• 한국환경보건학회지
• /
• 제46권5호
• /
• pp.576-587
• /
• 2020

Objectives: This study calculated local residents exposures to VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) released into the atmosphere using the CalTOX model and carried out uncertainty analysis and sensitivity analysis. The model validity was analyzed by comparing the predicted and the actual atmospheric concentrations. Methods: Uncertainty was parsed by conducting a Monte Carlo simulation. Sensitivity was dissected with the regression (coefficients) method. The model validity was analyzed by applying r² (coefficient of determination), RMSE (root mean square error), and the Nash-Sutcliffe EI (efficiency index) formula. Results: Among the concentrations in the atmosphere in this study, benzene was the highest and the lifetime average daily dose of benzene and the average daily dose of xylene were high. In terms of the sensitivity analysis outcome, the source term to air, exposure time, indoors resting (ETri), exposure time, outdoors at home (ETao), yearly average wind speed (v_w), contaminated area in ㎡ (Area), active breathing rate (BRa), resting breathing rate (BRr), exposure time, and active indoors (ETai) were elicited as input variables having great influence upon this model. In consequence of inspecting the validity of the model, r² appeared to be a value close to 1 and RMSE appeared to be a value close to 0, but EI indicated unacceptable model efficiency. To supplement this value, the regression formula was derived for benzene with y=0.002+15.48x, ethylbenzene with y ≡ 0.001+57.240x, styrene with y=0.000+42.249x, toluene with y=0.004+91.588x, and xylene with y=0.000+0.007x. Conclusions: In consequence of inspecting the validity of the model, r² appeared to be a value close to 1 and RMSE appeared to be a value close to 0, but EI indicated unacceptable model efficiency. This will be able to be used as base data for securing the accuracy and reliability of the model.

• 한국체육학회지인문사회과학편
• /
• 제58권1호
• /
• pp.295-308
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 청소년의 비만율이 증가하는 현 상황에서 건강신념모형을 적용하여 청소년 비만예방척도를 개발하고 선행연구에서 구축된 통합적 타당도의 틀로 분석하고 근거를 제시하고자 하였다. 이 연구에서는 Messick(1995)의 통합적 타당도, Benson(1998)의 강력한 구인타당도 프로그램 틀, Wolfe와 Smith(2007a, 2007b)가 제안한 Rasch 모형의 통합적 타당도 구현방안을 종합적으로 반영할 수 있도록 개발된 통합적 타당도 분석 틀(서은철, 2015)을 수정하여, 실제영역의 3단계를 분석하여 건강신념모형을 적용한 청소년 비만예방척도의 타당도 증거를 제시하였다. 연구대상은 서울-경기지역 12개 고등학교에서 1801명을 표집하였으며, 통합적 타당도 분석 틀의 적용을 위해 표본1에 902명(남:464명, 여:438명)과 표본2에 899명(남:464명, 여:435명)으로 무선 분류하였다. 자료처리는 SPSS 23.0과 WINSTEPS 4.30(Linacre, 2018)을 사용하였다. 연구결과 실제영역 1단계에서 개발된 청소년 비만예방척도는 5영역(민감성, 심각성, 유익성, 장애성, 건강동기) 33문항이었다. 2단계에서는 자료의 적합성(일차원성 검증, global fit statistic)을 확인, Rasch 모형의 문항적합도 검증에서 2개 문항이 삭제되었다. 3단계에서는 Rasch 부분점수모형을 적용하여 단계 조정값에 문제가 있는 3개 문항이 삭제되었다.

• 교육시설
• /
• 제12권5호
• /
• pp.47-56
• /
• 2005

Reports on population movement(2000-2030) by the National Statistical Office show that the number of elementary school age population will be decreased by 1.4million from 2005 to 2020. It will effect both school size and the policies for school facilities, which have focused on downsizing class as the high standard of OECD nations. As the unfolding evidence is emerging that a number of schools and classes will be emptied out by 2030. This study aims at developing a model for evaluating the validity of school establishment, which would help more reasonable decision-making for new school construction and the class extension in the existing schools. It classifies two different ways in founding a new school - school establishment in a residential developing site and school establishment for solving a overcrowd class. It proposes the assesment items and the methods for evaluating its validity. In the end, it suggests an assesment model which the district educational offices can use in the course of planning the student accomodations to schools and making decisions for new school construction and the class extension in the existing schools. This study would be expected to help the reasonable expenditure for school facilities and to restrict overbuilding of surplus classes.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.47-71
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this research is the examination of validity of data as well as simulation model, i.e. to simulate the real data in the SD model with the least error using the adjustments for the faithful reflection of real data to the simulation. In general, SD programs (e.g. VENSIM) utilize the Euler or Runge-Kutta method as an algorithm. It is possible to reflect the trend of real data via these two estimation methods however can cause the validity problem in case of the simulation requiring the accuracy as they have endogenous errors. In this article, the future population estimated by the Korea National Statistical Office (KNSO) to 2050 is simulated by the aging chain model, dividing the population into three cohorts, 0-14, 15-64, 65 and over cohorts by age and offering the adjustments to them. Adjustments are calculated by optimization with three different methods, optimization in EXCEL, manual optimization with iterative calculation, and optimization in VENSIM DSS, the results are compared, and at last the optimal adjustment set with the least error are found among them. The simulation results with the pre-determined optimal adjustment set are validated by methods proposed by Barlas (1996) and other alternative methods. It is concluded that the result of simulation model in this research has no significant difference from the real data and reflects the real trend faithfully.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.176-187
• /
• 2020

이 연구는 모델 스캐너로 석고 모형을 스캔한 디지털 모형(Model scanned digital model, MSD)과 구내 스캐너로 구강을 스캔한 디지털 모형(Intraoral scanned digital model, ISD)에서 계측한 치아 근원심 폭경(Tooth width, TW)과 치열궁 길이(Arch length, AL)의 신뢰도와 재현성, 치열궁 길이 편차(Arch length discrepancy, ALD) 분석의 타당도를 평가하였다. 만 12 - 18세의 남, 여 30명에게 석고 모형, MSD, ISD를 획득하고, 2번 계측한 TW, AL의 신뢰도는 Pearson 상관 분석, 4명의 재현성은 군간 상관 분석 그리고 TW, AL 및 ALD의 타당도는 대응표본 t검정으로 평가하였다. 결과적으로 모든 군에서 계측한 TW, AL는 높은 신뢰도와 재현성을 보였고 MSD군의 ALD분석은 적절한 타당도를 보였다. ISD 군의 TW는 가장 높은 타당도를 보인 반면에, AL와 ALD분석은 유의미하게 짧게 측정되어 낮은 타당도를 보였으므로 임상가는 디지털 모델을 이용하여 공간 분석 시행 시 이를 고려해야 할 것이다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제45권1호
• /
• pp.107-117
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale (ADKS-K) to determine its applicability to Korean adults. Methods: Cross-cultural validity was performed according to Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). The Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 for internal consistency and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability were conducted. Content validity, criterion related validity and construct validity were evaluated. The Classical Test Theory (CTT) model and the Item Response Theory (IRT) model were applied in performing the item analysis. Results: The KR 20 was .71, and the ICC was .90, indicating that the ADKS-K has internal consistency and stability reliability. Thirty items of the ADKS-K had significant Content Validity Ratio (CVR) values, i.e., mean of 0.82 and range of 0.60~1.00. Mean item difficulty and discrimination indices calculated by TestAn program were 0.63 and 0.23, respectively. Mean item difficulty and discrimination indices calculated by BayesiAn program were -0.60 and 0.77, respectively. These tests indicate that ADKS-K has an acceptable level of difficulty and discriminating efficiency. Conclusion: Results suggest that ADKS-K has the potential to be a proper instrument for assessing AD knowledge in Korean adults.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.436-446
• /
• 2017

This study was performed to verify the validity and utility of the Korean Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool Version(BRIEF-P). The BRIEF-P is one of the most used instruments to measure Executive Function(EF) and a teacher-rating assessment method designed to measure the executive function of preschoolers(age 2-5). A total of 200 preschoolers(104 boys, 96 girls; recruited aged 3 to 5years) participated. Confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to evaluate the model structure. Correlation analysis was done to verify the concurrent validity. In the results, the model fit indexes were good with the five BRIEF-P subscales (that is, inhibit, shift, emotional control, working memory, plan/organize). The internal consistency of the BRIEF-P five subscales were supported. As a results, the Korean Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool Version(BRIEF-P) was confirmed to be a reliable and valid assessment tool to measure executive function in preschoolers.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.121-142
• /
• 2007

본 연구의 목적은 과학기술경쟁력 향상을 위한 대형연구시설 및 장비구축 평가모형을 도출하고 이 평가모형의 신뢰성 및 타당성을 검토하고자 한다. 분석결과, 대형연구시설 및 장비구축 평가모형에 대한 신뢰성 및 타당성이 높게 나타났다. 과학기술과 국가정책차원의 신뢰성 분석결과에서 2개의 구성요인의 신뢰성은 높게 나타나고 있어, 과학기술차원의 5개 측정지표들, 국가정책차원의 6개 측정지표들의 내적일관성이 매우 높음을 보여주고 있다. 또한 타당성 분석결과에서 과학기술, 국가정책차원은 내용타당성, 구성타당성 그리고 기준타당성이 높게 나타나고 있다. 또한 고차요인 분석결과에서 대형연구시설 및 장비구축 평가모형 적합도가 대체로 적합하게 나타나고 있어 평가모형과 자료가 잘 부합되고 있음을 보여주고 있다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로 본 연구에서는 정책적 함의를 제시하고 있다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2001년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.246-249
• /
• 2001

In this study we propose a technology selection model, which captures technology seeds for new business area by a fuzzy structural modeling method and then, design a model, which evaluates the validity of New Business Development plans for the selected technology seeds with regard to the properties of manufacturing, product, market, and economy as well. Finally, a fuzzy inference system is designed in order to decide the degree of success of New Business Development plans based on the preceding validity evaluation.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제47권1호
• /
• pp.121-132
• /
• 2017

Purpose: In this study the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Cancer Stigma Scale (KCSS) was evaluated. Methods: The KCSS was formed through translation and modification of Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale. The KCSS, Psychological Symptom Inventory (PSI), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were administered to 247 men and women diagnosed with one of the five major cancers. Construct validity, item convergent and discriminant validity, concurrent validity, known-group validity, and internal consistency reliability of the KCSS were evaluated. Results: Exploratory factor analysis supported the construct validity with a six-factor solution; that explained 65.7% of the total variance. The six-factor model was validated by confirmatory factor analysis (Q (${\chi}^2/df$)= 2.28, GFI=.84, AGFI=.81, NFI=.80, TLI=.86, RMR=.03, and RMSEA=.07). Concurrent validity was demonstrated with the QLQ-C30 (global: r=-.44; functional: r=-.19; symptom: r=.42). The KCSS had known-group validity. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the 24 items was .89. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the 24-item KCSS has relatively acceptable reliability and validity and can be used in clinical research to assess cancer stigma and its impacts on health-related quality of life in Korean cancer patients.