• 산업공학
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.473-484
• /
• 2003

In this paper we deal with the logistics brokerage process in which a logistics agent intermediates between vehicle owners and shippers for matching empty vehicles and freights. Based on the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodology, the proposed agent system matches the most preferred empty vehicle to the shipper and the most preferred freight to the vehicle owner. In the proposed agent system, an MCDM based sensitivity analysis is also used for supporting decision makers under negotiations. Among various MCDM methodologies, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is utilized in this paper. Although AHP is one of the most popular MCDM methodologies, AHP needs a number of pair-wise comparisons for assessing alternatives and hence may give excessive decision making burden to the decision makers. In this paper, in order to reduce the decision making burden, a preference function based estimation method is proposed. We can expect that the MCDM based logistics brokerage agent can be used as an efficient and effective tool for e-logistics marketplaces on the internet.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.271-275
• /
• 2009

A strategic decision making on location selection for product transportation includes many tangible and untangible factors. To choose the best locations is a difficult job in the sense that objectives usually conflict with each other. In this paper, we consider a multi stage multi criteria transshipment problem with different types of items to be transported from the sources to the destination points. For the optimization of the problem, a goal programming formulation will be presented in which the location selection for each product type will be determined under the multi objective criteria. In the study, we generalize the transshipment model with a variety of product types and finite number of different intermediate nodes between origins and destinations. For the selection of the criteria we selected the costs(fixed cost and transportation cost), location numbers, and unsatisfied demand for each type of products in multi stage transportation, which are the main goals in transshipment modelling problems. The related conditions are also modelled through linear formats.

• 한국습지학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.87-93
• /
• 2010

하천의 다양성을 반영할 수 있는 하천복원 계획수립 및 선정방법이 필요하다. 한편, 하천복원의 궁극적인 목적은 하천 본래의 자연성 회복에 있으며, 최근에는 친수적 증진을 포함하는 추세이다. 본 연구에서는 자연형 하천복원 대안선정에 하천자연도을 적용하였다. 또한 하천자연도는 국내실정에 맞도록 다기준 의사결정을 활용하여 개발된 하천자연도평가법을 사용하여 산정하였다. 대상하천의 하천자연도 평가항목은 하천의 특성을 고려하여 선택한 후, 복수의 대안을 구성하고 대안별 하천자연도를 산정하여 비교하면, 각 대안별 자연성 회복효과 및 성과를 측정하는 것이 용이하였다.

• 한국정보과학회논문지:컴퓨팅의 실제 및 레터
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.306-310
• /
• 2008

정보추천 서비스를 위한 선호도는 상황에 따라 달라질 수 있으므로, 정보추천 서비스를 제공하기 위해서는 먼저 사용자의 컨덱스트 정보를 알아야 한다. 본 논문은 모바일 환경에서 다수 사용자의 선호도를 고려한 추천 시스템을 제안하며, 음식점 추천에 이를 적용하고자 한다. 모바일 환경에서 개별 사용자의 선호도를 모델링하기 위해 베이지안 네트워크를 사용하였으며, 음식점 추천은 많은 경우 개별 사용자가 아닌 다수 사용자의 선호도를 고려해야 하므로, 본 논문에서는 개별 사용자의 선호도를 바탕으로 다수의 선호도를 획득하기 위해 다기준 의사결정방법인 AHP를 이용하였다. 실험을 위해서 10가지 서로 다른 상황에서 추천을 수행하였으며, 마지막으로 SUS 사용성 평가를 통해 제안하는 시스템의 사용성이 높게 평가되었음을 확인하였다.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제21권8호
• /
• pp.1323-1333
• /
• 1997

The objectives of this study were to identify 1) the steps of information processing and evaluation in clothing purchase decision making, 2) evaluative criteria and determinant attributes at each step, 3) decision making rule, and 4) the effect of clothing involvement on information processing and evaluation. The data were obtained 71 female adults using questionnaire, observation and protocol in real shopping behavior. Consumer's information processing and evaluation was a circulated process composed of multi-steps. Consumer considered aesthetic and intrinsic evaluative criteria to be important and used compensatory and noncompensatory rule together at each decision making step. Clothing involvement had an partial effect on information processing and evaluation.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.47-55
• /
• 2016

As one of recent issues in the information and communication industry, internet of things has attracted attention to provide intelligent infrastructure services which connect and share data and information between real and virtual world. According to the development of these internet of things technologies, types of machines, telecommunication devices, and terminals are increasing tremendously. In this situation, connectivity and interoperability between internet of things components are important issues to build a hyper connected society. To visualize this society, it is important to set up and develop information and communication technology (ICT) standards among stakeholders. However, under limited budget and human resources, it is essential to rank standardization work items for setting standards with respect to efficiency. The purpose of this study is to provide a method for setting standardization strategies within group decision making. As a multi-criteria group decision making tool, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is adopted and applied to determine the priorities of setting work items. The proposed method first defines decision making problem with objective, criteria, and alternatives which produces a hierarchy consisting of upper and lower criteria. Then, pairwise comparisons of academy and public sector experts are performed with respect to their relative meaning and importance. Individual surveys of expert groups are collected and summarized to determine relative criteria importance measures. Furthermore, to deliver reliable importance criteria measures, differences between academy and public sector expert groups are compared and tested using Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. The results are illustrated for useful guidelines to practical group decision making in standardization strategy establishments.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.19-30
• /
• 2012

Material selection is a complex problem in the design and development of products for diverse engineering applications. This paper is aimed to present a fuzzy decision making approach to deal with the material selection in engineering design problems. A fuzzy multi criteria decision-making model is proposed for solving the material selection problem. The proposed model makes use of fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) with trapezoidal numbers for evaluating the criteria and ranking the alternatives. And result is compared with fuzzy VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje in Serbian, means Multi criteria Optimisation and Compromise Solution) which is proposed by Jeya Girubha and Vinodh [2012]. The present paper is aimed to also improve literature of fuzzy decision making for material selection problem.

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2009년도 학술발표회 초록집
• /
• pp.297-301
• /
• 2009

The impact of adding additional Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) criteria is demonstrated because current research shows MCDA for flood damage has been applied using only a few criteria but for better results the MCDA approach needs to apply more criteria for evaluating the alternatives. By adding additional criteria into MCDA, the capability to make the best alternatives more diverse and show the decision maker more differences in the scores of the alternatives to allow the decision maker to discriminate is significantly improved. The target region for a demonstration application of the methodology was the Suyoung River Basin in Korea. The 1991 Gladys flood event and five different return periods were used as a case study to demonstrate the proposed methodology of evaluation of various flood damage reduction alternatives.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2011년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.216-217
• /
• 2011

The problem of automated stacking cranes (ASC) dispatching in container terminals is addressed in this paper. We propose a heuristic-based ASC dispatching approach which adopts multi-criteria decision strategy. By aggregating different criteria the proposed strategy can consider multiple aspects of the dispatching situation and make robust decision in various situations. A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) is adopted to tune the weights associated to each criteria to minimize both the quay crane delay and external truck delay. The proposed approach is validated by comparison with different dispatching heuristics and simulation results obtained confirms its effectiveness.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.148-158
• /
• 2013

Generally, building construction projects have a complex decision-making process because of the participation of various agents. In this situation, a final decision is arrived at by relying on subjective judgments based on the experience of project participants. For this reason, a method of assessing the objectivity of opinions is needed. In previous studies, the multi-criteria decision making method was applied to arrive at a final decision objectively, but this method has a limitation, in that the experience of each decision maker is not considered differently in the decision making process. Therefore, this study proposed a theoretical model using the S-shaped growth curve and regression analysis by building construction project type to quantitatively estimate decision-making reliability according to the experience of individual project participant`s. The developed model could be added to the Multi-criteria decision making method, and secure the objectivity and reliability of project participants' final opinion.