMD 도입 요인에 대한 연구는 미흡한 편이다. 본 연구의 목적은 '인공지능 기반 SaMD' 도입에 대한 의료기관의 의사결정에 영향을 미치는 중요한 요인들을 찾고, 이들 요인의 가중치와 우선순위를 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위해 의료계의 기술수용 모델, 의료 인공지능 및 SaMD 등에 관한 문헌연구 결과를 바탕으로 델파이 조사를 실시하였으며, HOTE(Human, Organization, Technology and Environment) 프레임워크와 HABIO(Holistic Approach {Business, Information, Organizational}) 프레임워크를 결합하여 연구 모형을 개발하였다. 5가지 주기준과 22개의 하부기준으로 구성된 연구 모형을 바탕으로 국내 의료기관과 SaMD 공급자의 전문가들을 대상으로 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 분석을 실시하여 SaMD 도입 요인을 실증적으로 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과, 인공지능 기반의 SaMD 도입을 결정하는 주기준의 우선순위는 기술적 요인, 경제적 요인, 인적 요인, 조직적 요인, 환경적 요인의 순으로 나타났고, 하부기준의 우선순위는 신뢰성, 진료원가 절감, 의료진의 수용도, 안전성, 최고 경영자의 지원, 보안성, 인허가 및 규제 수준의 순이었다. 특히, 신뢰성, 안전성, 보안성 등의 기술적 요인이 SaMD 도입에 있어서 가장 중요한 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 각 집단별 가중치와 우선순위를 비교·분석한 결과, SaMD 도입 요인의 가중치와 우선순위는 기관의 유형, 의료기관의 유형 및 의료기관 보직의 유형에 따라 매우 다른 것으로 나타났다.