DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Scale Development for Youth Obesity Prevention and Unified Validity Test through the Health Belief Model-I

건강신념모형을 적용한 청소년 비만예방척도개발과 통합적 타당도검증-I

  • Received : 2018.11.30
  • Accepted : 2019.01.21
  • Published : 2019.01.31

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to apply a health belief model to the serious perception of an increase in youth obesity, and to develop and validate a measurement tool for youth obesity prevention among this group who are experiencing increasing rates of obesity. The specific goals of this study are to 1) apply a health belief model to develop a measurement tool for obesity prevention among youth who are seeing rising rates of obesity, and 2) provide an integrated validation procedure and foundation for developing this measurement tool. A total of 1801 high school students[sample1: 902(male:464,female:438); sample2: 899(male:464,female:438)] were recruited and collected data from 12 high school in Seoul and Kyonggi area. For this study the analytic framework of unified validity was developed which can comprehensively reflect unified validity be Messick(1995), framework for conducting a strong program of construct validation by Benson(1998), the unified validity implementation method of Rasch model suggested by Wolfe and Smith(2007a, 2007b). Furthermore, after dividing the developed analytic framework into each stage(the substantive domain), the evidence of validity of Youth Obesity Prevention Scale(YOPS) applying Health Belief Model was systematically suggested. The YOPS suggested the evidence about the substantive domain of unified validity. The developed YOPS was consist of Susceptibility, Severity, Benefits, Barriers and Cues to Action. After 3 stage in substantive domain, the components of YOPS(5factors and 28items) satisfied the unidimensionality, and the 5 point Likert scale had the significant discrimination of the respondents' response.

본 연구는 청소년의 비만율이 증가하는 현 상황에서 건강신념모형을 적용하여 청소년 비만예방척도를 개발하고 선행연구에서 구축된 통합적 타당도의 틀로 분석하고 근거를 제시하고자 하였다. 이 연구에서는 Messick(1995)의 통합적 타당도, Benson(1998)의 강력한 구인타당도 프로그램 틀, Wolfe와 Smith(2007a, 2007b)가 제안한 Rasch 모형의 통합적 타당도 구현방안을 종합적으로 반영할 수 있도록 개발된 통합적 타당도 분석 틀(서은철, 2015)을 수정하여, 실제영역의 3단계를 분석하여 건강신념모형을 적용한 청소년 비만예방척도의 타당도 증거를 제시하였다. 연구대상은 서울-경기지역 12개 고등학교에서 1801명을 표집하였으며, 통합적 타당도 분석 틀의 적용을 위해 표본1에 902명(남:464명, 여:438명)과 표본2에 899명(남:464명, 여:435명)으로 무선 분류하였다. 자료처리는 SPSS 23.0과 WINSTEPS 4.30(Linacre, 2018)을 사용하였다. 연구결과 실제영역 1단계에서 개발된 청소년 비만예방척도는 5영역(민감성, 심각성, 유익성, 장애성, 건강동기) 33문항이었다. 2단계에서는 자료의 적합성(일차원성 검증, global fit statistic)을 확인, Rasch 모형의 문항적합도 검증에서 2개 문항이 삭제되었다. 3단계에서는 Rasch 부분점수모형을 적용하여 단계 조정값에 문제가 있는 3개 문항이 삭제되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Becker, M. H. (1974). The health belief model and sick role behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2, 409-419. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200407
  2. Benson, J. (1998). Developing a strong program of construct validation: A test anxiety example. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00616.x
  3. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2010). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge.
  4. DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  5. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.4.3.272
  6. Hahn, D. W. (1997). Critical review of the social cognitive theories on health behavior. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 2(1), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539700200103
  7. Harrison, J. A., Mullen, P. D., & Green, L. W. (1992). A meta-analysis of studies of the Health Belief Model with adults, Health Education Research, 7, 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/7.1.107
  8. Hayslip, B., Weigand, D., Weinberg, R., Richardson, P., & Jackson, A. (1996). The development of new scales for assessing health belief model constructs in adulthood. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 4, 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.4.4.307
  9. Hively, W. (1974). Introduction to domain-referenced testing. In W. Hively (Ed.), Domain-referenced testing. Englewood, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  10. Hong, S. H. (1999). Development and Validation using item response theory and factor analysis. The Korean Psychological Association Division of Clinical Pshchology Workshop academic publications. 1-89.
  11. Hong, S. H., No, U. K., Jung, S. (2011). Factor Structure of Scale containing Negatively-worded items: A case of Self-Esteem Scale. Korean Journal of Educational Evaluation, 24(3), 713-732.
  12. Hong, S., Kim, B., & Wolfe, M. (2005). A psychometric revision of the European American values scale for Asian Americans using the Rasch model. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 194-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2005.11909760
  13. Jafari, P., Bagheri, Z., & Safe, M. (2012). Item and response category functioning of the persian version of the KIDSCREEN-27: Rasch partial credit model. Health and Quality of the Life Outcomes, 10, 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-127
  14. Janz, N., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101
  15. Jo, H. S., Kim, C. B., Lee, H. W., & Jeong, H. J. (2004). A Meta-Analysis of Health Related Behavior Study based on Health Belief Model in Korean. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 9(1), 69-84.
  16. Kim, C. B., Jo, H. S., & Rhee, J. A. (2003). A Meta-Analysis of Korean Literatures about Sick Role Behavior of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients applied Health Belief Model. Journal of Agricultural Medicine and Community Health, 28(1), 1-13.
  17. Kim, E. J. (2003). Item goodness-of-fit and differential item functioning of physical fitness knowledge test. Unpublished Ph.D.'s thesis, Korea National Sport University, Seoul, Korea.
  18. Kim, S. H. (2018). Development of Physical Education Safety Consciousness Measurement Scale for Elementary School Students using Mixed Research Method. Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 20(3), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.21797/KSME.2018.20.3.002
  19. King, M. F., & Bruner, G. C. (2000). Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology & Marketing, 17(2), 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<79::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-0
  20. Lee, J. Y., Seo, B. H., & Kang, S. K. (2012). Development of exercise participation-measurement tool using health belief model. Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 14(2), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.21797/ksme.2012.14.2.005
  21. Lee, B. K., Yoon, M. Y., Sohn, Y. K., Lee, S. L., Kim, M. H., & Kim, C. R. (2014). An Efficacy of Social Cognitive Theory to Predict Health Behavior A Meta-Analysis on the Health Belief Model Studies in Korea. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(2), 163-206. https://doi.org/10.15814/jpr.2014.18.2.163
  22. Lessard, L. M. (2008). Using a Partial-Credit Rasch model to detect social desirability bias. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 21(4), 1134-1135.
  23. Linacre, J. M. (2011). A user's guide to WINSTEPS MINISTEP Rasch-model computer programs. http://www.winsteps.com.
  24. Linacre, J. M. (2017). A user's guide to WINSTEPS MINISTEP Rasch-model computer programs. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com.
  25. Linacre, J. M. (2018). Winsteps 4.3.0 [Computer software]. http://www.winsteps.com.
  26. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
  27. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2016). Mplus 7.4 [Computer software]. http://statmodel.com.
  28. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2016). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
  29. Oh, S. H. (2000). A Unified Concept of Construct Validity. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sports Science, 2(2), 67-77.
  30. Seo, E. C. (2015). Developing a Scale for Measuring the Disability Sports Awareness through Multi-Paradigm of Disability Concept and Latent Variable Modeling. Unpublished Ph.D.'s thesis, Dankook University, Gyeonggi, Korea..
  31. Seol, H. S. (2007). A Study for Validation of Scores for Instruction Evaluation Questionnaires Using Rasch Measurement Model. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 20(4): 31-51
  32. Smith Jr., E. V. (2002). Detecting and Evaluating the impact of Multidimensionality Using Item Fit Satatistics and Principal Component Analysis of Residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 205-231.
  33. Stretcher, V., & Rosenstock, I. M. (1997). The Health Belief Model. In Glanz, K., Lewis, F.M. and Rimer, B.K., (Eds.). Health Behaviour and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  34. Twisk, J. W. R., Kemper, H. C. G., Wechelen, W. van. (2002). Prediction of cardiovascular disease risk factors later in life by physical activity and physical fitness in youth: Introduction. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 23, s5-s7.
  35. Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V. Jr. (2007a). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part I-Instrument development tools. In E. V. Jr. Smith & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Rasch measurement: Advanced and specialized applications. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
  36. Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V. Jr. (2007b). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II-Validation activities. In E. V. Jr. Smith & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Rasch measurement: Advanced and specialized applications. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.